53
1. Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000–2013. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [Internet]. 2015 (Cited 2015 Feb 23); 93(1): 19-28. Available from: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/1/14-139790/en/
2. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007. Desember 2008. Bab 3.10. h.278-9
3. Sitohang S, Budijanto D, Hardhana B, Soenardi TA, editor. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Buku Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2013. Jakarta: 2014. Bab 5. h.87
4. Janjindamai W, Petpisal S. Time to positivity on blood culture in newborn infants. Southeast As J Trop Med Public Health [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015 July 5); 37: 171-5.
5. Unicef. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality 2014: Report 2014 Estimates developed by the UN inter-agency group for children mortality estimation. 2014. h.15
7. Sepsis in Neonates. Neonatal Ehandbook. [Internet] Departement of Health, Victoria, Australia. Updated: July 16, 2014 (Cited 2014 Nov 4). Available from:
http://www.health.vic.gov.au/neonatalhandbook/infections/sepsis.htm 8. Gupta ML. Module for training of specialist in pediatrics on newborn care:
Module-A (Management of Common Neonatal Problems).
9. Kosim MS, Yunanto A, Dewi R, Sarosa GI, Usman A. Editor (2008). Ikatan Dokter Anak Indonesia. Buku Ajar Neonatologi. Ed. 1. Badan Penerbit IDAI. Jakarta. 2008. h.170-185
10.Tutut S. Sepsis pada neonatus (Sepsis neonatal). Sari Pediatri [Internet]. Agustus 2000 (Cited 2014 Nov 12); Vol.2, No.2: 96-102. Available from: http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=145
11.Juniatiningsih A, Aminullah A, Firmansyah A. Profil mikroorganisme penyebab sepsis neonatorum di Departement Ilmu Kesehatan Anak RSCM. Sari Pediatri, Vol.10, No.1. Juni 2008: 61.
12.Rini AE, Meconium stained amniotic fluid as a risk factor of early onset neonatal sepsis [dissertation]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro; 2010. 13.Anderson-Berry AL. Neonatal sepsis. [Internet]. 2014 (updated 2014 feb
11; Cited 2014 Nov 10). Available from:
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/978352-overview
Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-and-diagnosis-of-sepsis-in-term-and-late-preterm-infants
15.Rodrigo I. Changing patterns of neonatal sepsis. Sri Lanka J Child Health [Internet]. 2002 (Cited 2015 Feb 23); 31: 3-8. Available from: http://www.sljol.info/sljol/index.php/SLJCH/article/view/795
16. Russell ARB. Neonatal sepsis. Symposium: Neonatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2014 Nov 17); 265-9. Available from: ScienceDirect.
17.Aminullah A, Gatot D, Kosim MS, Rohsiswatmo R, Indarso F, Dharma R. (2007). Penatalaksanaan sepsis neonatorum. Jakarta: Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 3-80.
18.Tsai CH, Chen YY, Wang KG, Chen CY, Chen CP. Characterictic of early-onset neonatal sepsis caused by Escherichia coli. [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2014 Nov 25); 51(1):26-30. Available from: ScienceDirect.
19.Haque KN. Neonatal sepsis in the very low birth weight preterm infants Part 1: Review of Patho-physiology. Journal of Medical Science [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 Jan 26); 3(1): 1-10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
20.Richard A and the Committee on fetus and Newborn. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Journal of The American Academy of Pediatrics [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2014 Dec 10);
129: 1006-1015. Available from:
21.Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatric Critical care medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Niv 25 ); 6(3): S45-S49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15857558
22.Wynn, J. L., & Wong, H. R. Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock in neonates. Clinics in perinatology [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 jan
26); 37(2): 439-479. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891980/
23.Aminullah A. Masalah terkini sepsis neonatorum. Dalam: Hegar B, Trihono PP, Irfan EB penyunting. Update in neonatal infection. Naskah lengkap pendidikan kedokteran berkelanjutan IKA XLVIII; 13-14 Desember 2005, Jakarta, Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FK UI; 2005. H. 1-13.
24.Sales-santos M, Bunye MO. The complete blood count and hematologic finding as criteria for neonatal sepsis. Makati medical center proceeding [Internet]. 1995 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 40-50.
25.Kumar Y, Qunibi M, Neal TJ, Yoxall CW. Time to positivity of neonatal blood cultures. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition [Internet]. 2001 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 85(3): F182-F186. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1721335/
27.Melville JM, Moss TJ. The immune consequences of preterm birth. Frontiers in neuroscience [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734091
28.Butler, Stith A, Behrman RE. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. National Academies Press, 2007.
29.Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate. Pediatric Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015
Jan 29); 51(4), 939-959. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15275982
30.Arisandi ND. Faktor risiko dan kesamaan jenis kuman jalan lahir ibu dengan kultur darah pada sepsis neonatal awitan dini [Dissertation]. Master Program In Biomedical Science; 2008.
31.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. The Journal of American Medical Association [Internet]. 2004 (Cited 2015 Jan 28);
292(19): 2357-2365. Available from:
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=199811
2002 (Cited 2015 Jan 25); 347(4): 240-247. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12140299
33.Spitzer AR, Kirkby S, Kornhauser M. Practice variation in suspected neonatal sepsis: a costly problem in neonatal intensive care. Journal of perinatology [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2014 Nov 11); 25(4): 265-269.
Available from:
http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v25/n4/full/7211252a.html
34.Onyedibe KI, Utoh-Nedosa AU, Okolo M, Onyedibe KIO, Ita OI, Udoh U. A, Egah, DZ, et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors on neonatal sepsis in Jos, Nigeria. Jos Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2012 (Cited 2015 Jan 29);
6(2): 54-58. Available from:
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jjm/article/view/81871
35.Fikree FF, Ali TS, Durocher JM, Rahbar MH. Newborn care practices in low socioeconomic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. Social science & medicine [Internet]. 2005 (Cited 2015 Jan 29); 60(5): 911-921. Avaiable from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953604003193 36.Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L, Boyko V, Reichman B, Lerner-Geva L, Israel.
37.Carolus W, Rompis J, & Wilar R. Hubungan Apgar skor dan berat badan lahir dengan sepsis neonatorum. e-CliniC [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2014 Dec
4); 1(2). Available from:
http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/eclinic/article/view/3271/2815 38.Roeslani RD, Amir I, Nasrulloh MH, Suryani. Penelitian Awal: faktor
risiko pada sepsis neonatorum awitan dini. Sari Pediatri [Internet]. 2013 (Cited 2015 Feb 6); 14(6): 363-8. Available from:
http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/abstrak.asp?q=872
39.Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis. Edisi 4 – cetakan keempat. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2011.
40.Dahlan, M Sopiyudin. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan: deskriptif, bivariat dan multivariat. Edisi 5 – cetakan ketiga. Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2013.
41.Khair K, Rahman MA, Sultana T, Roy CK, Rahman MQ, Shaidullah M, dkk. Role of hematologic scoring system in early diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. BSSMU J [Internet]. 2010 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 3:62-7. 42.Yuliana N, Usman A. Sensitivitas dan spesifitas pemeriksaan leukosit dan
43.Utomo Mt. Risk factor of neonatal sepsis: A preliminary study in Dr. Soetomo Hospital. Indonesian Journal of Tropical and Infectious Disease. Vol.1, No.1. January-April 2010: 25-6.
44.Putra PJ. Insiden dan faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan sepsis neonatus di RSUP Sanglah. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 14, No.3. Oktober 2015:207.
45.Scharg SJ, Hadler JI, Arnold KE. Risk factors for invasive, early onset Eschericia coli infection in the era of wide spread intrapartum antibiotic use. Pediatrics 118 [Internet]. 2006 (Cited 2015 Jun 21): 570-6.
46.Simbolon D. Faktor risiko sepsis pada bayi baru lahir di RSND Curup Kab. Rejang Lebong. Diunduh dari:
http://isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/36308127134_0125-9695.pdf Diakses: 21 Juni 2015
47.Dawodu A, Al Umran K, Twum-Danso K. A case control study of neonatal sepsis: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford Journal [Internet]. 1997 (Cited 2015 Jun 21); 43(2):84-8.
48.Yumei Li, Wenli Zhou, Jiantao Zhang, Chaoying Yan. Clinical analyses of neonatal sepsis caused by Listeria monocytogene. Human Health and Biomedical Engineering (HHBE) [Internet]. 2011 (Cited 2015 Jun 21): 388-90.
coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pubmed [Internet]. 2015 (Cited 2015 Jun 25); 166(5): 1193-9. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25919728
50.Orlando Regional Health Care, Education and Development. Neonatal sepsis self learning pocket 2002. Diunduh dari:
LAMPIRAN 3. Hasil analisis SPSS
TABEL 6
JenisKelamin * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
JenisKelamin
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio ,041 1 ,840
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,500
Linear-by-Linear Association ,040 1 ,841
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,50.
MetodePersalinan * SNAW Crosstabulation
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
MetodePersalinan
pervaginam
Count 29 22 51
Expected Count 25,5 25,5 51,0
SCTP
Count 21 28 49
Expected Count 24,5 24,5 49,0
Total Count 50 50 100
Expected Count 50,0 50,0 100,0
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1,961a 1 ,161
Continuity Correctionb 1,441 1 ,230
Likelihood Ratio 1,967 1 ,161
Fisher's Exact Test ,230 ,115
Linear-by-Linear Association 1,941 1 ,164
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24,50.
TABEL 7
Descriptives
SNAW Statistic Std. Error
UsiaIbu
tidak sepsis
Mean 28,80 1,084
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 26,62 Upper Bound 30,98
5% Trimmed Mean 28,59
Median 28,50
Variance 58,735
Std. Deviation 7,664
Minimum 16
Maximum 46
Range 30
Interquartile Range 11
Skewness ,439 ,337
Kurtosis -,371 ,662
sepsis
Mean 29,78 ,938
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 27,89
Upper Bound 31,67
5% Trimmed Mean 29,88
Median 30,00
Variance 44,012
Std. Deviation 6,634
Minimum 15
Maximum 42
Range 27
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -,118 ,337
Tests of Normality
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of
Variances
t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df Sig.
(2-Interval of the
Difference
variances not
assumed
-,684
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
PendidikanIbu
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute ,060
Positive ,060
Negative ,000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,300
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1,000
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
PekerjaanIbu
pelajar/mahasiswa
Count 1 3 4
Expected Count 2,0 2,0 4,0
% within PekerjaanIbu 25,0% 75,0% 100,0%
ibu rumah tangga
Count 34 29 63
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute ,060
Positive ,060
Negative -,040
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,300
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1,000
TABEL 8
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
KPD
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio ,060 1 ,806
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,500
Linear-by-Linear Association ,060 1 ,807
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for KPD (tidak ada / ada) ,886 ,338 2,323
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis ,942 ,592 1,500
For cohort SNAW = sepsis 1,063 ,646 1,751
TABEL 9
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
InfeksiSaatHamil
tidak ada
Count 50 49 99
Expected Count 49,5 49,5 99,0
% within InfeksiSaatHamil 50,5% 49,5% 100,0%
ada
Count 0 1 1
Expected Count ,5 ,5 1,0
% within InfeksiSaatHamil 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Total
Count 50 50 100
Expected Count 50,0 50,0 100,0
% within InfeksiSaatHamil 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio 1,396 1 ,237
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,500
Linear-by-Linear Association 1,000 1 ,317
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
For cohort SNAW = sepsis ,495 ,406 ,604
TABEL 10
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
Sosek
Continuity Correctionb ,068 1 ,795
Likelihood Ratio ,271 1 ,602
Fisher's Exact Test ,795 ,398
Linear-by-Linear Association ,268 1 ,604
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Sosek (kurang / cukup) 1,313 ,471 3,660
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis 1,152 ,660 2,014
For cohort SNAW = sepsis ,878 ,549 1,403
TABEL 11
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
GawatJanin
Continuity Correctionb ,000 1 1,000
Likelihood Ratio ,350 1 ,554
Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,500
Linear-by-Linear Association ,340 1 ,560
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for GawatJanin (tidak ada / ada) 2,042 ,179 23,266
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis 1,515 ,302 7,600
For cohort SNAW = sepsis ,742 ,325 1,694
TABEL 12
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
BBL
Continuity Correctionb ,042 1 ,838
Likelihood Ratio ,167 1 ,683
Fisher's Exact Test ,838 ,419
Linear-by-Linear Association ,165 1 ,685
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for BBL (BBLR / BBLSR) ,846 ,380 1,885
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis ,921 ,621 1,365
For cohort SNAW = sepsis 1,088 ,724 1,635
TABEL 13
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
SkorApgar_1
Continuity Correctionb 4,203 1 ,040
Likelihood Ratio 5,140 1 ,023
Fisher's Exact Test ,040 ,020
Linear-by-Linear Association 5,035 1 ,025
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_1 (tidak rendah / rendah) 2,571 1,122 5,895
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis 1,564 1,068 2,291
For cohort SNAW = sepsis ,608 ,381 ,972
TABEL 14
Crosstab
SNAW Total
tidak sepsis sepsis
SkorApgar_5
Continuity Correctionb 3,722 1 ,054
Likelihood Ratio 4,654 1 ,031
Fisher's Exact Test ,053 ,026
Linear-by-Linear Association 4,550 1 ,033
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for SkorApgar_5 (tidak rendah / rendah) 2,567 1,072 6,150
For cohort SNAW = tidak sepsis 1,668 ,991 2,808
For cohort SNAW = sepsis ,650 ,448 ,943
ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: SkorApgar_1, SkorApgar_5.
Model if Term Removed
Variable Model Log
Likelihood
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
Step 2a Variables SkorApgar_5(1) 1,215 1 ,270 Overall Statistics 1,215 1 ,270
LAMPIRAN 4. DOKUMENTASI
LAMPIRAN 5. BIODATA PENULIS
Nama : Novrika Dwi Ningrum
NIM : 22010111120053
Tempat/Tanggal lahir : Purwakarta/ 28 November 1993 Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Jalan Taman Pahlawan No. 24 Purwakarta Nomor Telepon/HP : 085659911099
Email : novrikadwiningrum@yahoo.co.id
RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN FORMAL
1. TK : TK PURNAMA PURWAKARTA (1998-2000)
2. SD : SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA (2000-2006) 3. SMP : SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2008) 4. SMA : SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA (Lulus Tahun: 2011) 5. FK UNDIP (Masuk Tahun: 2011)
KEANGGOTAAN ORGANISASI
1. PASKIBRA SDN 1 NAGRIKALER PURWAKARTA 2004-2006 2. PASKIBRA SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2006-2008
3. PMR SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA 2007-2008
4. PASKIBRA SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010 5. MPK SMAN 1 PURWAKARTA 2009-2010
