• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

sigma09-071. 221KB Jun 04 2011 12:10:29 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "sigma09-071. 221KB Jun 04 2011 12:10:29 AM"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Inversion of the Dual Dunkl–Sonine Transform on

R

Using Dunkl Wavelets

Mohamed Ali MOUROU

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Al-Jouf University, P.O. Box 2014, Al-Jouf, Skaka, Saudi Arabia

E-mail: mohamed ali.mourou@yahoo.fr

Received March 02, 2009, in final form July 04, 2009; Published online July 14, 2009 doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2009.071

Abstract. We prove a Calder´on reproducing formula for the Dunkl continuous wavelet transform on R. We apply this result to derive new inversion formulas for the dual Dunkl– Sonine integral transform.

Key words: Dunkl continuous wavelet transform; Calder´on reproducing formula; dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 42B20; 42C15; 44A15; 44A35

1

Introduction

The one-dimensional Dunkl kernel eγ,γ >−1/2, is defined by

eγ(z) =jγ(iz) + z

2(γ+ 1)jγ+1(iz), z∈C,

where

jγ(z) = Γ(γ+ 1) ∞ X

n=0

(1)n(z/2)2n n! Γ(n+γ+ 1)

is the normalized spherical Bessel function of indexγ. It is well-known (see [3]) that the functions eγ(λ·), λC, are solutions of the differential-difference equation

Λγu=λu, u(0) = 1,

where

Λγf(x) =f′(x) +

γ+1 2

f(x)f(x) x

is the Dunkl operator with parameterγ+1/2 associated with the reflection grourZ2onR. Those

operators were introduced and studied by Dunkl [2, 3, 4] in connection with a generalization of the classical theory of spherical harmonics. Besides its mathematical interest, the Dunkl operator Λα has quantum-mechanical applications; it is naturally involved in the study of one-dimensional harmonic oscillators governed by Wigner’s commutation rules [6,11,16].

It is known, see for example [14,15], that the Dunkl kernels onRpossess the following Sonine

type integral representation

eβ(λx) = Z |x|

−|x|Kα,β

(2)

where

Kα,β(x, y) :=    

  

aα,βsgn(x) (x+y)

x2y2β−α−1

|x|2β+1 if|y|<|x|,

0 if|y| ≥ |x|,

(1.2)

with β > α >1/2, and

aα,β :=

Γ(β+ 1) Γ(α+ 1) Γ(βα).

Define the Dunkl–Sonine integral transformXα,β and its dualtXα,β, respectively, by

Xα,βf(x) = Z |x|

−|x|Kα,β

(x, y)f(y)|y|2α+1dy,

tX

α,βf(y) = Z

|x|≥|y|K

α,β(x, y)f(x)|x|2β+1dx.

Soltani has showed in [14] that the dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform tX

α,β is a trans-mutation operator between Λα and Λβ on the Schwartz space S(R), i.e., it is an automorphism of S(R) satisfying the intertwining relation

t

Xα,βΛβf = ΛαtXα,βf, f ∈ S(R).

The same author [14] has obtained inversion formulas for the transformtX

α,β involving pseudo-differential-difference operators and only valid on a restricted subspace of S(R).

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of Dunkl wavelets (see [5]) to derive a new inversion of the dual Dunkl–Sonine transform on some Lebesgue spaces. For other applications of wavelet type transforms to inverse problems we refer the reader to [7, 8] and the references therein.

The content of this article is as follows. In Section2 we recall some basic harmonic analysis results related to the Dunkl operator. In Section 3 we list some basic properties of the Dunkl– Sonine integral trnsform and its dual. In Section4we give the definition of the Dunkl continuous wavelet transform and we establish for this transform a Calder´on formula. By combining the results of the two previous sections, we obtain in Section 5 two new inversion formulas for the dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform.

2

Preliminaries

Note 2.1. Throughout this section assumeγ >1/2. Define Lp(R,|x|2γ+1dx), 1p≤ ∞, as the class of measurable functions f on Rfor which ||f||p,γ <, where

||f||p,γ = Z

R|

f(x)|p|x|2γ+1dx 1/p

, if p <,

and ||f||∞,γ =||f||∞= ess supx∈R|f(x)|. S(R) stands for the usual Schwartz space.

The Dunkl transform of orderγ+ 1/2 onRis defined for a functionf inL1(R,|x|2γ+1dx) by

Fγf(λ) = Z

R

(3)

Remark 2.2. It is known that the Dunkl transform Fγ maps continuously and injectively L1(R,|x|2γ+1dx) into the space C

0(R) (of continuous functions onRvanishing at infinity).

Two standard results about the Dunkl transformFγ are as follows.

Theorem 2.3 (see [1]).

(i) For every f L1L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) we have the Plancherel formula

Z

R|

f(x)|2|x|2γ+1dx=mγ Z

R|F

γf(λ)|2|λ|2γ+1dλ,

where

mγ =

1

22γ+2(Γ(γ+ 1))2. (2.2)

(ii) The Dunkl transform Fα extends uniquely to an isometric isomorphism from L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) onto L2(R, m

γ|λ|2γ+1dλ). The inverse transform is given by

Fγ−1g(x) =mγ Z

R

g(λ)eγ(iλx)|λ|2γ+1dλ,

where the integral converges in L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx).

Theorem 2.4 (see [1]). The Dunkl transformFα is an automorphism ofS(R). An outstanding result about Dunkl kernels onR(see [12]) is the product formula

eγ(λx)eγ(λy) =Tγx(eγ(λ·)) (y), λC, x, yR,

where Tγx stand for the Dunkl translation operators defined by

Tγxf(y) = 1 2

Z 1

−1

fpx2+y22xyt 1 +p x−y

x2+y22xyt

!

Wγ(t)dt

+1 2

Z 1

−1

fpx2+y22xyt 1 p x−y

x2+y22xyt

!

Wγ(t)dt, (2.3)

with

Wγ(t) =

Γ(γ+ 1)

πΓ(γ+ 1/2)(1 +t) 1t2γ−1/2.

The Dunkl convolution of two functionsf,g on Ris defined by the relation

f γg(x) = Z

R

Tγxf(y)g(y)|y|2γ+1dy. (2.4)

Proposition 2.5 (see [13]).

(i) Letp, q, r[1,]such that 1p+q11 = 1r. Iff Lp(R,|x|2γ+1dx)andgLq(R,|x|2γ+1dx),

then fγg∈Lr(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and

||f γg||r,γ ≤4||f||p,γ||g||q,γ. (2.5)

(ii) For f L1(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and gLp(R,|x|2γ+1dx), p= 1 or 2, we have

Fγ(f γg) =FγfFγg. (2.6)

(4)

3

The dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform

Throughout this section assumeβ > α >1/2.

Definition 3.1 (see [14]). The dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform tX

α,β is defined for smooth functions onR by

tX

α,βf(y) := Z

|x|≥|y|Kα,β

(x, y)f(x)|x|2β+1dx, yR, (3.1)

where Kα,β is the kernel given by (1.2).

Remark 3.2. Clearly, if supp (f)[a, a] then supp tXα,βf

⊂[a, a].

The next statement provides formulas relating harmonic analysis tools tied to Λα with those tied to Λβ, and involving the operatortXα,β.

Proposition 3.3.

(i) The dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform tXα,β maps L1(R,|x|2β+1dx) continuously into L1(R,|x|2α+1dx).

(ii) For every f L1(R,|x|2β+1dx) we have the identity

Fβ(f) =Fα◦tXα,β(f). (3.2)

(iii) Let f, gL1(R,|x|2β+1dx). Then

tX

α,β(f∗β g) =tXα,βf∗αtXα,βg. (3.3)

Proof . Letf L1(R,|x|2β+1dx). By Fubini’s theorem we have Z

R tX

α,β(|f|)(y)|y|2α+1dy= Z

R Z

|x|≥|y|Kα,β

(x, y)|f(x)||x|2β+1dx !

|y|2α+1dy

= Z

R| f(x)|

Z |x|

−|x|Kα,β

(x, y)|y|2α+1dy !

|x|2β+1dx.

But by (1.1),

Z |x|

−|x|Kα,β

(x, y)|y|2α+1dy=eβ(0) = 1. (3.4)

Hence,tXα,βf is almost everywhere defined onR, belongs toL1(R,|x|2α+1dx) and||tXα,βf||1,α≤

||f||1,β, which proves (i). Identity (3.2) follows by using (1.1), (2.1), (3.1), and Fubini’s theorem. Identity (3.3) follows by applying the Dunkl transformFα to both its sides and by using (2.6),

(3.2) and Remark2.2.

Remark 3.4. From (3.2) and Remark 2.2, we deduce that the transform tX

α,β maps L1(R,

|x|2β+1dx) injectively intoL1(R,|x|2α+1dx).

(5)

Theorem 3.5. The dual Dunkl–Sonine integral transform tXα,β is an automorphism of S(R)

satisfying the intertwining relation

t

Xα,βΛβf = ΛαtXα,βf, f ∈ S(R).

Moreover tXα,β admits the factorization tX

α,βf =tVα−1◦tVβf for all f ∈ S(R),

where for γ >1/2, tVγ denotes the dual Dunkl intertwining operator given by

tVγf(y) = Γ(γ+ 1) πΓ(γ+ 1/2)

Z

|x|≥|y|

sgn(x) (x+y) x2y2γ−1/2f(x)dx.

Definition 3.6 (see [14]). The Dunkl–Sonine integral transform Xα,β is defined for a locally bounded functionf on Rby

Xα,βf(x) =

(6)

4

Calder´

on’s formula for the Dunkl continuous

wavelet transform

Throughout this section assumeγ >1/2.

Definition 4.1. We say that a functiong L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) is a Dunkl wavelet of order γ, if it satisfies the admissibility condition

0< Cgγ := Z ∞

0 |Fγ

g(λ)|2dλ λ =

Z ∞

0 |Fγ

g(λ)|2dλ

λ <∞. (4.1)

Remark 4.2.

(i) If gis real-valued we have Fγg(−λ) =Fγg(λ), so (4.1) reduces to

0< Cgγ:= Z ∞

0 |F

γg(λ)|2dλ λ <∞.

(ii) If 06=gL2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) is real-valued and satisfies

∃η >0 such that Fγg(λ)− Fγg(0) =O(λη) as λ→0+

then (4.1) is equivalent toFγg(0) = 0.

Note 4.3. For a functiong inL2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and for (a, b)(0,)×Rwe write

ga,bγ (x) := 1 a2γ+2T

−b γ ga(x),

whereT−b

γ are the generalized translation operators given by (2.3), and ga(x) :=g(x/a),x∈R. Remark 4.4. Let g L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and a > 0. Then it is easily checked that ga L2(R,

|x|2γ+1dx), ||ga||2,γ =aγ+1||g||2,γ, and Fγ(ga)(λ) =a2γ+2Fγ(g)(aλ).

Definition 4.5. Let gL2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) be a Dunkl wavelet of orderγ. We define for regular

functions f on R, the Dunkl continuous wavelet transform by

Φγg(f)(a, b) := Z

R

f(x)ga,bγ (x)|x|2γ+1dx

which can also be written in the form

Φγg(f)(a, b) = 1

a2γ+2 f∗γega(b),

where γ is the generalized convolution product given by (2.4), andega(x) :=g(−x/a),x∈R.

The Dunkl continuous wavelet transform has been investigated in depth in [5] in which precise definitions, examples, and a more complete discussion of its properties can be found. We look here for a Calder´on formula for this transform. We start with some technical lemmas.

Lemma 4.6. For all f, gL2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and all ψ∈ S(R) we have the identity

Z

R

f γg(x)Fγ−1ψ(x)|x|2γ+1dx=mγ Z

RF

γf(λ)Fγg(λ)ψ−(λ)|λ|2γ+1dλ,

(7)

Proof . FixgL2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and ψ∈ S(R). Forf L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) put

S1(f) :=

Z

R

f γg(x)Fγ−1ψ(x)|x|2γ+1dx

and

S2(f) :=mγ Z

RF

γf(λ)Fγg(λ)ψ−(λ)|λ|2γ+1dλ.

By (2.5), (2.6) and Theorem2.3, we see that S1(f) =S2(f) for eachf ∈L1∩L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx).

Moreover, by using (2.5), H¨older’s inequality and Theorem 2.3 we have

|S1(f)| ≤ ||f∗γg||∞||Fγ−1ψ||1,γ ≤4||f||2,γ||g||2,γ||Fγ−1ψ||1,γ

and

|S2(f)| ≤mγ||FγfFγg||1,γ||ψ||∞≤mγ||Fγf||2,γ||Fγg||2,γ||ψ||∞=||f||2,γ||g||2,γ||ψ||∞,

which shows that the linear functionals S1 and S2 are bounded on L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx). Therefore

S1 ≡S2, and the lemma is proved.

Lemma 4.7. Let f1, f2 ∈ L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx). Then f1 ∗γ f2 ∈ L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) if and only if

Fγf1Fγf2 ∈L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) and we have

Fγ(f1∗γf2) =Fγf1Fγf2

in the L2-case.

Proof . Supposef1∗γf2 ∈L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx). By Lemma4.6and Theorem 2.3, we have for any

ψ∈ S(R),

mγ Z

RF

γf1(λ)Fγf2(λ)ψ(λ)|λ|2γ+1dλ=

Z

R

f1∗γf2(x)Fγ−1ψ−(x)|x|2γ+1dx

= Z

R

f1∗γf2(x)Fγ−1ψ(x)|x|2γ+1dx=mγ Z

RF

γ(f1∗γf2)(λ)ψ(λ)|λ|2γ+1dλ,

which shows that Fγf1Fγf2 =Fγ(f1∗γf2). Conversely, if Fγf1Fγf2 ∈ L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx), then

by Lemma4.6 and Theorem2.3, we have for anyψ∈ S(R), Z

R

f1∗γf2(x)Fγ−1ψ(x)|x|2γ+1dx=mγ Z

RF

γf1(λ)Fγf2(λ)ψ(λ)e |λ|2γ+1dλ

= Z

RF −1

γ (Fγf1Fγf2)(x)Fγ−1ψ(x)|x|2γ+1dx,

which shows, in view of Theorem 2.4, that f1∗γf2 =Fγ−1(Fγf1Fγf2). This achieves the proof

of Lemma4.7.

A combination of Lemma4.7 and Theorem2.3gives us the following.

Lemma 4.8. Let f1, f2 ∈L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx). Then

Z

R|

f1∗γf2(x)|2|x|2γ+1dx=mγ Z

R|F

γf1(λ)|2|Fγf2(λ)|2|λ|2γ+1dλ,

(8)

Lemma 4.9. Let g L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) be a Dunkl wavelet of order γ such that FγgL∞(R).

Proof . Using Schwarz inequality for the measure da

a4γ+5 we obtain Theorem2.3 and Lemma4.7we get

(9)

Hence, applying Fubini’s theorem, we find that

Gε,δ(x) =mγ

which completes the proof.

We can now state the main result of this section.

Theorem 4.10 (Calder´on’s formula). Let g L2(R,|x|2γ+1dx) be a Dunkl wavelet of order

Proof . It is easily seen that

fε,δ =fγGε,δ,

So (4.5) follows from the dominated convergence theorem.

Another pointwise inversion formula for the Dunkl wavelet transform, proved in [5], is as follows.

(10)

5

Inversion of the dual Dunkl–Sonine transform

using Dunkl wavelets

From now on assume β > α >1/2. In order to invert the dual Dunkl–Sonine transform, we need the following two technical lemmas.

Lemma 5.1. Let06=gL1L2(R,|x|2α+1dx)such thatFαgL1(R,|x|2α+1dx)and satisfying

Proof . By Theorem 2.3we have

g(x) =mα

By (5.1) there is a positive constantk such that

I1 ≤k

Z

|λ|≤1|

λ|2η+4α−2β+1dλ= k

η+ 2αβ+ 1 <∞.

From Theorem2.3, it follows that

I2 =

(11)

Lemma 5.2. Let 06=gL1L2(R,|x|2α+1dx) be real-valued such thatFαgL1(R,|x|2α+1dx)

and satisfying

∃η >2(βα) such that Fαg(λ) =O(λη) as λ0+. (5.3)

Then Xα,βg∈L2(R,|x|2β+1dx) is a Dunkl wavelet of order β andFβ(Xα,βg)∈L∞(R).

Proof . By combining (5.3) and Lemma5.1we see thatXα,βg∈L2(R,|x|2β+1dx),Fβ(Xα,βg) is bounded and

Fβ(Xα,βg)(λ) =O λη−2(β−α)

as λ0+.

Thus, in view of Remark4.2,Xα,βg satisfies the admissibility condition (4.1) for γ =β.

Remark 5.3. In view of Remark 4.2, each function satisfying the conditions of Lemma 5.1 is a Dunkl wavelet of order α.

Lemma 5.4. Let g be as in Lemma 5.2. Then for all f L1(R,|x|2β+1dx) we have

ΦβXα,βg(f)(a, b) = 1

a2(β−α)Xα,β

Φαg tXα,βf

(a,·)(b).

Proof . By Definition 4.5we have

ΦβXα,βg(f)(a, b) = 1 a2β+2f ∗β

^

(Xα,βg)a(b).

But (X^α,βg)a=Xα,β(ega) by virtue of (1.2) and (3.5). So using (3.8) we find that

ΦβXα,βg(f)(a, b) = 1

a2β+2f∗β[Xα,β(ega)] (b)

= 1

a2β+2Xα,β

t

Xα,βf ∗αega(b) = 1

a2(β−α)Xα,β

Φαg tXα,βf

(a,·)(b),

which gives the desired result.

Combining Theorems4.10,4.11 with Lemmas5.2,5.4we get

Theorem 5.5. Let g be as in Lemma 5.2. Then we have the following inversion formulas for the dual Dunkl–Sonine transform:

(i) If both f and Fβf are in L1(R,|x|2β+1dx) then for almost all xRwe have

f(x) = 1 CXα,ββ g

Z ∞

0

Z

RX α,β

Φαg tXα,βf

(a,·)(b) Xα,βg β

a,b(x)|b|

2β+1db

da a2(β−α)+1.

(ii) For f L1L2(R,|x|2β+1dx) and 0< ε < δ <, the function

fε,δ(x) := 1 CXα,ββ g

Z δ

ε Z

RX

α,βΦαg tXα,βf(a,·)(b) Xα,βgβa,b(x)|b|2β+1db da a2(β−α)+1

satisfies

lim ε→0, δ→∞

fε,δf2 = 0.

Acknowledgements

(12)

References

[1] de Jeu M.F.E., The Dunkl transform,Invent. Math.113(1993), 147–162.

[2] Dunkl C.F., Differential-difference operators associated with reflections groups,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311(1989), 167–183.

[3] Dunkl C.F., Integral kernels with reflection group invariance,Canad. J. Math.43(1991), 1213–1227. [4] Dunkl C.F., Hankel transforms associated to finite reflection groups,Contemp. Math.138(1992), 123–138. [5] Jouini A., Dunkl wavelets and applications to inversion of the Dunkl intertwining operator and its dual,Int.

J. Math. Math. Sci.6(2004), 285–293.

[6] Kamefuchi S., Ohnuki Y., Quantum field theory and parastatistics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

[7] Mourou M.A., Trim`eche K., Calder´on’s formula associated with a differential operator on (0,∞) and inver-sion of the generalized Abel transform,J. Fourier Anal. Appl.4(1998), 229–245.

[8] Mourou M.A., Trim`eche K., Inversion of the Weyl integral transform and the Radon transform onRnusing generalized wavelets,Monatsh. Math.126(1998), 73–83.

[9] Mourou M.A., Trim`eche K., Calderon’s reproducing formula related to the Dunkl operator on the real line, Monatsh. Math.136(2002), 47–65.

[10] Mourou M.A., Trim`eche K., Transmutation operators and Paley–Wiener associated with a singular differential-difference operator on the real line,Anal. Appl. (Singap.)1(2003), 43–70.

[11] Rosenblum M., Generalized Hermite polynomials and the Bose-like oscillator calculus, in Nonselfadjoint Operators and Related Topics (Beer Sheva, 1992), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., Vol. 73, Birkh¨auser, Basel, 1994, 369–396,math.CA/9307224.

[12] R¨osler M., Bessel-type signed hypergroups onR, in Probability Measures on Groups and Related Struc-tures, XI (Oberwolfach, 1994), Editors H. Heyer and A. Mukherjea, Oberwolfach, 1994, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1995, 292–304.

[13] Soltani F.,Lp-Fourier multipliers for the Dunkl operator on the real line,J. Funct. Anal.209(2004), 16–35. [14] Soltani F., Sonine transform associated to the Dunkl kernel on the real line,SIGMA4(2008), 092, 14 pages,

arXiv:0812.4666.

[15] Xu Y., An integral formula for generalized Gegenbauer polynomials and Jacobi polynomials,Adv. in Appl. Math.29(2002), 328–343.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Bila dilihat dari persentase skor tanggapan responden yaitu sebesar 63,6%, menunjukkan bahwa hasil audit para auditor pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Perpres Nomor 70 Tahun 2012 dan Perubahnnya, kepada Rekanan yang berkeberatan atas pengumuman ini, Diberikan kesempatan untuk mengajukan sanggahan

Batten (1995) menambahkan bahwa pemberdayaan karyawan dapat membantu perusahaan baik negeri maupun swasta dalam mencapai keunggulan bersaing, karena apabila karyawan

Sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Perpres Nomor 70 Tahun 2012 dan Perubahnnya, kepada Rekanan yang berkeberatan atas pengumuman ini, Diberikan kesempatan untuk mengajukan sanggahan

Demikian pengumuman pemenang lelang ini dibuat, agar dapat diketahui oleh seluruh peserta lelang. Bengkulu, 9

Manap Solihat, M.Si, selaku Ketua Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi dan Public Relations, yang telah memberikan kemudahan dalam penulisan laporan praktek kerja

brand yang tidak mencitrakan Darul Arqam sebagai Pondok

Sementara di sisi lain, structure dan substance yang seharusnya memberikan posisi dan peran pemerintah daerah kuat di mata hukum justru tidak digunakan secara optimal