• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T BING 1006939 Table of content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T BING 1006939 Table of content"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION --- i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS --- ii

ABSTRACT --- iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS --- iv

LIST OF FIGURES --- ix

LIST OF TABLES --- x

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1.1Background of the Study --- 1

1.2Statement of the Problems --- 3

1.3Purpose of the Study --- 4

1.4Significance of the Study --- 4

1.5Scope of the Study --- 4

1.6Clarification of Terms --- 5

(2)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

CHAPTER II: THEORITICAL REVIEW

2.1Corrective Feedback--- 6

2.1.1 Types of Corrective Feedback --- 7

2.1.1.1 Recast --- 8

2.1.1.2Explicit Correction --- 10

2.1.1.3Repetition --- 11

2.1.1.4Clarification Request --- 12

2.1.1.5Metalinguistic Feedback --- 13

2.1.1.6Elicitation --- 14

2.1.1.7Paralinguistic Signal --- 16

2.1.1.8Translation --- 16

2.1.2 Benefits and Drawbacks of Corrective Feedback --- 18

2.1.2.1Benefits --- 18

2.1.2.2Drawbacks --- 20

2.1.3 Factors Influencing the Use of Corrective Feedback --- 23

2.1.3.1Internal Factors --- 23

2.1.3.2Eksternal Factors --- 26

2.2Uptake --- 27

(3)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

2.3Students’ Attitude --- 32

2.4Previous Studies --- 34

2.5Concluding Remarks --- 37

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY 3.1Setting --- 38

3.2Participants --- 38

3.3Research Design --- 39

3.4Data Collection Techniques --- 40

3.4.1 Observation --- 40

3.4.2 Interview --- 41

3.5Data Analysis --- 43

3.5.1 Analyzing the Data from Video Recording --- 43

3.5.2 Analyzing the Data from Interview --- 46

3.5.3 Concluding Remarks --- 46

CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1Oral Corrective Feedback for Students of Different Proficiency Levels --- 47

(4)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

4.1.1.1Recast --- 49

4.1.1.2Elicitation --- 52

4.1.1.3Metalinguistic Feedback --- 54

4.1.1.4Translation --- 56

4.1.1.5Clarification Request --- 58

4.1.1.6Explicit Correction --- 60

4.1.1.7Repetition --- 62

4.1.1.8Paralinguistic Signal --- 63

4.1.2 Data Gained from Interview with the Teacher --- 65

4.2The Type of Corrective Feedback Contributing More to the Uptake --- 69

4.2.1 Data gainned from Observation --- 69

4.2.1.1Uptake Following Corrective Feedback In Low Level --- 69

4.2.1.2Uptake Following Corrective Feedback In Mid Level --- 73

4.2.1.3Uptake Following Corrective Feedback In High Level --- 76

4.2.2 Data Gained from Interview with the Teacher --- 77

(5)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

4.3.1 Cognitive Component --- 78

4.3.2 Affective Component --- 81

4.3.3 Behavioral Component --- 84

4.4Concluding Remarks --- 86

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION, LIMITATION, AND RECOMENDATION 5.1Conclusion--- 87

5.2Limitation--- 88

5.3Recomendation --- 89

REFERENCES --- 91

(6)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF FIGURES

2.1 Attitude Component --- 33

4.1 The Use of Recast in All Proficiency Levels --- 50

4.2 The Use Elicitation in All Proficiency Levels --- 52

4.3 The Use Metalinguistic Feedback in All Proficiency Levels--- 54

4.4 The Use Translation in All Proficiency Levels --- 56

4.5 The Use Clarification Request in All Proficiency Levels --- 58

4.6 The Use Explicit Correction in All Proficiency Levels --- 60

4.7 The Use Repetition in All Proficiency Levels --- 62

(7)

Gartika Pandu B, 2014

ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF TABLES

2.1 Types of Oral Corrective Feedback --- 7

2.2 Taxonomy of Corrective Feedback Strategy --- 18

3.1. Categorization of Corrective Feedback --- 44

3.2 Categorization of Uptake --- 45

4.1 The Distribution of Corrective Feedback --- 48

4.2. Uptake Following Corrective Feedback in Low Level --- 70

4.3 Uptake Following Corrective Feedback in Mid Level --- 73

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Keputusan hakim yang menyatakan seseorang bersalah atas perbuatan pidana yang dimaksud dalam pasal 13, menentukan pula perintah terhadap yang bersalah untuk

Pokja Jasa Konstruksi ULP Kabupaten Kepulauan Siau Tagulandang Biaro akan melaksanakan Pemilihan Langsung dengan pascakualifikasi untuk paket pekerjaan konstruksi

Data Flow Diagram (DFD) adalah alat pembuatan model yang memungkinkan professional sistem untuk menggambarkan sistem sebagai suatu jaringan proses fungsional yang

Dengan begitu banyaknya game yang ada saat ini, cukup banyak pilihan yang ditawarkan di pasaran, sehingga para penggemar game dapat dengan mudah mendapatkan game yang sesuai

Clustering Data Pencemaran Udara Sektor Industri di Jawa Tengah Dengan Kohenen Neural

Hubungan Penggunaan Visual Display Terminal dan Intensitas Penerangan Terhadap Kelelahan Mata Pengguna Komputer di PT.Sriwijaya Perdana Palembang, Program Studi Kesehatan

Laporan keuangan merupakan media informasi yang digunakan oleh perusahaan yang bersangkutan untuk melaporkan keadaan dan posisi keuangan kepada pihakpihak yang berkepentingan..

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui profil onikomikosis di Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin di RSUP Haji Adam Malik periode Januari