• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Sektor Finance Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderating

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Sektor Finance Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderating"

Copied!
17
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1 Data Perusahaan Sektor Finance

Kode Perusahaan Sektor Finance RO

A SIZE DER

Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk

2012 7.45

Asuransi Harta Aman Pratama Tbk

2010 7.62 126550 1.16 2 2 2 3 1 833.83

Asuransi Harta Aman Pratama Tbk

2011 10.5 144972 1.06 2 2 2 3 1 890.36

Asuransi Harta Aman Pratama Tbk

(2)

BBLD Buana Finance Tbk 2009 4.31 1370730 0.57 1 1 2 3 0 19.12

BPFI Batavia Prosperindo Finance Tbk

Tbk 2009 9.7 230152 0.83 2 2 2 6 1 1117.62

CFIN Clipan Finance Indonesia Tbk 2009 11.4

1 1771267 0.35 1 2 1 4 1 196.14

Equity Development Investment

Tbk 2012 1.34 1632359 2.38 2 2 1 5 1 1760.47

(3)

MTF

N Capitalinc Investment Tbk 2009 0.63 219554 9.9 2 2 2 3 1 7194.87 Capitalinc Investment Tbk 2010 0.12 523396 2.49 2 2 2 3 1 1668.49

Capitalinc Investment Tbk 2011

-2.61 643102 3.72 2 2 2 3 1 2865.69

Capitalinc Investment Tbk 2012

-1.32 701440 4.5 2 1 2 3 0 363.44

PANS Panin Sekuritas Tbk 2009 14.8

8 1030850 1.37 2 2 2 5 1 2048.65

Panin Sekuritas Tbk 2010 17.7

7 1411326 1.22 2 2 2 5 1 1988.39

Panin Sekuritas Tbk 2011 15.1

6 1562527 0.99 2 2 2 4 1 1228.33

Panin Sekuritas Tbk 2012 14.8

3 1383822 0.57 2 2 2 3 0 410.97

PEGE Panca Global Securities Tbk 2009 8.89 204715 0.89 2 2 2 4 1 1009.9 Panca Global Securities Tbk 2010 5.52 367468 5.52 2 2 1 4 1 3866.97 Panca Global Securities Tbk 2011 9.28 241132 9.28 2 2 1 3 0 6149.32 Panca Global Securities Tbk 2012 8.01 189445 8.01 2 2 1 3 1 4860.64 PNIN Panin Insurance Tbk 2009 7.58 8101058 0.8 2 2 1 3 1 618.64 Panin Insurance Tbk 2010 9.71 9358982 0.72 2 1 1 3 0 28.44

Panin Insurance Tbk 2011 9.39 1157277

1 0.44 2 2 2 3 1 384.66

Panin Insurance Tbk 2012 8.01 1234080

2 0.37 2 2 2 3 1 301.69

RELI Reliance Securities Tbk 2009 7.49 572991 1.83 1 1 1 3 0 1.98 Reliance Securities Tbk 2010 2.71 775288 2.5 2 2 2 3 1 811.18 Reliance Securities Tbk 2011 5.17 580244 1.13 2 2 2 5 1 985.49 Reliance Securities Tbk 2012 4.2 731846 1.37 2 2 2 5 1 1061.94 TRIM Trimegah Securities Tbk 2009 2.8 938382 1.59 2 2 2 5 1 900.53 Trimegah Securities Tbk 2010 2.4 858288 1.34 2 2 2 5 1 2105.76 Trimegah Securities Tbk 2011 1.34 683575 0.85 2 2 2 5 1 1047.28

Trimegah Securities Tbk 2012

-26.5 470126 0.83 2 2 2 5 1 338.22

TRUS Trust Finance Indonesia Tbk 2009 5.87 187616 0.66 2 2 2 3 1 340.4 Trust Finance Indonesia Tbk 2010 9.43 261959 0.8 2 2 2 3 1 537.5 Trust Finance Indonesia Tbk 2011 7.11 398071 1.39 2 2 2 3 1 843.75 Trust Finance Indonesia Tbk 2012 4.88 427228 1.35 1 2 1 3 0 332.93 VRN

(4)

Lampiran 2 Factor Analysis

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.491

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 8.061

df 6

Sig. .234

Anti-image Matrices

ROA SIZE DER AGE

Anti-image Covariance

ROA .934 -.209 -.029 -.126

SIZE -.209 .949 -.038 .029

DER -.029 -.038 .990 .084

AGE -.126 .029 .084 .976

Anti-image Correlation

ROA .492a -.222 -.030 -.132

SIZE -.222 .497a -.039 .030

DER -.030 -.039 .503a .085

AGE -.132 .030 .085 .469a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

(5)

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 5.536

df 3

Sig. .136

Anti-image Matrices

ROA SIZE DER

Anti-image Covariance ROA .951 -.209 -.019

SIZE -.209 .950 -.041

DER -.019 -.041 .997

Anti-image Correlation ROA .505a -.220 -.019

SIZE -.220 .505a -.042

DER -.019 -.042 .592a

(6)

Lampiran 3 Logistic Regression

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Std. Deviation

LNROA 108 .01 3.24 1.8385 .75505

LNSIZE 108 10.13 17.05 13.6541 1.32472

DER 108 -2.08 9.90 1.9809 1.94284

InsiderOwnership 108 1.00 2.00 1.8333 .37442

OutsiderOwnersip 108 1.00 2.00 1.7870 .41131

OperationComplexcity 108 2.00 1.00 1.7778 41768

KomiteAudit 108 2.00 7.00 4.0093 1.21128

KetepatanWaktuPelapor an

108 .00 1.00 .7685 .42375

Valid N (listwise) 108

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis

108 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 108 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

(7)

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis

108 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 108 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 108 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

.00 0

1.00 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Iteration Historya,b,c

Iteration

Coefficients -2 Log

likelihood Constant

Step 0 1 117.180 1.074

(8)

3 116.869 1.200

4 116.869 1.200

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predicted KetepatanWaktuPelapora

n

.00 1.00

Percentage Correct Step 0 KetepatanWaktuPelapor

an

.00 0 25 .0

1.00 0 83 100.0

Overall Percentage

76.9

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant 1.200 .228 27.665 1 .000 3.320

Variables not in the Equation

(9)

Step 0 Variables LNROA 24.481 1 .000

LNSIZE 8.500 1 .004

DER .022 1 .883

InsiderOwnership 36.236 1 .000

OutsiderOwnersip 23.374 1 .000

OperationComplexci ty

21.474 1 .000

Overall Statistics 57.250 6 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Iteration Historya,b,c,d

Iteration

Coefficients -2 Log

likelihood Constant LNROA LNSIZE DER

InsiderOwner ship

Step 1 1 68.699 -9.688 .337 .297 .027 1.231

2 57.510 -16.176 .668 .585 .016 1.484

3 54.797 -21.417 1.002 .841 .017 1.642

4 54.453 -24.189 1.182 .978 .028 1.720

5 54.444 -24.741 1.216 1.005 .032 1.733

6 54.444 -24.758 1.217 1.006 .032 1.734

(10)

a. Method: Enter

b. Constant is included in the model. c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 116.869

d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Iteration Historya,b,c,d

Iteration

Coefficients

OutsiderOwnersip

OperationComplexc ity

Step 1 1 1.111 1.010

2 1.667 1.594

3 1.926 2.019

4 2.028 2.249

5 2.049 2.298

6 2.050 2.299

7 2.050 2.299

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 62.425 6 .000

Block 62.425 6 .000

(11)

Model Summary

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 54.444a .439 .664

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 7.832 8 .450

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

KetepatanWaktuPelaporan = .00

KetepatanWaktuPelaporan = 1.00

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 11 10.490 0 .510 11

2 8 7.541 3 3.459 11

3 2 3.486 9 7.514 11

4 1 1.556 10 9.444 11

5 1 .835 10 10.165 11

(12)

7 0 .300 11 10.700 11

8 1 .142 10 10.858 11

9 0 .072 11 10.928 11

10 0 .019 9 8.981 9

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted KetepatanWaktuPelapora

n

.00 1.00

Percentage Correct Step 1 KetepatanWaktuPelapor

an

.00 19 6 76.0

1.00 1 82 98.8

Overall Percentage

93.5

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a LNROA 1.217 .607 4.021 1 .045 3.377

(13)

DER .032 .177 .033 1 .857 1.032

InsiderOwnership 1.734 .863 4.037 1 .045 5.661

OutsiderOwnersip 2.050 .897 5.217 1 .022 7.766

OperationComplexci ty

2.299 .967 5.654 1 .017 9.967

Constant -24.758 6.867 12.998 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: LNROA, LNSIZE, DER, InsiderOwnership, OutsiderOwnersip, OperationComplexcity.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a LNROA 1.028 11.094

LNSIZE 1.310 5.711

DER .730 1.459

InsiderOwnership 1.043 30.717 OutsiderOwnersip 1.338 45.085 OperationComplexci

ty

1.498 66.314

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: LNROA, LNSIZE, DER, InsiderOwnership, OutsiderOwnersip,

(14)

Correlation Matrix

Constant LNROA LNSIZE DER

Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.309 -.942 -.269

LNROA -.309 1.000 .232 -.013

LNSIZE -.942 .232 1.000 .177

DER -.269 -.013 .177 1.000

InsiderOwnership -.135 .047 .067 -.174

OutsiderOwnersip -.424 -.170 .298 .040

OperationComplexci ty

-.569 .131 .402 .487

Correlation Matrix

InsiderOwner ship

OutsiderOwne rsip

OperationCo mplexcity

Step 1 Constant -.135 -.424 -.569

LNROA .047 -.170 .131

LNSIZE .067 .298 .402

DER -.174 .040 .487

InsiderOwnership 1.000 -.265 -.285

OutsiderOwnersip -.265 1.000 .268

OperationComplexci ty

(15)

Step number: 1

Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

32 + +

| | | | F | | R 24 + +

E | 1|

Q | 1|

U | 1|

E 16 + 1+

N | 1|

C | 11|

Y | 11|

8 + 111+

| 1 11 111| |0 111111111|

|00000 0 00 0 00 00 1 00 0 1 111 1 0 111 1 011111 01 1101011101| Predicted ---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--- Prob: 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 Group:

(16)

Predicted Probability is of Membership for 1.00 The Cut Value is .50

Symbols: 0 - .00 1 - 1.00

Each Symbol Represents 2 Cases.

Casewise Listb

Case

Observed Temporary Variable

Selected Statusa

KetepatanWa

ktuPelaporan Predicted

Predicted

Group Resid ZResid

61 S 0** .925 1 -.925 -3.515

65 S 0** .943 1 -.943 -4.070

66 S 0** .990 1 -.990 -9.893

84 S 0** .872 1 -.872 -2.607

a. S = Selected, U = Unselected cases, and ** = Misclassified cases. b. Cases with studentized residuals greater than 2.000 are listed.

Lampiran 4 Uji moderating

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a

LNROA -.246 .786 .098 1 .754 .782

LNSIZE .889 .431 4.252 1 .039 2.433

DER -.629 .452 1.939 1 .164 .533

(17)

OutsiderOwnersip 2.023 1.145 3.123 1 .077 7.562 OperationComplexcit

y

3.321 1.445 5.284 1 .022 27.683

KomiteAudit 1.878 .768 5.977 1 .014 6.539

Moderating .003 .001 4.570 1 .033 1.003

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

SKRIPSI PENGARUH TEKANAN ANGGARAN WAKTU .... KRISNA

Distribusi frekuensi faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan persalinan prematur pada ibu bersalin spontan di Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Kota Yogyakarta tahun 2010-2012 yaitu usia

[r]

- Penayangan iklan layanan masyarakat (Public Service Announcement) Reformasi Birokrasi Departgmen Keuangan;. untuk sementara ditunda sampai dengan pemberitahuan

Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan model Make A Match berbasis moral tanggung jawab dan demokrasi dapat meningkatkan keterampilan guru dalam

Abstract — In this paper optimization process was performed to have light component. Shape optimization was applied to front rear spindle in order to reduce its

Dimana sistem pakar bila dikaitkan dengan kemampuan dokter dalam mendiagnosa secara dini kondisi kesehatan pasien, dapat diciptakan suatu sistem komputer yang bertugas untuk

Pelelangan dinyatakan gagal dikarenakan sampai batas waktu pemasukan penawaran yang telah ditetapkan tidak terdapat penyedia yang mendaftar dan memasukkan penawaran,