INTENTION OF ELECTRIC MOTORCYCLE: CASE STUDY OF SELIS
By Devin Pathavi
21954006
MASTER’S DEGREE in
MASTER OF ARTS
BUSINESS AND COMMUNICATION
SWISS GERMAN UNIVERSITY The Prominence Tower
Jalan Jalur Sutera Barat No. 15, Alam Sutera Tangerang, Banten 15143 - Indonesia
August 2020
Revision after Thesis Defense on August 11, 2020
Devin Pathavi
STATEMENT BY THE AUTHOR
I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at any educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis.
Devin Pathavi S.T., B.Sc.
_____________________________________________
Student Date
Approved by:
Dr. Ir. Yosman Bustaman, M.Buss
_____________________________________________
Thesis Advisor Date
Mochammad Riyadh Rizky Adam, S.T, M.S.M _____________________________________________
Thesis Co-Advisor Date
Dr. Nila Krisnawati Hidayat, S.E., M.M
_____________________________________________
Dean Date
Devin Pathavi
ABSTRACT
Analysis of Factors Affecting the Green Purchase Intention of Electric Motorcycle
By
Devin Pathavi S.T., B.Sc.
Dr. Ir. Yosman Bustaman, M.Buss, Advisor
Mochammad Riyadh Rizky Adam, S.T, M.S.M, Co-advisor
SWISS GERMAN UNIVERSITY
Although Selis brand under PT.JUARA BIKE has been the pioneer of electric bicycle in Indonesia since 2011, the brand still has lack of demand on the electric motorcycle. The objective of this research is to analyze the factors affecting the green purchase intention of electric motorcycle. Some logical frameworks of this research are Subjective Norms, Aesthetic Value, Green Value, Perceived Price, and Perceived Quality. By using an online survey, a total of 300 respondents from people live in Jabodetabek region were collected. The findings showed that subjective norms, aesthetic value, green value, Perceived Price, and perceived quality influenced green purchase intention positively. The findings also revealed that green value, perceived quality and aesthetic value made the largest contribution in influencing green purchase intention among consumers. On the other hand, Perceived Price and subjective norms had a lesser significant impact on consumer intention to purchase green products.
Keywords: Subjective Norms, Aesthetic Value, Green Value, Perceived Price, Perceived Quality, Green Purchase Intention.
Devin Pathavi
© Copyright 2020 by Devin Pathavi S.T., B.Sc.
All rights reserved
Devin Pathavi
DEDICATION
I dedicate this works for my families, girlfriend, friends and lecturers that always support me.
Devin Pathavi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I praise God, the almighty for His guidance throughout the months and successfully accomplish the thesis work.
I want to express my deepest gratitude and special thanks to my advisor Dr. Ir.
Yosman Bustaman M,Buss, for the patience and guidance during my thesis work.
Also, to my Co-Advisor Mochammad Riyadh Rizky Adam, S.T, M.S.M for being really kind and helpful for discussion and consultation.
Another big gratitude for all of the lecturers and staffs of Magister Management who always helped and support me, especially Meyrasari Dewi that always responsible and care about us.
To the class of Master of Arts in Business 2019 for the holidays, friendship, laugh and tears during my study in Swiss German University.
Last but not least, to my beloved girlfriend and family for always supporting me and give motivation in my hard times during thesis.
Devin Pathavi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT BY THE AUTHOR ... 2
ABSTRACT ... 3
DEDICATION ... 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMEN TS ... 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... 7
LIST OF FIGURES... 10
LIST OF TABLES ... 11
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ... 13
1.1 Background ... 13
1.2 Research Problems... 15
1.3 Research Questions ... 17
1.4 Research Objectives... 17
1.5 Scope of Limitation ... 18
1.6 Significance of Study... 18
CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW ... 19
2.1 Framework of Thinking ... 19
2.2 Marketing Management ... 20
2.2. Green marketing... 21
2.3. Consumer behavior ... 23
2.4. Subjective Norms ... 25
2.5. Aesthetic Value ... 25
2.6. Green Value ... 26
2.7. Perceived Price... 27
2.8. Perceived Q uality ... 27
2.9. Green Purchase Intention ... 28
2.10. Previous Studies ... 28
2.11. State of The Art... 32
2.12. Hypothesis... 32
Devin Pathavi
CHAPTER 3 – RESEARCH METHODS ... 36
3.1. Type of study ... 36
3.2. Unit of Analysis/Unit Observation ... 37
3.3. Sampling Design ... 37
3.3.1. Population & Sample Target... 37
3.3.2. Sampling Method ... 38
3.3.3. Sampling size ... 38
3.4. Location & Time Frame of Study ... 39
3.5. Data Sources & Collection... 39
3.5.1. Type of Data... 39
3.5.2. Interview Guidelines ... 40
3.5.3. Questionnaire Structure... 40
3.5.4. Data Collection Method ... 43
3.6. Research Model... 43
3.7. Variable Operationalization ... 44
3.8.1. Pre-test ... 47
3.8.2. Post-test ... 63
3.8.3. Multiple Regression Analysis ... 63
CHAPTER 4 – RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ... 65
4.1. Brief Company Background ... 65
4.2. Descriptive Analysis of Respondents ... 66
4.3. Classical Assumption Test ... 69
4.3.1 Normality Test ... 69
4.3.2 Linearity Test ... 71
4.3.3 Heteroscedasticity Test ... 72
4.3.4 Autocorrelation Test ... 73
4.3.5 Multicollinearity Test... 74
4.4. Validity and Reliability Test ... 74
4.4.1. Validity and Reliability Test of Subjective Norms ... 75
4.4.2. Validity and Reliability Test of Aesthetic Value ... 78
4.4.3. Validity and Reliability Test of Green Value ... 80
4.4.4. Validity and Reliability Test of Perceived Price ... 83
4.4.5. Validity and Reliability Test of Perceived Quality ... 85
4.4.6. Validity and Reliability Test of Green Purc hase Intention ... 88
4.4.7. Multiple Regression Test ... 90
Devin Pathavi
CHAPTER 5 – CONCLUSIONS AND RECCOMENDATIONS ... 97
5.1. Conclusions ... 97
5.2. Managerial Implication ... 99
5.2.1. Subjective Norms ... 99
5.2.2. Aesthetic Value ... 101
5.2.3. Green Value ... 103
5.2.4. Perceived Price... 105
5.2.5. Perceived Q uality ... 107
5.2.6. Green Purchase Intention ... 110
5.3. Recommendations for Further Research... 112
REFERENCES... 113
APPENDIX I : QUESTIONNAIRES ... 126
APPENDIX II : RAW DATA ... 139
APPENDIX III : OUTPUT RESULTS ... 145
CURRICULUM VITAE ... 167
Devin Pathavi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures Page
Figure 1.1 Top Cities of worst air quality index ... 14
Figure 2.1 Theory Reasoned Action ... 24
Figure 4. 1 Selis Electric Motorcycle ... 65
Figure 4. 2 Selis Partners... 66
Figure 4. 3 Normality Test Histogram ... 69
Figure 4. 4 Normal P-Plot of Regression Standardized Residual ... 71
Figure 4. 5 Scatterplot of Dependent Variable GPI ... 72
Figure 5. 1 Advertisement by Selis ... 100
Figure 5. 2 Selis Electric Motorcycle ... 102
Figure 5. 3 Cost Comparison... 104
Figure 5. 4 Bundling Promotion by Erafone ... 106
Figure 5. 5 Selis testimonial ... 109
Devin Pathavi
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Table 3.1 Likert Scale ... 41
Table 3.2 Variable Operationalization ... 44
Table 3.3 Construct Validity Parameters ... 48
Table 3.4 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Subjective Norms ... 49
Table 3.5 Pre-test: Anti-Image Matrices of Subjective Norms ... 50
Table 3.6 Pre-test: Communalities of Subjective Norms ... 50
Table 3.7 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Subjective Norms... 51
Table 3.8 Pre-test: Reliability Test of Subjective Norms... 51
Table 3.9 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Aesthetic Value... 52
Table 3.10 Pre-test: Anti- image Matrices of Aesthetic Value ... 52
Table 3.11 Pre-test: Communalities of Aesthetic Value ... 53
Table 3.12 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Aesthetic Value ... 53
Table 3.13 Pre-test: Reliability of Aesthetic Value... 54
Table 3.14 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Green Value ... 54
Table 3.15 Pre-test: Anti-Image Matrices of Green Value ... 54
Table 3.16 Pre-test: Communalities of Green Value ... 55
Table 3.17 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Green Value ... 55
Table 3.18 Pre-test: Reliability of Green Value ... 56
Table 3.19 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Perceived Price ... 56
Table 3.20 Pre-test: Anti-Image Matrices of Perceived Price... 56
Table 3.21 Pre-test: Communalities of Perceived Price... 57
Table 3.22 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Perceived Price... 57
Table 3.23 Pre-test: Reliability of Perceived Price ... 58
Table 3.24 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Perceived Quality ... 58
Table 3.25 Pre-test: Anti-Image Matrices of Perceived Quality ... 59
Table 3.26 Pre-test: Communalities of Perceived Q uality ... 59
Table 3.27 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Perceived Quality ... 60
Table 3.28 Pre-test: Reliability of Perceived Quality ... 60
Table 3.29 Pre-test: KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Green Purchase Intention... 61
Table 3.30 Pre-test: Anti-Image Matrices of Green Purchase Intention ... 61
Table 3.31 Pre-test: Communalities of Green Purchase Intention ... 61
Table 3.32 Pre-test: Component Matrix of Green Purchase Intention ... 62
Table 3.33 Pre-test: Reliability of Green Purchase Intention... 62
Devin Pathavi
Table 4. 1 Demographic Profile 67
Table 4. 2 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test 70
Table 4. 3 Spearman’s Rho Test 73
Table 4. 4 Multicollinearity Test 74
Table 4. 5 KMO and Bartlett’s test of Subjective Norms 75
Table 4. 6 Anti- image Matrices of Subjective Norms 75
Table 4. 7 Communalities of Subjective Norms 76
Table 4. 8 Component Matrix of Subjective Norms 77
Table 4. 9 Reliability Test of Subjective Norms 77
Table 4. 10 KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Aesthetic Value 78
Table 4. 11 Anti- Image Matrices of Aesthetic Value 78
Table 4. 12 Communalities of Aesthetic Value 79
Table 4. 13 Component Matrix of Aesthetic Value 79
Table 4. 14 Reliability Test of Aesthetic Value 80
Table 4. 15 KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Green Value 80
Table 4. 16 Anti- Image Matrices of Green Value 81
Table 4. 17 Communalities of Green Value 81
Table 4. 18 Component Matrix of Green Value 82
Table 4. 19 Reliability Test of Green Value 82
Table 4. 20 KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Perceived Price 83
Table 4. 21 Anti- image Matrices of Perceived Price 83
Table 4. 22 Communalities of Perceived Price 84
Table 4. 23 Component Matrix of Perceived Price 84
Table 4. 24 Reliability Test of Perceived Price 85
Table 4. 25 KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Perceived Quality 85
Table 4. 26 Anti- Image Matrices of Perceived Quality 86
Table 4. 27 Communalities of Perceived Quality 86
Table 4. 28 Component Matrix of Perceived Quality 87
Table 4. 29 Reliability Test of Perceived Q uality 87
Table 4. 30 KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Green Purchase Intention 88 Table 4. 31 Anti- Image Matrices of Green Purchase Intention 88
Table 4. 32 Communalities of Green Purchase Intention 89
Table 4. 33 Component Matrix of Green Purchase Intention 89
Table 4. 34 Reliability Test of Green Purchase Intention 90
Table 4. 35 Regression Analysis Test 90
Table 4. 36 Multiple Regression Test 91
Table 4. 37 T-Test (Partial) 92
Table 4. 38 F-Test (Simultaneously) 92
Table 4. 39 Hypothesis Results 93
Table 5. 1 Majority Result of Subjective Norms 99
Table 5. 2 Majority Result of Aesthetic Value 101
Table 5. 3 Majority Result of Green Value 103
Table 5. 4 Majority Result of Perceived Price 105
Table 5. 5 Majority Result of Perceived Quality 107
Table 5. 6 Majority Result of Green Purchase Intention 110