ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Industrial
Crops
and
Products
j o u r n al ho me p ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / i n d c r o p
Production
of
commercially
important
secondary
metabolites
and
antioxidant
activity
in
cell
suspension
cultures
of
Artemisia
absinthium
L.
Mohammad
Ali
a,
Bilal
Haider
Abbasi
a,∗,
Ihsan-ul-haq
baDepartmentofBiotechnology,Quaid-i-AzamUniversity,Islamabad45320,Pakistan bDepartmentofPharmacy,Quaid-i-AzamUniversity,Islamabad45320,Pakistan
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received15February2013
Receivedinrevisedform22May2013 Accepted27May2013
Keywords:
Callus Cellsuspension Phenolics Flavonoids Antioxidant
Artemisia
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
AninvitrocultureofArtemisiaabsinthiumL.wasestablishedforproductionofcommercially impor-tantsecondarymetabolites.CalluscultureswereobtainedbyinoculatingleafexplantsonMurashige andSkoog(MS)mediumsupplementedwithThidiazuron(TDZ;0.5–5.0mgl−1)aloneorincombination witheither␣-naphthaleneaceticacid(NAA;1.0mgl−1)orIndoleaceticacid(IAA;1.0mgl−1).The cal-lusobtainedinresponseto1.0mgl−1 TDZand1.0mgl−1NAAwassubculturedonthesamemedium toinvestigateitsbiomassaccumulationandsecondarymetabolitesproductiononweeklybasisfor7 weeks.Forsubmergedcultivation,35dayoldcalliwereculturedonMSbasalmediasupplemented with1.0mgl−1TDZand1.0mgl−1NAA.Growthkineticsandsecondarymetabolitesproductionwere investigatedin3dayoldsuspensionculturesfor42days.Additionally,highperformanceliquid chro-matography(HPLC)basedquantificationofgallicacid,caffeicacidandcatechinwascarriedoutincell suspensioncultures.Seedgerminatedplantletswereusedascontrol.Maximumlevelsoftotalphenolic content3.57mgGAE/gDW(control:2.75mgGAE/gDW),totalflavonoidcontent1.89mgQE/gDW (con-trol:1.20mgQE/gDW),andantioxidantactivity82.7%(control:72.3%)weredisplayedbysuspension cultures.Amongthephenoliccompounds,maximumlevelofgallicacid104gg−1(control:21.3gg−1), caffeicacid27.40gg−1 (control:28.5gg−1)andcatechin 92.0gg−1 (control:68.10gg−1)were detectedinsuspensioncultures.TheresultsindicatethatcellsuspensionculturesofA.absinthiumL. havethepotentialforenhancedproductionofphenolicsand,hence,highestantioxidantactivitythan calluscultureandseedderivedplantlets.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Secondarymetabolitesproduced inplantsarelowmolecular weight(LMW)naturalproducts(Jooetal.,2010).Plantcell cul-tureisanattractivealternativetechnologyforenhancingsecondary metabolitesthatare eitherdifficulttosynthesizechemically or areproduced in limited quantitiesinwildplants. In particular, plant cell suspension cultures containing undifferentiatedcells areattractiveindustrially,especially compared todifferentiated cultures,duetotheirrelativesimilaritytomicrobialcellculture systems(Koleweetal.,2008).
Among different classes of secondary metabolites, plant polyphenolsconstitutethelargestgroupofnaturalantioxidants
(Cie´slaetal.,2012).Phenolicsareconsideredmorepotent
antioxi-dantsthanVitaminCandEandcarotenoids(Rice-Evansetal.,1995,
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+925190644121;fax:+925190644121.
E-mailaddresses:bhabbasi@qau.edu.pk,chinabilal@yahoo.com(B.H.Abbasi).
1996).Thesecompoundsareconsideredtoplayaprotectiverole againstawiderangeofdiseasessuchascoronaryheartdiseaseand certaintypesofcancers(Ibrahimetal.,2012).Additionally,astrong relationshipexistsbetweenthephenoliccompoundsproducedby theinvitroculturesofdifferentplantsandtheirantioxidant activ-ities(Amidetal.,2011;Girietal.,2012;AlKhateebetal.,2012;
Diwanetal.,2012).
Artemisia absinthium L., commonly known as “Wormwood” has been used as herbal medicine throughout Europe, Middle East, North Africa, and Asia (Sharopov et al., 2012). A very populardrinkabsinthe, prepared fromA. absinthium L., is con-sidered to stimulate creativity and excitement (Gambelunghe
andMelai,2002).Theplanthastraditionallybeenusedas
anti-helmintic,choleretic,antiseptic, balsamic, depurative, digestive, diuretic, emmenagogueand intreating leukaemia andsclerosis
(Canadanovic-Brunetetal.,2005).Recently, theaerialpartofA.
absinthium L. has shown to possess anti-snake venom activity
(Nalbantsoy et al., 2013). Antimalarial and anticanceractivities
areamongtheprominentbiologicaleffectsreportedfordifferent
speciesofthegenusArtemisia(Hernandezetal.,1990;Zafaretal.,
1990;Canadanovic-Brunetetal.,2005;Irshadetal.,2011;Shafi
etal.,2012).
In vitro studies of the genus Artemisia have mainly been focusedonenhancedproductionofartemisinin;strategiesshould be adopted to enhance medicinally important phenolics and flavonoidsin thespeciesofthis commerciallyimportantgenus. Thisstudyaimedtoestablishcellsuspensioncultureandto inves-tigatephenolicsandflavonoidsandantioxidant potentialinthe suspensionculturesofA.absinthiumL.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Seedgerminationandexplantinoculation
SeedsofA. absinthium L.were obtainedfromNational Agri-culture Research Centre (NARC) Islamabad, Pakistan. Following a singlewashwithrunningtapwater seedswereimmersedin ethanol (3min), followed by treatment with mercuric chloride (2min)andthenwashedwithautoclavedwateranddriedon ster-ilized filter papers. MS0 (Murashige and Skoog basal medium; PhytotechnologyLabs,USA;MurashigeandSkoog,1962) contain-ing3%sucroseand0.8%(w/v)agar(PhytotechnologyLabs,USA) wasusedforseedgermination.
2.2. Callusinductionandbiomassyield
Tostudytheeffectsofplantgrowthregulatorsoncallus induc-tion,approximately1.5cmoftheleafsectionsfrom28-daysold seed germinated plantlets were incubated on Murashige and Skoog(MS) (1962)mediasupplementedwithTDZ(0.5,1.0,2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0mgl−1) alone and in combination with 1.0mgl−1 of NAA or 1.0mgl−1 IAA. Before autoclaving (121◦C, 20min,
Systec VX 100, Germany), pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 (Eutech Instruments pH 510, Singapore). All cultures were placedin16hphotoperiodwithlightintensityof40molm−2s−1 and temperature of the growth room was maintained at 25±1◦C.MurashigeandSkoogbasalmedium(MS0)wasusedas
control.
Differentialcallusformationfrequencyand changesincallus morphologywererecordedonweeklybasis.Furthermore,growth curvewasestablishedforthebiomassaccumulationoftherapidly growingfriablecallus,obtainedinresponseto1.0mgl−1TDZand 1.0mgl−1NAA.Forthispurpose,1.0gofthecallussectionswere subculturedonMSmediacontaining1.0mgl−1TDZand1.0mgl−1 NAA.Investigationsofthebiomassaccumulationwereperformed withanintervalof7daysfor49daysperiod.Triplicateflaskswere usedinallexperiments.
2.3. Cellsuspensioncultureandgrowthkinetics
To establishcell suspension culture,35-day old proliferated calliweretransferredto500mlErlenmeyerflaskscontainingMS basalmediasupplementedwithcombinationof1.0mgl−1TDZand 1.0mgl−1NAA.Thecultureswereplacedingyratoryshaker(25◦C,
120rpm) in dark for thedevelopment of stock cellsuspension culturesasinoculumcultures.Finecellsuspensioncultureswere collectedafteraperiodof14days.Subsequentexperimentswere carriedoutin250mlErlenmeyerflaskscontaining50mlMSmedia with30gl−1sucrose,1.0mgl−1TDZand1.0mgl−1NAAin combi-nationand1.5gfreshcellsuspensionwasinoculatedineachflask. Observationsanddatarecordingofthegrowthkineticswere per-formedwithanintervalofthreedaysfor42daysperiod.Triplicate flaskswereusedinallexperiments.
2.4. Analyticalmethods
For fresh weight (FW) determination, calli were harvested fromthemediaandweighedwhilecellsuspensionswerefiltered through0.45mstainlesssteelsieve(Sigma),washedwith dis-tilledwater,pressedgentlyonfilterpapertoremoveexcesswater andweighed.Subsequently,calliandcellsuspensioncultureswere ovendried(60◦C,24h)fordryweight(DW)determination.
Extractionofcalli,cellsuspensionculturesamplesandinvitro seedderivedplantlets(control)wasperformedaccordingtothe protocoldescribedbyGirietal.(2012)withminormodification. Briefly,eachfinelygrounddriedsample(100mg)wasmixedwith 80%(v/v)methanol(10ml).Themixturesweresonicated(10min; Toshiba,Japan)3timeswitharestingperiodof30mininbetween andcentrifuged(8000rpm,10min).Thesupernatantswere col-lectedandeitherimmediatelyusedforanalysisorstoredat4◦C.
For total phenolic content determination, Folin-Ciocalteu reagentwasusedaccordingtotheprotocolofVeliogluetal.(1998). Absorbancewasmeasuredat725nmbyusingUV/VIS–DAD spec-trophotometer(HaloDR-20,UV–VISspectrophotometer, Dynam-ica Ltd., Victoria, Australia). The calibrationcurve (0–50g/ml, R2=0.968)wasplottedbyusinggallicacidasstandardandtheTPC wasexpressedasgallicacidequivalents(GAE)/gofdryweight.
Fortotalflavonoidcontentdetermination,thealuminium chlo-ride colorimetric method as described by Chang et al. (2002) wasused.Absorbanceofthereactionmixtureswasmeasuredat 415nmbyusingUV/VIS–DADspectrophotometer.Thecalibration curve(0–40g/ml,R2=0.998)wasplottedbyusingquercetinas standard.TheTFCwasexpressedasquercetinequivalents(QE)/g ofdryweight.
Quantitativeanalysisofphenoliccompoundswascarriedoutby usingHPLC–DADattachedwithDiscoveryC-18analyticalcolumn, bythemethoddescribedbyZuetal.(2006)withminor modifi-cation.Methanol–acetonitrile–water–aecticacid(10:5:85:1)were used as mobile phase A and methanol-acetonitrile-acetic acid (60:40:1)wereusedasmobilephaseB.Agradientoftime0–20min for0–50%B,20–25minfor50–100%Bandthenisocratic100%Btill 30minwasused.Injectionvolumewas20landflowratewas 1.0ml/min.Gallicacidwasanalyzedat257nm,catechinat279nm andcaffeicacidat325nm.Everytimecolumnwasreconditioned for10minbeforethenextanalysis.
Forantioxidantactivitydetermination,theDPPHfree radical scavengingassay(FRSA)asdescribedbyAbbasietal.(2010)was used.Absorbanceofthemixtureswasrecordedat517nmby spec-trophotometer.Forbackgroundcorrection,amethanolicsolution ofDPPHthathaddecayedwithnoresultantpurplecolour(2mgof butylatedhydroxyanisole(BHA)dissolvedin4mlofmethanolwith 0.5mlofDPPHsolutionadded)wasusedinsteadofpuremethanol. Theradicalscavengingactivitywascalculatedbythefollowing for-mulaandexpressedas%ageofDPPHdiscoloration:
%scavengingDPPHfreeradical=100×
1−AEAD
whereAEisabsorbanceofthesolutionwhenanextractwasadded ataparticularconcentrationandADistheabsorbanceoftheDPPH solutionwithnothingadded.
2.5. Experimentaldesignanddataanalysis
Table1
EffectsofdifferentconcentrationsofTDZaloneandincombinationwithIAAandNAAoncallusformationfrequency,callusmorphologyandcallusgrowth(freshweightand dryweight).Valuesaremean±standarderrorofthreereplicates.
S.no. Growthregulator(mgl−1) Callus(%) Callusmorphology FW(gl−1) DW(gl−1)
(Windowsversion7.5.1,SPSSInc.,Chicago)wasusedtodetermine thesignificanceatP<0.05.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
3.1. Callusformationandgrowthkinetics
TheleafexplantsofA.absinthiumL.treatedwith1.0mgl−1TDZ incombinationwith1.0mgl−1 NAAresultedintohighestcallus formationfrequency(83.3%)andmaximumcallusbiomass(FW: 132gl−1)withyellowishfriablefeaturesafter5weeksofculture
(Table1).WhenTDZwasusedalone,maximumcallusformation
frequencyof80.3%wasobservedon1.0mgl−1TDZ.Thecalluswas greenandfriable.However,greencompactorbrownishcompact calliwereproducedinresponsetocombinationofTDZandIAA.NAA incombinationwithTDZwasmoreresponsiveforcallogensisthan IAAincombinationwithTDZ.Furthermore,combinationofTDZ andNAAwasmoreefficientforcallusformationcomparedtoTDZ alone.Previously,bestcallogenicresponseshavebeenobservedon BAincombinationwithNAA(Ninetal.,1997;Ziaetal.,2007a,b) which,inaccordancewithourresults,showthatthecombination ofcytokininsandauxinsissuperiorininducingfriablecalliinleaf explantsofA.absinthiumL.
Biomassformation of thecallus cultureshowed a 7-daylag phase with relatively slow growth (Fig. 1). Almost threefold increaseindrybiomass(DW:5.67gl−1)wasachievedonday14 and,asawhole,fourandhalf-foldincrease(DW:8.73gl−1)indry biomasswasobservedonday42of culture.Declinephasewas observedafter42daysofculture,characterizedbydecreaseindry biomass(DW:7.77gl−1)onday49.
3.2. Cellsuspensionculturedevelopmentandgrowthkinetics
BiomassformationofthecellsuspensioncultureofA.absinthium L.displayedarelativelyquickgrowthcurveandwascharacterized byalagphaseof6daysforfreshanddrybiomass,followedbya longlogphaseof21days,andasubsequentstationaryphase dur-ing42dayperiodofstudy(Fig.2).Almostdoublinginfreshweight (63gl−1)anddryweight(4.07gl−1)wererecordedonday9of cul-ture.However,maximumfreshweightanddryweightdisplayed bycultureatday27were171gl−1and9.20gl−1,respectively. Fur-thermore,cellsuspensioncultureswerefoundtobemilkywhite, greenandbrownishincolourduringlog,stationaryand decline phases,respectively(Fig.3).
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Culture time (days)
F
Fig.1.GrowthkineticsofcalluscultureofArtemisiaabsinthiumL.onMSmedium supplementedwith 1.0mgl−1TDZ+1.0mgl−1NAA.Values are mean±standard
Fig.3. Cellsuspensionculturesduring(A)logphase,(B)stationaryphaseand(C)declinephase.
3.3. Totalphenoliccontent(TPC)andtotalflavonoidcontent (TFC)incallusandcellsuspensioncultures
Phenolics and flavonoids induction in callus culture of A. absinthiumL.wasnotfoundtobestrictlygrowthdependent(Fig.4). Initialincrease in TPC and TFC wasobserved in the log phase (day21),withrespectivepeakvaluesof1.48mgGAE/gDW (4.9-foldincrease)and0.48mgQE/gDW(4.1-foldincrease)onday35. Earlier studies have been undertaken on the investigations of totalphenoliccontentincalluscultureofvariousmedicinalplants
(Schmeda-Hirschmann et al.,2005; Nazet al.,2008; Giri etal.,
2012).Ourresultswereconsistentwiththepreviousreportsfor highestlevelsofflavonoidsproductionincallusculturesof differ-entmedicinalspeciesduringthelogphaseoftheculture(Fuetal.,
2005;Antognonietal.,2007;Andreazza etal.,2009;Tanetal.,
2010).
A considerable increase with more than doubling in TPC andTFCwasobservedin6-dayoldsuspensioncultures(Fig.5). On contrary to callus profile, peak values of total phenolics with 3.57mgGAE/gDW (day 30) and total flavonoids with 1.89mgQE/gDW(day33)wereobservedintheearlystationary phaseofthegrowthcurve.Previously,thecellculturesofArtemisia fragidaandSilybummarianumwerereportedtobemore produc-tiveforphenolicacidsamongninedifferentplantspecies(Riedel et al., 2010). Furthermore, thepresence of different secondary
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Fig.4. Totalphenoliccontent(mggallicacid/gdryweight)andtotalflavonoid con-tent(mgquercetin/gdryweight)incallusculturewithrespecttogrowthcurve (DW).Valuesaremean±standarderrorofthreereplicates.
metabolites including phenolics and flavonoids in the in vitro culturesofA.annuahasbeenreviewed(Bhakunietal.,2001).
3.4. Antioxidantactivity
TheDPPHfreeradicalscavengingactivityincalluscultureswas foundtobeindependentofcallusbiomassaccumulation.However, itwasfoundtobedependentonsecondarymetabolites produc-tionduringtheculturegrowth.Highestantioxidantactivity(63.3%) andmaximumaccumulationoftotalphenolics(1.48mgGAE/gDW) andtotalflavonoids(0.48mgQE/gDW) wererecordedin35day oldcalli(Fig.6).Declineinantioxidantactivitywasrecordedafter 35 daysof culture.Theseresultsshowa positive correlationof phenoliccompoundsandantioxidantactivityincallusculturesof A.absinthiumL.
Ontheotherhand,theDPPHradicalscavengingactivityincell suspensioncultureswasnotfoundtobestrictlyculturegrowth associated.Maximumbiomassaccumulation(DW:9.03gl−1)was observedonday27whilehighestantioxidantactivity(82.7%)was foundin30-dayoldsuspensioncultures,instationaryphase. How-ever,antioxidantactivitywasfoundtobeassociatedwithtotal phenolics production (Fig.7). Maximum total phenolic content (3.57mgGAE/gDW)inconjunctionwithhighestantioxidant activ-itywasrecordedin30-dayoldsuspensionculturesinstationary phase.Declineinactivitywasrecordedafter39daysand59%of
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42
Fig.5. Totalphenoliccontent(mggallicacid/gdryweight)andtotalflavonoid con-tent(mgquercetin/gdryweight)incellsuspensioncultureofArtemisiaabsinthium
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49
Fig.6. DPPHradicalscavengingactivity(%)withrespecttototalphenoliccontent andtotalflavonoidcontentincallusculturesofArtemisiaabsinthiumL.Valuesare mean±standarderrorofthreereplicates.Columnswithsimilaralphabetsarenot significantlydifferentatP<0.05.
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42
Fig.7. DPPHradicalscavengingactivity(%)withrespecttototalphenoliccontent andtotalflavonoidcontentincellsuspensionculturesofArtemisiaabsinthiumL. Valuesaremean±standarderrorofthreereplicates.Columnswithsimilaralphabets arenotsignificantlydifferentatP<0.05.
radicalscavengingactivitywasobservedin42dayoldsuspension cultures.
3.5. HPLCbasedquantificationofphenoliccompoundsincell suspensionculture
Gallic acid was found to be the major phenolic compound whichaccumulatedinconjunctionwithbiomassaccumulationin cellculture(Table2).Overallaccumulationofgallicacidranged from 43.3gg−1 to 104gg−1DW (control: 21.3gg−1DW) and maximumaccumulation wasobserved during theonset of stationaryphase(day-30)ofculturewhichissignificantlyhigher thanthecontentfoundincontrol.Theseresultsareincorrelation withourfindingsofmaximumTPCaccumulationin30dayoldcell suspensioncultures.Caffeicacidwasthesecondmajorphenolic compoundobservedintermsofitsaccumulationinthelogphase of cultureand ranged from1.03gg−1DW to27.40gg−1DW (control:28.4gg−1DW). However,itsmaximumaccumulation wasrecordedinthemidlogphase(day24).Catechinwas accu-mulatedonlyinthestationaryphase(day36and42)ofculture
Table2
Quantificationofgallicacid,caffeicacidandcatechinincellsuspensionculturesof
ArtemisiaabsinthiumL.Valuesaremean±standarderrorofthreereplicates. Phenoliccompounds(gg−1)
Day Gallicacid Caffeicacid Catechin
Control(SDPa) 21.3
aSDP,seedderivedplantlets. bND,notdetected.
with the values 75.3gg−1DW and 92.0gg−1DW (control: 68.1gg−1DW)onday-36andday-42,respectively.
The phenolic compounds detectedin the present study are medicinallyimportantphytochemicals.Gallicacidisalow molec-ularweightantioxidant(LMWA)havingantiapoptotic(Sohietal., 2003),neuroprotective(Luetal.,2006)andanticarcinogenic prop-erties(Tomas-BarberanandClifford,2000).Similarly,Caffeicacid hasexhibitedpharmacologicalantioxidant,anticancerand antimu-tagenic activities(Okutan et al., 2005) and catechin prevented oxidativeinjuryinhumangastricepithelialcells(Grazianietal.,
2005).
3.6. Relationshipbetweentotalphenoliccontent,totalflavonoid content,phenoliccompoundsandantioxidantactivityincell suspensionculture
Manyreportsareavailableontheprotectiveeffectsofnatural antioxidantsagainstoxidativestressrelateddisorderslikeageing, degenerativediseases andcancer(Cozzietal.,1997).According
toBidcholetal.(2011),phenolic compoundsmayhavea direct
contributionintheantioxidantactivity.Theantioxidantpotential invariousmedicinalplantshasbeenshowntobemainlydueto phenoliccompounds(Jayasingheetal.,2003;Alietal.,2006;Kim
etal.,2006;Alietal.,2007).Althoughartemisininhasbeenreported
tobethemajorcompound againstmalariain Artemisiaspecies, reportsareavailableonthesynergisticeffectsofdietaryflavonoids aloneandincombinationsagainstthisdisease(LehaneandSaliba,
2008;Ferreiraetal.,2010).Inthepresentstudy,apositive
cor-relationwasobservedamongTPC(3.57mgGAE/gDW),gallicacid accumulation(104gg−1)andantioxidantactivity(82.7%)in30 dayoldsuspension cultures.Our resultsarein agreementwith apreviousreportwhereapositivecorrelationbetweenhighTPC andTFCandantiradicalandantioxidantactivitiesinA.absinthium L.wasobserved(Canadanovic-Brunetet al.,2005).Senguletal.
(2009)havealsoreportedapositivecorrelationbetweentotal
Table3
Comparativeanalysisoftotalphenoliccontent,totalflavonoidcontentandantioxidantactivityinseedderivedplantlets,calluscultureandcellsuspensionculture.Values aremean±standarderrorofthreereplicates.
Tissuetype Totalphenoliccontent(mgGAEg−1) Totalflavonoidcontent(mgQEg−1) Antioxidantactivity(%)
Seedderivedplantlets 2.75±0.077 1.200±0.121 72.3±1.068
Callus 1.48±0.101 0.48±0.011 63.3±1.760
Cellsuspension 3.57±0.088 1.77±0.168 82.7±3.530
antioxidant activity than callus and seed germinated plantlets
(Table3).
4. Conclusion
Thepresentreportdescribesestablishmentofcellsuspension culturesofA.absinthiumL.fortheenhancedproductionof pheno-licsandflavonoids.Cellsuspensioncultureswerefoundtoproduce significantlyhigherlevelsoftotalphenolics,totalflavonoidsand gallicacidandshowedhigherantioxidantactivitythantheseed derived plantlets. Furthermore, a positive correlation between phenolicsandantioxidantactivitywasfoundinsuspension cul-tures.Itcanbeconcludedthattheinvitrocultures, particularly cellsuspensionculture ofA. absinthiumL. hasthepotentialfor scaleupstudiesoncommerciallevelbypharmaceuticalindustries, inorder tofurtherenhancethemedicinallyimportant phenolic compounds.
References
Abbasi,B.H.,Khan,M.A.,Mahmood,T.,Ahmad,M.,Chaudhary,M.F.,Khan,M.A.,2010. Shootregenerationandfree-radicalscavengingactivityinSilybummarianumL. PlantCellTissueOrganCult.101(3),371–376.
AlKhateeb,W.,Hussein,E.,Qouta,L.,Alu’datt,M.,Al-Shara,B.,Abu-zaiton,A.,2012. Invitropropagationandcharacterizationofphenoliccontentalongwith antiox-idantandantimicrobialactivitiesofCichoriumpumilumJacq.PlantCellTissue OrganCult.1–8(110),103L110.
Ali,M.B.,Hahn,E.J.,Paek,K.Y.,2007.Methyljasmonateandsalicylicacidinduced oxidativestressandaccumulationofphenolicsinPanaxginsengbioreactorroot suspensioncultures.Molecules12(3),607–621.
Ali,M.B.,Khatun,S.,Hahn,E.J.,Paek,K.Y.,2006.Enhancementofphenylpropanoid enzymesandlignininPhalaenopsisorchidandtheirinfluenceonplant acclima-tisationatdifferentlevelsofphotosyntheticphotonflux.PlantGrowthRegul. 49,137–146.
Amid,A.,Johan,N.N.,Jamal,P.,Zain,W.N.W.M.,2011.Observationofantioxidant activityofleaves,callusandsuspensioncultureofJusticiagendarusa.Afr.J. Biotechnol.10(81),18653–18656.
Andreazza,N.L.,Abreu,I.N.,Sawaya,A.C.,Eberlin,M.N.,Mazzafera,P.,2009. Pro-ductionofimidazolealkaloidsincellculturesofjaborandiasaffectedbythe mediumpH.Biotechnol.Lett.31(4),607–614.
Antognoni,F.,Zheng,S.,Pagnucco,C.,Baraldi,R.,Poli,F.,Biondi,S.,2007. Induc-tionofflavonoidproductionbyUV-BradiationinPassifloraquadrangulariscallus cultures.Fitoterapia78(5),345–352.
Bhakuni,R.S.,Jain,D.C.,Sharma,R.P.,Kumar,S.,2001.Secondarymetabolitesof Artemisiaannuaandtheirbiologicalactivity.Curr.Sci.80(1),35–48. Bidchol,A.M.,Wilfred,A.,Abhijna,P.,Harish,R.,2011.Freeradicalscavenging
activ-ityofaqueousandethanolicextractofBrassicaoleraceaL.var.italica.Food BioprocessTech.4(7),1137–1143.
Canadanovic-Brunet,J.M.,Djilas,S.M.,Cetkovic,G.S.,Tumbas,V.T.,2005.Free-radical scavengingactivityofwormwood(ArtemisiaabsinthiumL.)extracts.J.Sci.Food Agric.85(2),265–272.
Chang,C.,Yang,M.,Wen,H.,Chern,J.,2002.Estimationoftotalflavonoidcontent inpropolisbytwocomplementarycolorimetricmethods.J.FoodDrugAnal.10, 178–182.
Cie´sla,Ł.,Kowalska,I.,Oleszek,W.,Stochmal,A.,2012.Freeradicalscavenging activ-itiesofpolyphenoliccompoundsisolatedfrommedicagosativaandmedicago truncatulaassessedbymeansofthin-layerchromatographyDPPH•rapidtest.
Phytochem.Anal.,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pca.2379.
Cozzi,R.,Ricordy,R.,Aglitti,T.,Gatta,V.,Petricone,P.,DeSalvia,R.,1997. Ascor-bicacidandb-caroteneasmodulatorsofoxidativedamage.Carcinogenesis18, 223±228.
Diwan, R., Shinde, A., Malpathak, N., 2012. Phytochemical composition and antioxidant otential of Ruta graveolens L. in vitro culture lines. J. Bot., http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/685427.
Ferreira,J.F.,Luthria,D.L.,Sasaki,T.,Heyerick,A.,2010.FlavonoidsfromArtemisia annuaL.asantioxidantsandtheirpotentialsynergismwithartemisininagainst malariaandcancer.Molecules15(5),3135–3170.
Fu,C.X.,Zhao,D.X.,Huang,Y.,Ma,F.S.,2005.Cellularaggregatesizeasthe criti-calfactorforflavonoidproductionbysuspensionculturesofSaussureamedusa. Biotechnol.Lett.27(2),91–95.
Gambelunghe,C.,Melai,P.,2002.Absinthe:enjoyinganewpopolarityamongyoung people?ForensicSci.Int.130(2),183–186.
Giri,L.,Dhyani,P.,Rawat,S.,Bhatt,I.D.,Nandi,S.K.,Rawal,R.S.,Pande,V.,2012.Invitro productionofphenoliccompoundsandantioxidantactivityincallussuspension culturesofHabenariaedgeworthii:arareHimalayanmedicinalorchid.Ind.Crops Prod.39,1–6.
Graziani,G.,D’Argenio,G.,Tuccillo,C.,Loguercio,C.,Ritieni,A.,Morisco,F.,Blanco, C.D.V.,Fogliano,V.,Romano,M.,2005.Applepolyphenolextractsprevent dam-agetohumangastricepithelialcellsinvitroandtoratgastricmucosainvivo. Gut54,193–200.
Hernandez,H.,Mendiola,J.,Torres,D.,Garrido,N.,Perez,N.,1990.Effectofaqueous extractsofArtemisiaontheinvitrocultureofPlasmodiumfalciparum.Fitoterapia 41(6),540–541.
Ibrahim,M.H.,Jaafar,H.Z.,Karimi,E.,Ghasemzadeh,A.,2012.Primary,secondary metabolites,photosyntheticcapacityandantioxidantactivityoftheMalaysian HerbKacipFatimah(LabisiaPumilaBenth)exposedtopotassiumfertilization undergreenhouseconditions.Int.J.Mol.Sci.13(11),15321–15342.
Irshad,S.,Mannan,A.,Mirza,B.,2011.AntimalarialactivityofthreePakistani medic-inalplants.Pak.J.Pharm.Sci.24(4),589.
Jayasinghe,C.,Jayasinghe,C.,Goto,N.,Aoki,T.,Wada,S.,2003.Phenolicscomposition andantioxidantactivityofsweetbasil.J.Agric.FoodChem.51,4442–4449. Joo,S.S.,Kim,Y.,Lee,D.I.,2010.Antimicrobialandantioxidantpropertiesof
sec-ondarymetabolitesfromwhiteroseflower.PlantPathol.J.26(1),57–62. Kim,H.J.,Chen,F.,WangXiChoi,J.H.,2006.Effectofmethyljasmonateonphenolics,
isothiocyanate,andmetabolicenzymesinradishsprout(RaphanussativusL.).J. Agric.FoodChem.54,7263–7269.
Kolewe,M.E.,Gaurav,V.,Roberts,S.C.,2008.Pharmaceuticallyactivenatural prod-uctsynthesisandsupplyviaplantcellculturetechnology.Mol.Pharm.5, 243–256.
Lehane,A.M.,Saliba,K.J.,2008.Commondietaryflavonoidsinhibitthegrowthofthe intraerythrocyticmalariaparasite.BMCRes.Notes1,26.
Lu,Z.,Nie,G.,Belton,P.S.,Tang,H.,Zhao,B.,2006.Structure–activityrelationship analysisofantioxidantabilityandneuroprotectiveeffectofgallicacid deriva-tives.Neurochem.Int.48(4),263–274.
Murashige,T.,Skoog,F.,1962.Arevisedmediumforrapidgrowthandbioassays withtobaccotissuecultures.Physiol.Plant.15(3),473–497.
Nalbantsoy,A.,Erel,S.B.,Köksal,C.,Göc¸men,B.,Yıldız,M.Z.,Karabay,Y.N.,2013.Viper VenominducedinflammationwithMontiviperaxanthina(Gray,1849)andthe anti-snakevenomactivitiesofArtemisiaabsinthiumL.inRat.Toxicon65,34–40. Naz,S.,Ali,A.,Iqbal,J.,2008.Phenoliccontentinvitroculturesofchickpea(Cicer ari-etinumL.).Duringcallogenesisandorganogenesis.Pak.J.Bot.40(6),2525–2539. Nin,S.,Bennici,A.,Roselli,R.,Mariotti,D.,Sciff,S.,Magherini,A.R.,1997. Agrobc-teriummediatedtransformationonArtemisiaabsinthiumL.,(wormwood)and productionofsecondarymetabolites.PlantCellRep.16,725–730.
Okutan,H.,Ozcelik,N.,Yilmaz,H.R.,Uz,E.,2005.Effectsofcaffeicacidphenethyl esteronlipidperoxidationandantioxidantenzymesindiabeticratheart.Clin. Biochem.38(2),191.
Rice-Evans,C.A.,Miller,N.J.,Bolwell,P.G.,Bramley,P.M.,Pridham,J.B.,1995.The rel-ativeantioxidantactivitiesofplant-derivedpolyphenolicflavonoids.FreeRadic. Res.22,375–383.
Rice-Evans,C.A.,Miller,N.J.,Paganga,G.,1996.Structure–antioxidantactivity rela-tionshipsofflavonoidsandphenolicacids.FreeRadic.Biol.Med.20,933–956. Riedel,H.,Cai,Z.,Kütük,O.,Smetanska,I.,2010.Obtainingphenolicacidsfromcell
culturesofvariousArtemisiaspecies.Afr.J.Biotechnol.9(51),8805–8809. Schmeda-Hirschmann,G.,Jordan,M.,Gerth,A.,Wilken,D.,2005.Secondary
metabo-litecontentinrhizomes,callusculturesandinvitroregeneratedplantletsof Solidagochilensis.Z.Naturforsch.C60(1–2),5–10.
Sengul,M.,Yildiz,H.,Gungor,N.,Cetin,B.,Eser,Z.,Ercisli,S.,2009.Totalphenolic content,antioxidantandantimicrobialactivitiesofsomemedicinalplants.Pak. J.Pharm.Sci.22(1),102–106.
Shafi,G.,Hasan,T.N.,Syed,N.A.,Al-Hazzani,A.A.,Alshatwi,A.A.,Jyothi,A., Mun-shi,A.,2012.Artemisiaabsinthium(AA):anovelpotentialcomplementaryand alternativemedicineforbreastcancer.Mol.Biol.Rep.39,7373–7379. Sharopov,F.S.,Sulaimonova,V.A.,Setzer,W.N.,2012.Compositionoftheessential
oilofArtemisiaabsinthiumfromTajikistan.Rec.Nat.Prod.6(2),127–134. Sohi,K.K.,Mittal,N.,Hundal,M.K.,Khanduja,K.L.,2003.Gallicacid,an
antioxi-dant,exhibitsantiapoptoticpotentialinnormalhumanlymphocytes:aBcl-2 independentmechanism.J.Nutr.Sci.Vitaminol.49(4),221.
Tan,S.H.,Musa,R.,Ariff,A.,Maziah,M.,2010.Effectofplantgrowthregulatorson cal-lus,cellsuspensionandcelllineselectionforflavonoidproductionfromPegaga (CentellaasiaticaL.urban).Am.J.Biochem.Biotechnol.6(4),284–299. Tomas-Barberan,F.,Clifford,M.N.,2000.Dietaryhydroxybenzoicacidderivatives
Velioglu,Y.S.,Mazza,G.,Gao,L.,Oomah,B.D.,1998.Antioxidantactivityandtotal phenolicsinselectedfruits,vegetables,andgrainproducts.J.Agric.FoodChem. 46,4113–4117.
Zafar,M.M.,Hamdard,M.E.,Hameed,A.,1990.ScreeningofArtemisiaabsinthium forantimalarialeffectsonPlasmodiumbergheiinmice:apreliminaryreport.J. Ethnopharmacol.30,223–226.
Zia,M.,Mannan,A.,Chaudhary,M.F.,2007a.Effectofgrowthregulatorsandamino acidsonartemisininproductioninthecallusofArtemisiaabsinthium.Pak.J.Bot. 39(2),799–805.
Zia,M.,Rehman,R.,Chaudhary,M.F.,2007b.Hormonalregulationfor calloge-nesisandorgangenesisofArtemisiaabsinthiumL.Afr.J. Biotechnol.6(16), 1874–1878.