• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

getdoc6b4c. 66KB Jun 04 2011 12:04:29 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "getdoc6b4c. 66KB Jun 04 2011 12:04:29 AM"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

El e c t ro n ic

Jo ur n

a l o

f

P r

o b

a b i l i t y

Vol. 12 (2007), Paper no. 37, pages 1048–1051.

Journal URL

http://www.math.washington.edu/~ejpecp/

Erratum to Eigenvalues of GUE Minors

Kurt Johansson Eric Nordenstam

Abstract

This is an erratum to EJP paper number 50, volume 11,Eigenvalues of GUE minors.

Key words: Random matrices; Tiling problems.

AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary 60G55; 15A52; 52C20. Submitted to EJP on May 4, 2007, final version accepted July 20, 2007.

(2)

1

Introduction

In the paper (JN06) two expressions for the so called GUE minor kernel are presented, one in definition 1.2 and one in the the formulas (5.6) and (5.7). The expressions given in (5.6) and (5.7) are correct, but the expression in definition 1.2 of the paper has to be modified in the case r > s. The proof of the equality of the two expressions for the GUE minor kernel given in the paper was based on lemma 5.6 which is not correct since some terms in the expansion are missing. The correct expansion is given in lemma 1.2 below.

The corrected version of definition 1.2 in (JN06) reads as follows.

Definition 1.1. The GUE minor kernelis

KGUE(r, ξ;s, η) =φ(r, ξ; s, η) +

the Heaviside function.

The expansion of the double integral formula (6.16) in (JN06) in terms of Hermite polynomials also has to be modified in the caser > s. This expansion was used in the proofs of lemma 3.15 and lemma 4.2 in (JN06) and the modification leads to the correct kernel given in definition 1.1 above. Expanding the integral formula in (6.16) gives

whereγ is a small circle counter clockwise around the origin and Γ is parameterisedv= 2 +it, wheret:−∞ → ∞. Here we recognize the two classical integral representations for the Hermite polynomials.

which is valid forn1 and one of the classical integral representation for the Hermite polyno-mials we obtain the expression we want for the omitted terms.

(3)

It remains to verify the formula (2). Observe that, by repeated partial integration,

Here we can change the order of integration and evaluating the Gaussian integral gives the right hand side of (2).

where γ is a circle around the origin. The right term can be evaluated using the the result for

η >0 above. The left term can be rewritten using the equality between the two integral formulas for the Hermite polynomials mentioned above and we obtain

2n

which proves formula (2) for η <0.

Finally, we give the corrected version of lemma 5.6 in (JN06).

Lemma 1.2. The following expansion

calculation fails for 0n < k, and those terms account for the second sum in the statement of this lemma. Use the formula e−x2

Hn(x) =−dxd(e−x 2

Hn−1(x)) to perform integration by parts

as many times as possible.

Z ∞

Inserting this in (6.1) in (JN06) and changing to normalised Hermite polynomials proves the lemma.

(4)

2

Acknowledgement

We thank Peter Forrester and Taro Nagao for pointing out the mistake in the proof of lemma 5.6 in (JN06), indicating that terms were missing in the expression for the GUE minor kernel whenr > s, and sending us a preliminary version of work in progress.

References

[JN06] Kurt Johansson and Eric Nordenstam. Eigenvalues of GUE minors.Electron. J. Probab., 11(50):1342–1371 (electronic), 2006.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

bas´ee sur les formes lin´eaires en logarithmes, pour r´esoudre une famille d’´equations de Thue li´ee `a une famille de corps de nombres de degr´e 3. In this paper, we use

interested reader. Note that the upper bounds in Lemma 8 and Corollary 10 neither depend on the structure of G nor on the underlying migration mechanism, as long as there is

Applying our proofs to the renewal equation representation (see the proof of their Lemma 2.6), one obtains the same results for local times of Lévy processes as we obtained in

As a corollary thereof, we obtain an integral equation for the modified Laplace transform of the Virgin Island Model in Lemma 5.3 which is the key equation for our proof of

GUE, eigenvalues of random matrices, Hermitian Brownian motion, non-colliding Brownian motions, Weyl chamber, queues in series, Burke’s theorem, reversibility, Pitman’s representa-

The main lemma in the proof of Theorem 1.1 involves estimating the resistances. A combination of the above identities will then yield lower bounds for the hitting times. We then

In the next section basic properties on subexponentiality are presented and a new result (Lemma 2.4) on the limiting behavior of the convolution of an subexpo- nential and a

We show how a description of Brownian exponential functionals as a renewal series gives access to the law of the hitting time of a square-root boundary by a Bessel