AN ANAI,YSIS OF CONNOTATIW I!'LANING
OF
Ki}1VORD
IN TIIE SCRIPI OI B.{RRACK OBA]'IIA'S RACE SPEECTTAlh6is
S ubnilerl id Panial Ft
lJiln.nt
tot|.
R.quirctuntFo, Saima S61d Deq,.e
By
RESTI'ASTRIANI 0i935009
ENGLISIT DE?ART'TENI
IlACULIII
OI LETTERSABSlf,AX
Dxld
sknpsiini
dib,na.dtds
tata(uci
(*4eor.')
yos
rerdat:t
Pada FidaroBmck
Obamaybg
berken@dc.gd
16.
Kcll
kunci memiliki
b!lrM_b3's{r
}atu
nencindilasikd sutu
t
nruk piliFn m,upm akivirT, Dembdgkirkmtnmgot.
ncnciDdklnallu
nenjuigrn
Mliid
peidatal/kepe(ate
unm,
nemp€4aruni
.niosio.alpembaca/pendensa'dr nenpun)ai li.laensi hemlDculd ymg cuhrp dtg€l
TUue F€Dulis skipsi ini idllan
utuk
nen8idcntifitdi
F.w
p*n
Rtrnck Obmd)dg
dimpaitd
mehlui m,Ina tonoratif(.o,,,/,r,rs
zs,nr",g)
dri
tis}liap
lila
kurcilntisn
ini
dilatulm
o"l.lui
linjam
iLnupenrdm
dald
suatu\Ma
(yzi.ridr
i,
,i.r!6s).
Seldjubta Fnelitim ininengguale
teod karaluci
ole[
R Frond
william( (1981)da
leon mrrna konol:tilol.h Roled Barthes (1975)Hnbug m
ktlr
kunci dm md{na konotaril dijab.rtM Delalui'anapm
sigiifit6i
(J€,ircation
ard{)
K^^
^tn
l
vdnqada
djlajtke
dengm bnltr Gis,) i-dg rerilat dengd konicts shinega d.{Er diket4hui pcsddtui
Beack
Obui ros
diiderDreBikdoehlui
du
ialEpd
sielitk3si
]ttu
sis'ifihisi
denotalilda
siglillBi
koDobriiPenclitid
membrhikmban{a
Bara.kobma neneglnale
bctodc
penard's
tonobdldalm
ncnydpokd pes,
notivasi d.npbddeamva
Sciia9l:1:
kuci
mcmliki , p o.e .r
"
emt
.-4e". ..1
b
Bolon""_ m., hJ Llali p
ib
mLpb
Lri
rbcqma.
rDolar
{l.d
n\c. d,L Jdlr
dmJi
l'r' .
CIIA.PTER 1
INTRODUCTION
r.l
Da.rq.odd or drc SludYLanguee
i5
d
srslemol
signs lha,exp6*s
idat dd h
$eFoG
.o6p6ble
to a slsred ol Miri.g, $o alpbdtt ol d.il-oDres srnbolic rires, tolirefomllc,
milirart si8Ieh,d..
hit
ir ir th. moninpotur
of allrice
s)llBms {Saussure in Ddesi, 2004:8) All p&plc hare lan3usc; ir.an b.
.al
ldgur8e, wrinen ldguaee orbql]
lang!a!.. Ldsunleco
btqods
imaEccsounds
sd
gesture rhtt have r mdni.g {Cbsdler, 2002:2)One ol lhc ways to *pEss rhc idca is
bl
spceh Commoily, sp€ahha
wor& thar are callcd kewords. Kclaeords
m
*ods *hich aE u*d.ver.rd
overintherexlMd
e crucidl lo lhe lEmes
lopic und.Idisu$ion Atit
may h3vD*veEl
le)*ordi
Keylods
arc mos otun Lrords *hich represnt aness.rliil
or basic co.c.pt or rhc ler.l4d
$ey ue often lhemdic (LaMn,This
Eedh
co.cds
on how lan8Eee isNd
in lom ofsF(h
ad
6nd our $e mtuings ol .ach ke)1vords. Towl)ze
i!
snioiics is consideEbly agNd appoach dcak
wih
lnis kind ofdN|lrlfue!
The basic defrlirjon orseniotics is 1he srddy oasi$5. Th. mod doDinet coiEDpoBrj modelsolrvhat conniturer of si8!
k
rhal pop.sed by a sans I'guist Fedinaid de saussu.e.infltrcnc.. and
de
b6:use liDsrisiics is mo'e esbblishendi{iplinc
rhm dE nudyolothersienrftds.
Satrsuto toleded to language as itE monifrPotul'
olall otlne synen olsiSs (Sausure. in Chandler, 2002:t),
semiorics
inrolrs
$esdv
nd
oilv
or ebar*c
rfs b
ar'sig6
in €ver,day spec.\ bur of M)U1tlS which ttand fo.' soneifiingel+
lni
.:fridi
sns,
signs hke rhelbft
ol
*o
s,
imases, sounds,sesr€
dd
obje-ls (Chmdle., 2002:l). Semidrics an be rpplicd to anlhin8 Bhichcu
b€H 6
In
m$t
trrl'
IheEtill
bt
some kc!.vords $hichwill
acqutcslnboln
vrlue. Thcy come ro c&ry ligrdtive or netapharical m€ninA
s
well as rhe Lasicneaningolrhc Ford. For exuPle:
si8niljing sohdhiig Sedslics
:Dtllsh
cu lho
be appliglb
i'edd
1*r
including rdLlni.n. r.nmns, n.*sp.pcrsd
naSaines 3nicle, posler! trlxq nusic, phorogipht 4d Pdinling.Semiolics is nos doely asmi.rcd
qi$
cultucl srudies,cdtat
anlsn
is rvdLe$blishcd *ilnin the mriidNan hdnionolseinl$i. €
Esch. \\hrt
content anallsis inrol'cs a qletibrivc oppDach to the.ndlt3is of
ii.
smiLn
'contedt of fr.niaF{!
semiolics*c|l
b
3ml}ze m€didres
6
$rucnn:d*holss
Md in\digrtF
lareni, connobiive mebin8s(Cirodla.
2005:6). Connokliv€ m@iognor
ro
slretch' lanBlag. b.vond iis nomal'evcri&v'
ruge of meanine.
lh*
cotcems engendered in criticieh a psdcupationeirh
By hjs
ddn
on lne.os,
Chrin defoyed 6ecmity,
by ncans ol $c crois h.lnnen h{Lb rues inro onc
dy
ad
b.ought $em b3ckb
Gol. Hs dic'l on rhecrN
roput
d end to L\e hateddd
bnng us borh bac*b
God6
one peoplc,frcm lne
cwple
ab.vc, lne*ord
closs' Rle610 w..dcn cro$4.d
lor crucifi\ionduingtheiimeoltLe RomanEmpn.- Howe'.'er. forchii$io,
it has aslmb.lic mtring b€yond rhc basionBeing Synboliolly, it mcans dearh md
\uff.nig (tnon,
l93a:l8l)Bsd
onlno*
fa.rs. this ftsarch is conduc&d to find out rh. kcyrordsof
B3l*k Obdat
€ce spccchod
relrte each kojeordsb
comohtivc meaningon*mioric poiir viev. Byconsidering rhisphenonenq llar itiswonhvto sbdv
'I(le"o'd-o
'le
BrrtObas a p.T-br"m'igt'
rp'^pr''iv"
ii
ordtr ro
disdrle
rhe rcal meenings behind itLl
idhtifi
utiotr df tbclroblrB
-l]]ir
Estrrch is lEused on t*o main probl.ns Thcy
m 6
follorvingll. Wl.t
e
tn3 rypes oi kelvd.ds lound in A.rack Obana\ nce sp€ech? 2.$t
connobtiv. meaningcs
b€ derived6on
6e
key {ordsol
Bmck
Obma\trespc-h2
Tii5
lgch
k D attmpl ro stody keFvorddd
i3
connobtivd hedningin *riden rert of Bnock Ob€ma s Fce spe€h
ln
do;na$is
tes.arch, thc kerlord found in $ccch and {he Prccess ofitlentiryios thc otuoGivD mcming of lnde key sords de dcscnb€dMor6!er,
this rhesis helP$c
rcndod touderldd
$e meaning ol atet
motu lbJougl its kela\_ords, b€cause knowhdgeCIIAPTER,I
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
evert rexr will h.ve cerlai! keyavods, whethgr in rhe lom olRord
!r
phrasq *hich are ctucial to lhe unde6lrnding ol the baic coF.plof1h.l.n,
Kewo.d
h6
sev.ml c.ireria such6
hiqh fFquency dfdclancq
$esod
cbe build a positive or negative in.Ae, rhc word has po*er or spirit dre *onl that
un credte rhe inplicn naninS, ihe wod lhat ehpo{ed ptoplc Io do 5melning.
rnd rhe word
cd
cret
or tum out people\ bclict It ahotu
be applied in anolher sbdy liketusltio..
dd
il ako ca. b€ used for analyzing $a{tle
lndLuer'j.od\qrt.qqlF.nboi.\3 c r\.,. ornour\,c",
Coniotdive ncrning
h
eeneElly unsrable. h varies considerabll a.coilL.g to such Ii.rors such as culture, hislori.sl p.riod,sial
:la*
and dE e.deEllil.
expenence oa thesF€lei
Th€sinildty
benveen key*d,n Md conDotlriveTriner
d.ulru?lEile"c
hrt:.
orre'inE hctr
sorh,!'.
Havi4 an.ltzed the pEvious dal4 ir is concluded $or
ii
hk s!€eh, Bamck Obma u$d rhe signstslm
io convey lbc intended n,es@es viewsdd
norivalions in thc comohlile
fom
ol keyyods. asloqd
6oh di€ da6. hkintended
mcss!6
rold aboul the spnl to haleI
perfecl unior spinr to figfir aeains thc .Jcial discih;naiion. rhc ptul.sr for moratiry and hrmoi!,, and debclicr in Cod, Clristirlity
ed
rhehlh
BIBLIOGRAPIIY
&ines, Rolud. {1975).
,l4rl loda!
ln: L!cv.N. editor. I995. Socnd ScmioricsPe1n
\l ,o.r
\e'
'a
Dours. Jin. (20119) Obat@ Marer
A
tica
Berotu1f.rz7
Resi€ved lcbruary t4,201
o.rron
hq://M.scdbd.coitdet?81
I 76/Obma Moles Am€nuuBeyond-Racial#sbts
Brc*n, Gillim Md Gerge Yule ( 1983).
I)'rc,dr,,,ltutr^
Cdlndse:
Cmbndge Uniredity Pr€ssBurchcr,
Mdgmt
JEr
(\956). The N?Faj
Antican
Ctrue.
N€R York: Al&cdChandler, Ddiel. (?002) S.r,ort.rr
fte
ds,.s
London: RornledscChedrer, Ddier 1.2c05) Seniotic
lol
Beginnlrs. Retrieved Mdch 22, 2009,rom
hlll//*lrvltd
.c.u]./hcdid/s,lB/ Quoted at ! 9/l ? 2007.Cobl€y,
laul
ud l-ita Jbe.
(1999). lntroducinq sehiatics. Cdbndge:TotemCullen. Jim
(rmr)
nE,ltuticdh
dreah: asho
historrafan
idea that shaped a,drt
n Oslodunivedity Prcs US.Fairclorgh,
Nomo
(200 I ).,vd
t,rar,
,V,Blz,Szdsa
London: Rourlcdsc.Gallinsky,
Adm
G, eId\.
(2003) The ReappropriationaI
SriC atizihg Labeb:lnplicdi.$
lor
Social
ldentity
Reliieved
Ap.il 4
2009.
liom http://*$e.psych.nonnwestem.edrtpsych/peopldf&ulty,/bodennausdreapp.HalD. St€veL (20119). ne Por?rol
wa/l^
ofsl@ery ana Fteedon.HNard Univediry Pres.
Hawkcs, Tercn.e. {2001).
Jhcru,/dn
d,/
Se,i,rtcr. Londo.: RoutledCc.Homby,A.s (r93r). atrbldgudsnt s Dictiohary af,4herican Enelilh