Repor t
HigHligHts
Accomplishments of the U.S. Global Change
Research Program
the U.s. global Research Program (UsgCRP) is the nation’s principal contribution to the worldwide effort to understand our changing planet. growing out of interagency planning under the Reagan and H. W. Bush administrations, UsgRCP was established by Congress in the 1990 global Change Research Act. At that time, it was clear that global environmental change was important, but the many forces altering the ocean and atmo-sphere—affecting the climate, ecosystems, freshwater systems, agricultural systems and more—were not well understood. information needs have also grown as global changes are increasingly visible in our everyday affairs, from droughts and extreme storms to the acidifying ocean.
From its inception, UsgCRP has consistently focused on building scientiic knowledge and making it useful. For example, the Program has documented substantial increases in heavy downpours in most regions of the United states over the past 50 years, which can cause looding that overwhelms the existing infrastructure of sewers and roads. Awareness of such trends can help governments, businesses, and citizens plan accord-ingly in a number of realms, including agriculture, conservation, and human health.
this report highlights advances in global change science in the quarter century the UsgCRP has been in existence, and documents some of its contributions to that growth. Accomplishments are discussed in terms of the two primary functions of UsgCRP: (1) strategic planning and coordination of global change research efforts in 13 participat-ing federal agencies and departments (see Box 1); and (2) high-level synthesis of global change research results presented in assessments and other products that are shared with decision makers and the American public.
Major Contributions to understanding global Change
looking back over a quarter century, the UsgCRP has made notable accomplishments in its mission of scientiic research to advance the national interest. this report identiies the following four examples of notable contributions.development of global observation systems
Earth system science is an observational science in which the whole planet is the laboratory. Aside from a few early datasets on global processes—such as the record of atmospheric CO2 measured at Mauna loa—no truly global datasets were available in the late 1980s and few had been measured for a long enough time to measure global change.One of the major contributions of the UsgCRP is the collection of consistent data sets, at levels of spatial resolution from global down to speciic watersheds and neighborhoods. Working with NAsA’s Earth Observing system (EOs), which also got its start from Congress in 1990, UsgCRP instituted objectives and associated critical measurements designed to
February 2017
U.S. GLOBAL
CHANGE RESEARCH
PROGRAM
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE
REPORT
address understanding of global change with space-based observations.
One early success of the global space-based observ-ing system was a greatly improved understandobserv-ing of land-cover change. For example, landsat data together with new methods for analysis produced the irst consis-tent, replicable measurement of loss of humid tropical forest in the Amazon basin. today, the ability to calculate terrestrial global processes, such as changes in the length of the growing season, can only be accomplished with the global-satellite data record initiated by the UsgCRP.
As global Earth observations from space were expanding, some of the same UsgCRP agencies, and oth-ers as well, planned and implemented airborne, ground, and ocean-based observing systems. the tropical Ocean-global Atmosphere (tOgA) Array in the western Paciic, the expansion of the ocean Argo loats, the development of AmeriFlux for terrestrial CO2 luxes, and the creation of a nationally consistent archive of temperature observa-tions are prime examples.
through its integrated Observations interagency Working group, UsgCRP continues to coordinate a large and growing portfolio of observations, both satellite and
in situ. More than 30 instruments are currently operating in near-Earth orbit, which measure or allow the calcula-tion of a wide suite of variables, including wind speeds and circulation patterns, atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and aerosols, land-cover change, ice sheets, cloud properties, ocean salinity, sea ice, and the biosphere’s net primary productivity on both land and ocean.
earth system Modeling Earth system models,
which mathematically represent the physical, chemical, and biological processes across the planet, are indis-pensable tools for understanding global change and generating information needed by decision makers. in1990, most models focused only on the atmosphere component of the Earth system, with crude repre-sentation of clouds and radiation processes and little representation of interactions with the ocean and land surfaces. While useful for studying large-scale responses to changes, such as increases in greenhouse gases, those models were not useful for smaller-scale features, such as tropical storms, hurricanes, or sharply deined warm and cold fronts.
signiicant investments by several UsgCRP agen-cies have addressed many of those limitations. today’s models represent multiple interacting components at increasingly higher resolutions. it is now possible to sim-ulate realistic past conditions that can be compared with both satellite and in situ observations. this advance is critical to advancing scientiic knowledge, making more accurate forecasts of near-term risks such as drought, informing maps of coastal lood risk, and many other practical applications.
in recognition of the need to coordinate the nation’s diverse and decentralized modeling efforts, the UsgCRP set up the interagency group on integrative Modeling (igiM) in 2011. UsgCRP agencies also play a role in inter-national modeling efforts, speciically the Coupled Model intercomparison Project (CMiP) established in 1995, which uses standardized speciications of model inputs and outputs established by an international committee.
Carbon-Cycle science Carbon-cycling research
has been a focus for UsgCRP agencies because of the role carbon plays as a major regulator of Earth’s climate and as a key factor in controlling the acidity of the global oceans. in order to assess and predict change, both carbon luxes to the atmosphere (sources) and carbon sequestration in land and ocean ecosystems (sinks) need to be under-stood and quantiied.the UsgCRP agencies have championed strate-gic planning activities and promoted and coordinated core observations and process studies on global carbon sources and sinks. in 1998, the Carbon Cycle interagency
box 1. Current Participating agencies and departments in the usgCrP
•
National science Foundation•
National Aeronautics and space Administration•
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration•
Environmental Protection Agency•
Department of Energy•
Department of state•
Department of Defense•
Department of the interior•
Department of Agriculture•
Department of transportation•
Department of Health and Human services•
U.s. Agency for international Development•
smithsonian institutionbringing together the natural and social sciences in global change research and encouraging member agencies to support fundamental social science.
social science is also important in the efforts UsgCRP has made to deliver actionable science in support of deci-sion making, particularly at the regional scale. Regional decision support centers were established by the Department of the interior (Climate science Centers), NOAA (Regional integrated sciences and Assessments [RisA] program and Regional Climate Centers), and UsDA (Climate Hubs), each targeted at the speciic responsi-bilities of the sponsoring agency. these centers have served as testbeds for experimentation in informing deci-sions, effectively providing platforms for applied human dimensions research.
While progress is being made in advancing human dimensions research, challenges remain. in particular, many UsgCRP agencies lack social science expertise and sustained social science data resources. these challenges will have to be overcome for further progress in incorpo-rating the social sciences into the UsgCRP, to provide the
the Value Chain of scientiic Knowledge on global Change
Working group (CCiWg) was formally constituted to coordinate efforts that 12 U.s. government agencies and departments now lead as part of the U.s. Carbon Cycle science Program.
During the past 25 years, research organized and sup-ported in part by the UsgCRP has greatly increased our understanding of the processes involved in, for example, the potential for enhanced decomposition of soil carbon as the climate warms, and the processes inluencing CO2 uptake in a warming ocean. important components of this research are intensive, interagency coordinated ield campaigns that unite in situ, airborne, and satellite-based observations.
integrating human dimensions into global
Change research the social forces shaping land
and energy use and urbanization globally—including the behavior of individuals, organizations, and communities— are understood to be of basic importance in all aspects of global change research. through its coordinating activi-ties, the UsgCRP has made important contributions toin addition to the new scientiic knowledge produced by its coordinated research, the UsgCRP provides the nation with a range of beneits resulting from use of this information. this value chain is illustrated above with research on the cycling of carbon, nitro-gen, phosphorus, and other key elements, which have, among other things, led to advice to farmers on how to optimize fertilizer use. Another example is the use of knowledge about changes in the frequency, intensity,
Copyright 2017 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
CoMMittee to adVise the u.s. global Change researCh PrograM
Warren Washington (Chair), National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO; Kai lee (Vice Chair), David and lucile Packard Foundation (Ret.), los Altos, CA; doug arent, National Renewable Energy laboratory, golden, CO; susan avery, Woods Hole Oceanographic institute (Ret.), MA; arrietta Chakos, Urban Resilience strategies, Berkeley, CA; Peter daszak, EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY; thomas dietz, Michigan state University, East lansing; Kristie l. ebi, University of Washington, seattle; baruch Fischhoff, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA; nancy b. grimm, Arizona state University, tempe; henry d. jacoby, Massachusetts institute of technology, Cambridge; anthony C. janetos, Boston University, MA; jerry M. Melillo, Marine Biological laboratory, Woods Hole, MA; richard h. Moss, University of Maryland, College Park; ian noble, ND-gAiN, Vienna, VA; Margo oge, Environmental Protection Agency (Ret.), Mclean, VA; Kathleen segerson, University of Connecticut, storrs; Kathleen tierney, University of Colorado, Boulder; Charles j. Vörösmarty,
City University of New York, NY; brian l. Zuckerman, science and technology Policy institute, Washington, DC; amanda Purcell (Associate Program Oficer, Board on Atmospheric sciences and Climate [BAsC]), Paul C. stern (senior scholar, Board on Environmental Change and society), amanda staudt (Director, BAsC), rita gaskins (Administrative Coordinator, BAsC), National Academies of sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
For More Information . . . this Report Highlights was prepared by the Board on Atmospheric sciences and Climate and
the Board on Environmental Change and society based on the report Accomplishments of the U.S. Global Change Research Program. the study was sponsored by the National Aeronautics and space Administration. Any opinions, indings, con-clusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authoring committee and do not necessarily relect those of the sponsor. Copies of the report are available from the National Academies Press, (800) 624-6242; http://
www.nap.edu.
information the nation needs to effectively and eficiently manage current and likely consequences of global envi-ronmental changes.
looKing ahead
through interagency partnerships and collaborations with leading experts, the UsgCRP has worked success-fully since its inception to advance global change science and improve understanding of how global change affects society today and how it could affect society in the future. in the coming decades, as the impacts of global change become increasingly apparent, UsgCRP will need to augment the knowledge base for explor-ing options to protect the nation’s interests in the face of accelerating global changes. the Program should build on its accomplishments by sustaining, expanding, and coordinating observations of the Earth system and maintaining a balanced program of discovery-driven
and use-inspired research to support the needs of the nation at local, regional, national, and global scales. the Program is well poised to tackle this task.
usgrCP assessments and other Products
UsgCRP has prepared three National Climate Assessments (NCAs)—published in 2000, 2009, and 2014—and is in the process of preparing a fourth one. the NCAs are coordinated and produced by the UsgCRP National Coordination Ofice. Dozens of supplementary reports have been produced by the Program and its participating agencies, often as input to the NCAs. Assessments and assessment products are critical components that connect the coordinated research and results with the decision makers and American public who use them.Division on Earth and life studies
