• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Code of conduct for publishers FINAL 1 0

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Code of conduct for publishers FINAL 1 0"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

• Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi-tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)

• Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en-tails

• Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)

Publishers should:

• Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract

• Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)

• Protect intellectual property and copyright

• Foster editorial independence

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

• Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to: – Editorial independence

– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

– Authorship

– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards – Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

– Appeals and complaints

• Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)

• Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE

• Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines

• Maintain the integrity of the academic record

• Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases

• Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions

• Publish content on a timely basis

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Similarly, APCERT members should respect, as confidential, information about policy and operations of other members unless authorised to disclose it in the course of their

APP Group shall require all companies in the respective stages of the supply chain (from logging to distribution) to submit the documents necessary to confirm the legality

• Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance..

To undertake the third phase of this project, which is related to Fisheries Management in the Southeast Asia region, the technically competent SEAFDEC Marine Fishery Resources

Pages: 1-6 Editorial Beyond the pandemic: Lessons for the future of SOTL in the global South part two Michael Samuel School of Education, University of KwaZulu- Natal, Durban,

Similar to Mickan, Tilney argues that SFL has had an integral role in shaping TESOL in Australia and highlights the critical importance of funding for teacher support Editorial:

In this editorial we will explore these issues as well as the current state of peer review in the context of educational technology publishing, with a focus on how the peer review

5 Strive to attend the general meetings of the Company; 6 Where they have concerns about the running of the Company or a proposed action, ensure that these are addressed by the Board