Estimating After-Tax
Incremental Cash Flows
Estimating After-Tax
Incremental Cash Flows
Cash (not accounting income) flowss
Operating (not fnancing) flowss
After-tax flowss
Incremental flowss
Cash
(not accounting income)
flowss
Operating
(not fnancing)
flowss
After-tax flowss
Incremental flowss
Estimating After-Tax
Incremental Cash Flows
Estimating After-Tax
Incremental Cash Flows
Ignore
sunk costs
Include
opportunity costs
Include
project-driven changes in
wsorking capital net of
spontaneous changes in current
liabilities
Include
efects of inflation
Ignore
sunk costs
Include
opportunity costs
Include
project-driven
changes in
wsorking capital
net of
spontaneous changes in current
liabilities
Include
efects of inflation
Principles that must be
Tax Considerations
and Depreciation
Generally, proftable frms prefer to
use an accelerated method for tax
reporting purposes (MACRS).
Depreciation
represents the systematic
allocation of the cost of a capital asset
Depreciation and the
MACRS Method
Everything else equal, the greater the
depreciation charges, the lowser the
taxes paid by the frm.
Depreciation is a noncash expense.
Assets are depreciated (MACRS) on
one of eight diferent property
classes.
Generally, the half-year convention is
MACRS Sample Schedule
Recovery Property Class
Year 3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 1 33.33% 20.00% 14.29% 2 44.45 32.00 24.49 3 14.81 19.20 17.49 4 7.41 11.52 12.49 5 11.52 8.93 6 5.76 8.92
7 8.93
Depreciable Basis
In tax accounting, the fully installed cost of an asset. This is the amount that, by laws, may be wsritten of over time for tax
purposes.
Depreciable Basis =
Capitalized Expenditures
Capitalized Expenditures are
expenditures that may provide
benefts into the future and
therefore are treated as capital
outlays and not as expenses of the
period in wshich they wsere incurred.
Sale or Disposal of
a Depreciable Asset
Often historically, capital gains
income has received more favorable
U.S. tax treatment than operating
income.
Generally, the sale of a “capital asset” (as
defined by the IRS) generates a capital
gain (asset sells for more than book
Capital Budgeting: The process of planning for purchases of long-term assets.
For example: Our firm must decide whether to purchase a new plastic molding machine for $127,000.
How do we decide?
Will the machine be profitable? Will our firm earn a high rate of
return on the investment?
The relevant project information
The cost of the new machine is
$127,000.
Installation will cost $20,000.
$4,000 in net working capital will be
needed at the time of installation.
The project will increase revenues by
$85,000 per year, but operating costs will increase by 35% of the revenue increase.
Simplified straight line depreciation is
used.
Class life is 5 years, and the firm is
planning to keep the project for 5
years.
Salvage value at the end of year 5 will
be $50,000.
14% cost of capital; 34% marginal tax
Capital Budgeting Steps
1) Evaluate Cash Flows
Look at all incremental cash
flows occurring as a result
of the project.
Initial outlay
Diferential Cash Flows
over
the life of the project (also
referred to as annual cash
flows).
Capital Budgeting Steps
1) Evaluate Cash
Flows
Capital Budgeting Steps
1) Evaluate Cash
Flows
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
. . .
n
Capital Budgeting Steps
1) Evaluate Cash
Flows
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
. . .
n
Annual Cash Flows
Initial
Capital Budgeting Steps
1) Evaluate Cash
Flows
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
. . .
n
Terminal
Cash flow
Annual Cash Flows
Initial
2)
Evaluate the Risk of the
Project
We’ll get to this in the next
chapter.
For now, we’ll assume that the
risk of the project is the same as the risk of the overall firm.
If we do this, we can use the
firm’s cost of capital as the discount rate for capital
investment projects.
3) Accept or Reject the
Project
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(Purchase price of the asset)
+ (shipping and installation costs) (Depreciable asset)
+ (Investment in working capital) + After-tax proceeds from sale of
old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000)
+ (shipping and installation costs) (Depreciable asset)
+ (Investment in working capital) + After-tax proceeds from sale of
old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) + ( 20,000)
(Depreciable asset)
+ (Investment in working capital) + After-tax proceeds from sale of
old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) + ( 20,000) (147,000)
+ (Investment in working capital) + After-tax proceeds from sale of
old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) + (20,000) (147,000) + (4,000)
+ After-tax proceeds from sale of old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) + (20,000) (147,000) + (4,000) + 0
Step 1: Evaluate Cash Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash
flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) Purchase price of asset
+ (20,000) Shipping and installation
(147,000) Depreciable asset
+ (4,000) Net working capital
+ 0 Proceeds from sale of old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
a) Initial Outlay: What is the cash flow at “ttime 0?�
(127,000) Purchase price of asset
+ (20,000) Shipping and installation
(147,000) Depreciable asset + (4,000) Net working capital
+ 0 Proceeds from sale of old asset
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
For Each Year, Calculate:
Incremental revenue
- Incremental costs
- Depreciation on project
Incremental earnings
before taxes
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings after
taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
Incremental revenue
- Incremental costs
- Depreciation on project
Incremental earnings
before taxes
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings after
taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
- Incremental costs
- Depreciation on project
Incremental earnings
before taxes
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings after
taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
- Depreciation on project
Incremental earnings
before taxes
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings
after taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
(29,400)
Incremental earnings
before taxes
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings after
taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
(29,400)
25,850
- Tax on incremental EBT
Incremental earnings
after taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
(29,400)
25,850
(8,789)
Incremental earnings
after taxes
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
(29,400)
25,850
(8,789)
17,061
+ Depreciation
reversal
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
(29,750)
(29,400)
25,850
(8,789)
17,061
29,400
For Years 1 - 5:
85,000
Revenue
(29,750)
Costs
(29,400)
Depreciation
25,850
EBT
(8,789)
Taxes
17,061
EAT
29,400
Depreciation
reversal
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
c) Terminal Cash Flow: What is the cash flow at the end of the
project’s life?
Salvage value
+/- Tax efects of capital gain/loss + Recapture of net working
capital
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
c) Terminal Cash Flow: What is the cash flow at the end of the
project’s life?
50,000 Salvage value
+/- Tax efects of capital gain/loss + Recapture of net working
capital
Tax Effects of Sale of
Asset:
Salvage value = $50,000. Book value = depreciable
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
c) Terminal Cash Flow: What is the cash flow at the end of the
project’s life?
50,000 Salvage value
(17,000) Tax on capital gain Recapture of NWC
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
c) Terminal Cash Flow: What is the cash flow at the end of the
project’s life?
50,000 Salvage value
(17,000) Tax on capital gain
Step 1: Evaluate Cash
Flows
c) Terminal Cash Flow: What is the cash flow at the end of the
project’s life?
50,000 Salvage value
(17,000) Tax on capital gain
Project NPV:
CF(0) =
-151,000.
CF(1 - 4) =
46,461.
CF(5) = 46,461 + 37,000
=
83,461.
Discount rate =
14%.
NPV =
$27,721.
We would
accept
the
Capital
Rationing
Suppose that you have
evaluated five capital
investment projects for
your company.
Suppose that the VP of
Finance has given you a
limited capital budget.
How do you decide which
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
IRR
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
$
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
IRR
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
$
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
IRR
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
$
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
IRR
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
$
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
IRR
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
$
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
Our budget is limited
so we accept only
Capital Rationing
You could rank the projects
by IRR:
Our budget is limited
so we accept only
Capital Rationing
Ranking projects by IRR is
not always the best way to
deal with a limited capital
budget.
It’s better to pick the
largest NPVs.
Let’s try ranking projects by
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing
occurs wshen a
constraint (or budget ceiling) is
placed on the total size of capital
expenditures during a particular
period.
Example: Julie Miller must determine wshat investment opportunities to
undertake for Basket Wonders (BW). She is limited to a maximum
Available Projects for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV
PI
A $ 500 18% $ 50 1.10
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30 C 5,000 37 5,500 2.10 D 7,500 20
5,000 1.67
E 12,500 26 500 1.04
F 15,000 28 21,000 2.40 G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
Choosing by IRRs for BW
Project ICO IRR
NPV PI
C $ 5,000 37% $ 5,500 2.10
F 15,000 28 21,000 2.40
E 12,500 26 500 1.04 B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
Projects C, F, and E have the three
largest IRRs.
Project ICO IRR NPV
PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43 B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
Projects F and G have the twso
largest NPVs
.
The resulting increase in shareholder wsealth is $28,500 wsith a $32,500 outlay.
Choosing by PIs for BW
Project ICO IRR
NPV PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40 B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30 C 5,000
37 5,500 2.10 D
7,500 20 5,000 1.67 G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
Projects F, B, C, and D have the four largest PIs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wsealth is
Method Projects Accepted Value
Added
PI F, B, C, and D
$38,000
NPV
F and G $28,500
IRR
C, F, and E $27,000
PI
generates the
greatest
increase
in
shareholder wealth
wshen a limited capital
budget exists for a
single period
.
Problems with Project
Ranking
1) Mutually exclusive projects of unequal size (the size disparity
problem)
The NPV decision may not agree
with IRR or PI.
Solution: select the project with
Size Disparity Example
Project A year cash flow
0 (135,000) 1 60,000 2 60,000 3 60,000
required return = 12% IRR = 15.89%
Size Disparity Example
Project B year cash flow
0 (30,000) 1 15,000 2 15,000 3 15,000
required return = 12% IRR = 23.38%
NPV = $6,027 PI = 1.20
Project A year cash flow
0 (135,000) 1 60,000 2 60,000 3 60,000
required return = 12% IRR = 15.89%
Size Disparity Example
Project B year cash flow
0 (30,000) 1 15,000 2 15,000 3 15,000
required return = 12%
IRR = 23.38%
NPV = $6,027
PI = 1.20 Project A
year cash flow
0 (135,000) 1 60,000 2 60,000 3 60,000
required return = 12% IRR = 15.89%
NPV = $9,110
Cash Flow Disparity
Cash Flow Disparity
Let us compare a decreasing cash-flows (D) project and an increasing cash-flows (I)
project.
NET CASH FLOWS
Project D Project I END OF YEAR
D 23%
Which project is preferred?
Project IRR NPV PI
Examine NPV Profiles
Fisher’s Rate of Intersection
Fisher’s Rate of Intersection
Discount Rate ($)
At k<10%, I is best! Fisher’s Rate of
Intersection
Mutually Exclusive
Investments with
Unequal
Lives
Suppose our firm is planning to
expand and we have to select one of two machines.
They difer in terms of economic life and capacity.
How do we decide which machine to
The after-tax cash flows
Step 1: Calculate NPV
NPV
1=
$1,433
NPV
2=
$1,664
So, does this mean #2 is
better?
No! The two NPVs can’t
Step 2: Equivalent
Annual Annuity (EAA)
method
If we assume that each project
will be replaced an infinite
number of times in the future, we can convert each NPV to an
annuity.
The projects’ EAAs can be
compared to determine which is the best project!
EAA: Simply annuitize the NPV
EAA with your
calculator:
Simply “tspread the NPV
over the life of the project�
Machine 1
:
PV = 1433, N =
3, I = 14,
solve:
PMT = -617.24
.
Machine 2
:
PV = 1664, N =
6, I = 14,
EAA
1= $617
EAA
2= $428
This tells us that:
NPV
1= annuity of
$617
per
year.
NPV
2= annuity of
$428
per
year.
So, we’ve reduced a problem
with diferent time horizons
to a couple of annuities.
Decision Rule:
Select the
Step 3: Convert back to
Step 3: Convert back to
NPV
Assuming infinite replacement,
the EAAs are actually
perpetuities. Get the PV by dividing the EAA by the
required rate of return.
Step 3: Convert back to
NPV
Assuming infinite replacement,
the EAAs are actually
perpetuities. Get the PV by dividing the EAA by the
required rate of return.
NPV
1 = 617/.14 = $4,407
¥
Step 3: Convert back to
NPV
Assuming infinite replacement,
the EAAs are actually
perpetuities. Get the PV by dividing the EAA by the
required rate of return.
NPV
1 = 617/.14 = $4,407
NPV 2 = 428/.14 = $3,057
¥
¥
Step 3: Convert back to
NPV
Assuming infinite replacement,
the EAAs are actually
perpetuities. Get the PV by dividing the EAA by the
required rate of return.
NPV
1 = 617/.14 = $4,407
NPV 2 = 428/.14 = $3,057
This doesn’t change the answer,
of course; it just converts EAA to an NPV that can be
compared.
¥
¥
Practice Problems:
Cash Flows & Other
Topics
Problem 1a
Project Information:
Cost of equipment = $400,000.
Shipping & installation will be $20,000. $25,000 in net working capital required
at setup.
3-year project life, 5-year class life. Simplified straight line depreciation. Revenues will increase by $220,000
per year.
Defects costs will fall by $10,000 per
year.
Operating costs will rise by $30,000
per year.
Salvage value after year 3 is $200,000. Cost of capital = 12%, marginal tax
Problem 1a
Initial Outlay:
(400,000) Cost of asset
+ ( 20,000)Shipping &
installation
(420,000) Depreciable
asset
+ ( 25,000)Investment in
NWC
For Years 1
- 3:
220,000 Increased revenue 10,000 Decreased defects(30,000) Increased operating costs
(84,000) Increased depreciation
116,000 EBT
(39,440) Taxes (34%) 76,560 EAT
84,000 Depreciation reversal
160,560 = Annual Cash Flow
Terminal Cash Flow:
Salvage value
+/- Tax efects of capital
gain/loss
+ Recapture of net
working capital
Terminal Cash Flow
Terminal Cash Flow:
Salvage value =
$200,000
.
Book value = depreciable
asset - total amount
depreciated.
Book value = $168,000.
Capital gain = SV - BV =
$32,000
.
Tax payment = 32,000 x .34 =
($10,880)
.Terminal Cash Flow:
200,000 Salvage value
(10,880) Tax on capital
gain
25,000 Recapture of
NWC
214,120 Terminal Cash
Flow
Problem 1a Solution
NPV and IRR:
CF(0) = -445,000
CF(1 ), (2), = 160,560
CF(3 ) = 160,560 + 214,120
= 374,680
Discount rate = 12%
IRR = 22.1%
NPV = $93,044. Accept the
Problem 1b
Project Information:
For the same project,
suppose we can only get
$100,000 for the old
equipment after year 3,
due to rapidly changing
technology.
Calculate the IRR and NPV
for the project.
Terminal Cash Flow:
Salvage value
+/- Tax efects of capital
gain/loss
+ Recapture of net working
capital
Terminal Cash Flow
Terminal Cash Flow:
Salvage value =
$100,000
.
Book value = depreciable
asset - total amount
depreciated.
Book value = $168,000.
Capital loss = SV - BV =
($68,000)
.
Tax refund = 68,000 x .34 =
$23,120
.Terminal Cash Flow:
100,000 Salvage value
23,120 Tax on capital
gain
25,000 Recapture of
NWC
148,120 Terminal Cash
Flow
Problem 1b
Solution
NPV and IRR:
CF(0) = -445,000.
CF(1), (2) = 160,560.
CF(3) = 160,560 + 148,120
= 308,680.
Discount rate = 12%.
IRR = 17.3%
.
NPV = $46,067. Accept the
Problem 2
Automation Project:
Cost of equipment = $550,000.
Shipping & installation will be $25,000. $15,000 in net working capital required
at setup.
8-year project life, 5-year class life. Simplified straight line depreciation. Current operating expenses are
$640,000 per yr.
New operating expenses will be
$400,000 per yr.
Already paid consultant $25,000 for
analysis.
Salvage value after year 8 is $40,000. Cost of capital = 14%, marginal tax
Problem
2
Initial Outlay:
(550,000) Cost of new
machine
+ (25,000) Shipping &
installation
(575,000) Depreciable
asset
+ (15,000) NWC
investment
For Years 1 -
5:
240,000 Cost decrease
(115,000) Depreciation
increase
125,000 EBIT
(42,500) Taxes (34%)
82,500 EAT
115,000 Depreciation
reversal
197,500 = Annual
Cash Flow
For Years 6 -
8:
240,000 Cost decrease
( 0) Depreciation
increase
240,000 EBIT
(81,600) Taxes (34%)
158,400 EAT
0 Depreciation
reversal
158,400 = Annual
Cash Flow
Terminal Cash Flow:
40,000 Salvage
value
(13,600) Tax on
capital gain
15,000 Recapture
of NWC
41,400 Terminal
Cash Flow
Problem 2 Solution
NPV and IRR:
CF(0) = -590,000.
CF(1 - 5) = 197,500.
CF(6 - 7) = 158,400.
CF(10) = 158,400 + 41,400
= 199,800.
Discount rate = 14%.
IRR = 28.13% NPV =
$293,543
.
We would
accept
the
Problem 3
Replacement Project:
Old Asset (5 years old):
Cost of equipment =
$1,125,000.
10-year project life, 10-year
class life.
Simplified straight line
depreciation.
Current salvage value is
$400,000.
Cost of capital = 14%,
Problem 3
Replacement Project:
New Asset:
Cost of equipment = $1,750,000.
Shipping & installation will be $56,000. $68,000 investment in net working
capital.
5-year project life, 5-year class life. Simplified straight line depreciation. Will increase sales by $285,000 per
year.
Operating expenses will fall by
$100,000 per year.
Already paid $15,000 for training
program.
Salvage value after year 5 is $500,000. Cost of capital = 14%, marginal tax
Problem 3: Sell the Old
Asset
Salvage value =
$400,000
.
Book value = depreciable
Problem 3
(1,806,000) Depreciable
asset
+ ( 68,000) NWC investment
+ 456,875 After-tax
proceeds (sold
old
machine)
For Years 1 -
5:
385,000 Increased sales &
cost savings
(248,700) Extra depreciation
136,300 EBT
(47,705) Taxes (35%)
88,595 EAT
248,700 Depreciation reversal
337,295 = Diferential Cash
Flow
Terminal Cash Flow:
500,000 Salvage
value
(175,000) Tax on
capital gain
68,000 Recapture
of NWC
393,000 Terminal
Cash Flow
Problem 3 Solution
NPV and IRR:
CF(0) = -1,417,125. CF(1 - 4) = 337,295.
CF(5) = 337,295 + 393,000 =
730,295.
Discount rate = 14%. NPV = (55,052.07).
IRR = 12.55%.