A THESIS
THE INFLUENCE OF DEFENSE MECHANISM ON
JOHN’S PERSONALITY IN DAVID MAMET’S
OLEANNA
GUNAWAN PEBRUONO NIM 2012.1111.001
ADVISORS
Ari Setyorini, SS., MA.
Pramudana Ihsan, S. Hum., M. Pd.
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
2016
um
surabaya
Uii
THE INFLUENCE OF DEFENSE MECHANISM ON
JOHN’S PERSONALITY IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA
SKRIPSI
Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat
Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Pendidikan
GUNAWAN PEBRUONO NIM 2012.1111.001
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
iii
HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN PEMBIMBING
Skripsi yang ditulis oleh Gunawan Pebruono ini telah disetujui ole dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Pembimbing TandaTangan Tanggal
I. Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. ……… ………
II. Pramudana Ihsan, S. Hum., M. Pd. ……… ………
Mengetahui :
Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
iv
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PANITIA UJIAN
Skripsi ini telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjan aPendidikan, pada tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Penguji TandaTangan Tanggal
I. Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. ..……… …...………….
II. Dra. Mas’ulah, M. A. ..……… …...………….
III. Radius Setiyawan, S. Pd., M. A. ..……… …...………….
Mengetahui
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Dekan
v
PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama : Gunawan Pebruono
NIM : 20121111001
Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Menyatakan bahwa Skripsi yang saya tulis ini benar – benar tulisan karya sendiri bukan hasil plagiasi, baik sebagian maupun keseluruhan. Bila di kemudian hari terbukti hasil plagiasi, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik sesuai ketentuan yang berlaku di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
Surabaya, 15 Agustus 2016 Yang membuat pernyataan,
vi MOTTO:
“EXPECT VICTORY AND YOU MAKE A VICTORY”
“LET YOUR HOPES, NOT YOUR HURTS TO SHAPE YOUR FUTURE”
Dedication:
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Alhamdulillahirrabbil ’alamin first of all, the researcher would like to say thanks to God Allah SWT, The almighty who gives him all his blessing and becomes the power to finish his thesis, Sholawatsalam to prophet Muhammad SAW the last prophets who becomes the leader of Moslem and guides the human to the right way and also to all his families and his friends.
The completion of this thesis witness to encouragement, support and guidance of many individuals. It is with sincere gratitude that I think:
1. My beloved parents in heaven: Alm. Mr. Nyamun Sufiyanto and Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
4. Sulton Dedi Wijaya, S. Pd. as the head of English Department Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya, for giving me the permission to conduct this study.
5. Ari Setyorini, S. S., M. A. is my first advisor, for her suggestions, criticism, support and help to finish this thesis.
6. PramudanaIhsan, S. Hum.,M. Pd. is my second advisor for his support, contributions and advice in completing this thesis.
7. All lectures at English Department Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya, who have taught, motivated, and given guidance the time of study.
viii
9. All of my friends in English Department especially Morning Class. Thanks for togetherness
10.All people who names I cannot mention one by one. Thanks for everything.
Surabaya, August15, 2016 The Researcher
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE
COVER PAGE ……….. i
HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN ……….. iii
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN PANITIA UJIAN ………. iv
PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN TULISAN ………. v
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ……….. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……….. vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ………. ix
BIBLIOGRAPHY…..………. xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ………... 1
1.1Background of the Study ………. 1
1.2Statements of the Problem ………... 3
1.3Objective of the Study ………. 3
1.4Significance of the Study ………. 4
1.5Scope and Limitation ……… 4
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITTERATURE ………... 5
2.1 Psychology in Literature ….……….. 5
2.2 Psychoanalysis ..……… 6
2.2.1 Structure of Personality ……….. 7
2.2.2 Defense Mechanism ……….……….. 8
2.2.2.1 Reaction Formation ……….. 9
x
2.2.2.3 Denial ………... 9
2.2.2.4 Rationalization ……… 10
2.3Review of the Previous Study ……….. 10
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ………... 13
3.1 The Nature of the Research ……… 13
3.2 The Source of Data ……….. 14
3.2.1 The Main Data ……….. 14
3.2.2 The Supporting the Data ……….. 14
3.3 Data Collection ……… 14
3.4 The Data Analysis ……… 15
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS ………... 16
4.1 John’s Defense Mechanism ………. 16
4.1.1 John’s Reaction Formation ………... 17
4.1.2 John’s Sublimation ………... 19
4.1.3 John’s Denial and Rationalization ……… 21
4.2 The Influence of The Defense Mechanism on John’s Personality ….. 24
4.2.1 John as an Empathic Person ………. 24
4.2.2 John as a Lustful Person ……….. 29
4.2.3 John as an Emotional Person ………... 30
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ………. 35
5.1 Conclusion ………. 35
5.2 Suggestion ………. 36
xi
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barone, David F., Hersen, Michel and Hasselt, Vincent B. Van. 1998. Advanced Personality. New York: Springer Science+Bussiness Media
Bennett, Andrew and Royle, Nicholas. 2004. An Introduction to Literature, Critism and Theory. England: Pearson
Chiaramonte, Peter. 2014. Power play: The dynamics of power and interpersonal
communication in higher education as reflected in David Mamet’s
Oleanna. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. Vol 44 P(38-51).
Corr, Philip J. and Matthews, Gerald. 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press
Creswell, John. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. U.S.A: Pericson Education
Editor. 2015. David Mamet Biography. The Biography (Online). Retrieved from http://www.biography.com/people/david-mamet-9396766 January 27,
2016.
Ewen, Robert B. 2003. Theories of Personality. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hughes, Doug. 2009. Between the Lines: Oleanna by David Mamet. Los Angeles: Center Theatre Group
Klarer, Mario. 1999. An Introduction to Literary Studies. London: Routledge Lexmond, Jen and Reeves, Richard. 2009. Building Character. London: Demos Liang, Yamin. 2011. The Id, Ego and Super-ego in Pride and Prejudice.
International Education Studies, Vol 4, Pg (177-181)
xii
Minderop, Albertine.2011. PsikologiSastra: KaryaSastra, Metode, Teori, danContohKasus. Jakarta: YayasanPustakaObor Indonesia
Kutsiyah, H., M. Adiana., B. Imam. 2013. An Analysis of Ego Defense Mechanisms of Mr. BorkmaninHenrik Ibsen’s John Gabriel Borkman. Page 1-8.
Passer, Michael W. and Smith, Ronald E. 2009. Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill
Ridgway, Ian. 2007. Theory & Practice 1: Lecture 3 SIGMUND FREUD (1856-1939).My Auz (Online). Retrieved from: myauz.com/ianr/articles/lect3freud07.pdfMey 04, 2016.
Rycorft, Charles. 1992. A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. England: Penguin Book.
Schultz, Duane P. 2009. Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. United States of America: Michele Sordi
Shiner, Rebecca L. and DeYoung, Colin G. 2011. The Structure of Temperament and Personality Traits: A Developmental Perspective. Chicago: Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group. Working Paper No. 2011-025.
Statt, David A. 1998. The Concise Dictionary of Psychology. London: Harper & Row
Strongman, Kenneth T. 2003. The Psychology of Emotion: From Everyday Llife. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Suchet, David and Williams, David. 1992. Oleanna by David Mamet. The
Archieve (Online). Retrieved from:
http://archieve.org/stream/oleanna00mame#page/n17/model/1up January
27, 2016.
xiii
Wahyuni, ShobrinaEka. 2015. A Psychological Study on Helen Keller’s Structure of Personality as seen in The Story of My Life Novel by Helen Keller. Thesis.
Winnicott, D. W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis