TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION
S OF ORAL CORRECTIVE
FEEDBACK AND THEIR ACTUAL PRACTICE IN EFL
CLASSROOM
(A Descriptive Study on English Teachers of State Junior High Schools in Banyumas)
A Thesis
Submitted as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Obtaining S.Pd. Degree of Education
in English Education Department
by:
LUQMAN HAFIDH MU‟IZ 1101050048
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
MOTTO
“Niscaya Allah akan meninggikan orang-orang yang beriman di antaramu dan orang-orang yang diberi ilmu pengetahuan beberapa derajat. Dan Allah Maha Mengetahui apa yang kamu kerjakan”
--- Al Mujadilah :11 ---
Science is a great thing we can ONLYreach by our mind.
Absolutely we can UTILIZE it ourself for others with our sincerity.
The rich comes from the poor... The diligent appears because of the lazy...
All of the things come from the zero to be called as HERO...
“In this life, there is no the great at all.” “There is no the big at all.”
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated for:
My Parents
I exactly want to say thank much because they always support me to get more and
more experiences and lessons from every challenge in my study. Teaching me to
find a great chance and use it to develop my ability.
My brothers
You are my motivation to be a wiser brother for you all.
My special friend
You “Z” are the extra ordinary friend who is always besides me. You give me happiness for every moment.
My best friends
You “Rizky Kurniawan, M. Zidny Ilman A., and Annas Permadi” are the true
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Assalamu‟alaikum Wr. Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil „alamin, Praise is merely to the Almighty Allah SWT
for the gracious mercy and tremendous blessing that enables me to accomplish
this bachelor entitled: “Teachers‟ Perceptions of Oral Corrective Feedback and
Their Actual Practice in EFL Classroom” (A Descriptive Study on English
Teachers of State Junior High Schools in Banyumas). This thesis is presented to
fulfill one of the requirements in accomplishing S-1 Degree in English Education
Study Program, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah
University of Purwokerto.
The writer would like to express his great special appreciation to:
1. Drs. H. Syamsuhadi Irsyad, S. H, M. H, the rector of Muhammadiyah
University of Purwokerto.
2. Drs. Ahmad, M. Pd, the dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty
who has given the permission to write this thesis.
3. Drs. Pudiyono, M. Hum, as the chief of the English Department who has
given opportunity and agreement to conduct this study.
4. Dr. Furqanul Aziez, M. Pd for your valuable assistance and inspiration to
5. I also would like to express my deep gratitude to my academic advisor,
Endang Kusrini, M. Pd who has guided when studied in the university.
6. The writer also would like to extent my gratitude to all of my English
lecturers who have inspired me. Thank you for the guidance and patience
during study in the university.
7. Furthermore, The writer would like to honorably say thanks to headmaster
of SMP N 1 Sokaraja, SMP N 3 Sokaraja, and SMP N 3 Banyumas, who
given permission to do the research and to Mrs. Tursinah, Mr. Angga, Mr.
Tri, Mrs. Fitri, Mrs. Tri Wahyuni, Mrs. Rini for their assistance during the
research.
8. The greatest honor and appreciation would be finally dedicated to all my
English department friends who always help and support in every term of
my study.
Finally, the writer believes that this thesis has still weaknesses.
Therefore, the writer would appreciate to invite criticisms and suggestions
from the readers. Hopefully this thesis will be useful for English education
especially for teachers and English learners.
Purwokerto, 17 Juni 2015
TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
AND THEIR ACTUAL PRACTICE IN EFL CLASSROOM
LUQMAN HAFIDH MU‟IZ 1101050048
ABSTRACT
This study was to investigate teachers‟ perceptions of oral corrective feedback and their actual practice in EFL classroom. It is a descriptive study committed at three Junior High Schools in Banyumas. 6 English teachers as subjects were interviewed in order to obtain their perceptions of roles, strategies and timing of oral corrective feedback. Non-participated observations were also conducted for collecting the factual data of implementations of oral corrective feedback in their classroom. The findings stated positive perceptions from the teachers that oral corrective feedback has various roles for students, teacher, and language learning. Those were supported by their assumptions of the effective strategies for facing many errors and their explanations of the best timing in applying oral corrective feedback to maximize its roles. 114 errors were corrected in the class observations by the teachers through oral corrective feedback that are classified into morpho-syntactic, phonological, and lexical errors. Furthermore, the teachers responded by considered several questions such what errors should be corrected (type of error), how to correct the errors (strategy, type, and timing) and who corrects the errors (provider). As a result, the teachers‟ perceptions of oral corrective feedback and its actual practices in EFL context were proven that the teachers appropriately implemented oral corrective feedback by considering its
roles for students, teacher, and language learning; appropriate strategies; specific types; timing; and providers.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... vii
ABSTRACT ... viii
2. Strategies of corrective feedback ... 11
3. Types of corrective feedback ... 12
6. Corrective feedback providers ... 17
C. Language, Learning and Teaching 1. Language ... 18
CHAPTER IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION A. Result ... 35
B. Discussion ... 67
CHAPTER V. CONDLUSION AND IMPLICATION A. Conclusion ... 78
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 3.1 Schedule of the Research ... 26
TABLE 3.2 Interview Guide... ... 29
TABLE 3.3 Observation Guide ... 30
TABLE 3.4 Likert-scale... ... 34
TABLE 4.1 Types of Errors... ... 51
TABLE 4.2 Strategies of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 54
TABLE 4.3 Types of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 57
TABLE 4.4 Timing of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 62
TABLE 4.5 Providers of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 65
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART 4.1 The Roles of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 68
CHART 4.2 Strategies of Oral Corrective Feedback ... 69
CHART 4.3 The Relations on Strategies ... 75
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Instrument ... 86
APPENDIX B Result ... 89