• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Defining and Classifying Groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "Defining and Classifying Groups"

Copied!
33
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S

E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N

E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. PowerPoint PresentationPowerPoint Presentation

Foundations of Group Behavior Pertemuan 6

Muhammad Arief

(2)

Defining and Classifying Groups

Defining and Classifying Groups

Group(s)

Two or more individuals interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives.

Formal Group

A designated work group defined by the organization’s structure.

Informal Group

A group that is neither formally structured nor

(3)

Defining and Classifying Groups (cont’d)

Defining and Classifying Groups (cont’d)

Command Group

A group composed of the individuals who report directly to a given manager.

Task Group

Those working together to complete a job or task.

Interest Group

Those working together to attain a specific

objective with which each is concerned.

Friendship Group

Those brought together because they share one or more common

(4)

Why People Join Groups

Why People Join Groups

Security

Status

Self-esteem

Affiliation

Power

(5)

The Five-Stage Model of Group Development

The Five-Stage Model of Group Development

Forming Stage

The first stage in group development, characterized by much uncertainty.

Storming Stage

The second stage in group development, characterized by intragroup conflict.

Norming Stage

The third stage in group

(6)

…Group Development (cont’d)

…Group Development (cont’d)

Performing Stage

The fourth stage in group development, when the group is fully functional.

Adjourning Stage

The final stage in group

development for temporary groups, characterized by concern with wrapping up activities rather than

(7)

Stages of Group Development

Stages of Group Development

E X H I B I T 9–2

(8)

An Alternative Model: Temporary Groups with

Deadlines

An Alternative Model: Temporary Groups with

Deadlines

Sequence of actions:

1. Setting group direction 2. First phase of inertia

3. Half-way point transition 4. Major changes

5. Second phase of inertia 6. Accelerated activity

Sequence of actions:

1. Setting group direction 2. First phase of inertia

3. Half-way point transition 4. Major changes

5. Second phase of inertia 6. Accelerated activity

Punctuated-Equilibrium Model

Temporary groups

under time constrained deadlines go through transitions between

inertia and activity---at the half-way point,

they experience an increase in

(9)

The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model

The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model

E X H I B I T 9–3

(10)

Group Properties

Group Properties

Roles

Norms

Status

Size

(11)

Group Properties - Roles

Group Properties - Roles

Role(s)

A set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit.

Role Identity

Certain attitudes and behaviors consistent with a role.

Role Perception

(12)

Group Properties - Roles (cont’d)

Group Properties - Roles (cont’d)

Role Expectations

How others believe a person should act in a given situation.

Role Conflict

A situation in which an individual is confronted by divergent role expectations.

Psychological Contract

(13)

Group Properties - Norms

Group Properties - Norms

Classes of Norms:

Performance norms

Appearance norms

Social arrangement norms

Allocation of resources norms

Classes of Norms:

Performance norms

Appearance norms

Social arrangement norms

Allocation of resources

norms

Norms

(14)

Group Norms & The Hawthorne Studies

Group Norms & The Hawthorne Studies

A series of studies undertaken by Elton Mayo at Western Electric Company’s Hawthorne Works in Chicago between 1924 and 1932.

Research Conclusions:

– Worker behavior and sentiments were closely related.

– Group influences (norms) were significant in affecting individual behavior.

– Group standards (norms) were highly effective in establishing individual worker output.

– Money was less a factor in determining worker

(15)

Group Properties - Norms (cont’d)

Group Properties - Norms (cont’d)

Conformity

Adjusting one’s behavior to align with the norms of the group.

Reference Groups

Important groups to which individuals belong or hope to belong and with whose norms individuals are likely to conform.

EXHIBIT 9–4

EXHIBIT 9–4

(16)

Group Properties - Norms (cont’d)

Group Properties - Norms (cont’d)

Deviant Workplace Behavior

Antisocial actions by organizational members that intentionally violate established norms and result in negative consequences for the

organization, its members, or both.

(17)

Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior

Typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior

E X H I B I T 9–5

E X H I B I T 9–5

Category Examples

Production Leaving early

Intentionally working slowly Wasting resources

Property Sabotage

Lying about hours worked

Stealing from the organization Political Showing favoritism

Gossiping and spreading rumors Blaming coworkers

Personal Aggression Sexual harassment Verbal abuse

Stealing from coworkers

Source: Adapted from S.L. Robinson, and R.J. Bennett. “A Typology of Deviant Workplace

(18)
(19)

Group Properties - Status

Group Properties - Status

Power over Power over Others Others Power over Power over Others Others Ability to Ability to Contribute Contribute Ability to Ability to Contribute Contribute Personal Personal Characteristics Characteristics Personal Personal Characteristics Characteristics Group Member Group Member Status Status Group Member Group Member Status Status

Status: A socially defined position or rank given to groups

or group members by others.

Norms & Norms & Interaction Interaction Norms & Norms & Interaction Interaction Status Inequity Status Inequity Status Inequity

Status Inequity National National

Culture Culture National National Culture Culture

(20)

Group Properties - Size

Group Properties - Size

Performance

Expe cted

Actua

l (due

to lo

afing

) Other conclusions:

Odd number groups do better than even.

Groups of 5 to 7 perform better overall than larger or smaller groups.

Other conclusions:

Odd number groups do

better than even.

Groups of 5 to 7 perform

better overall than larger or smaller groups.

Social Loafing

(21)

Group Properties - Cohesiveness

Group Properties - Cohesiveness

Increasing group cohesiveness:

1. Make the group smaller.

2. Encourage agreement with group goals. 3. Increase time members spend together.

4. Increase group status and admission difficultly. 5. Stimulate competition with other groups.

6. Give rewards to the group, not individuals. 7. Physically isolate the group.

Increasing group cohesiveness:

1. Make the group smaller.

2. Encourage agreement with group goals. 3. Increase time members spend together.

4. Increase group status and admission difficultly. 5. Stimulate competition with other groups.

6. Give rewards to the group, not individuals. 7. Physically isolate the group.

Cohesiveness

(22)

Relationship Between Group Cohesiveness,

Performance Norms, and Productivity

(23)

E X H I B I T 9–8

E X H I B I T 9–8

(24)

Group Decision Making

Group Decision Making

Decision-making

– Large groups facilitate the pooling of information about complex tasks.

– Smaller groups are better suited to coordinating and facilitating the implementation of complex tasks.

– Simple, routine standardized tasks reduce the

(25)

Group Decision Making (cont’d)

Group Decision Making (cont’d)

Strengths

– More complete information

– Increased diversity of views

– Higher quality of decisions (more accuracy) – Increased acceptance of solutions  Weaknesses

– More time

consuming (slower)

– Increased pressure to conform

– Domination by one or a few members

(26)

Group Decision Making (cont’d)

Group Decision Making (cont’d)

Groupthink

Phenomenon in which the norm for consensus

overrides the realistic appraisal of alternative course of action.

Groupshift

(27)

Symptoms Of The Groupthink Phenomenon

Symptoms Of The Groupthink Phenomenon

Group members rationalize any resistance to the assumptions they have made.

Members apply direct pressures on those who express doubts about shared views or who

question the alternative favored by the majority.

Members who have doubts or differing points of view keep silent about misgivings.

(28)

Group Decision-Making Techniques

Group Decision-Making Techniques

Interacting Groups

Typical groups, in which the members interact with each other face-to-face.

Nominal Group Technique

(29)

Group Decision-Making Techniques

Group Decision-Making Techniques

Electronic Meeting

A meeting in which members interact on computers, allowing for anonymity of comments and aggregation of votes.

Brainstorming

An idea-generation process that specifically encourages any and all alternatives, while

(30)

Evaluating Group Effectiveness

Evaluating Group Effectiveness

TYPE OF GROUP

Efectiveness Criteria Interacting Brainstorming

Nominal Electronic

Number and quality of ideas Low Moderate High High Social pressure High Low Moderate Low

Money costs Low Low Low High

Speed Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Task orientation Low High High High

Potential for interpersonal confict High Low Moderate Low

Commitment to solution High Not applicable Moderate Moderate Development of High High Moderate Low

(31)

True or False: The Punctuated Equilibrium Model True or False: The Punctuated Equilibrium Model suggests that groups have an equilibrium, but that suggests that groups have an equilibrium, but that

equilibrium will be punctuated at the half-way point. But, equilibrium will be punctuated at the half-way point. But, after the punctuation, the group will return to the

after the punctuation, the group will return to the equilibrium it had prior to the punctuation.

equilibrium it had prior to the punctuation.

Chapter Check-Up: Groups

FALSE. The first part is true, but the second

sentence is false. After the punctuation, the group will have a new equilibrium of increased

(32)

List 2 drawbacks of brainstorming

and 2 plusses of the Nominal Group

Decision Making Technique. Compare

your answers with your neighbor, and

discuss which one you would use for

a group project in this class and why.

(33)

L

Lorraine is a non-traditional student (she’s 51 years old) and is working in a group for a class project. They keep turning to her for the answers to questions. Which of the following

might the group have that is driving Lorraine’s experience?

Groupthink Groupthink Groupshift Groupshift Role Conflict Role Conflict

Role Expectations Role Expectations

Chapter Check-Up: Groups

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Therefore, this study aims to determine the mediation effect of knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition on relationship between classroom climate student cohesiveness,

The Relationship between the Effectiveness of K3 Management and Achievement Motivation Together with Employee Productivity In accordance with the research hypothesis, the

Understanding the link between inter-group relations and psychological issues ABSTRACT Understanding the relationship between inter-group relations, stress and copying strategies

Result of the relationship between organizational performance and its predictors Relationship Regression weight Commitment to learning ---> organizational performance .076 Shared

Values and norms- deciding what knowledge must be captivated and which knowledge creation activities are allowed and encouraged 1.3 The relationship between human resource strategy and

Conclusion This research concludes that there is significant relationship between the independent variables of multiple dating frequency, dating status, religious norms, household

The document analyzes the relationship between financial distress and corporate

The document examines the relationship between economic competitiveness and logistics performance in the Visegrád Group countries using data from