Manajemen Institusi:
Memandu Pencapaian
Akreditasi Internasional
Prof. Dr. Hermawan Kresnodipojono
Isi Bahasan
• Latar Belakang Budaya Akademik – Era 1970-an
• Perjalanan Transformasi Diri – Era 1990-an
• FTI – ITB mengenal ABET: impossible
• Proyek QUE
• Proyek PHK – I
• Membangun niat & tekad
• Belajar tentang ABET
• Sosialisasi: mahasiswa, karyawan, dosen, alumni
• Aksi
• MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
Latar Belakang
Budaya Akademik
Atmosfir Akademik Era 70-an
• Dosen ‘penguasa absolut’ di domain akademiknya
• Sistem tidak sanggup melakukan intervensi di
wilayah akademik dosen
• Kuliah adalah milik dosen, bukan milik institusi;
kapan daftar nilai akademik diumumkan (?), sepenuhnya ditentukan oleh dosen
• Rata-rata lama studi mantap di atas 7 tahun
• Belum ada sistem akreditasi; tidak perlu standar
karena lulusan sudah terbukti selalu mendapat pekerjaan, posisi yang bagus dan terkenal selalu ‘berprestasi’
Atmosfir Akademik Era 90-an
• FTI – ITB, dengan biaya Dikti, mengunjungi dan
mencoba belajar ttg ABET dengan mengikuti workshop ABET di Maryland – USA
• Kesimpulan:
• Impossible untuk bisa memperoleh akreditasi ABET
• Cita-cita memperoleh akreditasi ABET terkubur
Atmosfir Akademik Era 90-an
• BAN berdiri 1994
• tidak semua prodi di ITB siap untuk diakreditasi, bahkan
sebagian merasa tidak perlu,
• ‘we are the standard and hence do not need accreditation’
• tidak mengherankan ada prodi yang memperoleh nilai C
di ITB
• Sistem insentif (reward) kepada prodi
diperkenalkan oleh Dikti:
• Que-project, dengan syarat akreditasi prodi: A
Transformasi
Diri Dimulai
QUE – PHK Project
QUE – PHK Project
• QUE-PROJECT 1998 – 2003
• world class department, internationally accredited by
world known accreditation body
• ABET menjadi pilihan bersama, melalui diskusi panjang
selama menjalankan QUE-PROJECT
• PHK – Project 2004 – 2007
• ABET mulai menjadi pembicaraan harian karena
merupakan janji akhir proyek PHK - I
• Disadari sepenuhnya bahwa itu adalah janji yang amat
berat, harus ada perubahan budaya, ada tambahan
pekerjaan namun tidak ada jaminan akan ada tambahan insentif.
Rektor
Kusmayanto
Kadiman
Mencanangkan perubahan fundamental
Daftar Nilai Akademik harus masuk pada waktunya Muncul istilah Dosen Tercela
Rektor Djoko Santoso
Rektor Akhmaloka
Accreditation Board
for Engineering and Technology -
ABET
• Tantangan yang amat berat bagi institusi –
departemen (jurusan)
• Skeptis untuk sebagian dosen karena terlalu berat
syarat dan biayanya bagi departemen
• Akreditasi BAN yang selalu mendapat nilai A
sudah cukup, toh lulusan selalu dapat pekerjaan yang memadai
Membangun Niat dan Tekad
• Apakah akreditasi itu?
• Mengapa perlu akreditasi internasional?
• Akreditasi internasional yang mana dan mengapa?
• Mengapa ada dosen yang skeptis?
• Bagaimana menjaga stamina para champion,
pemimpi di siang hari?
Mencari Jawaban:
PERJALANAN PANJANG
• Mengikuti Workshop ABET
• di NUS – 2002
• Mengikuti Workshop ABET
• di Rose Hulman Institute of Technology,
Terre Haute, INDIANA – USA – 2004
• Mengumpulkan dan mempelajari
dokumen-dokumen terkait ABET
Sosialisasi
• Kepada civitas academica di tingkat
departemen/jurusan/program studi di berbagai kesempatan dan forum, formal dan informal
• Kepada anggota rapat pimpinan di tingkat fakultas
• Secara informal, dalam berbagai kesempatan,
dengan Rektor ITB
• Menggalang dukungan fisik, psikologis, dan ruhani
dari alumni
Aksi
• Mulai menyusun dan menulis draft self-evaluation
document 2008
• Membandingkan dengan program studi sejenis
yang sedang atau sudah mendapat akreditasi ABET
• Membentuk tim kecil dengan anggota sekitar
4 – 5 orang, para champions, believers untuk terus mempersiapkan dokumen-dokumen yang diperlukan
Dekan:
full power in command
• Pertemuan wajib mingguan untuk tim inti,
para champion dan believers.
• Dekan mewajibkan dirinya untuk selalu hadir
dalam pertemuan-pertemuan terkait ABET
• Membentuk Industrial Advisory Board dan
melakukan pertemuan rutin di Bandung dan Jakarta
• Menentukan jadwal untuk mengirim dokumen
lamaran ke ABET
• Mengirim tim untuk belajar ttg ABET ke USA
dengan dukungan dari alumni dan ITB
The Moment is Coming:
Finally
• Learning from previous visit
• Self Study Reports submitted and accepted for visit
• Visited by reviewers:
• the importance of first, immediate impression
• Wrap-up meeting, need additional works, reporting and waiting for final verdict
• Mission accomplished,
a sense of relieved and proud, thanks God finally is over
TERIMA KASIH
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
Dokumen sosialisasi bertahun 2007
SOSIALISASI
ACCREDITATION
WHAT - DEFINITION
COMPONENTS
WHY
• VOLUNTARY, SUBJECTIVE, FREE CHOICE
• BENEFIT TO: THE PUBLIC, THE PROFESSION,
THE INSTITUTION, THE STUDENT
BENEFIT TO
• The Public:
• identifies programs for the investment of public or
private funds (prerequisite for many government grants: PHK etc).
• The Profession:
• insures that graduates have met the educational
requirements to enter the profession.
BENEFIT TO
• The Institution:
• promulgates “best practices” in education.
• The Student:
• assists prospective students in identifying acceptable
programs
TYPES
• LOCAL, NATIONAL, REGIONAL,
INTERNATIONAL
• SPECIALIZED or PROFESSIONAL
PROCESS
• Criteria developed by professional societies,
practitioners and educators
• Self-study by the institution and program
• On-site evaluation
• Publication of lists of accredited of programs
• Periodic of evaluation
ABET
THE THEME
THE FOCUS
MORE EMPHASIS ON
WHAT IS BEING
LEARNT
THAN ON
WHAT IS BEING
TAUGHT
PHILOSOPHY
SUBSTANTIALLY ABET
EQUIVALENT (OCT 2006)
• TU Delft:
• Aerospace Eng., Chemical Eng., Civil Eng, Mechanical Eng.,
Materials Sci. Eng., Naval & Marine Eng.
• University Karlsruhe:
• Electrical Eng.
• National Univ. of Singapore:
• Computer Sci., Information Systems
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO
• be familiar with ABET and their general
philosophy and terminology of outcome-based management
• be familiar with the Program Educational
Objectives, Outcomes, and Assessment Matrix as
published on the web.
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO
• have a clear set of published course learning
objectives. If it is a course with design content, the instructor should identify the design
objectives along with appropriate evidence (i.e. samples of student work).
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO
• collect assessment data which can in principle be
evaluated to determine the degree to which the course learning objectives are being met.
• evaluate the assessment data relative to the
course objectives and make recommendations for course improvement which might involve actions by instructor himself, faculty teaching other
courses, or administration.
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO
• All of the above must be documented for external review
by the ABET examiner.
• Faculty already carry out most of the above activities. The
new feature is that now this all must be documented.
• For this purpose each instructor will be asked to maintain
a Course Notebook which, for each term the course is offered, will contain:
• (1) Course syllabus with well-identified course learning objectives,
• (2) a sampling of assessment data including but not limited to: exams, quizzes, reports, student evaluations, etc.,
• (3) a brief (or not) analysis and evaluation of the assessment data,
• (4) recommendations for course improvement, and
• (5) an action plan with follow-up record of actions.
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 1(a). have depth of understanding in the
fundamental disciplines of physics: mechanics,
electromagnetism, thermal and statistical physics, and quantum mechanics;
• Outcome 1(b) understand a broad array of
diverse physical phenomena in terms of fundamental concepts;
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 1(c) be able to design and implement
an experiment or theoretical study to understand a physical phenomenon in an applied context;
• Outcome 1(d) be able to apply scientific
understanding and models of thinking in engineering physics contexts;
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 1(e) be able to use fundamental physics
in the design of a component, system, or process;
• Outcome 2(a)be able to write a well-organized,
logical, scientifically sound physics research paper or engineering physics report;
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 2(b) be able to present effectively a
well-organized, logical, scientifically sound, and audience-appropriate oral report on an applied physics topic;
• Outcome 2(c) be able to communicate and
present information electronically including the appropriate use of multimedia modes of
communication;
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 3(a) be able to work effectively in
teams and exercise leadership at appropriate times in their careers;
• Outcome 3(b) understand and appreciate the
human dimensions of their profession, including the diverse social, cultural, economic, and
international aspects of their professional activities; and
EP PROGRAM OUTCOMES
• Outcome 3(c) demonstrate high standards of
ethical and professional integrity in the conduct of their professional activities.
HELP
• To help faculty in this activity a "Course
Post-delivery Review" template will be created by the
team. Staffs will be asked to provide summaries of their course improvements to be incorporated into the Self-Study Report.
PRESENTASI DEKAN DI
HADAPAN REVIEWER
LAMPIRAN 2: Beberapa bahan presentasi Dekan
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April
FACULTY OF
INDUSTRIAL
TECHNOLOGY (FIT)
Fact & Profile
Faculty of Industrial Technology
Overview
• Introduction: Historical Background
• Vision and Missions
• FIT Study Programs
• Teaching Facilities
• Student Activities & Achievements
• Faculty Members: Research Activities &
Achievements
• Alumni Achievements
• Support Staffs
• Budget
1920 – 1940 Hogeschool (TH)Technische July 3, 1920, officially declared by the Dutch governmentJuly 1, 1924, the first graduates
July 3, 1926, the first Indonesian graduates (among others, Ir. Soekarno, the 1stPresident of ROI)
1941 – 1945 Bandung Kogyo Daigaku (BKD) 1941 Department of Chemical Engineering was establishedApril 1, 1942, TH was re-opened & named as BKD by the Japanese government 1945 – 1946 Sekolah Tinggi Teknik (STT) 1945, opened1946, moved to Yogyakarta & named as STT Bandung in Jogja
1946, became Faculty of Engineering, University of Gajah Mada (UGM)
1946 – 1950 Universiteit van Indonesie June 21, 1946, officially declared by NICA1946, Faculteit van Technische Wetenschap was established October 6, 1947, Faculteit van Exacte Wetenschap was established
1950 – 1959 Universitas Indonesia Faculty of Engineering: 1950 Dept. of Engineering Physics was established
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
1959 – 1999 TEKNOLOGI INSTITUT
BANDUNG (ITB)
March 2, 1959, officially declared by Soekarno (1stPresident of ROI)
1959, The first Rector of ITB was inaugurated,
1971 Department of Industrial Engineering was established 1973, Faculty of Industrial Technology was formed
1979, The first Graduate Programs
2000 – 2011 FUTURE
December 26, 2000, ITB embarked on new status as legal entity (AUTONOMOUS)
ITB as Research and Development University:
Academic excellence for education, contribution to knowledge, industrial relevance, and community services.
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG (ITB) AS LEGAL ENTITY (AUTONOMOUS)
The History of ITB
Faculty/School since 2008
• Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
• Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering (FTTM)
• Faculty of Earth Sciences And Technology (FITB)
• Faculty of Industrial Technology (FIT/FTI)
• Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (FTMD)
• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering (FTSL)
• Faculty of Art and Design (FSRD)
• School of Business and Management (SBM)
• School of Pharmacy (SF)
• School Of Life Sciences and Technology (SITH)
• School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (STEI)
• School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development (SAPPK)
+ ITB Graduate School(SPS)
Structure Organization of ITB
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19 April 2017 52
Board of Trustees (MWA) Audit Board Rector Vice Rectors LPPM Faculty/ School Library Internal Control Unit (SPI) Academic Senate Board of Professors
Academic Support Units Funding and Wealth
Commercial & Business Foundations Academic Programme USDI LK
Research Centre Others Unit
World University Rank of ITB
• 2010 QS World University Ranking
• Engineering and Information Technology, Indonesia Rank:
1, World Rank: 93
• 2010 Webometrics
• Indonesia Rank: 1; Asia Rank: 56; World Rank: 569.
• 2010 4ICU
• Indonesia Rank: 1; Asia Rank: 11; World Rank: 44
The History of FIT
• FIT was established in 1973. But almost all degree programs in FIT have started their academic
activities years before.
• After several changes, until December 2005, FIT
consists of 7 departments: Aeronautical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering,
Engineering Physics, Mechanical & Material
Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Informatics Engineering.
• Reorganization took place again in early 2006; the management of resources and programs was shifted from departments to faculties/schools. The Dean
holds the authority to carry out the entire academic activities.
Vision
• To be excellent faculty in industrial management,
technology and engineering science for accelerating nation’s competitiveness and prosperity.
MISSION
• To conduct higher education and continuing
education in chemical engineering, engineering physics, industrial engineering, and engineering management.
• To develop science and technology in chemical
engineering, engineering physics, industrial
engineering, and engineering management through research and development activities.
• To develop academic staff, which enable faculty to
achieve excellence in education, research and service to the society.
MISSION
• To disseminate science, technology and insights in chemical engineeirng, engineering physics, industrial engineering, and engineering management to the
society through our graduates’ roles, partnership with industries or other institutions, as well as service to the society,in order tocontribute in building our
nation’s competitiveness.
• To expand and maintain international cooperation networks with overseas reputable universities in education (i.e. conducting double degree programs and student exchange programs) and research.
House of FIT
Draft Akhir Rancangan Kurikulum Teknik Industri (S1, S2, S3) 2008
Mission and Vision
Faculty of Industrial Technology
C he -En g R es -G ro up En g. Ph ysi cs; Re s-G ro up . In d. E ng ; Re s-G ro up En g. M ng t ; Re s-G ro up Community services
Laboratory; Supporting Units
Research Educational Programs
Strategy for Improving Study
Program Effectiveness
• To improve educational (teaching and learning)
(continous improvement) process
• To monitor and evaluate curriculum implementation
• To integrate study programs –undergraduate, master and
doctorate programs
• To integrate educational and research activities
• To obtain international accreditation (ABET) for
undergraduate programs
Continuous Improvement Process
Chemical Engineering
Continuous Improvement Process
Engineering Physics
Advisory Board Meeting
