SOCIAL DISC
PR
A SO
SCHOOL OF
MUHAMM
SCRIMINATION IN MIKE NEWELL’S
PRINCE OF PERSIA (2010):
SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Bachelor Degree
in English Department
by:
AR FACHRUDIN
A 320 060 192
OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUC
MADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKA
2011
L’S
CATION
APPROVAL
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MIKE NEWELL’S
PRINCE OF PERSIA (2010):
A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH
RESEARCH PAPER
by:
AR FACHRUDIN A.320.060.192
Approved to be Examined by Consultant Team:
Consultant I Consultant II
Drs. H. Abdillah Nugroho, M. Hum. Titis Setyabudi, S.Si.
ACCEPTANCE
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MIKE NEWELL’S
PRINCE OF PERSIA (2010):
A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH
Written by: AR Fachrudin
A320 060 192
Accepted and Approved by the Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
The Board of Examiners:
1. Drs. H. Abdillah Nugroho, M. Hum. ( )
(Chair Person)
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.Si. ( )
(Member I)
3.
Dr.Phil.Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed. ( ) ( Member II )Approved by:
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Dean,
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si.
TESTIMONY
On this occasion, the researcher states that in this research paper, there is no plagiarism of the previous literary work which has been raised to obtain Bachelor Degree of University, nor there are opinions or masterpieces which have been written or published by others, except referred written in this research paper and mentioned in the bibliography.
If it is proved that there are mistakes in the writer’s statement above later in the future, he will be wholly responsible.
Surakarta… 2011 The writer,
AR Fachrudin
Dedicated to:
My beloved parent “Ayah and Bunda“
My dearest sister “mb’ Izun” and ”mb’ Idah”
My younger brother “Rois” My friends niece and nephew
Assalamualaikum
Alhamdulillahirabbi grateful to Allah SWT Universe, who gives a m writer, so he can accomp in Mike Newell’s Princ requirement for getting b Muhammadiyah Univers
The writer realizes th other people’s help, so appreciation to:
1. Beloved Mother and
and advice.
2. Drs. H. Abdillah N
valuable guidance a paper.
3. Titis Setyabudi, S.S
to conduct this pape giving the writer sug
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
um Wr. Wb.
bil ‘alamin, Glory to Allah Almighty, the resea T for the guidance, The Most Merciful, Lord a million blessings, miracles and uncountable gif
mplish his research paper entitled “Social Discrim ince of Persia (2010): A Sociological Approach
g bachelor degree of education in English Depart ersity of Surakarta.
s that this research paper would never been possib so that the writer would like to express his gra
nd Father, for the wholeheartedness, suggestion,
Nugroho, M.Hum. The first consultant who ha e and suggestion during the completion of thi
Si. The Chief of English Department who has per per and the second consultant for being good cons
uggestion in correcting this research paper.
searcher is this research
4. Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed, as the third examiner. For the evaluation, suggestion and hospitality.
5. Dr. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum. The academic adviser who has patiently guided the writer from the beginning of the study and makes him understand better what is the meaning of life.
6. Drs. Sofyan Anif, M. Si. The Dean of the School of Teacher Training and Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
7. All of the lecturers of English Department for precious knowledge given to him.
8. The writer’s sweetest sister, “Mb’ Izun and Mb Idah”. Who have given motivation, advice, support and spirit?
9. All of friends in the “Krisna” boarding house.
10. Beloved best friends (Hanif, Andang, Hery, Dedi, Samsudin, Yohanes) for the cheerful that make this life to be colorful, interesting, worthy and lively.
11. The writer’s friends in class D 2006 English Department.
12. All of friends of English Department who have given suggestion, spirit, friendship, and motivation.
13. All of the people, who cannot be mentioned one by one for everything.
Finally, the researcher is aware that this research paper is far from being perfect. Therefore, the researcher expects suggestion and criticism from anybody to improve this paper.
Wassalamualaikum Wr. Wb.
Surakarta………..2011
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE... i
APPROVAL... ii
ACCEPTANCE... iii
TESTIMONY ... iv
MOTTO... v
DEDICATION... vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT... ix
ABSTRACT... xiii
LIST OF PICTURE ……….. xv
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ... 1
B. Literature Review ... 4
C. Problem Statement... 5
D. Limitation of the Study... 5
E. Objective of the Study... 5
F. Benefit of the Study... 5
G. Research Method... 6
H. Paper Organization... 7
1. Sociology of Literature... 9
2. Types of Sociology of Literature... 11
3. Basic Principles of Sociology of Literature... 12
B. Structural Element of the Movie... 14
a. Narrative Elements... 14
1) Characters and Characterization... 14
2) Setting... 15
3) Casting………. 15
4) Plot... 16
5) Point of View... 17
6) Style... 18
7) Theme... 21
b. Technical Elements... 22
1) Mise-en-Scene... 22
2) Cinematography... 24
3) Sound... 27
4) Editing... 27
c. Theoretical Application... 29
CHAPTER III SOCIAL BACKGROUND OF AMERICA SOCIETY IN TWENTY FIRST CENTURY A. Social Aspect... 30
B. Political Aspect... 35
D. Religious Aspect... 39
E. Cultural Aspect... 40
F. Science and Technology... 41
CHAPTER IV STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS A. Structural Elements... 42
1. Character and Characterization... 42
2. Setting... 52
2. Cinematography... 72
3. Sound ... 75
4. Editing... 76
C. Discussion ... 80
CHAPTER V SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS A. Social Aspect... 83
B. Political Aspect... 86
C. Economic Aspect ... 87
D. Cultural Aspect... 88
F. Science and Technology... 90 G. Discussion... 91
CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion... 95 B. Suggestion... 96
BIBLIOGRAPHY
SYNOPSIS
ABSTRACT
AR FACHRUDIN. A. 320 060 192. SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MIKE NEWELL’S PRINCE OF PERSIA (2010): A SOCIOLOGICAL
APPROACH. RESEACRH PAPER. SCHOOL OF TEACHER
TRAINING AND EDUCATION. MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2010.
The main aim of this study is to find how discrimination is reflected in Mike Newell’s Prince of Persia by correlating its structural elements and social historical background of Persia in ninth century. Indeed, literature and sociology are bounded each other due to the assumption that the appearance of literary work is in social emptiness.
This study uses qualitative method in which the data are taken from both primary and secondary data source in form of words, sentence and phrases. Primary data source is Mike Newell’s Prince of Persia meanwhile secondary data sources are other sources related to the primary data. Data collecting method in this study is library research, and in analyzing the data the researcher employs descriptive analysis.
The outcomes of this study are as follows: (1) Mike Newell’s Prince of Persia reflects social condition occurred in ninth century of Persia. (2) Mike Newell’s depicts social discrimination that creates crimes in Prince of Persia. (3) Prince of Persia is Mike Newell’ satire and criticism toward unbalance situation and condition that can be found in character’s characterization, narration and dialogue.
Key words: discrimination, Persia, Prince of Persia.
Consultant II
Titis Setyabudi, S.Si.
NIK: 948
Consultant I
Drs.H. Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum.
NIK: 589
Dean
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
LIST OF PICTURE
Picture 1 : Dastan ... 44
Picture 2 : Prince Tamina ... 45
Picture 3 : Nizam ... 47
Picture 4 : King Sharaman ... 47
Picture 5 : Tus ... 48
Picture 6 : Grasiv ... 49
Picture 7 : Bis ... 49
Picture 8 : Zolm ... 50
Picture 9 : Sheik Amar... 51
Picture 10 : Seso ... 52
Picture 11 : Emperor City of Nafas ... 53
Picture 12 : Alamut City ... 53
Picture 13 : Persia Empire ... 54
Picture 14 : Market Place... 54
Picture 15 : The Desert ... 55
Picture 16 : The Lair of Hassansin ... 55
Picture 17 : Avrat ... 55
Picture 18 : Point of View ... 65
Picture 19 : Costume ... 69
Picture 20 : Make-Up ... 70
Picture 22 : Character in out Door ... 71
Picture 23 : Character in Sun Rise ... 71
Picture 24 : Extremely Long Shot ... 73
Picture 25 : Long Shot ... 74
Picture 26 : Medium Long Shot ... 74
Picture 27 : Medium Shot ... 74
Picture 28 : Close Up ... 75
Picture 29 : Medium Close Up ... 75
Picture 30 : Axis of Action ... 77
Picture 31 : Shot/Reverse Shot ... 78
Picture 32 : Eye Line Match ... 78
Picture 33 : Match on Action ... 78
Picture 34 : Order ... 79
