• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

AN ANALYSIS OF CONNOTATIVE MEANING OF KEYWORD IN THE SCRIPT OF BARRACK OBAMA'S RACE SPEECH.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "AN ANALYSIS OF CONNOTATIVE MEANING OF KEYWORD IN THE SCRIPT OF BARRACK OBAMA'S RACE SPEECH."

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

AN ANAI,YSIS OF CONNOTATIW I!'LANING

OF

Ki}1VORD

IN TIIE SCRIPI OI B.{RRACK OBA]'IIA'S RACE SPEECTT

Alh6is

S ubnilerl id Panial Ft

lJiln.nt

to

t|.

R.quirctunt

Fo, Saima S61d Deq,.e

By

RESTI'ASTRIANI 0i935009

ENGLISIT DE?ART'TENI

IlACULIII

OI LETTERS
(2)

ABSlf,AX

Dxld

sknpsi

ini

dib,na.

dtds

tata

(uci

(*4eor.')

yos

rerdat:t

Pada Fidaro

Bmck

Obama

ybg

berken@

dc.gd

16.

Kcll

kunci memiliki

b!lrM_b3's{r

}atu

nencindilasikd sutu

t

nruk piliFn m,upm akivirT, Dembdgkirkm

tnmgot.

ncnciDdkln

allu

nenjuigrn

Mliid

peidatal/kepe(ate

unm,

nemp€4aruni

.niosio.al

pembaca/pendensa'dr nenpun)ai li.laensi hemlDculd ymg cuhrp dtg€l

TUue F€Dulis skipsi ini idllan

utuk

nen8idcntifitdi

F.w

p*n

Rtrnck Obmd

)dg

dimpaitd

mehlui m,Ina tonoratif

(.o,,,/,r,rs

zs,nr",g)

dri

tis}liap

lila

kurci

lntisn

ini

dilatulm

o"l.lui

linjam

iLnu

penrdm

dald

suatu

\Ma

(yzi.ridr

i,

,i.r!6s).

Seldjubta Fnelitim ini

nengguale

teod kara

luci

ole[

R Frond

william( (1981)

da

leon mrrna konol:tilol.h Roled Barthes (1975)

Hnbug m

ktlr

kunci dm md{na konotaril dijab.rtM Delalui

'anapm

sigiifit6i

(J€,ircation

ard{)

K^^

^tn

l

vdnq

ada

djlajtke

dengm bnltr Gis,) i-dg rerilat dengd konicts shinega d.{Er diket4hui pcsd

dtui

Beack

Obui ros

diiderDreBikd

oehlui

du

ialEpd

sielitk3si

]ttu

sis'ifihisi

denotalilda

siglillBi

koDobrii

Penclitid

membrhikm

ban{a

Bara.k

obma neneglnale

bctodc

penard's

tonobdldalm

ncnydpokd pes,

notivasi d.n

pbddeamva

Sciia9

l:1:

kuci

mcmliki , p o.e .

r

"

emt

.-4e". ..1

b

Bolon""_ m., hJ L

lali p

ib

mLpb

Lri

rbcqma.

rDolar

{l.d

n\c. d,L Jd

lr

dm

Ji

l'r' .

(3)

CIIA.PTER 1

INTRODUCTION

r.l

Da.rq.odd or drc SludY

Languee

i5

d

srslem

ol

signs lha,

exp6*s

idat dd h

$eFoG

.o6p6ble

to a slsred ol Miri.g, $o alpbdtt ol d.il-oDres srnbolic rires, tolire

fomllc,

milirart si8Ieh,

d..

hit

ir ir th. mon

inpotur

of all

rice

s)llBms {Saussure in Ddesi, 2004:8) All p&plc hare lan3usc; ir.an b.

.al

ldgur8e, wrinen ldguaee or

bql]

lang!a!.. Ldsunle

co

bt

qods

imaEcc

sounds

sd

gesture rhtt have r mdni.g {Cbsdler, 2002:2)

One ol lhc ways to *pEss rhc idca is

bl

spceh Commoily, sp€ah

ha

wor& thar are callcd kewords. Kclaeords

m

*ods *hich aE u*d

.ver.rd

overin

therexlMd

e crucidl lo lhe lEme

s

lopic und.Idisu$ion A

tit

may h3vD

*veEl

le)*ordi

Keylods

arc mos otun Lrords *hich represnt an

ess.rliil

or basic co.c.pt or rhc ler.l

4d

$ey ue often lhemdic (LaMn,

This

Eedh

co.cds

on how lan8Eee is

Nd

in lom of

sF(h

ad

6nd our $e mtuings ol .ach ke)1vords. To

wl)ze

i!

snioiics is consideEbly a

gNd appoach dcak

wih

lnis kind of

dN|lrlfue!

The basic defrlirjon or

seniotics is 1he srddy oasi$5. Th. mod doDinet coiEDpoBrj modelsolrvhat conniturer of si8!

k

rhal pop.sed by a sans I'guist Fedinaid de saussu.e.
(4)

infltrcnc.. and

de

b6:use liDsrisiics is mo'e esbblishen

di{iplinc

rhm dE nudyolothersien

rftds.

Satrsuto toleded to language as itE mon

ifrPotul'

olall otlne synen olsiSs (Sausure. in Chandler, 2002:t),

semiorics

inrolrs

$e

sdv

nd

oilv

or ebar

*c

rfs b

ar'sig6

in €ver,day spec.\ bur of M)U1tlS which ttand fo.' soneifiing

el+

ln

i

.:fridi

sns,

signs hke rhe

lbft

ol

*o

s,

imases, sounds,

sesr€

dd

obje-ls (Chmdle., 2002:l). Semidrics an be rpplicd to anlhin8 Bhich

cu

b€

H 6

In

m$t

trrl'

IheE

till

bt

some kc!.vords $hich

will

acqutc

slnboln

vrlue. Thcy come ro c&ry ligrdtive or netapharical m€ninA

s

well as rhe Lasic

neaningolrhc Ford. For exuPle:

si8niljing sohdhiig Sedslics

:Dtllsh

cu lho

be appligl

b

i'edd

1*r

including rdLlni.n. r.nmns, n.*sp.pcr

sd

naSaines 3nicle, posler! trlxq nusic, phorogipht 4d Pdinling.

Semiolics is nos doely asmi.rcd

qi$

cultucl srudies,

cdtat

an

lsn

is rvdLe$blishcd *ilnin the mriidNan hdnion

olseinl$i. €

Esch. \\hrt

content anallsis inrol'cs a qletibrivc oppDach to the.ndlt3is of

ii.

smiLn

'contedt of fr.nia

F{!

semiolics

*c|l

b

3ml}ze m€did

res

6

$rucnn:d

*holss

Md in\digrtF

lareni, connobiive mebin8s

(Cirodla.

2005:6). Connokliv€ m@iog

nor

ro

slretch' lanBlag. b.vond iis nomal

'evcri&v'

ruge of meanine.

lh*

cotcems engendered in criticieh a psdcupation

eirh

(5)

By hjs

ddn

on lne

.os,

Chrin defoyed 6e

cmity,

by ncans ol $c crois h.

lnnen h{Lb rues inro onc

dy

ad

b.ought $em b3ck

b

Gol. Hs dic'l on rhe

crN

ro

put

d end to L\e hated

dd

bnng us borh bac*

b

God

6

one peoplc,

frcm lne

cwple

ab.vc, lne

*ord

closs' Rle610 w..dcn cro$

4.d

lor crucifi\ionduingtheiimeoltLe RomanEmpn.- Howe'.'er. for

chii$io,

it has a

slmb.lic mtring b€yond rhc basionBeing Synboliolly, it mcans dearh md

\uff.nig (tnon,

l93a:l8l)

Bsd

on

lno*

fa.rs. this ftsarch is conduc&d to find out rh. kcyrords

of

B3l*k Obdat

€ce spccch

od

relrte each kojeords

b

comohtivc meaning

on*mioric poiir viev. Byconsidering rhisphenonenq llar itiswonhvto sbdv

'I(le"o'd-o

'le

BrrtObas a p.T-br"m'igt'

r

p'^pr''iv"

ii

ordtr ro

disdrle

rhe rcal meenings behind it

Ll

idhtifi

utiotr df tbc

lroblrB

-l]]ir

Estrrch is lEused on t*o main probl.ns Thcy

m 6

follorvingl

l. Wl.t

e

tn3 rypes oi kelvd.ds lound in A.rack Obana\ nce sp€ech? 2.

$t

connobtiv. meaning

cs

b€ derived

6on

6e

key {ords

ol

Bmck

Obma\trespc-h2

Tii5

lgch

k D attmpl ro stody keFvord

dd

i3

connobtivd hedning

in *riden rert of Bnock Ob€ma s Fce spe€h

ln

do;na

$is

tes.arch, thc kerlord found in $ccch and {he Prccess ofitlentiryios thc otuoGivD mcming of lnde key sords de dcscnb€d

Mor6!er,

this rhesis helP

$c

rcndod to

uderldd

$e meaning ol a

tet

motu lbJougl its kela\_ords, b€cause knowhdge
(6)

CIIAPTER,I

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

evert rexr will h.ve cerlai! keyavods, whethgr in rhe lom olRord

!r

phrasq *hich are ctucial to lhe unde6lrnding ol the baic coF.pl

of1h.l.n,

Kewo.d

h6

sev.ml c.ireria such

6

hiqh fFquency df

dclancq

$e

sod

c

be build a positive or negative in.Ae, rhc word has po*er or spirit dre *onl that

un credte rhe inplicn naninS, ihe wod lhat ehpo{ed ptoplc Io do 5melning.

rnd rhe word

cd

cret

or tum out people\ bclict It aho

tu

be applied in anolher sbdy like

tusltio..

dd

il ako ca. b€ used for analyzing $a

{tle

lnd

Luer'j.od\qrt.qqlF.nboi.\3 c r\.,. ornour\,c",

Coniotdive ncrning

h

eeneElly unsrable. h varies considerabll a.coilL.g to such Ii.rors such as culture, hislori.sl p.riod,

sial

:la*

and dE e.deEl

lil.

expenence oa the

sF€lei

Th€

sinildty

benveen key*d,n Md conDotlrive

Triner

d.ulru?lEile"c

hrt:.

orre

'inE hctr

sorh,!'.

Havi4 an.ltzed the pEvious dal4 ir is concluded $or

ii

hk s!€eh, Bamck Obma u$d rhe sign

stslm

io convey lbc intended n,es@es views

dd

norivalions in thc comohlile

fom

ol keyyods. as

loqd

6oh di€ da6. hk

intended

mcss!6

rold aboul the spnl to hale

I

perfecl unior spinr to figfir aeains thc .Jcial discih;naiion. rhc ptul.sr for moratiry and hrmoi!,, and de

bclicr in Cod, Clristirlity

ed

rhe

hlh

(7)

BIBLIOGRAPIIY

&ines, Rolud. {1975).

,l4rl loda!

ln: L!cv.N. editor. I995. Socnd Scmiorics

Pe1n

\l ,o.r

\e'

'a

Dours. Jin. (20119) Obat@ Marer

A

tica

Berotu1f.rz7

Resi€ved lcbruary t4,

201

o.rron

hq://M.scdbd.coitdet?81

I 76/Obma Moles Am€nuu

Beyond-Racial#sbts

Brc*n, Gillim Md Gerge Yule ( 1983).

I)'rc,dr,,,ltutr^

Cdlndse:

Cmbndge Uniredity Pr€ss

Burchcr,

Mdgmt

JEr

(\956). The N?Fa

j

Antican

Ctrue.

N€R York: Al&cd

Chandler, Ddiel. (?002) S.r,ort.rr

fte

ds,.s

London: Rornledsc

Chedrer, Ddier 1.2c05) Seniotic

lol

Beginnlrs. Retrieved Mdch 22, 2009,

rom

hlll//*lrvltd

.c.u]./hcdid/s,lB/ Quoted at ! 9/l ? 2007.

Cobl€y,

laul

ud l-ita Jbe.

(1999). lntroducinq sehiatics. Cdbndge:Totem

Cullen. Jim

(rmr)

nE,ltuticdh

dreah: a

sho

historr

afan

idea that shaped a

,drt

n Oslodunivedity Prcs US.

Fairclorgh,

Nomo

(200 I ).

,vd

t,rar,

,V,B

lz,Szdsa

London: Rourlcdsc.

Gallinsky,

Adm

G, eI

d\.

(2003) The Reappropriation

aI

SriC atizihg Labeb:

lnplicdi.$

lor

Social

ldentity

Reliieved

Ap.il 4

2009.

liom http://*$e.psych.nonnwestem.edrtpsych/peopldf&ulty,/bodennausdreapp.

HalD. St€veL (20119). ne Por?rol

wa/l^

ofsl@ery ana Fteedon.

HNard Univediry Pres.

Hawkcs, Tercn.e. {2001).

Jhcru,/dn

d,/

Se,i,rtcr. Londo.: RoutledCc.

Homby,A.s (r93r). atrbldgudsnt s Dictiohary af,4herican Enelilh

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

There are 20 non-literal meanings in the Reader Digest Magazine Advertisement based on difference edition. Below are the number and the percentage of each type of figurative

Assertive speech act is concerned with facts which the purpose is to inform. There are six focuses of assertive utterances: on information, on truth-value of utterance, on

Idiomatic expressions are often used by the people when they are communicating. Idiom is an expression which can be a term or a group of words whose meaning cannot be

Therefore, sentence (b) is not a euphemism expression anymore in which the real meaning is shown explicitly. In sentence oh, not tonight, dear, 'tonight' neutralize the

A thesis entitled “ An Analysis of Connotative Meaning and Its Implication on the Javanese Taboos Word , Surabaya Dialect ” has been approved and accepted by

Hasil penelitian ini yaitu penemuan sistem transitivity, sistem mood dan sistem theme (lexicogrammar pattern) dan penemuan Field, Tenor, dan Mode melalui

The Characteristics and Types of The Research In completing this research, the researcher applies a qualitative approach because this research aims to find out words or phrases that

Because pragmatics is subfield of speech acts and also the study of meanings based on the context and the meaning is not structural meaning but what the speaker means or based on the