Chapter 6
DIFFERENTIABLE MAPPINGS
In this chapter we will generalize the notion of derivability known from high school for several variable functions. The notion of differentiability which we will study here will allow us to approximate the value of a function in a certain point with the value of a polynomial of first degree in that point, improving the known results from the continuous functions.
We remind that if f : A IRp → IR is continuous in aA, then there exists a neighbourhood UVa for which f
x f(a) forA U
x (approximation with a constant). Here we will show that, in some conditions, there is a first-degree polynomial of p variables T1 for which f
x T1
x , xUA.1. PARTIAL DERIVATIVES
Definition 1. Let AIRp. A point aA is named interior point
of the set A if there exists a sphere with the centre in a included in A, i.e.
0 r
such that S
a,r A.The set of the interior points of the set A is named the interior of the set Aand is denoted Å or Int A.
Remark 1. The set A IRp is open if and only if A=Å. Indeed, if z is open, then for any aA there exists r0 so that S
a,r A, hence a is an interior point and consequently AÅ; from definition 1 results that ÅA, hence A=Å. Conversely, if Å=A, then for any aA there exists r0 so that S
a,r A, hence A is an open set.Remark 2. The interior of the set A is the largest open set included in A; therefore if G is an open set included in A then GÅ.
Then Å={(x,y,z) IR3 x,y,z > 0, x2+y2+z2 < 1}.
Proposition 1. If A IRp then Å A'.
Proof. Let aÅ. According to definition 1 results that there
exists r>0 so that S
a,r A; then S
a,r A\
a Ø, hencea is an accumulation point of the set A.Corollary. If aÅ then there exists
xn A\
a so that axn n
lim . This affirmation results from proposition 1 and proposition 5 from chapter 5.
Definition 2. Let f : A IRpIRq be a function and
p
p e,...,e
B 1 respectively Bq
e1 ,...,eq
the canonical bases of thelinear spaces IRp, respectively IRq. We say that the function f is partially derivable according to xi (where i
1,2,...,p
) in the pointaÅif exists:
f(a)] )
te [f(a
t i
IR t t
1 lim
0 IR
q. (*)
This limit is named the partial derivative of the function f
according to (with respect to, or shortly, w.r.t) xiin the point a and is denoted
a xf
i
or fxi
a .If f has a partial derivative according to every variable we say that f
is partially derivable in a. If A=Å and f is partially derivable according to xiin any point aA we say that f is partially derivable according to xi (on A); in this case the function:
(a) f , a :A
f x
f
i
i x
x i
q
IR
is named partial derivative of the function f according to xi. If f is continuous on A, partially derivable according to xi in any point aA we say that f is of class C1 on A and we write f C1(A)
.
Remark 2. In case
f
a t
f
a
ta x f , p
t
1 lim 1
0 , or,
denoting x=a+t,
a x
a f x f a
x f
a
x
lim ;
then in the case of the functions with a single variable the partial derivative coincides with the derivative and we will keep the notations from high-school:
adx df a
f . In case p=2, if
a,b Å IR2:
t f( a,b t , ) f a,b
a,b f
t
x 10
1 lim
0
t a x t t f at,b f a,b
1 lim
0
a x
a,b f x,b f
a
x
lim
and, analogously
b y
a,b f a,y f a,b
f
b y y
lim .
Remark 3. If f
f1,...,fq
, and aÅ, then according to proposition 1, a
a1,...,ap
A' , and from theorem 7 (chapter 5) it results that f is partially derivable if and only if the q scalar components have partial derivatives in a; also:
a x f ,..., a x f a x
f
i q
i i
1 .
If we denote xi atei then t0 if and only if xi ai and:
i i
p j
p i i i j
a x i
j
a x
,...,a a f ,...,a ,a ,x ,...,a a f a
x f
i
i
1 1
1 1
lim .
Example 2. The function: derivable, because:
we say f is partially derivable two times according to xi and xj, hence exists:
x a te f a
f
t i j
t
1 lim
0 IR
q. We denote this limit (if exists) with
afxixj or
ax x
f
j i
2
and we call it the partial derivative of second order (derivative II) of
the function f according xi and xj in a. If ij then
a x xf
j i
2
and
a x xf
i j
2
are called mixed derivatives according to xi and xj in a. If i=j we call the derivative II according to xi and xj the partial
derivative of second order (or derivative II) according to xi in a and we denote
a xf
i
2 2
, or f
ai
x2 .
Analogously we define the derivatives of higher order. If A=Å, f is continuous and admits partial derivatives of any order hn, continuous on A we say f is of class Cn on A and we write
A C f n.
If f Cn
Afor any nIN we say f is of classConA and we write f C
A .The partial derivative of order n according to xi (if exists) is denoted
n i n
x f
, or n
xin
f ,
and the partial derivative of order m according to xj (if exists) for the function n
xin
f we denote:
m j n i
m n
x x
f
or n m
x x jm
n i
Remark. For the single variable function derivable n times it understand function u (respectively v). As the partial derivatives are, actually, the derivatives of the partial functions, therefore derivatives of the single variable functions, results that the Leibniz formula is valid for products of scalar functions of several variables as well.
Example 4. Let us compute 7 6
Example 5. Let us calculate the mixed derivatives of second
and
,
2 00 fy x y , hence
0
C
fy ( IR2). But for mixed derivatives
f
x ym m m mx
x f y
x
f yx
mx y x xy
x xy
mx y
x lim ,
1 3 6 1 ,
lim ,
lim
0 3
2 4 2
0
0
,
hence doesn’t exist limit in origin, namely (0,0) is a point of discontinuity of the mixed derivatives; consequently 2( 2)
IR
C
f .
As following, we will show that the functions of class C2 have the mixed derivatives equal. For simplifying the notations we will show this property for p2 and q1 in general hypothesis.
Theorem 1. (Schwarz) Let f : A IR2 IR and
a,b Å. If there exists an open neighbourhood VV(a,b), there exists the partial derivatives fx
x,y ,fy
x,y , fxy
x,y for any
x,y V, and fxy iscontinuous in
a,b , then there exists fyx
a,b'' and
a b f
a b fxy , yx , .Proof. Let h, k IR* so that
a h,b k
V and
h k f
a h b k
f a h b
f a b k
f a bF , , , , , (1)
If we denote g
x,y f
x,yk
f x,y , then:
h k g
a h b
g a b F , , , .With respect to the definition of function g it results that:
h k hkf
a h b k
F , xy , (2)
But fxy is continuous in (a,b), hence the function
h,k fxy
ah,bk
fxy
a,b (3)
, 0 lim0
,k h k
h . (4)
Let
h
h kk ,
lim 0
. (5)
Certainly, from (4) and (5) results that:
0 lim0
h
h . (6)
Multiplying the equality (1) with k
1
, replacing F
h,k from (2) and
a h b k
fxy , form (3) we obtain:
f a h b k f a h b
k k h h b a f
h xy , ,
1 ,
,
f a b k f a b
k , ,
1
(7)
Because on V there exists the partial derivative fy , passing to the
limit when k 0 in (7) and considering (5) we have:
a b h
h f
a h b
f
a b fh xy , y , y , ,
or:
f a h b f a h
f
a b h h y , y , xy , 1
. (8) Passing at the limit in (8) for h0, from (6) it results that fyx
a,b exists, and fyx
a,b fxy
a,b .Corollary. Let A IRp be an open set. If f C2
A2. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVES
We have noticed that the partial derivative of a function w.r.t. the variable xi assumes the existence of the limit (*) (definition 2). In this context the vector
i
te
a tends to a IRp when t0. For example, in IR2, for the derivative in
a,b w.r.t the variable x,
at,b
tends (when t0) to
a,b along a parallel line with Ox. Let there be (u,v)
0,0 . Then the point of coordinates
atu,btv
tends to the point of coordinates
a,b (when t0) along the line parallel with the vector ui vj. Wewill generalize the notion of partial derivative replacing the vector ei from (*) with an arbitrary vector, introducing the concept of
(directional) derivative along a vector, concept that plays an important role in the study of electromagnetic phenomena.
Definition 4. Let there be f : A IRp IRq a vectorial function,
A
a and v IRp\{0} a vector. If there exists
qt
t t f a tv f a R
R
I I
1 lim
0 (**)
we say that f is derivable at a along the vector v. The limit (**), if exists, is denoted
av f
and is called the directional derivative of function f along the vector (with respect to (w.r.t.)) v at the point a. The directional derivative at a of the function f along the versor of the vector v (i.e. with respect to v
v
1
) is also called the (directional) derivative of f in the directionv.
0
(a,b)
0 x
(u,v)
(a,b) y
A
Remark 1. If veiBp then
a xf a e
f
i
i
.
Remark 2. For p=q=1, denoting atvx or
x a
v
t 1 , we remark that (**) becomes:
vf
a ax a f x f a
v f
a
x
lim ,
so, in this particular case, the derivability along a vector implies the derivability.
Conversely, if f is derivable in a, and v IR*, taking vtxa we have:
av f v v a f tv a f t a
x a f x f a
f
I t t a
x
1 1 1
lim lim
0
R
, so, derivability implies derivability along any non-zero vector.
Example 6. The derivative along any non-zero vector v of a
linear application is exactly the respective application calculated in v. Truly if fL(IRp, IRq), a IRp and v IRp \{0} then
a tv
f
a tf
vf , for any t IR. From (**) results
a f
v vf
, for any a IRp.
Definition 5. Let there be x = (x1,…, xp), y = (y1,…, yp) IRp. The real number
p
k
p p k
ky x y x y
x y
x
1
1 1 ... ,
is named the scalar product of the vectors x and y.
Remark. The scalar product has the following properties:
(P1) x,x x 2,x IRp and x,x0x0
(P2)
<
x,y
>=<
y,x>
,
x,y
IRp(P3) x,y x,y,IR,x,y IRp
(P4) x y,z x,z y,z,x,y,z IRp
Theorem 2 (Riesz). Let fL(IRp, IR). Then there exists a unique a IRp such that:
(a) f
x x,a, for any x IRp(b) A a , where A is the matrix of the linear application f.
Proof. Let x
x1,...,xp
IRp
. Then:
p
i
i i p
i i
ie x f e x a
x f x f
1 1
, , where a
f
e1 ,..., f
ep
IRp
. If exists b
b1,...,bp
IRp
such that: f
x x,b, for any x IRp, then ei,bei,a, for anyp
i1, , so bi ai,i 1,p hence ba and the point (a) is proved. Of course A=a, so (b) is, also, proved.
We will give a set of sufficient conditions for derivability w.r.t. a vector and the formula of the derivative w.r.t. a vector.
Theorem 3(Sufficient conditions for derivability).
Let f : A IRp IRq and aÅ. If exists a neighbourhood V
V
a such that f has partial derivatives on V, continuous in a, then fis derivable w.r.t. any vector v IRp\{0} and:
p
i
i i
v a x
f a
v f
1
, where v = (v1,…, vp).
Proof. Let t IR* such that atvV. Then:
atv
f
a f
a tv a tv ap tvp
f a a tv ap tvp
f 1 1, 2 2,..., 1, 2 2,...,
f a1,a2 tv2,a3 tv3,...,ap tvp f a1,a2,a3 tv3,...,ap tvp ...
a a ap ap tvp
f a a ap ap
f 1, 2,..., 1, 1, 2,..., 1, (1)
Knowing that f has partial derivatives on V, applying the theorem of Lagrange on the intervals
ak,ak tvk
, k 1,p, for the p differences from (1) it results the existence of the elements
t a a tv
k p
From the hypothesis of the theorem we know that the partial derivatives are continuous in a; multiplying both members from (2) with
so f is derivable w.r.t. the vector v, and the formula of the directional derivative is proved.
Definition 6. Let f : A IRp IR be a scalar function, partial
is called the gradient of function f, or, the nabla operator applied to f.
Example 7. Let f : IR2→ IR2,
x z x z
ye xe y x
f , , . Let us calculate the derivative of f in (0,0) w.r.t. a versor v=(v1,v2) which forms an angle of 30 with the axis Ox.
Then
2 3 30 cos 1
v and
2 1 30 sin 2
v .
Therefore
2 1 , 2
3
v . Moreover:
x y x y
x x y x e ye
f , 1 , , fy
x,y
xexy,
1 y
exy
and, according to theorem 3:
v
vy f v x f v
f
1 , 0 2 1 0 , 1 2
3 0
, 0 0
, 0 0
,
0 1 2 .
Remark. The derivability of a function in a point w.r.t. any non-zero vector implies the continuity of it along any line which passes through the respective point. Nevertheless it does not imply the continuity for p1.
Example 8. Let f : IR2→ IR,
0 ,
2
y x y x f
0 ,
0 ,
y y
.
The function f is not continue in (0,0) because
m mx x fx
1 ,
lim 2
0
for
m IR*, so it does not even have limit (w.r.t. the set of variables) in the origin. However it is derivable w.r.t. any vector (u,v)IR2\{(0,0)}, because forv0:
v u tv tu f t f
v u t f
t t
t
2
0
0 ,
1 lim 0
, 0 ,
0 , 0 1
lim
,
and for v0:
,0 0,0
01 lim
0
t f tu f
Proposition 2. Let f, g : A IRp IRq and h:A IR
derivable in aÅ w.r.t. v IRp \{0}. Then the functions f g and hf are derivable in a w.r.t. v and
a v g a
v f a
v g f
,
a h a vf a f a v h a v hf
.
Proof. Passing to limit when t0 in the equalities:
g
a tv
g a
t a f tv a f t a g f tv a g f
t
1 1
1
and
f
a tv
f
a
h
a ttv a f a h tv a h t a hf tv a hf
t
1 1
1
as f
a tv
f
at0
lim , according to the previous Remark, we obtain the conclusions from the text.
Remark. The set of functions f : A IRp IRq derivable in aÅ w.r.t. v with the function addition operation and with the multiplication with scalars from the field IR is, according to proposition 2, a linear space over IR.
Definition 7. Let f : A IRp IRq,
A
a and two vectors u,v IRp\{0}. If there exist a sphere S
a,r A, the directional derivative (x)v f
for all xS(a,r), and the function v f
is derivable w.r.t. the vector u at the point a, we denote this derivative:
a u vf
2
, or
a vf
2 2
if uv
and we name it derivative of order two of the function f in (at) the point a w.r.t. the vectors v, u, and we say that f is two times derivable in the point a w.r.t. v and u.
Of course, if v ei and uej, then
a x xf a
e e
f
j i j
i
2 2
In the same way are defined the higher order derivatives along to the non-zero vectors from IRp.
Remark 1. If v u 1 then vi cosi,ui cosi,i1,p are the director cosines of the versors v and u i.e.:
p pe
e
vcos1 1...cos and ucos1e1 ...cospep,
and, from theorem 3:
and, according to Schwarz theorem:
According to the previous formula:3. DIFFERENTIABILITY
We will now extend the notion of differentiability studied on functions with a single variable. We remind that the function
A
f : IR→ IR
is differentiable in aÅ if it exists a linear application daf the differential of the function f in a so that:
x f
a d f
xa
xa
(x),
a 0f a
where :A IR is a continuous function in a. Moreover, f is differentiable in a if and only if f is derivable in a, and
h f
a h fda ' , or using the notations from definition 6,
h f
a ,h.f
da
Definition 8. Let f : A IRp IRq and aÅ. A linear application da f : IRp→ IRq is called the differential of the function f
in (at) the point a (in Fréchet's sense) if:
0
1
lim f x f a d f x a a
x a
a
x IR
q
, or, equivalent (denoting xah)
01 lim
0
h f a h f a daf h
h .
In this case we say that f is differentiable in (at) a. If f is differentiable in any, aA the function f is called differentiable function (on A).
Remark. As in the case of pq1, we can rewrite this definition: the application daf L( IR
p
, IRq) is the differential of the function f in a if it exists a function :A IRqcontinuous in a with
a 0 and
x f
a d f
x a
x a
xf a
or equivalent, it exists a neighbourhood V
V
0 and a function V
: 0
IRq, continuous in 0 IRq so that:
a h
f
a d f
h h 0
h ,(h V)The use of the expression “the differential of the function f in a” imposes proving the next Proposition.
Proposition 3. If the function f :AIRp→ IRq is
differentiable in aÅ then its differential in this point is unique.
Proof. Let us suppose that da f and d'a f L( IR
p
, IRq) are differentials of the function f in a. Then:
h d a f h daf h
h '
1 lim
0
'
01 lim
0
h f a h f a daf h f a h f a d a f h h
(1) Choosing in (1) htek,t0, where
e1,e2,...,ep
is the canonical basisin IRp we have:
a k a k
a
k a
ko
t t d f te d f te d f e d f e
' '
1 lim
0 ,
meaning
, 1, . ' f e d f e k p d a k a k So the two linear applications are identical: d'a f da f.
Example 10. Let f : IRp IRq be a linear application and a IRp. Then
01 lim
0
h f a h f a f h
h ,
so f is differentiable and daf f , for any a IR
p
. It follows that any linear application is differentiable and its differential is the linear application itself.
In particular, if g : A IRp IRq is differentiable in aÅ and because dagL( IR
p
, IRq) it follows that: db
dag dag,b IRp
. We now try to find a formula for da f . We saw that if pq1,
questions we will start by presenting some necessary conditions of differentiability of a function in a point and also the formula for the differential in a point.
Theorem 4. If f : A IRp IRq is differentiable in aÅ then: (a) f is continuous in a,
(b) f is derivable along any vIRp\{0} and
a d f
v.v f
a
(c)
p
k
k k
a a h
x f h
f d
1
, for any h
h1,....,hp
IRp.
Proof. Let da f L( IR
p
, IRq) be the differential of the function f in the point a.
(a) Because da f is the differential of f in a it follows that it exists :A IRq, continuous in a, with
a 0 andf
x f
a daf
xa
xa
x,xA.But daf is a uniform continuous function (see exercise 24 chap.5), and daf
0 0 so, computing the limit when xa in this equality we obtain f
x f
aa
x
lim ; it follows that f is continuous in a.
(b) Let v IRp\{0}. From theorem’s hypothesis it follows that:
01 lim
0
h f a h f a daf h
h . (1)
Choosing htv, with t IR*, because h0 IRp it follows that
0
t , and from (1) we obtain:
0,1 lim
0
t v f a tv f a da f tv
t
or, equivalent:
t t f a tv f a d f v
t v
f td a f tv a f
t a t a
t
1 lim 1
lim 0
0
0 ,
from where:
01 lim
0
t f a tv f a da f v
t . (2)
function
h k f
h f
k k
h k L , 'x 0,0 'y 0,0 , , IR
2
.
must be the differential of the function f in (0,0). Let us study the differentiability of f in a with the definition 8:
but not sufficient, as shown in the examples that follow:
, 0
0,0. lim0
,y f x y f
x
Also f is partial derivable in (0,0) and:
0,0 lim
,0 0,0 0
0,0.0 y
x
x f
x f x f
f
If f would be differentiable in the origin, using the theorem 4, then the linear function:
,
0,0
0,0 0
y
y f x x f y x L
must be the differential of the function f in (0,0). But f is not differentiable in (0,0) because the function
2 22
2 ,
1 ,
0 , 0 ,
, 1 ,
y x
xy y
x f y x y
x L f
y x f y x y x
,
x,y 0,0, does not have a limit in (0,0).Prove using another method that f is not differentiable in the origin!
Example 13. The function
0 y , 0
0 y y x y x, f
2
,
is derivable along any vector (not null), but it is not differentiable in (0,0).
Truly, if w =(u,v) IR2\{(0,0)}
0,0 lim1
,
0,0
, 20 v
u f
tv tu f t w
f
t
for v0 and for v0:
,0 0,0
0. 1lim ) 0 , 0 (
0
t f tu f
w f
t
On the other hand,
2
2 0 ,lim f mx x m
x
so f is not continuous in (0,0); by following the point (a) from theorem 4, the function f is not differentiable in (0,0).
Remark. If A= Å and f is differentiable on A then f C0
A . We now give sufficient conditions of differentiability.Theorem 5. Let f : A IRp IRqand aÅ. If it exists V
V
a sothat f admits partial derivatives on V continuous in a, then f is differentiable in a.
Proof. We will show, using theorem 4 (c), that demonstration of theorem 3 replacing tv with h. More precise, from the existence of partial derivatives on the interval
a,ah
V , applying Lagrange's theorem, it follows the existence of the elements:
,..., , , ,...,
,...,
01
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
p
k
p k
p p k k k k k k k
a a x
f h a h a h c h a h a x
f
when h0, because
k
x f
is continuous in a, k 1,p. It follows that
0 lim0
h
h , f is differentiable in a and
pk
k x
af h f a h
d k
1
' , for any
h hp
h 1,..., IR p
.
Corollary. If f C1
Athen f is differentiable on A.
Example 14. Let us compute d 0,0 f
1,1 for the functionf : IR2 IR2, f
x,y
x2 y,exy
. Because
x y
y y x
x x y x e f x y e
f , 2 , , , 1, ,
0,0 0,1
x
f , fy
0,0 1,1 , and1
C
f ( IR2), it follows that f is differentiable on IR2 so also in (0,0) and:
0,0
,
0,0
0,0v 0,u v,v v,u v
,y f u x f v u f
d
and d 0,0 f
1,1 1,2 .Remark. The sufficient conditions of differentiability given at theorem 5 are not also necessary, as shown by the following example.
Example 15. The function
0
1 sin ) (
, 2 2
2 2
y x y
x y x
f
0 ,
0 ,
2 2
2 2
y x
y x
is differentiable in
0,0. Truly, because:
0,0 lim
,0 0,0 lim sin1 0
0,0, 00 x y
x
x f
x x x
f x f
f
, 1
, 2 2 sin 2 1 2 0, 22
y x y x y x f y x y x
when x,y0, so f is differentiable in (0,0). On the other hand 0
C
f ( IR2), admits partial derivatives on IR2 but they are not continuous in (0,0). Indeed
, 2 sin 2 1 2 22 2 cos 2 1 2 ,y x y x
x y
x x y x fx
for
x,y 0,0and for the sequence
2 n
1 , n 2
1
which tends to (0,0) (when
n ),
n n
n
fx 2
2 1 , 2
1
, so, according to Heine's theorem, fx is not continuous in (0,0).
Remark 1. We are now able to synthesize some connexions
between the notions that we discussed. For an interior point of the domain A of the function f the following implications take place:
and none of these implications are, in general, equivalences.
Remark 2. In computing differentials we use for the
projections prk : IR p
→ IR the notation dxk,k 1,p. We remind that
k p
p
k h h h h h h
dx ( 1,..., ) , 1,..., IR p
.
In the case pq1 pr1 dx and:
a dx L dxdf f
da ( IR, IR).
In the case p 2 and q1, pr1 dx and pr2 dy and, according to
theorem 4(c): Differentiability
Continuity Relative continuity with respect to the
sets {a+tv|tIR}
Partial continuity Derivability along any
not null vector v
a b dy Ly f dx b a x f f
dab
, ,
, ( IR
2
, IR),
formula, which represents the differential as a linear application. If
x,y IR2thend(a,b)f(x,y) = (a,b) y y
f (a,b) x x
f
IR,
formula which represents the differential of the function f in (a,b)
computed in (x,y). If f is differentiable in A = Å IR2 we will use the total differential of f:
df = dy
y f dx x f
and the differential operator:
d = dy
y dx
x
,
operator that associates to a differentiable function its total differential df. The previous notations and formulas can be extended for any p, q IN*:
- the differential of f in the point a:
da f = (a) dx L x
f
k p
k k
1
( IRp, IRq)
- the differential of f in the point a calculated in x=(x1, …,xp): daf (x) =
k
p
k
x a x
f k
1
' IRq
- the total differential of f on an open set:
d f = k
p
k k
dx x
f
1
- differential operator:
d = k
p
k k
dx x
1
.
Let us now consider that f =
f1,..., fq
: A IRp
daf (x) = i
which is called the Jacobi matrix (or Jacobian matrix) of function f in the point a. Then:
The differential formula shows us that some of the properties of the operators operator.
=g
a daf f
a dag,for any aA, hence d
fg = fdggdf .(b) da (f+g)=
x
k pk
x a g a dx
f k k )
( 1
=
p
kk
x a dx
f k
1
+
kp
k
x a dx
g k
1
=daf dag, for any aA, therefore d
f g
=df dg.(c)
g f
da =
x
k pk
x a g a f a g a dx
f a
g k k
1 2
1
=
=
a g21
g(a)
kp
k
x a dx
f k
1
-f(a)
kp
k
x a dx
g k
1
==
a
g
a d f f
a d g
g2 a a
1
,
for any aA, therefore
g f
d =
gdf fdg
g2 1
.
Geometrical Interpretations
1. We observed that the function f : A IR→ IR is differentiable in aÅ if and only if f is derivable in a, therefore the curve of equation y= f
x , xA (which is the graph of the function f) admits a tangent in the point M
a, f
a
of equationy-f(a) = f'
a xa
, or, equivalenty= f
a da f
xa
.2. If f : A= Å IR2 IR, fC1
A and
A ba, then the equation:
C : f(x,y) – f(a,b) = 0
is represented geometrically as a curve which goes through the point P(a,b). Let us suppose that this equation can be explicitly given with respect to x, this means there is a function g : B IR IR
such that
Then:
x,y -g
xfx , and fy
x,y 1;the equation
f
xa yb
0da,b ,
is equivalent with
,
,
-g
0 a b x a f a b y b a x a y b
fx y ,
or
a x a
b
y g
Therefore the equation
0 ) , ( ) ,
( f xa yb
d ab
is the equation tangent to the curve C in the point P with the slope m=g
a = -
b a f
b a f
y x
, ,
, and grad f
a,b = -g
a i j is a perpendicular vector tothis line.3. If f : A IR3 IR, fC1
A and
A c ba, , then the equation:
S: f
x,y,z
f
a,b,c
is represented graphically by a plane which goes through P(a,b,c) and the equation:
,
0) ,
( f xa yb
d ab
x O
y=g(x)
P ) b , a ( f
, , f
xa,yb,zc
0dabc
or equivalent:
: fx
a,b,c
xa
fy
a,b,c
yb
fz
a,b,c
zc
=0 is represented graphically by a plane which goes through P, is tangent to S and its norm is the vector:grad f(a,b,c) =fx
a,b,c
i fy
a,b,c
j fz
a,b,c
k .4. Let us now consider f : A IR2 IR, fC1
A . Then the graphic of the function f is a surface of equationS : z = f(x,y), (x,y) A,
surface that admits a tangent plane in P0
a,b, f
a,b
a,b A
of equation:: z-f(a,b) =
a x b a x f
,
a b y b
yf
, =d a,b f
xa,yb
Let there P
x,y, f
x,y
S and PP’ the line which goes through P, parallel to Oz. Then Q(x, y, f(a,b) +d a,b f(xa,yb))PP’, and the distance from P to Q is:
d(P,Q)= |(f
x,y - f
a,b -d a,b f
xa,yb
|. Therefore the approximate relation:f
x,y f
a,b +d a,b f
xa,yb
0x
z
S s
)
P
(
f
y
is equivalent to d(P,Q)0; therefore, if P is ''close enough to'' P0,
then the point PS is ''close'' to the point Q and the value of f(x,y) is approximately equal with the value in (x-a, y-b) of the 1st grade polynomial f(a,b) + d(a,b)f.
Example 16. Let f : IR2 IR, f(x,y) =
4 2
2 2
y x
. The equation f(x,y) = f(1, 2 ), or the equivalent:
4 2
2 2
y x
= 1 is represented graphically by an ellipse with the semi axes 2 and 2, and the equation:
) 2 , 1 (
d f(x-1, y- 2) = 0,
is equivalent to 2 (x –1) + 2 (y - 2 )= 0, or to the equation x y = 2 1
and is represented graphically by a line with the slope m = -1 tangent to the ellipse in P(1, 2 ); the vector
O
x
Q P0
P S
z
P’(x,y,0)
grad f(1, 2 ) = 2 ((i j) is perpendicular to this line.
Example 17. The equation f(x, y, z) = f ( , 3
3 2 , 3 1
), where f (x, y, z) = x2 +
9 4
2 2
z y
is represented graphically by an ellipsoid of the equation x2 +
9 4
2 2
z y
=1 (of semi axes 1, 2 and 3), and the equation:
0 3 , 3 2 , 3 1 3
, 3 2 , 3
1
x y z
d f , or
3
03 3
2 3 2 3
1 3 1 3
2
x y z ,
x
1
,
2
f
represents a plane tangent to the ellipsoid in P
3 , 3 2 , 3 1
;
grad f( k
3 3
2 j 3 1 i 3 2 3 , 3 2 , 3
1
is a vector perpendicular to this plane.
Example 18. If
,
, f ñ,ó x,y f : 0, 0,2 IR IR- 00 ,
x
where cos and y=sin, are the functions which make the transition to the polar coordinates, then:
cos sin
sin cos
,
f
J , and
,
,
D y x D
.
Of course f is invertible and f 1
x,y ,
, where2
y
x
and
x y
óArctan . Then:
2 2 2
2
2 2 2
2
1
y x
x y x
y
y x
y y x
x
x,y
Jf ,
and
ñy x
y x x,y
D
ñ,ó
D 1
3 2 2
2 2
.
4. THE DIFFERENTIALS AND DERIVATIVES OF
COMPOSITE FUNCTIONS
Theorem 6. If the function f : A IRp →B IRq is differentiable in aÅ, and g : B IRr is differentiable in b=f(a)
B, then gf : A IRr is differentiable in a and:
g f
da = df(a)gdaf .
Proof. Because f is differentiable in aÅ there exists : A→
IRq such that:
0 lim a x
x and f
x f
a daf
xa
xa á
x (1)Because g is differentiable in b=f (a)
B there exists : B→ IRr such that:
0lim
b x
x and g
y g
b dbg
yb
yb
y (2)By putting y=f(x) in (2), from (1) it follows that: gf (x)= gf(a)+ d g
b
daf
xa
xa
x
++ daf
xa
xa
x
y = gf (a)+ +dbgdaf
xa
xa
x , where for x a :
x =
a x
1
y x a x a x f d x g d a
x b a . (3)
We must also prove that a x lim
x =0. Using the triangle inequality in(3) we obtain:
x dbg((
x ) + a x1
) y (
daf
xa
xa (x)
. (4)But daf L (IRp,IRq) and dbg L ( IRq,IRr); using the inequality form exercise 14, chapter 5, it follows that: