LAMPIRAN A
Kuesioner
KUESIONER
Data Responden :
Nama
:
NIM
:
Angkatan
:
Jenis kelamin
: ( ) laki-laki
( ) perempuan
Jalur konsentrasi : ( ) akuntansi keuangan
( ) akuntansi manajemen
( ) sistem informasi
Berikut ini adalah beberapa pertanyaan terkait dengan faktor-faktor apa
yang menjadi pertimbangan anda dalam memilih jalur konsentrasi. Hasil
kuesioner ini diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan bagi jurusan akuntansi
Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata dalam upaya pengembangan jalur konsentrasi
sesuai dengan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi mahasiswa dalam pemilihan jalur
konsentrasi tersebut.
Petunjuk pengisian :
Berikan tanda (
√
) pada jawaban yang anda anggap sesuai dengan penilaian anda
untuk pertanyaan atribut berikut.
1
: sangat tidak setuju
2
:
tidak setuju
3
:
ragu-ragu
4
:
setuju
5
:
sangat setuju
Berikut ini adalah faktor-faktor yang menjadi pertimbangan anda dalam memilih
jalur konsentrasi sesuai dengan pengalaman anda :
No
Pertimbangan saya
1
2
3
4
5
Motivasi diri sendiri jalur AK
1
Ingin
mendapat
pengetahuan
tentang
dimensi-dimensi internasional akuntansi,
pola pengembangan akuntansi internasional
, perbandingan sistem dan praktek akuntansi
di berbagai negara, termasuk issue teknikal
akuntansi internasional dan usaha-usaha
yang telah dilakukan untuk mengurangi
diversitas prinsip dan praktek akuntansi di
negara-negara dunia.
1
2
3
4
5
2
Dapat
membahas,
mendiskusikan dan
menelaah artikel-artikel aktual akuntansi
sebagai penerapan kerangka teoritis dari
teori akuntansi.
1
2
3
4
5
3
Ingin mendapat pengetahuan tentang pasar
modal, mekanisme dan lembaga-lembaga
yang
ada
didalamnya,
mekanisme
perdagangan bursa efek, settlement dan
jenis-jenis sekuritas yang dipedagangkan
serta teori portofolionya.
1
2
3
4
5
4
Ingin
mendapat
pengetahuan
tentang
prosedur, metode dan tehnik analisis
laporan keuangan dan interpretasi terhadap
hasil analisis tersebut.
1
2
3
4
5
5
Adanya keahlian yang ingin dikembangkan
melalui jalur konsentrasi ini
1
2
3
4
5
Motivasi diri sendiri jalur AM
6
Ingin
membahas,
mendiskusikan
dan
menelaah artikel-artikel dan issue-issue
aktual
akuntansi
dan
perkembangan
akuntansi manajemen sebagai penerapan
kerangka
teoritis
dari
Akuntansi
Manajemen.
1
2
3
4
5
7
Ingin membahas pemeriksaan terhadap
semua
fungsi
manajemen,
yaitu
perencanaan,
pengorganisasian,
pengarahan dan pengawasan untuk menilai
efektivitas, efisiensi dan ekonomisasi dari
setiap fungsi manajemen tersebut sebagai
dasar perbaikan di masa mendatang.
1
2
3
4
5
8
Ingin
mendapat
pengetahuan
tentang
internal auditing, proses pemeriksaan yang
dilakukan internal auditor dan berbagai
peraturan
yang
berkaitan
dengan
pemeriksaan internal, dan kedudukan serta
peran internal audito tentang
temuan-temuan
audit,
pelaporannya
serta
tanggapan atas laporan audit.
1
2
3
4
5
9
Ingin
mendapat
pemahaman
tentang
penyusunan perencanaan dan pengendalian
laba komprehensif, baik laba taktis jangka
pendek maupun laba strategis jangka
panjang.
1
2
3
4
5
10
Adanya keahlian yang ingin dikembangkan
melalui jalur konsentrasi ini
1
2
3
4
5
Motivasi diri sendiri jalur SIA
11
Ingin mempelajari berbagai aplikasi TI
dalam bisnis yang ada dewasa ini dan
perubahan manajemen sistem informasi
dalam organisasi. Mata kuliah ini juga akan
membahas lebih lanjut tentang tantangan
manajemen dalam era informasi.
1
2
3
4
5
12
Ingin mendapat pemahaman konsep dan
aplikasi sistem manajemen basis data yang
memungkinkan mahasiswa memahami dan
mampu mendesain serta membangun
struktur basis data yang efektif dan efisien.
1
2
3
4
5
13
Ingin mendapat pengetahuan mahasiswa
konsep dan aplikasi pengembangan sistem
informasi berbasis komputer. Pembahasan
mencakup antara lain konsep, tools, teknik
dan aplikasi-aplikasinya. Secara umum,
mata kuliah ini memberikan tekanan pada
tahap analisis dan perancangan. Meskipun
demikian
untuk
melengkapi
siklus
pengembangan system, mata kuiah ini juga
akan memberikan bahasan secara ringkas
tentang
tahap-tahap
konstruksi
dan
implementasi, serta operasi dan dukungan
system.
1
2
3
4
5
14
Ingin
mendapat
pengetahuan
dan
ketrampilan teknis pemrograman aplikasi
berbasis data yang merupakan tipe dari
aplikasi-aplikasi
sistem
informasi
akuntansi dan manajemen. Ketrampilan ini
akan
memperkuat
kemampuan
untuk
mempersiapkan mahasiswa menjasi analis
sistem dan auditor sistem informasi.
1
2
3
4
5
15
Adanya keahlian yang ingin dikembangkan
melalui jalur konsentrasi ini
1
2
3
4
5
Motivasi Orang lain
16
Saran dari teman / yang sudah memilih jalur
konsentrasi tersebut
1
2
3
4
5
17
Saran dari orang tua
1
2
3
4
5
18
Banyak peminat/ banyak teman pada bidang
konsentrasi tersebut
1
2
3
4
5
Content
kuliah
19
Dosen yang mengajar menarik
1
2
3
4
5
20
Dosen yang mengajar menguasai materi
kuliah yang disampaikan
1
2
3
4
5
21
Materi kuliah disajikan secara menarik
1
2
3
4
5
22
Distribusi penilaian yang diberikan
1
2
3
4
5
Keterkaitan mata kuliah jalur AK
23
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Teori
Akuntansi (TA)
1
2
3
4
5
24
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Manajemen
Keuangan (MK)
1
2
3
4
5
25
Saya menguasai mata kuliah AKM II
1
2
3
4
5
26
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Statistik
1
2
3
4
5
27
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Akuntansi
Manajemen (Akmen)
1
2
3
4
5
Keterkaitan mata kuliah jalur AM
28
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Manajemen
Keuangan (MK)
1
2
3
4
5
29
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Akuntansi
Manajemen (Akmen)
1
2
3
4
5
30
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Pemeriksaan
Akuntansi
1
2
3
4
5
Keterkaitan mata kuliah jalur SIA
31
Saya menguasai mata kuliah pengantar
Aplikom lanjutan
1
2
3
4
5
32
Saya menguasai mata kuliah Sistem
Informasi Akuntansi (SIA)
1
2
3
4
5
Faktor eksternal
33
Rencana studi yang akan saya ambil setelah
lulus jenjang s1 mempengaruhi bidang
konsentrasi
1
2
3
4
5
34
Lapangan kerja setelah lulus
1
2
3
4
5
Relevansi
pengkonsentrasian
di
jurusan akuntansi
35
Pengkonsentrasian di jurusan akuntansi
sebaiknya tetap dilakukan
1
2
3
4
5
Nilai terakhir mata kuliah berikut :
A
AB
B
BC
C
CD
D
E
Teori Akuntansi (TA)
Manajemen Keuangan (MK)
AKM II
Statistik
Akuntansi Manajemen (Akmen)
Pemeriksaan Akuntansi
Pengantar aplikom lanjutan
Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (SIA)
LAMPIRAN B
Statistic descriptive
1. Statistic descriptive jalur akuntansi keuangan
Mahasiswa perempuan angkatan 2002
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AK 3 16.00 18.00 16.6667 1.15470 Motivasi Org Lain 3 9.00 12.00 11.0000 1.73205 Conten Kuliah 3 13.00 15.00 14.3333 1.15470 keterkaitan MK AK 3 18.00 22.00 20.0000 2.00000 Faktor Eksternal 3 6.00 9.00 7.3333 1.52753
Valid N (listwise) 3
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2002
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AK 4 13.00 20.00 16.2500 2.98608 Motivasi Org Lain 4 5.00 11.00 7.5000 2.64575 Conten Kuliah 4 7.00 18.00 12.0000 4.54606 keterkaitan MK AK 4 14.00 24.00 18.5000 4.12311 Faktor Eksternal 4 8.00 8.00 8.0000 .00000
Valid N (listwise) 4
Mahasiswa perempuan angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AK 43 8.00 20.00 15.6512 2.25604 Motivasi Org Lain 43 3.00 15.00 8.9070 3.09234 Conten Kuliah 43 6.00 19.00 13.4186 3.00185 keterkaitan MK AK 43 10.00 25.00 17.0930 2.52430 Faktor Eksternal 43 4.00 10.00 7.6977 1.38933
Valid N (listwise) 43
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AK 11 5.00 16.00 12.4545 3.88236 Motivasi Org Lain 11 6.00 13.00 8.8182 2.40076 Conten Kuliah 11 8.00 17.00 12.9091 2.46798 keterkaitan MK AK 11 10.00 20.00 16.0909 2.77325 Faktor Eksternal 11 6.00 10.00 7.8182 .98165
Valid N (listwise) 11
2. Statistic descriptive jalur akuntansi manajemen
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2002
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AM 10 11.00 19.00 16.1000 2.18327 Motivasi Org Lain 10 6.00 13.00 8.9000 3.14289 Conten Kuliah 10 9.00 20.00 14.6000 3.06232 keterkaitan MK AM 10 8.00 15.00 10.5000 2.22361 Faktor Eksternal 10 4.00 10.00 7.2000 1.93218
Valid N (listwise) 10
Mahasiswa perempuan angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AM 42 12.00 19.00 16.0476 1.49719 Motivasi Org Lain 42 3.00 14.00 9.3810 2.83663 Conten Kuliah 42 9.00 20.00 14.4286 2.81237 keterkaitan MK AM 42 7.00 12.00 9.9048 1.46187 Faktor Eksternal 42 2.00 10.00 7.2143 1.93221
Valid N (listwise) 42
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi Diri AM 16 14.00 19.00 15.6875 1.35247 Motivasi Org Lain 16 6.00 12.00 9.2500 1.91485 Conten Kuliah 16 5.00 20.00 14.2500 3.54965 keterkaitan MK AM 16 6.00 12.00 9.7500 1.43759 Faktor Eksternal 16 5.00 10.00 7.3750 1.31022
Valid N (listwise) 16
3.
Statistic descriptive jalur sistem informasi
Mahasiswa perempuan angkatan 2002
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi diri sia 3 16.00 20.00 18.6667 2.30940 Motivasi Org Lain 3 5.00 11.00 7.3333 3.21455 Conten Kuliah 3 14.00 17.00 15.6667 1.52753 Keterkaitan MK SIA 3 6.00 8.00 7.0000 1.00000 Faktor Eksternal 3 6.00 7.00 6.6667 .57735
Valid N (listwise) 3
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2002
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi diri sia 4 18.00 20.00 19.5000 1.00000 Motivasi Org Lain 4 3.00 13.00 7.5000 4.43471 Conten Kuliah 4 18.00 20.00 19.2500 .95743 Keterkaitan MK SIA 4 8.00 10.00 9.0000 1.15470 Faktor Eksternal 4 6.00 10.00 9.0000 2.00000
Valid N (listwise) 4
Mahasiswa perempuan angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi diri sia 7 15.00 19.00 16.7143 1.88982 Motivasi Org Lain 7 5.00 12.00 8.8571 2.54484 Conten Kuliah 7 10.00 17.00 14.5714 2.50713 Keterkaitan MK SIA 7 6.00 9.00 7.2857 1.11270 Faktor Eksternal 7 6.00 9.00 7.2857 1.38013
Valid N (listwise) 7
Mahasiswa laki-laki angkatan 2003
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Motivasi diri sia 23 12.00 20.00 17.3043 2.18330 Motivasi Org Lain 23 6.00 14.00 9.1304 2.56381 Conten Kuliah 23 5.00 20.00 16.2609 3.23640 Keterkaitan MK SIA 23 6.00 10.00 8.1304 1.09977 Faktor Eksternal 23 4.00 10.00 7.5652 1.70096
Valid N (listwise) 23
Tabel motivasi diri mahasiswa AK berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MDS1 MDS2 MDS3 MDS4 Mean 3.87 3.74 4.06 4.02
N 47 47 47 47
Perempuan
Std. Deviation .612 .706 .791 .571 Mean 3.31 3.38 3.38 3.69
N 16 16 16 16
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation 1.078 1.088 1.408 1.401 Mean 3.73 3.65 3.89 3.94
N 63 63 63 63
Total
Std. Deviation .787 .826 1.018 .859
Tabel motivasi diri mahasiswa AM berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MDS6 MDS7 MDS8 MDS9 Mean 3.93 4.16 4.07 3.84
N 44 44 44 44
Perempuan
Std. Deviation .452 .479 .587 .713 Mean 3.96 4.11 4.04 3.78
N 27 27 27 27
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation .587 .506 .587 .698 Mean 3.94 4.14 4.06 3.82
N 71 71 71 71
Total
Std. Deviation .504 .487 .583 .703
Tabel motivasi diri mahasiswa SIA berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MDS11 MDS12 MDS13 MDS14 Mean 4.40 4.50 4.10 4.30
N 10 10 10 10
Perempuan
Std. Deviation .516 .527 .876 .483 Mean 4.54 4.54 4.18 4.46
N 28 28 28 28
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation .637 .576 .772 .744 Mean 4.50 4.53 4.16 4.42
N 38 38 38 38
Total
Std. Deviation .604 .557 .789 .683
Tabel motivasi orang lain mahasiswa AK berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MOL1 MOL2 MOL3 Mean 2.85 3.11 3.02
N 47 47 47
Perempuan
Std. Deviation 1.285 1.068 1.170 Mean 3.00 2.69 2.81
N 16 16 16
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation 1.265 .946 1.109 Mean 2.89 3.00 2.97
N 63 63 63
Total
Std. Deviation 1.271 1.047 1.150
Tabel motivasi orang lain mahasiswa AM berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MOL1 MOL2 MOL3 Mean 3.27 3.07 3.05
N 44 44 44
Perempuan
Std. Deviation 1.128 1.169 1.160 Mean 3.30 2.56 3.11
N 27 27 27
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation 1.068 .974 1.121 Mean 3.28 2.87 3.07
N 71 71 71
Total
Std. Deviation 1.098 1.120 1.138
Tabel motivasi orang lain mahasiswa SIA berdasarkan jenis kelamin
Jenis Kelamin MOL1 MOL2 MOL3 Mean 2.90 2.20 3.30
N 10 10 10
Perempuan
Std. Deviation 1.101 1.229 1.337 Mean 3.36 2.82 2.89
N 28 28 28
Laki-laki
Std. Deviation 1.129 1.249 1.257 Mean 3.24 2.66 3.00
N 38 38 38
Total
Std. Deviation 1.125 1.258 1.273
LAMPIRAN C
Validitas
1.
faktor analisis jalur akuntansi keuangan
Factor Analysis
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
Adequacy. .827
Approx. Chi-Square 1227.496
df 171
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Sig. .000
Communalities
Initial Extraction MDS1 1.000 .686 MDS2 1.000 .676 MDS3 1.000 .718 MDS4 1.000 .747 MDS5 1.000 .398 MOL1 1.000 .689 MOL2 1.000 .625 MOL3 1.000 .630 CK1 1.000 .621 CK2 1.000 .696 CK3 1.000 .727 CK4 1.000 .670 KMK1 1.000 .603 KMK2 1.000 .664 KMK3 1.000 .673 KMK4 1.000 .612 KMK5 1.000 .566 FE1 1.000 .713 FE2 1.000 .683
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Comp
onent Initial Eigenvalues
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulative % 1 5.072 26.692 26.692 5.072 26.692 26.692 2.994 15.758 15.758 2 2.731 14.376 41.068 2.731 14.376 41.068 2.945 15.500 31.258 3 2.034 10.707 51.775 2.034 10.707 51.775 2.868 15.092 46.350 4 1.350 7.108 58.883 1.350 7.108 58.883 2.020 10.631 56.982 5 1.209 6.363 65.246 1.209 6.363 65.246 1.570 8.264 65.246
6 .798 4.202 69.448
7 .676 3.556 73.004
8 .642 3.378 76.382
9 .621 3.270 79.652
10 .537 2.827 82.479
11 .501 2.635 85.114
12 .470 2.474 87.589
13 .423 2.224 89.813
14 .386 2.032 91.844
15 .365 1.919 93.764
16 .343 1.806 95.570
17 .310 1.634 97.204
18 .282 1.487 98.690
19 .249 1.310 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS1 .544 -.406
MDS2 .561 -.490
MDS3 .537 -.484
MDS4 .552 -.468 .415
MDS5 .438
MOL1 .464 .441
MOL2 -.410
MOL3 .546
CK1 .405 .656
CK2 .585 .507
CK3 .502 .594
CK4 .515 .591
KMK1 .525 -.432
KMK2 .572 -.557
KMK3 .571
KMK4 .594 -.413
KMK5 .616
FE1 .410 .528 .506
FE2 .613
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a 5 components extracted.
Rotated Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS1 .810
MDS2 .774
MDS3 .830
MDS4 .844
MDS5 .550
MOL1 .785
MOL2 .775
MOL3 .722
CK1 .704
CK2 .781
CK3 .839
CK4 .787
KMK1 .742
KMK2 .778
KMK3 .788
KMK4 .725
KMK5 .666
FE1 .816
FE2 .787
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2 3 4 5
1 .572 .487 .489 .356 .263
2 -.270 .731 -.570 .255 -.051 3 -.689 -.011 .534 .476 -.118 4 -.353 .217 .157 -.496 .747 5 .030 -.426 -.354 .579 .597
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
2
.
faktor analisis jalur akuntansi manajemen
Factor Analysis
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
Adequacy. .797
Approx. Chi-Square 989.349
df 136
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Sig. .000
Communalities
Initial Extraction MDS6 1.000 .630 MDS7 1.000 .704 MDS8 1.000 .675 MDS9 1.000 .614 MDS10 1.000 .438 MOL1 1.000 .706 MOL2 1.000 .645 MOL3 1.000 .637 CK1 1.000 .599 CK2 1.000 .688 CK3 1.000 .730 CK4 1.000 .679 KMK2 1.000 .678 KMK5 1.000 .655 KMK6 1.000 .652 FE1 1.000 .700 FE2 1.000 .709
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Comp
onent Initial Eigenvalues
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulativ e % 1 4.756 27.979 27.979 4.756 27.979 27.979 2.941 17.299 17.299 2 2.129 12.522 40.501 2.129 12.522 40.501 2.634 15.496 32.794 3 1.821 10.715 51.215 1.821 10.715 51.215 2.032 11.955 44.750 4 1.334 7.848 59.063 1.334 7.848 59.063 1.983 11.667 56.417 5 1.100 6.471 65.535 1.100 6.471 65.535 1.550 9.118 65.535
6 .837 4.925 70.460
7 .697 4.099 74.559
8 .625 3.674 78.233
9 .604 3.553 81.786
10 .528 3.105 84.892
11 .489 2.874 87.765
12 .457 2.688 90.453
13 .365 2.148 92.602
14 .355 2.086 94.688
15 .337 1.984 96.672
16 .302 1.778 98.450
17 .264 1.550 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS6 .439 .610
MDS7 .548 .571
MDS8 .545 .593
MDS9 .475 .591
MDS10 .476
MOL1 .545 -.411 .462
MOL2 .531
MOL3 .600
CK1 .612
CK2 .656 -.410
CK3 .671
CK4 .655
KMK2 .410 .531
KMK5 .539 .509
KMK6 .571 .406
FE1 .454
FE2 .510 .507
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a 5 components extracted.
Rotated Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS6 .784
MDS7 .804
MDS8 .781
MDS9 .746
MDS10 .521
MOL1 .773
MOL2 .798
MOL3 .716
CK1 .706
CK2 .767
CK3 .822
CK4 .795
KMK2 .804
KMK5 .737
KMK6 .736
FE1 .793
FE2 .812
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2 3 4 5
1 .631 .471 .402 .400 .244
2 -.493 .825 -.210 .105 -.144 3 -.360 .092 .641 -.475 .475 4 -.434 -.272 -.001 .728 .455 5 .205 .121 -.619 -.270 .698
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
3
.
faktor analisis jalur system informasi
Factor Analysis
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
Adequacy. .820
Approx. Chi-Square 1121.170
df 120
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Sig. .000
Communalities
Initial Extraction MDS11 1.000 .769 MDS12 1.000 .801 MDS13 1.000 .794 MDS14 1.000 .807 MDS15 1.000 .392 MOL1 1.000 .662 MOL2 1.000 .633 MOL3 1.000 .640 CK1 1.000 .588 CK2 1.000 .694 CK3 1.000 .736 CK4 1.000 .675 KMK7 1.000 .724 KMK8 1.000 .851 FE1 1.000 .667 FE2 1.000 .747
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Comp
onent Initial Eigenvalues
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of Variance
Cumulative % 1 4.827 30.168 30.168 4.827 30.168 30.168 3.219 20.116 20.116 2 2.398 14.988 45.156 2.398 14.988 45.156 2.930 18.311 38.427 3 1.721 10.757 55.913 1.721 10.757 55.913 2.050 12.813 51.240 4 1.346 8.410 64.323 1.346 8.410 64.323 1.582 9.889 61.130 5 .890 5.560 69.883 .890 5.560 69.883 1.401 8.753 69.883
6 .803 5.019 74.902
7 .622 3.890 78.793
8 .587 3.666 82.458
9 .533 3.330 85.789
10 .465 2.908 88.697
11 .397 2.483 91.180
12 .370 2.315 93.495
13 .311 1.945 95.440
14 .288 1.797 97.237
15 .233 1.457 98.695
16 .209 1.305 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS11 .624 -.569
MDS12 .704 -.524
MDS13 .655 -.589
MDS14 .622 -.593
MDS15 .511
MOL1 .452 .406
MOL2 .505 -.402
MOL3 .465 .434
CK1 .594
CK2 .617 .409
CK3 .684
CK4 .719
KMK7 .467 .631
KMK8 .490 .688
FE1 .416 .554
FE2 .585 .438
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a 5 components extracted.
Rotated Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4 5
MDS11 .858
MDS12 .865
MDS13 .861
MDS14 .892
MDS15 .517
MOL1 .778
MOL2 .786
MOL3 .751
CK1 .685
CK2 .805
CK3 .822
CK4 .748
KMK7 .704
KMK8 .882
FE1 .773
FE2 .854
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2 3 4 5
1 .604 .637 .309 .235 .280
2 -.740 .429 .513 .072 -.008 3 -.277 .090 -.553 .607 .491 4 .094 -.585 .541 .595 .034 5 -.051 -.243 .207 -.465 .824
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
LAMPIRAN D
Reliabilitas
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. MDS1 3.5988 .9091 172.0
2. MDS2 3.6395 .8841 172.0
3. MDS3 3.6512 1.0233 172.0
4. MDS4 3.7674 .8809 172.0
Correlation Matrix
MDS1 MDS2 MDS3 MDS4
MDS1 1.0000
MDS2 .5976 1.0000
MDS3 .5905 .5583 1.0000
MDS4 .5839 .6426 .6685 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 14.6570 9.6419 3.1051 4
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
MDS1 11.0581 5.8212 .6826 .4688 .8288
MDS2 11.0174 5.8886 .6926 .4956 .8251
MDS3 11.0058 5.2807 .7046 .5150 .8228
MDS4 10.8895 5.7246 .7452 .5653 .8043
Reliability Coefficients 4 items
Alpha = .8588 Standardized item alpha = .8606
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. MDS6 3.5291 .8613 172.0
2. MDS7 3.6919 .9134 172.0
3. MDS8 3.7849 .8687 172.0
4. MDS9 3.7093 .8358 172.0
Correlation Matrix
MDS6 MDS7 MDS8 MDS9
MDS6 1.0000
MDS7 .5801 1.0000
MDS8 .4891 .5424 1.0000
MDS9 .4098 .4948 .5819 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 14.7151 7.7254 2.7795 4
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
MDS6 11.1860 4.7488 .5953 .3830 .7774
MDS7 11.0233 4.3620 .6628 .4498 .7452
MDS8 10.9302 4.5331 .6590 .4480 .7473
MDS9 11.0058 4.8362 .5959 .3874 .7771
Reliability Coefficients 4 items
Alpha = .8105 Standardized item alpha = .8103
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. MDS11 3.7849 .9764 172.0
2. MDS12 3.7384 .9279 172.0
3. MDS13 3.6221 .8867 172.0
4. MDS14 3.7674 .9199 172.0
Correlation Matrix
MDS11 MDS12 MDS13 MDS14
MDS11 1.0000
MDS12 .6991 1.0000
MDS13 .6621 .7534 1.0000
MDS14 .7318 .7094 .7233 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 14.9128 10.8052 3.2871 4
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
MDS11 11.1279 6.1239 .7714 .6065 .8893
MDS12 11.1744 6.2267 .8028 .6543 .8771
MDS13 11.2907 6.4530 .7916 .6447 .8815
MDS14 11.1453 6.2536 .8054 .6523 .8762
Reliability Coefficients 4 items
Alpha = .9080 Standardized item alpha = .9086
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. MOL1 3.1279 1.1777 172.0
2. MOL2 2.8721 1.1270 172.0
3. MOL3 3.0174 1.1672 172.0
Correlation Matrix
MOL1 MOL2 MOL3
MOL1 1.0000
MOL2 .4750 1.0000
MOL3 .5216 .4107 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 9.0174 7.7950 2.7920 3
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
MOL1 5.8895 3.7129 .5938 .3539 .5820
MOL2 6.1453 4.1834 .5079 .2621 .6856
MOL3 6.0000 3.9181 .5442 .3064 .6437
Reliability Coefficients 3 items
Alpha = .7265 Standardized item alpha = .7261
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. CK1 3.2733 1.1347 172.0
2. CK2 3.8663 .8981 172.0
3. CK3 3.7733 .9495 172.0
4. CK4 3.4477 .9868 172.0
Correlation Matrix
CK1 CK2 CK3 CK4
CK1 1.0000
CK2 .5181 1.0000
CK3 .5192 .5815 1.0000
CK4 .5012 .5958 .6270 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 14.3605 10.4892 3.2387 4
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
CK1 11.0872 5.9046 .5979 .3593 .8187
CK2 10.4942 6.5789 .6737 .4590 .7789
CK3 10.5872 6.3023 .6892 .4869 .7698
CK4 10.9128 6.1619 .6845 .4891 .7708
Reliability Coefficients 4 items
Alpha = .8288 Standardized item alpha = .8342
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KMK1 3.0116 .7872 172.0
2. KMK2 3.1453 .8494 172.0
3. KMK3 3.1395 .8117 172.0
4. KMK4 3.0698 .8348 172.0
5. KMK5 3.4419 .8251 172.0
Covariance Matrix
KMK1 KMK2 KMK3 KMK4 KMK5
KMK1 .6197
KMK2 .3550 .7214
KMK3 .3317 .3656 .6588
KMK4 .2740 .3407 .3469 .6969
KMK5 .2638 .3389 .2947 .3725 .6808
Correlation Matrix
KMK1 KMK2 KMK3 KMK4 KMK5
KMK1 1.0000
KMK2 .5309 1.0000
KMK3 .5191 .5303 1.0000
KMK4 .4170 .4805 .5120 1.0000
KMK5 .4062 .4836 .4401 .5408 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
KMK1 12.7965 6.8765 .5932 .3751 .7986
KMK2 12.6628 6.4236 .6504 .4296 .7820
KMK3 12.6686 6.6088 .6417 .4217 .7848
KMK4 12.7384 6.5803 .6230 .4084 .7901
KMK5 12.3663 6.7247 .5935 .3737 .7986
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Reliability Coefficients 5 items
Alpha = .8255 Standardized item alpha = .8254
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KMK2 3.1453 .8494 172.0
2. KMK5 3.4419 .8251 172.0
3. KMK6 3.3547 .7546 172.0
Correlation Matrix
KMK2 KMK5 KMK6
KMK2 1.0000
KMK5 .4836 1.0000
KMK6 .4392 .4982 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 9.9419 3.8329 1.9578 3
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
KMK2 6.7965 1.8706 .5340 .2861 .6633
KMK5 6.5000 1.8538 .5778 .3351 .6074
KMK6 6.5872 2.0801 .5437 .2995 .6517
Reliability Coefficients 3 items
Alpha = .7284 Standardized item alpha = .7297
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KMK7 3.8895 .7129 172.0
2. KMK8 3.5814 .7249 172.0
Correlation Matrix
KMK7 KMK8
KMK7 1.0000
KMK8 .4758 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 7.4709 1.5255 1.2351 2
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
KMK7 3.5814 .5255 .4758 .2264 .
KMK8 3.8895 .5082 .4758 .2264 .
Reliability Coefficients 2 items
Alpha = .6448 Standardized item alpha = .6448
Reliability
****** Method 2 (covariance matrix) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. FE1 3.5698 .9182 172.0
2. FE2 3.9419 .9222 172.0
Correlation Matrix
FE1 FE2
FE1 1.0000
FE2 .4537 1.0000
N of Cases = 172.0
N of
Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
Scale 7.5116 2.4619 1.5690 2
Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item- Squared Alpha
if Item if Item Total Multiple if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
FE1 3.9419 .8504 .4537 .2059 .
FE2 3.5698 .8431 .4537 .2059 .
Reliability Coefficients 2 items
Alpha = .6242 Standardized item alpha = .6242
LAMPIRAN E
Regresi Logistik
1. Regresi logistik konsentrasi akuntansi keuangan
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases(a) N Percent
Included in Analysis 172 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Selected Cases
Total 172 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 172 100.0
a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value
non ak 0
ak 1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Iteration History(a,b,c)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant
1 225.996 -.535
2 225.989 -.548
Step 0
3 225.989 -.548
a Constant is included in the model. b Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 225.989
c Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Table(a,b)
Observed Predicted
akt keu
non ak ak
Percentage Correct
akt keu non ak 109 0 100.0
ak 63 0 .0
Step 0
Overall Percentage 63.4
a Constant is included in the model. b The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant -.548 .158 11.999 1 .001 .578
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
MDSAK 3.130 1 .077
MOL .330 1 .566
CK 11.339 1 .001
KMKAK 18.774 1 .000
Variables
FE 1.417 1 .234
Step 0
Overall Statistics 39.814 5 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter
Iteration History(a,b,c,d)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant MDSAK MOL CK KMKAK FE
1 182.915 -1.748 .006 .013 -.220 .248 .032
2 177.211 -2.815 .009 .035 -.313 .384 .010
3 176.911 -3.121 .011 .040 -.339 .425 -.005
4 176.909 -3.142 .011 .041 -.341 .428 -.006
Step 1
5 176.909 -3.142 .011 .041 -.341 .428 -.006
a Method: Enter
b Constant is included in the model. c Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 225.989
d Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 49.080 5 .000
Block 49.080 5 .000
Step 1
Model 49.080 5 .000
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1 176.909 .248 .339
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 3.695 8 .884
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
akt keu = non ak akt keu = ak
Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
1 16 16.412 1 .588 17
2 17 15.264 0 1.736 17
3 14 14.338 3 2.662 17
4 12 13.326 5 3.674 17
5 11 12.251 6 4.749 17
6 11 10.665 6 6.335 17
7 9 9.392 8 7.608 17
8 9 8.096 8 8.904 17
9 6 5.669 11 11.331 17
Step 1
10 4 3.588 15 15.412 19
Classification Table(a)
Observed Predicted
akt keu
non ak ak
Percentage Correct
akt keu non ak 94 15 86.2
ak 29 34 54.0
Step 1
Overall Percentage 74.4
a The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
MDSAK .011 .072 .025 1 .875 1.011
MOL .041 .078 .271 1 .603 1.042
CK -.341 .076 20.337 1 .000 .711
KMKAK .428 .092 21.439 1 .000 1.534
FE -.006 .136 .002 1 .963 .994
Step 1(a)
Constan
t -3.142 1.457 4.648 1 .031 .043
a Variable(s) entered on step 1: MDSAK, MOL, CK, KMKAK, FE.
Correlation Matrix
Constant MDSAK MOL CK KMKAK FE
Constan
t 1.000 -.311 -.107 -.104 -.413 -.284
MDSAK -.311 1.000 -.176 .034 -.193 -.225
MOL -.107 -.176 1.000 -.385 .037 -.022
CK -.104 .034 -.385 1.000 -.450 .018
KMKAK -.413 -.193 .037 -.450 1.000 -.249
Step 1
FE -.284 -.225 -.022 .018 -.249 1.000
Step number: 1
_
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
16
F
R 12
E
Q
n
U
n
E 8
n
N
n a a a
C
n n a aaa a a
Y
n n n a ann a a a a
4
n nna n n n ann n aaa a na a a a
nnnnnnnnn nnnnn nan nnna naanaaa a a a
nnnnnnnnn nnnnn nnan nnnnannannaa ana aaaanaa a a
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnannnnannnnnnnnnnnnannn naannnnaaa aaa a n a
Predicted
Prob: 0 .25 .5 .75 1
Group: nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Predicted Probability is of Membership for ak
The Cut Value is .50
Symbols: n - non ak
a - ak
Each Symbol Represents 1 Case.
2. Regresi logistik konsentrasi akuntansi manajemen
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases(a) N Percent
Included in Analysis 172 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Selected Cases
Total 172 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 172 100.0
a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value
non am 0
am 1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Iteration History(a,b,c)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant
1 233.184 -.349
2 233.183 -.352
Step 0
3 233.183 -.352
a Constant is included in the model. b Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 233.183
c Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Table(a,b)
Observed Predicted
akt mnj
non am am
Percentage Correct
akt mnj non am 101 0 100.0
am 71 0 .0
Step 0
Overall Percentage 58.7
a Constant is included in the model. b The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant -.352 .155 5.179 1 .023 .703
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
MDSAM 24.309 1 .000
MOL .674 1 .412
CK .030 1 .863
KMKAM .029 1 .866
Variables
FE 2.302 1 .129
Step 0
Overall Statistics 30.119 5 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter
Iteration History(a,b,c,d)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant MDSAM MOL CK KMKAM FE
1 198.949 -2.462 .300 -.015 -.044 -.013 -.187
2 193.654 -3.901 .459 .022 -.097 -.034 -.242
3 193.367 -4.476 .508 .031 -.110 -.038 -.249
4 193.365 -4.521 .511 .032 -.111 -.038 -.249
Step 1
5 193.365 -4.521 .511 .032 -.111 -.038 -.249
a Method: Enter
b Constant is included in the model. c Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 233.183
d Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 39.818 5 .000
Block 39.818 5 .000
Step 1
Model 39.818 5 .000
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1 193.365 .207 .278
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 3.507 8 .899
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
akt mnj = non am akt mnj = am
Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
1 17 16.257 0 .743 17
2 13 14.271 4 2.729 17
3 13 13.116 4 3.884 17
4 12 11.838 5 5.162 17
5 12 10.440 5 6.560 17
6 10 9.492 7 7.508 17
7 7 8.528 10 8.472 17
8 6 7.345 11 9.655 17
9 6 5.760 11 11.240 17
Step 1
10 5 3.954 14 15.046 19
Classification Table(a)
Observed Predicted
akt mnj
non am am
Percentage Correct
akt mnj non am 81 20 80.2
am 30 41 57.7
Step 1
Overall Percentage 70.9
a The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
MDSAM .511 .105 23.513 1 .000 1.668
MOL .032 .072 .192 1 .661 1.032
CK -.111 .070 2.548 1 .110 .895
KMKAM -.038 .113 .113 1 .737 .963
FE -.249 .125 3.943 1 .047 .780
Step 1(a)
Constan
t -4.521 1.684 7.205 1 .007 .011
a Variable(s) entered on step 1: MDSAM, MOL, CK, KMKAM, FE.
Correlation Matrix
Constant MDSAM MOL CK KMKAM FE
Constan
t 1.000 -.653 -.119 -.028 -.206 -.281
MDSAM -.653 1.000 .022 -.274 -.162 -.084
MOL -.119 .022 1.000 -.406 -.009 -.088
CK -.028 -.274 -.406 1.000 -.249 .040
KMKAM -.206 -.162 -.009 -.249 1.000 -.282
Step 1
FE -.281 -.084 -.088 .040 -.282 1.000
Step number: 1
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
8
a
a
a a
F
a a
R 6
a n a aa a a
E
a n a aa a a
Q
n a na a n a aan a a a a
U
n a na a n a aan a a a a
E 4
n n nna aan n anan aaa a a aa a a
N
n n nna aan n anan aaa a a aa a a
C
nnnn n nannnn nnn aan nnnnanaaaanaa aa aa a
Y
nnnn n nannnn nnn aan nnnnanaaaanaa aa aa a
2
nnnn n nannnn nnnnnan nnnnnnanaanaa aanaaa aa a a
nnnn n nannnn nnnnnan nnnnnnanaanaa aanaaa aa a a
nnnn nn nnnnnnnnnnnnannnnnnnnnnnnnannannnnnnnnaanaan
nnnn nn nnnnnnnnnnnnannnnnnnnnnnnnannannnnnnnnaanaan
Predicted
Prob: 0 .25 .5 .75 1
Group: nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Predicted Probability is of Membership for am
The Cut Value is .50
Symbols: n - non am
a - am
Each Symbol Represents .5 Cases.
3. Regresi logistik konsentrasi sistem informasi
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Cases(a) N Percent
Included in Analysis 172 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Selected Cases
Total 172 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 172 100.0
a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value
non si 0
si 1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Iteration History(a,b,c)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant
1 182.291 -1.116
2 181.661 -1.255
3 181.660 -1.260
Step 0
4 181.660 -1.260
a Constant is included in the model. b Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 181.660
c Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Table(a,b)
Observed Predicted
sistem
non si si
Percentage Correct
sistem non si 134 0 100.0
si 38 0 .0
Step 0
Overall Percentage 77.9
a Constant is included in the model. b The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant -1.260 .184 47.019 1 .000 .284
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
MDSSIA 32.916 1 .000
MOL .095 1 .758
CK 16.933 1 .000
KMKSIA 8.129 1 .004
Variables
FE .175 1 .676
Step 0
Overall Statistics 44.151 5 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter
Iteration History(a,b,c,d)
Coefficients
Iteration
-2 Log
likelihood Constant MDSSIA MOL CK KMKSIA FE
1 143.537 -4.989 .187 -.099 .132 .079 -.067
2 130.291 -8.381 .333 -.122 .212 .104 -.121
3 128.075 -10.397 .426 -.125 .258 .094 -.152
4 127.981 -10.902 .450 -.126 .271 .089 -.161
5 127.981 -10.927 .451 -.126 .272 .088 -.162
Step 1
6 127.981 -10.927 .451 -.126 .272 .088 -.162
a Method: Enter
b Constant is included in the model. c Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 181.660
d Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 53.680 5 .000
Block 53.680 5 .000
Step 1
Model 53.680 5 .000
Model Summary
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1 127.981 .268 .411
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 3.456 8 .903
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
sistem = non si sistem = si
Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
1 17 16.911 0 .089 17
2 17 16.714 0 .286 17
3 16 16.390 1 .610 17
4 16 15.879 1 1.121 17
5 14 15.121 3 1.879 17
6 13 14.265 4 2.735 17
7 14 13.101 3 3.899 17
8 13 11.514 4 5.486 17
9 10 9.073 7 7.927 17
Step 1
10 4 5.033 15 13.967 19
Classification Table(a)
Observed Predicted
sistem
non si si
Percentage Correct
sistem non si 126 8 94.0
si 22 16 42.1
Step 1
Overall Percentage 82.6
a The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
MDSSIA .451 .106 18.003 1 .000 1.569
MOL -.126 .086 2.130 1 .144 .882
CK .272 .104 6.773 1 .009 1.312
KMKSIA .088 .216 .168 1 .682 1.093
FE -.162 .153 1.124 1 .289 .851
Step 1(a)
Constan
t -10.927 2.319 22.198 1 .000 .000
a Variable(s) entered on step 1: MDSSIA, MOL, CK, KMKSIA, FE.
Correlation Matrix
Constant MDSSIA MOL CK KMKSIA FE
Constan
t 1.000 -.577 -.144 -.286 -.307 -.158
MDSSIA -.577 1.000 .067 -.068 -.171 -.084
MOL -.144 .067 1.000 -.337 -.030 .017
CK -.286 -.068 -.337 1.000 -.228 -.172
KMKSIA -.307 -.171 -.030 -.228 1.000 -.221
Step 1
FE -.158 -.084 .017 -.172 -.221 1.000
Step number: 1
Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities
32
n
F
n
R 24
n
E
n
Q
n
U
n
E 16
n
N
ns
C
nn n
Y
nnnn
8
nnnn s s s
nnnnnnnss ns n s
nnnnnnnnnnnn nn nnn s n s s
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnsnnnnn ns snnsnnsn nns n ssns sssss s
Predicted
Prob: 0 .25 .5 .75 1
Group: nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Predicted Probability is of Membership for si
The Cut Value is .50
Symbols: n - non si
s - si
Each Symbol Represents 2 Cases.
LAMPIRAN F
ANOVA
Oneway
Descriptives
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Minim um
Maxim um
Lower Bound
Upper
Bound