Cummins J dan Mullin R, 2004, Sales Promotion, PPM, Jakarta.
Hadi, Sutrisno, 1991, Statistika II, BPFE, Yogyakarta.
Kasali, R.,1998, Membidik Pasar Indonesia: Segmenting, Targeting, dan Positioning,
Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kotler, Philip & Armstrong, Gary, 2001, Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran, Edisi VIII, Jilid
I, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Kotler, Philip, 1997, Manajemen Pemasaran : Analisis Perencanaan, Implementasi
dan Kontrol, Jilid I, PT. Prenhalindo, Jakarta.
Loundon, D. L. and Della- Bitta, A. J., 1993, Consumer Behavior, Singapore :
McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Ries, A. and Trout, J., 1986, Positioning : The Battle For Your Mind, New York :
McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Santoso, S. and Tjiptono, F., 2001, Riset Pemasaran : Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan
SPSS, Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Simamora, Bilson, 2001, Panduan Riset Pemasaran, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama,
Jakarta.
Sugiyono, Dr. Prof, 1999, Metode Penelitian Bisnis, CV Alfabeta, Bandung.
Umar, H., 1997, Metodologi Penelitian : Aplikasi Dalam Pemasaran, Jakarta : PT
Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
www.media-indonesia.com
www.gizi.net
Lampiran 1.
Profil
Responden
Minuman
Isotonik
13 26.0 26.0 26.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
4 8.0 8.0 8.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
6 12.0 12.0 12.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
3 6.0 6.0 6.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Lampiran 3.
ANACOR
TABLE=ALL(12,3) /DIMENSION=2
/NORMALIZATION CANONICAL
/PRINT TABLE SCORES CONTRIBUTIONS PROFILES PERMUTATION /VARIANCE ROWS COLUMS SINGULAR
/PLOT ROWS COLUMS JOINT NDIM(ALL,MAX).
ANACOR
The table to be analyzed:
1 .081 -.121 -.287
Contribution of row points to the inertia of each dimension:
Marginal Dim
Contribution of dimensions to the inertia of each row point:
8 .082 .811 .189 1.000 9 .081 .997 .003 1.000 10 .074 .994 .006 1.000 11 .092 .991 .009 1.000 12 .089 .923 .077 1.000
Column Scores:
Marginal Dim
Column Profile 1 2
1 Pocari_S .335 -.445 .078 2 Mizone .346 .094 -.225 3 Vitazone .320 .365 .162 C
Contribution of column points to the inertia of each dimension:
Marginal Dim
Column Profile 1 2
1 Pocari_S .335 .593 .072 2 Mizone .346 .027 .627 3 Vitazone .320 .380 .301 --- --- 1.000 1.000
Contribution of dimensions to the inertia of each column point:
Marginal Dim Total Column Profile 1 2
1 Pocari_S .335 .993 .007 1.000 2 Mizone .346 .413 .587 1.000 3 Vitazone .320 .953 .047 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of the singular values:
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .006 1.000
2 .008 -.006 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 1
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .248 1.000
2 .066 .119 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 3
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .136 1.000
2 .191 -.016 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 4
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .389 1.000
2 .326 -.116 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 5
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .088 1.000
2 .073 -.069 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 6
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .142 1.000
2 .118 .031 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 7
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .040 1.000
2 .036 .407 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 8
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .007 1.000
2 .005 .228 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 9
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .022 1.000
2 .030 .409 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 10
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .009 1.000
2 .011 -.533 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 11
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .004 1.000
2 .004 .497 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Row 12
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .024 1.000
2 .021 .379 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Column 1 Pocari_Sweat
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .038 1.000
2 .054 .497 1.000
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Column 2 Mizone
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .163 1.000
2 .127 .113 1.000
C
Variances and Correlation Matrix of scores of Column 3 Vitazone
Dim Variances Correlations between dimensions 1 .113 1.000
9 4.16 3.50 2.94 10.60 10 3.52 3.30 2.84 9.66 12 4.16 3.88 3.56 11.60 1 3.66 3.86 3.08 10.60 11 4.24 4.08 3.68 12.00 4 3.56 3.84 2.98 10.38 2 3.90 3.66 3.52 11.08 8 3.66 3.64 3.38 10.68 6 3.84 3.62 3.60 11.06 5 3.74 3.72 3.70 11.16 7 3.20 3.84 3.60 10.64 3 1.98 4.12 4.76 10.86 --- --- --- --- Margin 43.62 45.06 41.64 130.32
The data-matrix permuted according to the scores in dimension: 2
2 1 3
Mizone Pocari_S Vitazone Margin
4 3.84 3.56 2.98 10.38 1 3.86 3.66 3.08 10.60 7 3.84 3.20 3.60 10.64 10 3.30 3.52 2.84 9.66 3 4.12 1.98 4.76 10.86 11 4.08 4.24 3.68 12.00 9 3.50 4.16 2.94 10.60 8 3.64 3.66 3.38 10.68 12 3.88 4.16 3.56 11.60 2 3.66 3.90 3.52 11.08 5 3.72 3.74 3.70 11.16 6 3.62 3.84 3.60 11.06 --- --- --- --- Margin 45.06 43.62 41.64 130.32 C
Abbreviated Extended Name Name
Dimension 1
1.5 1.0
0.5 0.0
-0.5
Di
mension 2
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
12
11 10 9 8
7 6
5
4
3 2
1
Row Scores
Dimension 1
0.4 0.2
0.0 -0.2
-0.4 -0.6
Dimensio
n 2
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
Vitazone
Mizone Pocari_Sweat
Column Scores
Dimension 1
1.5 1.0
0.5 0.0
-0.5
Di
mension 2
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
12 11 10 9
8 7 6
5
4
3 2
1
Vitazone
Mizone Pocari_Sweat
Row and Column Scores
Rows Columns
Variable
Symmetric Normalization
Lampiran 4.
Reliability POCARI SWEAT
50 100.0
Reliability MIZONE
Case Processing Summary
