• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Computational And Applied Mathematics:Vol99.Issue1-2.1998:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Computational And Applied Mathematics:Vol99.Issue1-2.1998:"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

An upper bound for the Laguerre polynomials

Zdzis law Lewandowski, Jan Szynal∗

Department of Mathematics, M. Curie-Sklodowska University, 20-031 Lublin, Poland

Received 8 January 1998

Abstract

A simple new uniform estimate for the Laguerre polynomials of order , L()n (x); ∈R is given. c 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

AMS classication:33C45; 30C50

Keywords:Laguerre polynomials; Laplace integral

The Laguerre polynomials L()

n (x) of order can be dened in many ways [5, 7]. Assuming

R; x¿0 and n= 0;1;2; : : : they are dened, for instance, by the generating function

(1z)−−1

exp

1xz

−z

=

X

n=0 L()

n (x)z n;

|z|¡1; (1)

or by explicit formula

L(n)(x) = n X

k=0

n+ nk

! (x)k

k! : (2)

Two classical global uniform (w.r.t. n; x and ) estimates given by Szego are known (e.g. [1]):

|L(n)(x)|6(+ 1)n n! e

x=2; ¿0; x¿0; n= 0;1;2; : : : ; (S 1)

|L(n)(x)|6

2(+ 1)n

n!

ex=2; 1¡60; x¿0; n= 0;1;2; : : : : (S2)

Corresponding author. [email protected].

(2)

The estimate (S2) has been improved in 1985 by Rooney [6], who proved with the aid of Askey formula that

|L(n)(x)|62−

qnex=2; 6−12; x¿0; n= 0;1;2; : : : (R1)

and

|L(n)(x)|6√2qn(+ 1)n (1=2)n

ex=2; ¿1

2; x¿0; n= 0;1;2; : : : ; (R2)

where qn=√(2n)!=2n+1=2n!; qn∼1=

4 √

4n; n→ ∞.

However, by his method Rooney could not improve the estimate (S1).

Using the less known representation formula given by Koornwinder [2] (¿1

2; x¿0; n= 0;1;2; : : :),

L()

n (x) =

2(1)n

(+1

2)n!

Z ∞

0

Z

0

(xr2+ i2√x rcos)ner2

r2+1 sin2 ddr; (K)

we nd the simple estimate for |L()

n (x)|which improves (S1) for some values of x and covers wider range of parameter .

More important than the result is the motivation, which comes out from pretty attractive and dicult Krzy˙z conjecture (for the references see, e.g., [3]) in the geometric function theory which says that for any bounded and nonvanishing holomorphic function in the unit disk |z|¡1; which has the form

f(z) = e−t

+a1z+a2z2+· · ·; t¿0; |z|¡1; (3)

we have

sup|an|= 2

e = 0:735: : : ; n= 1;2; : : : (4)

with the equality for the function

Fn(z) =F(1; zn) = exp

−1 +z

n

1zn

; n= 1;2; : : : ; (5)

where

F(t; z) = exp

−t1 +z

1z

= e−t

+

X

n=0

An(t)zn; t¿0; |z|¡1: (6)

So far Krzy˙z conjecture is proved only for n= 1;2;3;4 and in general it is known only that

|an|¡0:99918: : : .

From (1) and (6) we easily see that

An(t) = e

−t

L(−1)

n (2t); n= 1;2; : : : : (7)

Therefore, the properties of the Laguerre polynomials are strongly involved in Krzy˙z conjecture [3]. There are many formulae for Laguerre polynomials [5, 7]; however, the direct estimate for |L()

(3)

We start with the following simple:

Proof. Using the Laplace’s integral [5] for the Gegenbauer polynomials C()

n ,

and Koornwinder formula (K) we can write the following chain of equalities:

L(n)(x) = 2(−1)

which ends the proof.

Remark. We do not claim the representation (8) is new, however we have diculty to nd refer-ences for the proof.

Compare formula (8) with the denition of the Gamma function

() =

In order to state our result we need the following denition. For the formal series P∞

n=0an and

¿1 we dene the Cesaro mean ()

n by the formula

(4)

Theorem. For ¿1

Proof. From the Laplace integral (L) it follows directly that

|C()

Corollary 2. Estimate (10) gives by the continuity:

|L(−1=2)

which for large x is better than (R1) and moreover with better constant.

Remark 1. Estimate (10) is better than Szego (S1) for largex, because(n)(expx) is the polynomial. Moreover, it covers for the range ¿1

(5)

The easily checked monotonicity of ()

n (expx) (n(1)(expx)¿n(2)(expx) for 1¡2) shows that the estimate (10) is better than (S1) for all x¿0 if ¿n.

Remark 2. The Askey formula [6]

e−x

L(−)

n (x) = 1 ()

Z ∞

x

(tx)−1

e−t

L()

n (t) dt; ¿0; ∈R; x¿0; n= 0;1; : : : ; (A)

can be applied to extend estimate (10) for 6−1 2.

Remark 3. The more precise bounds for the Gegenbauer polynomials (see for instance [4]) can be applied to obtain a better estimate than (10). However, they are too complicated to quote them here.

References

[1] M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York, 1964.

[2] T. Koornwinder, Jacobi polynomials II. An analytic proof of the product formula, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 5 (1974) 125 –137.

[3] Z. Lewandowski, J. Szynal, On the Krzy ˙z conjecture and related problems, in: Laine, Martio (Eds.), XVIth Rolf Nevanlinna Colloquium, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 257– 268.

[4] G. Lohofer, Inequalities for Legendre and Gegenbauer functions, J. Approx. Theory 64 (1991) 226 – 234. [5] E.D. Rainville, Special Functions, Macmillan, New York, 1960.

[6] P.G. Rooney, Further inequalities for generalized Laguerre polynomials, C.R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 7 (1985) 273 – 275.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait