A STYLISI'ICANALYSISOFLE ICAI- COEFJION AS I1OUND IN
FOTJR OF KAELIL CIER]$I'S POEMS
A
Thdii
S6rtd.d
ln I'wdatFdft^.d
tott *.qrnMt
IuWMse,tDaN
Bv
MIRA KERISTINA
FI(:TJSTI I'EPARIMENT , FACTJLTY OF LETTERS
Di dalm
p€nelitieini dib,na
hagidha
iEngamg mengguuruleugkll
kohcsileksikt
dalm
nenydpaikan
MloF
sasta dalamsebul
F'hi
setu kenunculd D.@gkal kohcsi l€kikal'€ns
dismpaikm peneamg
leNb
. Tuj@npenelilu
ini adalai Mnr( nensebhuibasaim
ia nenssunatoprug}lt
lohet
leksikal teFebutdrlm
mcnympaikmnaha
stE
yans tedapatdalm tuki
pLqDlascruFrmsLr\o\6ilc\-
lal ytremu.u
&lm
DLni-DLi.inJrPdelitim
id
n€nssudko
leon sdlisdkayde
diLdulold
oleh l€t€r Vedonk (2002)dtr
kohsi
lekikal
ysg
dikemdeld
olehHdllidat.Ln
Has
(1976)Suber
datadidhil ddi
puisi puisi'ss
didis
oleh Katil
Gibtu.
Dalm
p€neupulo
dall! p€nulis nensmbil &ra dalm b€ntut bail dai puisi'puisicibru.
Dalm
nensdalisis .tara pc.ulis neneeuakm nelode Efecnsial. KeDudian haril amlisisdll!
disiike
sm
infomal sedancrssunak
tabdutut
ncmbu(uDli
hsil
.nalisis .lapatdisinpulle
berdadtd
efek psi(ologis. Gib@mengelcpFsike lentaq
k
indahmt(cnllid
banvakctu,tid
itummPale
halymE
tidal Dqh dn*ud
nelaint
halyss
ditussu
-
luggu.
Oib@ jusr
ncnympaika Dew nordl dm aeamditMa
ia mencelilakmsi@i
sn@i ymg m€mbutrrya IlFah.sdih
de
guda! sna
keinsim-kei.simya
y&gnenbur
lmbm
ne.silgat
kenbalirltu
kckuM
SeC Pencipta. K.nudian dari haril arulisis te6.but jueadilenuka
*mu
lipe lohesi leksilnl, ynitu:l)
tilcNi
teiteratioh)
r,jtu:
karamu
fs€,eral,ord).
Fpetisi(repeitior).
si^onin6vonyn), otonin
(ahtaht,t), hipon\n (htpontm)dd
nnnin
(hmnyn).
2)koloksi (coltocorion)
Gib,n
endtue
ncngCud@nillEi
lcrut nakaIa
&!ramm
(46.6014, reFtisi (15.5%).dd
kolokai
(l5.5ez)rge
pcmbaq mcnahmi!€mm
kohesi lekikalysg
dinalsld penulisulul
nenenula
nornosLE
ymgCHAITDR 2
REVIEW OF RXLATED LITERATURN
2.1.
Rdi.w
of tbePsiow
StudiesMeid
(2002) anslyzes about ihc p@n of Philip L5n{in s Talking in Bcd "Asrylislic an lysis
ofLdki!'s
laltins in Bcd."ll.
ues lhc dcsdiprivc frclhods in malyzins. In his dalys's. hc follows thfte @in sieF €lated ro the tbr€e main "stylistic levelsoaa
t€xt d1,tpmp.sd
by Finch (l9s3r 203) snch as: the "nicm", thc"irtcm.diatc'.
od
t!€
'mrcrc"ld.ls.
Thcbicm lcvcl
is lnc levelof
lhelDen
d
afom
that deals wilh stud, investigating lhc ovcrallsaucu€
ol
thepoen
md gmnalical sdclurc of
thc senrcnccslinm
a [aditional, pE fibction, &d poinl of vicw. Ibc "inlmedialcl.v.l'
of th.to.m
6
a discouse derls with the difrmnt neeines oa Ae najorldical
irdns, llD*mdtic
ofnesltio6. fi€ iGbn.es ofoomaly, ambislityod
polysenysd
lneus. of adjccrivc in rbc Focn.
Thc
iaco
lcvcl" ofthc pocna
comNicariondent
relales to the bioeraphjcal conlextdd
senqicdd
olllq
lcxt extemdl spcct of lhe poem. Msnd also iwestisates thispcn bed
on nalliday'sdory
aboui
6r
nctafiDction. th.yer
inaecs, GolopicelmsMcc, lovc, and natur.l lexicalell,
cohesive devicca,e!rcsmt
tion offtality
(deld) md lresinvirychoims-pm*ses, FfeEnes md th€ d€ictic sub-words oflhe po€m.
I.
nk
findins. drclqical
itcmse
.slabhhcd lo thc cohcsivcclai6
mdlenFlds Mzid
avoids&
cmolionailinglidic
dildna
ofa
Fcoplc whom
unallc lo colm@icare. a couple sho scd md lo b€ honesl He
tls
fnds thd intne Iwels of the fom md
dsuN
in $eFcn
mhfimnst
ol thc lcatuesol
rtc
comuicalion
situationwh6
itws
witlc.
Thcpo.
k
hc
to itsoM
senr
md rhe authoriio
lhehsi6iliiy
lo whichit
bclonss. wirh ilsnininal
srmbolisdard
mbiguity,
ud
to
the scio-hisloricalmndilio$
whereil
@cud.d TrlisBcmh 6s sinile
rhdry locDss on thc uscofl.iiol
cohcsion usine Halliday s mdHs
s $@ry mes*hil€Maid
brcadens his malvsh bvsins
llaUidly s 6€oryfocus
on theneialudioN
Eliab.th
(2008) malyzcsabo
Siylistic Alalvsisol
Snclcvs
lcns
Eliab€th
f6Ns
herMlras
into slylistics darysis d€€ls with lso of Shellev spo€n
"Ozynmdid
dd
"Englffdin
1819"
In
stylistcs aidvsis oft\o
of
Shcll.y s soMcis. Eliz2b.tn besins withm
analysisol
lhc coh€sivc dcvic*popoed by Halliday md
Has's
theory sucha:
rcfdc€,
subsdndo. mdcllipsis, @njmction,
ed
l*ical
orgsization-h
her dntvzine. EliTalElh inv.stisatcs{'al
ShcllcyNs
of
Epclition sncns: Ged-sd.
md
Dd. Ep.tilionofde
devie of quolatior) 10 c@te @hesion al lhe lexicaildel
Sbeconcludd tnat Shelley b€giff with
d
tn
lysis of the coh*ive devicesllat
iscxktins
hisroric.lBord
in a
sp€inc
My.
Eliab.t[
01s
lsd ni6
endoDhoiic
pmnal
6d dnonst
atjv. iefeEnes in rhis Do€m ([p€6oDal;yrr
hMle.
then-legs,
j|hase
visaEe,ite-isage.
thn-p6sio$,
m!Otlhontlidsl
d6obljJatir..
thore-fow
thok
sr
iw,
rhes*vieadle$,
that
hdnd,thtt
heart,
theselttotatioh, thotjuototion,
riege,
legtl
Eliabdn
cmls
chai6 ofMmtic
nedrquival€nls in this poem.M.swnib,
in
"E4lad
in
lSlE
Eliabct[
mploys
tm
qophoncEfeBnces
(E,Elu.d,1ine\
iloat
edtre
,
epeale.l),
ed
six cndophorjcftf.:Mc.s
(th.ir
lirces
whFprir@'
theit
ru|erc,thertule
rhicherae,
o*-Englant)
B this pocm. Th. cxophonc EfcEnesFly
on Eaders*no*ledge ol history Md polilic for their Esobtion.
T6*
d€ iwo inpontutdmplcs
oI eUipsis which o@ur in line ninead
ten. Ovemll, lhe eniiE poetosccds to bc i6 a Elation
ofcxrcsio!
to thc litlcoftn.
D.cn. Ii is Mincn N onccontiruou senter'@, a garden pal!, witn a grcai rveGal of
neeing
in th.laqrCHA?TER 4
ARer &a]'zins $e daq
d.
Miter finds oul thal themsing
of d€tod
m
b. disovecd byraltzing
the laical @hesiond
loud
in fod ol Gibmis !o€ms. T!€ !s,ccofde
iqical
@llesion hclps th€ read€r to calch th€ messss d€l is conlcycd 6y tn€ poel.In
qpEssi.g
hisid.a
tn
p@t tc.dsto norc
u$
Fp.ri!'on md collocdtion$d
olhd tlT€s of lexical cohesion. By uing rcpclition mdoleolio!.
il
shows how fa!Gibtu
infoms hisid6
aboul his imasimtion$d
isb.i4
aqiDinal. nis vishes thal
e
b€ing thc spnfts Mtnoul troublcdd
so on. Tncwril.r
co.cludes that thc Base ofrep€dtionad
collocalonce
crealc psychologi€qleil&t
to thc r€ad€r. To 6nd oul the cfect, lhe irtuilioB play imponet rcle in @tchinsllE
ness€c
of litcErr
so*s.
Srylislically,6ibm
s
pods
hrvcchucldistics
s
subjdt
loin
of view in shich he telh aloul hisn6eges
ahour noElityud
3lsoTne
wi1f
6!ds thal all tinds ofl.iicd
mn.sionm sad.l
mrds (46.617'), Ep€lition ( I 5.5%), onocation (15.5olt,elontn
(6 6vo). symryb (6.67t,ntuDan
(a.470 md h}Tlrn)m (3.3%).ln otner sid€. the role ofrcpelition
dd
@ll@atione
veryinponet
b.€u*
by uiog bo$oflh.s wr&,
tn. €addd
6nd thcp!r!os.
BIBLIOGRAPEY
Brown. cillian and Csr8e
Yule
1981.D,r.o,
elerrte.
Gmt
Bnbin.Cambridge Univenity PE$.
Cdgr,
Rotuld and Brumri! Chrisropher 1982- Litdw
ad
L
AwSe?.,.rtJ,'
Oxfor'l: (Xford UniveNiry PiesrCollin.
Fod.
1990.71t Colli4:
PdperhukDds,!z!.
S6ond Edition. Harpcrcollins Publishe6Cosl,
David dd P. Davy. t969.Idurldt
s,nsln,
&1.. London: l-oignantlalliday. M.A.K md Ruqaiya
HNn.
1916. Cnltosionin
,,l,lr.
Lr.don.
19a5. AnldtuIrction
to
Frct!'itl
C.(anar S*.ad
Edirion.hltot/}w.1mdti.lovcs4ret.co6/bcButv-dcathsUine-@mi gDta!.bE!l. Rebieved o. Junc grh.2009 ar 10.10 AM
Dliabe$. 2003. sheLy
.nl
Sttlislidntubsn
ol
hi\ PoeN.,id
lhilosopht
of
k"a1ut!..
Available:]&pLd.alaniali|ejatml conDal76tu'l
Rebiev€d onMfth
l3th,Jacobson.
Romd.
\960.
An
,lnltsn
af
Fiction
nEorr.
A\ai|ah],c: lnt p!
/an b s em h i t h lo ss rd. c onl
2 0 A 9 /A 7 /IE o ry<fMU
si sj,
lite.au hhl. Rexle\ed on S€ptemb€r I
l$
2009Leech,
C6fiid'.
1931. ,tsrarrl.r: TXe Sluar olMeaniqNq
Z.alsd. PengoinMuid, Bah@ Eddin M. 20m. A
S'lisft
Tmbns.roumai ol
Lusudaeo[
Ldkin|fa]kins
jn Be.l .rssN
h,
p ://wv
s ho ke speR.
rk nt ttjow
llj I ljlll
Retieled on March I ?' . 2009 rt 10.21 AM.
Mich&l S. Clark. 1987.
7
,/zt
t:
A S\'listn amllsis2002
9t
htpl
ewv mLa orE nry/Ef/I937/Min9.*hlNursiyanloo, Burnu. 1q97. Teoi Penslaji. F)l:i. voEyakan . Cajah Mala