THE IM
Submitt Universi
POST
MPOLITEN
ted to Post ity of Surak
M TGRADUA MUHA NESS STRA O Graduate karta as a p Master Degr RA ATE PROG MMADIYA i ATEGIES I OF DONAL A THE Program o partial fulf ree of Lang
Writte AJID KHU S20015 GRAM MA AH UNIVE 201 IN REPUB LD TRUMP ESIS of Languag fillment of t guage Study en by URNIAWAN 50033 AGISTER O ERSITY O 17 BLICAN PA P
ge Study of the require y of English
vii MOTTO
LAA ILAHA ILLALLAH MUHAMMAD-UR-RASULULLAH
ALL OF MINE IS FOR ALLAH
LAA HAWLA WA LAA QUWWATA ILLA BILLAH
SHOLAT, SHOLAT, SHOLAT, SHOLAT, SHOLAT
“NO MATTER WHAT HAPPEN TO US BEHIND, WE HAVE TO KEEP MOVING
FORWARD”
“DO NOT LOSE YOUR COURAGE NO MATTER WHAT. BECAUSE IF WE GIVE UP
THE GAME IS OVER”
“IF WE DO NOT HAVE COURAGE TO TAKE RISKS, WE CANNOT MAKE OUR
DEDICATION
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All Praise to Allah SWA, The Lord that has opened us the doors of mercy so this thesis can be finished. Peace be upon to Prophet Muhammad SAW, his family, his companions and people who have been defending their faith and love doing good deeds.
The writer would like to express his sincere gratitude to the following people :
1. Prof. Dr.H. Khudzaifah Dimyati,SH,M.Hum, the Director of Post Graduate Program Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
2. Prof. Dr. Markamah,M.Hum, the Headmaster of Language Studies Program. 3. Agus Wijayanto and Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D. For giving the writer
valuable advice, suggestion and guidance to finish this thesis.
4. The writer’s parents, Purnomo and Suyatmi who always supporting to finish this thesis.
Hopefully, Allah SWA will always bless them.Amin
5. Special thanks for my Super classmate, Bu.Sri Tilar Winarni Bu.Hayati, and Bu.Endah , thanks for all of your motivation and your inspiration, You all are really kindly English teacher. For Mbk.Dar, Mbk.Marlina, Mbk.Anik, Thanks for all of your BULLIYING. And the special thanks for my Big Big Big enemy Mbk.Anik, I will strugle to make my English skill better than you, amin. Special thanks for Mas.Sajad, thanks for all of your help, you are really a kind young man. Mas.Kirda, you are really a good father. Special thanks for Mbk.Ardita, Mbk.Anggi, Mbk.Iggit, Mbk.Olip and Indisa, thanks for all of your KANTIN KUPON you have given to me. Please forgive me for always compeling you all to give your Kantin Kupon to me. I feel no regret did that. Come on guys you all can finish your thisis”.
7. And thanks for all of my friends mas.Zainal, mas.Yafi, Tima, mas. Kadir,mas.Rian, Mas.Amrin, Mas.Arif. mas.Syhaid, mas. Udin, mas.Darmadi, mas.Dika, Widi, mas.Wakid, Pak. Gadot, Pak.Alex, Pak.Yanto. Thanks for anything.
Finally, the researcher requires constructive suggestions for the progress of the next study. The researcher hopes this will give advantages for other researcher.
Surakarta, 28 February 2017
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE...i
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM 1...ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM 2...iii
APPROVAL...iv
APPROVAL OF THESIS FOR SUBMISSION...v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP...vi
MOTTO...vii
DEDICATION...viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS...xi
LIST OF TABLES...xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES...xv
ABSTRACT...xvi
ABSTRAK...xvii
CHAPTER I...1
INTRODUCTION...1
A. Background of Study...1
B. Problem Statements...12
C. Objective of The Study...13
D. Limitation of The Study...13
E. Significance of The Study...13
F. Research Paper Organization...14
CHAPTER II...16
A. Previews Research...16
B. Underlying Theory...37
1. The Notion of Pragmatic...37
2. The Notion of Face...40
3. The Notion of Politeness...47
4. The Criticism of Brown and Levinson’s theory...49
5. Impoliteness...51
6. Culpeper’s Impoliteness Strategies...55
CHAPTER III...59
RESEARCH METHOD...59
A. Research Type...59
B. Object of The Research...59
C. Subject of The Research...59
D. Data and Data Source...60
E. Technique of Collecting Data...60
F. Credibility of Data...61
G. Technique for Analyzing Data...61
CHAPTWR IV...62
DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION...62
A. Data Analysis...62
1. The analysis of data...62
2. The dominand impoliteness used by Donald Trump...120
B. Research Findings...124
C. Discussion of the findings ...126
CHAPTER V...141
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION...141
A. Conclusion...141
B. The Prdogogical Implication...144
C. Suggestion...145
1. Practical Benefit...145
xiii
LIST OF TABLE
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
ABSTRACT
RAJID KHURNIAWAN. S200150033. 2017. The Impoliteness Strategies in Republican Party’s debate of Donald Trump. Thesis. Magister of Language Study. Faculty of Language Department Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Donald Trump is a US politician that has been successful using impoliteness strategies as a deadly weapon to win in US presidential debate. This research tried to investigate the impoliteness strategies used by Donald Trump and the strategies most frequently used by Donald Trump in GOP Debate Republican President Election at Detroit when he faced Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Ted Cruz and Governor John Kasich. This research used descriptive qualitative as a method to cultivate the data. The researcher used impoliteness strategies from Culpeper(1996) to investigate Trump’s impoliteness in GOP debate. The research findngs are as follows. There are frour impoliteness strategies used by Trump.They are bald on record, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness and sarcasm. The total impoliteness strategies found is 100 data. Senator Marco Rubio is a candidate in debate stage that got the most frequently attack by Donald Trump. He was attacked by violating of the structure of conversation (17) data, condescend (2) data, ridicule (12) data, bald on record (1) data, call the other name (4) data, denied (6) data, disassociate from the other (4) data, use inappropriate identity markers (4) data and seek disagreement (5) data. The total, Trump attacked Senator Marco Rubio (55) time. It means 55% from the total of Trump’s attack. From the data above it can be concluded that the impoliteness strategies used by Donald Trump in generally is as follows. There were ( 4) data 4%of bald on record. That was (1) data 1% of sarcasm. The positive impoliteness found consists of be disinterested (1) data 1%, disassociate from the other (8 ) data 8%, use inappropriate identity markers (5) data 5%, seek disagreement (5 ) data 5%, call the other name ( 6) data 6%, exclude the other from an activity (1) data 1%, denied (9) data 9%, and exclude the other from an activity (1) data 1%. The Total number of positive impoliteness found was (30) data 30%. The negative impoliteness that were found consist of ridicule (28)data 28%, explicitly associate the other with a negative aspect (1) data 1%, violate the structure of conversation (25) data 25%, condescend (3) data 3%, frighten (2) data 2%, be little (1) data 1%. The total number of negative impoliteness found is (60) data 60%. That was sarcasm 1 data 1%. The total impoliteness strategies found were (100) data 100%.The most frequently strategies used by Donald Trump is negative impoliteness.
xvii ABSTRAK
RAJID KHURNIAWAN. S200150033. 2017. The Impoliteness Strategies in Republican Party’s debate of Donald Trump. Thesis. Magister Pengkajian Bahasa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
