ii
ABOUT THE EDITOR IN CHIEF
Merrill Skolnik was Superintendent of the Radar Division at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory for over 30
years. Before that he was involved in advances in radar while at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, the Institute for
Defense Analyses, and the Research Division of Electronic Communications, Inc. He is the author of the
popular McGraw-Hill textbook Introduction to Radar Systems, now in its third edition, the editor of Radar
Applications, as well as being a former editor of the Proceedings of the IEEE. He earned the Doctor ofEngineering Degree from The Johns Hopkins University, where he also received the B.E and M.S.E degrees in
electrical engineering. He is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering, a Fellow of the IEEE,
and the first recipient of the IEEE Dennis J. Picard Medal for Radar Technologies and Applications.
iii
RADAR HANDBOOK
Merrill I. Skolnik
Editor in Chief Third Edition
New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul
Singapore Sydney Toronto
iv
Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress
McGraw-Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us pages at www.mhprofessional.com.
Radar Handbook, Third Edition
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies.
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of publisher.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC DOC 0 1 9 8 ISBN 978-0-07-148547-0
MHID 0-07-148547-3
Sponsoring Editor Wendy Rinaldi Editorial Supervisor Janet Walden Project Editor LeeAnn Pickrell
Acquisitions Coordinator Mandy Canales Copy Editor LeeAnn Pickrell
Proofreader Susie Elkind
Production Supervisor Jean Bodeaux
Composition International Typesetting & Composition Illustration International Typesetting & Composition Art Director, Cover Jeff Weeks
Cover Designer Mary McKeon
Information has been obtained by McGraw-Hill from sources believed to be reliable. However, because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by our sources, McGraw-Hill, or others, McGraw-Hill does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or the results obtained from the use of such information.
v
CONTENTS
Contributors xiii
Preface xv
Chapter 1 An Introduction and Overview of Radar Merrill Skolnik
1.1
1.1 Radar in Brief / 1.1
1.2 Types of Radars / 1.5
1.3 Information Available from a Radar / 1.7
1.4 The Radar Equation / 1.10
1.5 Radar Frequency Letter-band Nomenclature / 1.13
1.6 Effect of Operating Frequency on Radar / 1.14
1.7 Radar Nomenclature / 1.18
1.8 Some Past Advances in Radar / 1.19
1.9 Applications of Radar / 1.20
1.10 Conceptual Radar System Design / 1.22
Chapter 2 MTI Radar
William W. Shrader and Vilhelm Gregers-Hansen
2.1
2.1 Preface / 2.1
2.2 Introduction to MTI Radar / 2.2
2.3 Clutter Filter Response to Moving Targets / 2.9
2.4 Clutter Characteristics / 2.10
2.5 Definitions / 2.19
2.6 Improvement Factor Calculations / 2.23
2.7 Optimum Design of Clutter Filters / 2.25
2.8 MTI Clutter Filter Design / 2.33
2.9 MTI Filter Design for Weather Radars / 2.46
2.10 Clutter Filter Bank Design / 2.52
2.11 Performance Degradation Caused by Receiver Limiting / 2.59
2.12 Radar System Stability Requirements / 2.65
2.13 Dynamic Range and A/D Conversion Considerations / 2.78
2.14 Adaptive MTI / 2.80
2.15 Radar Clutter Maps / 2.83
2.16 Sensitivity-velocity Control (SVC) / 2.87
2.17 Considerations Applicable to MTI Radar Systems / 2.91
vi
Chapter 3 Airborne MTI
James K. Day and Fred M. Staudaher
3.1
3.1 Systems Using Airborne MTI Techniques / 3.1
3.2 Coverage Considerations / 3.2
3.3 Airborne MTI Performance Drivers / 3.3
3.4 Platform Motion and Altitude Effects on MTI Performance / 3.3
3.5 Platform-motion Compensation Abeam / 3.10
3.6 Scanning-motion Compensation / 3.14
3.7 Simultaneous Platform Motion and Scan Compensation / 3.18 3.8 Platform-motion Compensation, Forward Direction / 3.21
3.9 Space-time Adaptive Motion Compensation / 3.23
3.10 Effect of Multiple Spectra / 3.31
3.11 Example AMTI Radar System / 3.32
Chapter 4 Pulse Doppler Radar
John P. Stralka and William G. Fedarko
4.1
4.1 Characteristics and Applications / 4.1
4.2 Pulse Doppler Clutter / 4.14
4.3 Dynamic-range and Stability Requirements / 4.24
4.4 Range and Doppler Ambiguity Resoluton / 4.31
4.5 Mode and Waveform Design / 4.35
4.6 Range Performance / 4.39
List of Abbreviations / 4.48
Chapter 5 Multifunctional Radar Systems for Fighter Aircraft David Lynch, Jr. and Carlo Kopp
5.1
5.1 Introduction / 5.1
5.2 Typical Missions and Modes / 5.10
5.3 A-A Mode Descriptions & Waveforms / 5.16
5.4 A-S Mode Descriptions & Waveforms / 5.28
Chapter 6 Radar Receivers Michael E. Yeomans
6.1
6.1 The Configuration of a Radar Receiver / 6.1
6.2 Noise and Dynamic-range Considerations / 6.4
6.3 Bandwidth Considerations / 6.9
6.4 Receiver Front End / 6.10
6.5 Local Oscillators / 6.14
6.6 Gain Control / 6.22
6.7 Filtering / 6.24
6.8 Limiters / 6.29
6.9 I/Q Demodulators / 6.31
6.10 Analog-to-Digital Converters / 6.35
6.11 Digital Receivers / 6.40
6.12 Diplex Operation / 6.46
6.13 Waveform Generation and Upconversion / 6.47
vii
Chapter 7 Automatic Detection, Tracking, and Sensor Integration W. G. Bath and G. V.Trunk
7.1
7.1 Introduction / 7.1
7.2 Automatic Detection / 7.1
7.3 Automatic Tracking / 7.22
7.4 Networked Radars / 7.46
7.5 Unlike-sensor Integration / 7.49
Chapter 8 Pulse Compression Radar
Michael R. Ducoff and Byron W. Tietjen
8.1
8.1 Introduction / 8.1
8.2 Pulse Compression Waveform Types / 8.2
8.3 Factors Affecting Choice of Pulse Compression Systems / 8.26 8.4 Pulse Compression Implementation and Radar System Examples / 8.28
Appendix / 8.36
Chapter 9 Tracking Radar Dean D. Howard
9.1
9.1 Introduction / 9.1
9.2 Monopulse (Simultaneous Lobing) / 9.3
9.3 Scanning and Lobing / 9.16
9.4 Servosystems for Tracking Radar / 9.17
9.5 Target Acquisition and Range Tracking / 9.20
9.6 Special Monopulse Techniques / 9.24
9.7 Sources of Error / 9.26
9.8 Target-caused Errors (Target Noise) / 9.26
9.9 Other External Causes of Error / 9.37
9.10 Internal Sources of Error / 9.42
9.11 Summary of Sources of Error / 9.43
9.12 Error Reduction Techniques / 9.46
Chapter 10 The Radar Transmitter
Thomas A. Weil and Merrill Skolnik
10.1
10.1 Introduction / 10.1
10.2 Linear-beam Amplifiers / 10.4
10.3 Magnetron / 10.14
10.4 Crossed-field Amplifiers / 10.16
10.5 Gyrotrons / 10.17
10.6 Transmitter Spectrum Control / 10.19
10.7 Grid-controlled Tubes / 10.21
10.8 Modulators / 10.23
10.9 Which RF Power Source to Use? / 10.25
viii
Chapter 11 Solid id-State Transmitters Michael T. Borkowski
11.1
11.1 Introduction / 11.1
11.2 Advantages of Solid State / 11.1
11.3 Solid-state Devices / 11.5
11.4 Designing for the Solid-state Bottle Transmitter / 11.17 11.5 Designing for the Solid-state Phased Array Transmitter / 11.24
11.6 Solid-state System Examples / 11.37
Chapter 12 Reflector Antennas
Michael E. Cooley and Daniel Davis
12.1
12.1 Introduction / 12.7
12.2 Basic Principles and Parameters / 12.3
12.3 Reflector Antenna Architectures / 12.16
12.4 Reflector Feeds / 12.25
12.5 Reflector Antenna Analysis / 12.37
12.6 Mechanical Design Considerations / 12.35
Acknowledgments / 12.47
Chapter 13 Phased Array Radar Antennas Joe Frank and John D. Richards
13.1
13.1 Introduction / 13.7
13.2 Array Theory / 13.9
13.3 Planar Arrays and Beam Steering / 13.15
13.4 Aperture Matching and Mutual Coupling / 13.20
13.5 Low-sidelobe Phased Arrays / 13.28
13.6 Quantization Effects / 13.34
13.7 Bandwidth of Phased Arrays / 13.38
13.8 Feed Networks (Beamformers) / 13.46
13.9 Phase Shifters / 13.57
13.10 Solid-state Modules / 13.53
13.11 Multiple Simultaneous Receive Beams / 13.54
13.12 Digital Beamforming / 13.56
13.13 Radiation Pattern Nulling / 13.57
13.14 Calibration of Active Phased Array Antennas / 13.60
13.15 Phased Array Systems / 13.62
Chapter 14 Radar Cross Section Eugene F. Knott
14.1
14.1 Introduction / 14.1
14.2 The Concept of Echo Power / 14.4
14.3 RCS Prediction Techniques / 14.16
14.4 RCS Measurement Techniques / 14.27
14.5 Radar Echo Suppression / 14.36
ix
Chapter 15 Sea Clutter Lewis B. Wetzel
15.1
15.1 Introduction / 15.1
15.2 The Sea Surface / 15.3
15.3 Empirical Behavior of Sea Clutter / 15.7
15.4 Theories and Models of Sea Clutter / 15.27
15.5 Summary and Conclusions / 15.37
Chapter 16 Ground Echo Richard K. Moore
16.1
16.1 Introduction / 16.1
16.2 Parameters Affecting Ground Return / 16.4
16.3 Theoretical Models and Their Limitations / 16.7
16.4 Fading of Ground Echoes / 16.12
16.5 Measurement Techniques for Ground Return / 16.19 16.6 General Models for Scattering Coefficient (Clutter Models) / 16.29
16.7 Scattering Coefficient Data / 16.35
16.8 Polarimetry / 16.46
16.9 Scattering Coefficient Data Near Grazing / 16.52
16.10 Imaging Radar Interpretation / 16.55
Chapter 17 Synthetic Aperture Radar Roger Sullivan
17.1
17.1 Basic Principle of SAR / 17.1
17.2 Early History of SAR / 17.2
17.3 Types of SAR / 17.2
17.4 SAR Resolution / 17.6
17.5 Key Aspects of SAR / 17.10
17.6 SAR Image Quality / 17.16
17.7 Summary of Key SAR Equations / 17.21
17.8 Special SAR Applications / 17.22
Chapter 18 Space-Based Remote Sensing Radars R. Keith Raney
18.1
18.1 Perspective / 18.1
18.2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) / 18.5
18.3 Altimeters / 18.29
18.4 Planetary Radars / 18.43
18.5 Scatterometers / 18.53
18.6 Radar Sounders / 18.59
x
Chapter 19 Meteorological Radar
R. Jeffrey Keeler and Robert J. Serafin
19.1
19.1 Introduction / 19.1
19.2 The Radar Equation for Meteorological Targets / 19.3
19.3 Design Considerations / 19.6
19.4 Signal Processing / 19.19
19.5 Operational Applications / 19.25
19.6 Research Applications / 19.33
Chapter 20 HF Over-the-Horizon Radar
James M. Headrick and Stuart J. Anderson
20.1
20.1 Introduction / 20.1
20.2 The Radar Equation / 20.5
20.3 Factors Influencing Skywave Radar Design / 20.7 20.4 The Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation / 20.13
20.5 Waveforms for HF Radar / 20.21
20.6 The Transmitting System / 20.23
20.7 Radar Cross Section / 20.26
20.8 Clutter: Echoes from the Environment / 20.29
20.9 Noise, Interference, and Spectrum Occupancy / 20.40
20.10 The Receiving System / 20.45
20.11 Signal Processing and Tracking / 20.49
20.12 Radar Resource Management / 20.54
20.13 Radar Performance Modeling / 20.55
Appendix: HF Surface Wave Radar / 20.70
Chapter 21 Ground Penetrating Radar David Daniels
21.1
21.1 Introduction / 21.1
21.2 Physics of Propagation in Materials / 21.6
21.3 Modeling / 21.13
21.4 Properties of Materials / 21.18
21.5 GPR Systems / 21.20
21.6 Modulation Techniques / 21.21
21.7 Antennas / 21.24
21.8 Signal and Image Processing / 21.30
21.9 Applications / 21.35
21.10 Licensing / 21.39
Chapter 22 Civil Marine Radar Andy Norris
22.1
22.1 Introduction / 22.1
22.2 The Challenges / 22.3
22.3 International Standards / 22.7
22.4 Technology / 22.10
22.5 Target Tracking / 22.17
xi
22.6 User Interface / 22.19
22.7 Integration with AIS / 22.23
22.8 Radar Beacons / 22.25
22.9 Validation Testing / 22.28
22.10 Vessel Tracking Services / 22.29
Appendix The Early Days of CMR / 22.31
List of Maritime Radar-related Abbreviations / 22.33
Acknowledgments / 22.34
Chapter 23 Bistatic Radar Nicholas J. Willis
23.1
23.1 Concept and Definitions / 23.1
23.2 Coordinate Systems / 23.3
23.3 Bistatic Radar Equation / 23.4
23.4 Applications / 23.9
23.5 Bistatic Doppler / 23.14
23.6 Target Location / 23.17
23.7 Target Cross Section / 23.19
23.8 Surface Clutter / 23.22
23.9 Unique Problems and Requirements / 23.26
Chapter 24 Electronic Counter-Countermeasures Alfonso Farina
24.1
24.1 Introduction / 24.1
24.2 Terminology / 24.2
24.3 Electronic Warfare Support Measures / 24.2
24.4 Electronic Countermeasures / 24.5
24.5 Objectives and Taxonomy of ECCM Techniques / 24.8
24.6 Antenna-related ECCM / 24.10
24.7 Transmitter-related ECCM / 24.31
24.8 Receiver-related ECCM / 24.32
24.9 Signal-processing-related ECCM / 24.33
24.10 Operational-deployment Techniques / 24.36
24.11 Application of ECCM Techniques / 24.37
24.12 ECCM and ECM Efficacy / 24.54
Acronym List / 24.56
Acknowledgments / 24.58
Chapter 25 Radar Digital Signal Processing
James J. Alter and Jeffrey O. Coleman
25.1
25.1 Introduction / 25.1
25.2 Receive Channel Processing / 25.2
25.3 Transmit Channel Processing / 25.20
25.4 DSP Tools / 25.22
25.5 Design Considerations / 25.34
25.6 Summary / 25.37
Acknowledgments / 25.38
xii
Chapter 26 The Propagation Factor, F
p, in the Radar Equation Wayne L. Patterson
26.1
26.1 Introduction / 26.1
26.2 The Earth’s Atmosphere / 26.2
26.3 Refraction / 26.3
26.4 Standard Propagation / 26.4
26.5 Anomalous Propagation / 26.6
26.6 Propagation Modeling / 26.13
26.7 EM System Assessment Programs / 26.18
26.8 AREPS Radar System Assessment Model / 26.23
26.9 AREPS Radar Displays / 26.25
Index 1.1
xiii
CONTRIBUTORS
James J. Alter Naval Research Laboratory (CHAPTER 25)
Stuart J. Anderson Australian Defense Science and Technology Organisation (CHAPTER 20) W. G. Bath The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (CHAPTER 7)
Michael T. Borkowski Raytheon Company (CHAPTER 11) Jeffrey O. Coleman Naval Research Laboratory (CHAPTER 25)
Michael E. Cooley Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems (CHAPTER 12) David Daniels ERA Technology (CHAPTER 21)
Daniel Davis Northrop Grumman Corporation (CHAPTER 12) James K. Day Lockheed Martin Corporation (CHAPTER 3) Michael R. Ducoff Lockheed Martin Corporation (CHAPTER 8) Alfonso Farina SELEX Sistemi Integrati (CHAPTER 24)
William G. Fedarko Northrop Grumman Corporation (CHAPTER 4)
Joe Frank The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (CHAPTER 13) Vilhelm Gregers-Hansen Naval Research Laboratory (CHAPTER 2)
James M. Headrick Naval Research Laboratory, retired (CHAPTER 20) Dean D. Howard Consultant to ITT Industries, Inc. (CHAPTER 9)
R. Jeffrey Keeler National Center for Atmospheric Research (CHAPTER 19) Eugene F. Knott Tomorrow’s Research (CHAPTER 14)
Carlo Kopp Monash University (CHAPTER 5) David Lynch, Jr. DL Sciences, Inc. (CHAPTER 5)
Richard K. Moore The University of Kansas (CHAPTER 16) Andy Norris Consultant in Navigation Systems (CHAPTER 22)
Wayne L. Patterson Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (CHAPTER 26)
Keith Raney The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (CHAPTER 18) John D. Richards The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (CHAPTER 13) Robert J. Serafin National Center for Atmospheric Research (CHAPTER 19)
William W. Shrader Shrader Associates (CHAPTER 2) Merrill Skolnik (CHAPTERS 1 and 10)
Fred M. Staudaher Naval Research Laboratory, retired (CHAPTER 3)
xiv
John P. Stralka Northrop Grumman Corporation (CHAPTER 4) Roger Sullivan Institute for Defense Analyses (CHAPTER 17) Byron W. Tietjen Lockheed Martin Corporation (CHAPTER 8)
G. V. Trunk The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (CHAPTER 7) Thomas A. Weil (CHAPTER 10)
Lewis B. Wetzel Naval Research Laboratory, retired (CHAPTER 15)
Nicholas J. Willis Technology Service Corporation, retired (CHAPTER 23)
Michael E. Yeomans Raytheon Company (CHAPTER 6)
xv
PREFACE
Radar is an important example of an electrical engineering system. In university engineering courses, the emphasis usually is on the basic tools of the electrical engineer such as circuit design, signals, solid state, digital processing, electronic devices, electromagnetics, automatic control, microwaves, and so forth. But in the real world of electrical engineering practice, these are only the techniques, piece parts, or subsystems that make up some type of system employed for a useful purpose. In addition to radar and other sensor systems, electrical engineering systems include communications, control, energy, information, industrial, military, navigation, entertainment, medical, and others. These are what the practice of electrical engineering is all about. Without them there would be little need for electrical engineers. However, the practicing engineer who is involved in producing a new type of electrical engineering system often has to depend on acquiring knowledge that was not usually covered in his or her engineering courses. The radar engineer, for example, has to understand the major components and subsystems that make up a radar, as well as how they fit together. The Radar Handbook attempts to help in this task. In addition to the radar system designer, it is hoped that those who are responsible for procuring new radar systems, those who utilize radars, those who maintain radar systems, and those who manage the engineers who do the above, also will find the Radar
Handbook to be of help in fulfilling such tasks.The third edition of the Radar Handbook is evidence that the development and application of radar for both civilian and military purposes continue to grow in both utility and in improved technology. Some of the many advances in radar since the previous edition include the following:
- The extensive use of digital methods for improved signal processing, data processing, decision making, flexible radar control, and multifunction radar
- Doppler weather radar
- Ground moving target indication, or GMTI
- An extensive experimental database describing low-angle land clutter, as obtained by MIT Lincoln Laboratory, that replaced the previously widely used clutter model that dated back to World War II
- The realization that microwave sea echo at low grazing angles is due chiefly to what are called “sea spikes”
- The active-aperture phased array radar system using solid-state modules, also called active electronically scanned arrays (AESA), which is attractive for some multifunction radar applications that need to manage both power and spatial coverage
- Planetary exploration with radar
- Computer-based methods for predicting radar propagation performance in realistic environments
xvi
- Operational use of HF over-the-horizon radar
- Improved methods for detecting moving targets in clutter, including space-time adaptive processing - Operational use of inverse synthetic aperture radar for target recognition
- Interferometric synthetic aperture radar, or InSAR, to obtain the height of a resolved scatterer or to detect moving ground targets as well as provide a SAR image of a scene
- High precision space-based altimeters, with accuracy of a few centimeters, to measure the Earth’s geoid - Ultrawideband radar for ground penetrating and similar applications
- Improved high power, wide bandwidth klystron power sources based on clustered cavity resonators, as well as the multiple-beam klystron
- The appearance of wide bandgap semiconductors that allow better performance because of high power and high operating temperatures
- The availability of high-power millimeter-wave generators based on the gyroklystron - Nonlinear FM pulse compression with low sidelobe levels
- The replacement, by the computer, of the operator as information extractor and decision maker
The above are not listed in any particular order, nor should they be considered a complete enumeration of radar developments since the appearance of the previous edition. There were also some radar topics in previous editions of the Radar Handbook that are of lesser interest and so were not included in this edition.
The chapter authors, who are experts in their particular field, were told to consider the reader of their chapter as being knowledgeable in the general subject of radar and even an expert in some other particular area of radar, but not necessarily knowledgeable about the subject of the particular chapter the author was writing.
It should be expected that with a book in print as long as the Radar Handbook has been, not all chapter authors from the previous editions would be available to do the third edition. Many of the previous authors have retired or are no longer with us. Sixteen of the twenty-six chapters in this edition have authors or coauthors who were not involved in the previous editions.
The hard work of preparing these chapters was done by the individual expert authors of the various chapters. Thus the value of the Radar Handbook is the result of the diligence and expertise of the authors who contributed their time, knowledge, and experience to make this handbook a useful addition to the desk of radar system engineers and all those people vital to the development, production, and employment of radar systems.
I am deeply grateful to all the contributing authors for their fine work and the long hours they had to apply to their task. It is the chapter authors who make any handbook a success. My sincere thanks to them all.
As stated in the Preface of the previous edition, readers who wish to reference or quote material from the
Radar Handbook are asked to mention the names of the individual chapter authors who produced the material.MERRILL SKOLNIK
Baltimore, Maryland
£°£
ÊÌÀ`ÕVÌÊ>`Ê
"ÛiÀÛiÜÊvÊ,>`>À
iÀÀÊ-
£°£Ê ,,Ê Ê ,
2ADAR OBJECTS
L
L
A
L
L
L
DECISION SIGNAL ABOUT
! GULAR LIKE AIRCRAFT
ONE PULSE TER POWER BE 7Eo QUENCY
#HAPTER
RADAR
o CAVITIES RADARS
£°Ó 2!$!2
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE SIMPLICITY p OF VARY FOR
POWER RADARn
THAN TRANSMITTED
3OME HOME BALL NEAREST OR
2ADAR PEOPLE
VEGETATION POLES AND TION RATE FROM MEASURED WHICH AND DETERMINE OR
"ASIC SHOWING AS TO WATTS
MANCE ANTENNA
4HE THE RECEIVED
4HE SPACE ANTENNA POWER THAT TO CONCENTRATES ACTS
p SOME
!. £°Î
4HE BE A TO FREQUENCIES IS NOISE UNWANTED HAVE AFFECT DYNAMIC THE OPERATE BY THE MIGHT )&
SEPARATES TION PUT MAXIMIZES RECEIVER CLUTTER IS )F THE OTHERWISE THRESHOLD RATE
!FTER A PROCESSING
TO
&)'52%
PORTION
£°{ 2!$!2
MISSILE INFORMATION PARTS PROVIDING
4HE BANDWIDTH LONG PERFORMANCE ANTENNA
ELECTROMAGNETIC SPHERE
THE
2ADAR PEAK BUT THE USUALLY
4HERE 4HE EXCEPT LOW ARE MOVING LATOR CROSSED FIELD ALSO ING WAVE POWERS AS
4HE CIALLY EACH TO SISTOR DUTY REQUIRE TION EFFECT CAN CONTROL FREQUENCY
!LTHOUGH CHOICEWOULD POWER
2ADAR
#HAPTERS
!. £°x ON ECHO TARGET
THE PARABOLIC END FIRE TER EACH ELEMENT
%ACH ANTENNA
£°ÓÊ /9* -Ê"Ê,,-
!LTHOUGH WHAT
0ULSE PULSES
AS
(IGH RESOLUTION PLER RANGE FRACTIONS
0ULSE LATION WITH
#ONTINUOUS ALWAYS ING
&- #7 A
3URVEILLANCE SURVEILLANCE A OVER
-OVING IN RANGE SO CALLED
0ULSE A EXTRACT TIES PULSE
£°È 2!$!2
4RACKING 4RACKING TRACKERS
3INGLE TO
DATA EMPLOY THE
!UTOMATIC VEILLANCE MEASUREMENTS )TS
4RACK WHILE SCAN ROW UPDATE OF AIRCRAFT MILITARY
0HASED TINUOUSLYv NEOUSLY PERFORMED
)MAGING SUCH ARE
3IDELOOKING VIDES NARROW
3YNTHETIC VEHICLE SCENE OFTEN
)NVERSE HIGH TION BE
7EAPON FOR
'UIDANCE hHOME
7EATHER PRECIPITATION
!. £°Ç IMPORTANT FUNCTION
$OPPLER PLER WIND DANGEROUS OTHER
4ARGET BEING TICULAR ROW 7HEN NITION
IDENTIFICATION SOME ING
-ULTIFUNCTION RADAR SUCH 4HERE BORNE WIDEBAND WHICH
£°ÎÊ ",/" Ê6 Ê,"ÊÊ,,
$ETECTION AS
2ANGE
TO PROPAGATE MEASURE LIMITED
!T OF BE MODULATION ON BANDWIDTH
2ADIAL OF PLER TIME SPEED CAN
£°n 2!$!2
!NGULAR DETERMINING IS ANTENNA THIS USING TUDE IN A OF
3IZE IT TION
RANGE VERY LIMITED RANGE BY OR NEEDS CROSS RANGE CROSS RANGE TARGET
4HE MATION
BANDWIDTH DETERMINED OTHER WAVE HAVE WIDTH A ANOTHER
OF BASED RADAR
ALSO RATIO
NUMBER TYPES
4UNABLE OVER FERENCE TO FREQUENCY
! BY
!. £°
#OMMISSION THE THIRD OVER hWIRELESSv ENGINEER ALLOCATIONS
3IGNAL TO .OISE RELIABLEO OFO UNITOIS OF
/PERATION WHEN REFERS USUALLY MORE TANEOUSLY CONTROL OF BE GREATER
%LEVATION LOBED THE FACE SOME CHANGE OVER BE EXPERIMENTAL SHOWED MENTALLY PARTICULAR RATED FREQUENCY
)NCREASED AS RADAR SINGLE TION
CAN SINGLE OPERATE TARGET
£°£ä 2!$!2
2EDUCED CESSFUL TIVENESS
DIFFICULT FREQUENCY MER THE DIVERSITY INTERCEPT
4HE BEGAN INCREASINGLY MUCH SHIFTD
FDVRLVCOS Q L
WHERER THE ANGLE CENTR 4HE STATIONARY
MOVING TRAFFIC RADARS 77)) RADAR THIS DO EARTHS
!NOTHER VATION
#HAPTER
"OTH QUENCY DOPPLER STABILITY ING
BENEFITS CAPABILITY MAINTAINING
£°{Ê / Ê,,Ê +1/"
4HE PURPOSE
!. £°££
BUT RADAR
0 0 '
2 2 !
R T T
r r E
P S
P
4HE PHYSICAL ATTT NUMERATOR OF TARGET FOR OF .OTE ANTENNAER )FMAX EQUALMIN EQUATION
2 0 ' ! 3
T T E
MAX
MIN
S P
'ENERALLY ANTENNAT ITSET P!EL THE RADAR THE
4HE LEAVESMIN NOISE
3MINK4 "& 3 .O N
)NO"
TORO RECEIVER PRODUCTO
BY NOISEN NOISE THAN NOISE TO THRESHOLD TEXTS DETECTION LIKE
£°£Ó 2!$!2
IS MULTIPLIEDIN IN 4HIS
4HETAV MEASURE RADARTAVFPSP RADAR DRASTICALLY CAPABILITIES BY THE
2 0 '! N% N &
K4 & F 3 . ,
E I
O N P S
MAX
AV S
P
)N APPLICABLES INSERTED CAN THE
%QUATION PULSESO TOP AO OBSERVESS HAVE CONSTRAINTS TIMESO77O OPANDO
STERADIANS O WHENPS'7 SURVEILLANCE
2 0 ! % N &
K4 & 3 . ,
E I T
O N S
S MAX
AV S r
P 7
4HESOR 7 SECTION AAV!E
&OR POWER APERTURE IN IMPLICITLY
*UST RADAR TION TION
NOISE
!. £°£Î DETECTION MIGHT NOISE OPTIMIZED BE CAPABILITY
£°xÊ ,,Ê, +1 9Ê // , Ê " /1,
)T PARTICULAR QUENCY RADAR
%LECTRONIC AS
#OMMENTS ASSIGNS USE AND , BAND AND ARE
"AND .OMINAL
3PECIFIC ON
FOR (&
6(& n n
n
5(& n n
n
, n n
3 n n
n
# n n
n
8 n n
+U n n
n
+ n n
n
+A n n
6 n n
7 n n
n
4!",% )%%%
£°£{ 2!$!2
WITH FOR NETIC ARE LISTED '(ZA OF FREQUENCIES OF DIFFERENCE -ICROWAVES RADARSA NOT TO THE TO WITH
/THER THEY USES EXERCISES WITH MAY
£°ÈÊ /Ê"Ê"* ,/ ÊÊ
, +1 9Ê" Ê,,
2ADARS CAST ALLY EXTENT APPLICATIONS RADAR TIES IS TRANSMITTERS HAND RANGE DETERMINES FOR TION BRIEFLY IN
A
MILLIMETERS
!. £°£x (&
DETECT REFRACTION 2ADIO LONG MISSILES THE
6(&
RADARS OF OR SCATTERING CONSTRUCTIVE INCREASE BLE THE NULLS ENCE IS FREQUENCY AT AFFECTED CROSS FREQUENCIES
PERFORMANCE
!LTHOUGH VEILLANCE LOW ALTITUDE RADAR USUALLY IN BROADCAST LEVELS FREQUENCIES
OBTAINING
)N 3OVIET THEM 4HEY SOME )T 'ERMANS ATED WERE
5(&
6(&
-OVING AS
£°£È 2!$!2
RADARS PORTION AND
'ROUND IS ERS FOR GOOD RADAR IS RANGES OBJECTS
FREQUENCIES
, OF 2ADAR UP RADAR HIGHER DETECTION
3 AIR NMI
ANGLE
)T QUENCIES FREQUENCIES
THEN CHOICE RADAR PARTICULAR THE .AVYS THAT ABOUT
4HE VATION ECHO THE PROPAGATES RATE
RANGE THAN
# IN ALTHOUGH
!. £°£Ç 8 APPLICATIONS
INTERCEPTOR POPULAR FOR RADARS 2ADARS APPLICATIONS A THE ARE QUENCY OF
+UA"ANDS THE LARGE 8U BAND SIZE
$ETECTION AIRPORTSU THE ATTENUATION AFTER +UA ITY
-ILLIMETER MOST WHERE
!
DOW PREVIOUSLY STARTS RADARS MICROWAVE ENCED PROPAGATING REGION
ATION ATTENUATION ESSENTIALLY THE
)NTEREST TO EMPLOYING HIGH COUNTERMEASURES
£°£n 2!$!2
A FREQUENCIES
POWER GYROTRONS THAN POWER
,ASER INFRARED AND THAN FORMANCE EFFECTS APPLICATION
£°ÇÊ ,,Ê " /1,
-ILITARY 4YPE
$
AND INSTALLED AND LETTERS
! OF THESES MAY THEREOF EQUIPMENT TIONS 3PECIAL BE
4HE TRAFFIC
L !IRPORT
L !IR
L !IRPORT
L
4HE
IN
7EATHER IGNATION SERVICE
4HE
!. £°£
£°nÊ -" Ê*-/Ê6 -Ê Ê,,
! IN AS
L
MILITARY
L
NOLOGY SO
L
,ABORATORY FOR
L
L
VIDED )NSTALLATION
4YPE
0URPOSE
! , "
"
SUBMARINE
0 $
AND
$ 3
COMBINATION
'
& 7
PECULIAR NOT
.
' 1
+ 2
- 3
BEARING
0 4
3 7
CONTROL
4 8
5 9
BOTH 6
7
UNDERWATER :
VEHICLES
4!",% *%4$3
£°Óä 2!$!2
L
MUCH
L
L
L
TRONIC
L
L
OF
L
HIGH 02&
L
BY
L
TIES
L
L
L
FOR
L
L
L
L
IN AND
)T MIGHT IN PLES THE
£°Ê **/" -Ê"Ê,,
-ILITARY FOR PROBABLY DEVELOPMENTS
4HE OR DEFENSE ALTITUDE RECOGNITION
!. £°Ó£
ALSO AIR ITS TRONIC AIRCRAFT OVER
/N ING CONTROL ROCKETS
4HE THREAT SPEEDS 4HERE BUT FUSION THE BECOMES 4HE DIFFERENT DEPLOYED
! TRAFFIC
LONG RANGE
2EMOTE HAS SEEN RADARS THE
$OPPLER BY 4HERE WELL
!NOTHER ALTIMETER THE ATTEMPTS STATUS RADARS ERN TO
!IR 4RAFFIC TO AIR THE NEARBY ALSO
£°ÓÓ 2!$!2
AND AIR 2ADARS
!4#2"3 USES
&RIEND
/THER INFORMATION OF THAT THE SHIPS
THE HAS OBJECTS FOR FOR ONSTRATED OIL
4HERE EXISTED GUIDE THE DESIGN TION TER RADAR OPTIONS MEET MIGHT ESTABLISHED EVERY BRIEF
'ENERAL WHICH METHOD NEW 7ORLD FROM CEPTUAL VARIOUS APPROACH FISCAL
!. £°ÓÎ
L
L
BE OUT OF PROCUREMENTS
L
SIBLE
L
MIGHT MEANS ING BASED
L
BE
L
!S START NEW
/NE )F USUAL THE
4HE FOR MINED THE THE IS IS THE THE ANTENNA MORE MIGHT MUM RANGE MANY 4HE MANY
£°Ó{ 2!$!2
, , -
)%%%
)%%%
!LLOCATIONSv
/0.!6).34
!&2
)NSTITUTEv
AND
Ó°£
/Ê,>`>À
7>Ê7°Ê- À>`iÀ
3HRADER
6 iÊÀi}iÀÃ>Ãi
.AVAL
Ó°£Ê *,
4HIS ONBOARD DESIGN
4HE PREVIOUS OF
TIONS FOUR AND EARLY ING
!LTHOUGH THERE SYSTEM THE LIMITATIONS FALSE RESIDUE EXAMPLE CLUTTER THE PRECLUDE THE
-4) AND LOUS
#HAPTER
Ó°Ó 2!$!2
AT AND
4HE CLUTTER AND
EG
RADAR DEVIATION
-4) NING THROUGH
))2
#0)S USED FILTERS
4HERE CIFIC TRANSMITTER
! INCLUDED DIFFICULT TION
!TTENTION
!PPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL
Ó°ÓÊ /,"1/" Ê/"Ê/Ê,,
4HE TARGETS SIGNALS OF THE 4HE RETURNS
4HE AS REFLECTED A NALS FREQUENCY
MOVING TIME OCCURS OCCURS BETWEEN THE CHANGES FOR
-4) Ó°Î
THE PHASE
&IGURE OSCILLATOR
&)'52%
SYSTEM WAS
&)'52%
Ó°{ 2!$!2
IS PHASE 4 CURRENT HAS
-OVING 4ARGET GRAM MODERN OF TUBE WAVEFORM A INTERMEDIATE LIMITER LIMITING ITER RESIDUES QUADRATURE DETECTORS QUADRATURE
&)'52%
-4) Ó°x
HAVE THAT VIDEO TER IMPOSED 4HE ING MATIC STORED MITTED IMPLEMENTED CANCELERS IMPLEMENTED
4HE GETS IS PUTED )1 VERTER DETECTION
! THAT FROM REMOVED
&)'52%
&)'52%
Ó°È 2!$!2
ABOVE LONG SYSTEM 4O TWO MENTAL
-OVING 4ARGET PROCESSING THE TO THE THESE
#OHERENT
DOPPLER TER OF WHAT AND PROVIDED MENTATION
4HE RADAR -4$
&)'52%
! "
#
#
-4) Ó°Ç 0ART EIGHT LARGER RESIDUES OF
4HE PROCESSING CELER TARGETS h 6ELOCITY TWO THE TO IS 0RIMITIVE CESSED 4ARGET DISPLAY
4HE QUENCY TO ADDITIONAL RETURNS DURING FILTERS
#0)
&)'52%
Ó°n 2!$!2
02&S FREQUENCIES TARGET
%ACH OF FREQUENCIES
FILTER ACHIEVABLE MULTIPLE USE IS SUPPRESSION
4HE AVERAGING RANGE EXTENDED
!S OFTEN RECEIVER THE EFFECT PRESSION
&)'52%
-4) Ó°
)N CLUTTER RAISE THE SUPPORTED A DYNAMIC CLUTTER
IS STORAGE
!LSO TO
REGION RAISING TRACK
)N DISCUSSED
FILTER 3INCE OF
!LSO LING NEWER
Ó°ÎÊ 1// ,Ê/ ,Ê, -*" - ÊÊ /"Ê"6 Ê/, /-
4HE RADIAL UNITY TO KNOWN BETWEEN
&)'52%
Ó°£ä 2!$!2
SHIFTED IN
6 K F
" R K L o
WHERE"
METERSR
6 K F F K
"KNOTS R
'(Z
o
WHERER'(Z FREQUENCY TARGETS A
4HE FREQUENCY
F 6
D 2
L
WHERED2 PER
&IGURE TIPLES
4HE ISTICS THE OPERATING
&)'52%
-4) Ó°££
WAVEFORM BILITY
ON
3PECTRAL MOST WAVEFORM
PULSE IS
F
4HESE RESPONSE THIS BROADENED AS 4HIS
/FTEN GAUSSIAN RVVBOTH SPECTRAL
3 F F M
'
F
F F
EXP
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
PS S
4HIS BEEN
M M
F V
F V
L S S L
&)'52%
Ó°£Ó 2!$!2
WHEREF TRUM
3 F
"
F
"
' LN
EXP LN
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
P
WHERE
" LN SF S F
4HE WERE SOMETIMES
"Y THE NEW OF
3 F
N N
" F
"
0/,9 N
SIN
\ \
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
P P
4HE ORDER IS
3 F
" F
"
0/,9
\ \
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
P
4HE IS
" S F
! VERY
$URING ,ABORATORY RADAR RESULTS
3%80 F LN " " F EXP LN
\ \
¤
¦¥
³ µ´
(ERE " LN SF S F
-4) Ó°£Î
"ILLINGSLEYC POLYNOMIAL FOR DESCRIPTION WIDTH
G
V
S GAUSSIAN SPECTRRUM POLYNOMIAL SPECTRU
VC LN SV MM WITH
E
N
V
B
S XXPONENTIAL SPECTRUM
!SSUMINGV CLUTTER MODELS APPRECIABLY
%STIMATED FOR ON RMS IN
UPPER A
&)'52%
SPECTRALV
Ó°£{ 2!$!2
4HE
"ILLINGSLEY THAT VALUES ATTENUATION
4HE ING PERFORMANCE
0
0
0
#'&)"
$&
(* +,
#'.
(#+
* /.
#!",#*
())% * %(#,.-&+
&)'52%
SPEEDS
Ú
4!",% -EASURED Ú
#ONDITIONS
7IND
MPH
%XPONENTIAL 0ARAMETER
2-3 7IDTHV 4YPICAL 7ORST 4YPICAL 7ORST ,IGHT n
"REEZY 7INDY n
'ALE n
-4) Ó°£x
! AS LOW MOST SCANNING BE OF
.ATHANSON
MARILY -EASUREMENTSVT RVSSVS 2 QEL FOR RANGEEL CALVS VERTICALVS SV SVT SVS MS ITY WHEN
4HE 4HEF
S S L
F
V
(Z
WHEREV DEVIATION
&)'52%
Ó°£È 2!$!2
!NTENNA AMPLITUDE
ING S
F P FR R
N
F
LN N
(Z
WHERER ANTENNA TIALLY
4HE SF4
N
WHERE
4HE LATION ARE THAT
"Y A ESTIMATE IMPROVEMENT SPECTRA FOR GUIDELINE
&)'52%
-4) Ó°£Ç
!MPLITUDE POWER AMPLITUDE THE SECTION OR
&OR S S T
S
! 2 C
C
PAZ
WHEREC ILLUMINATEDAZ HALF POWER MS IS
&OR S H T
H
6 2 ( C
C PAZ PEL
WHEREC
MM C AZIMUTHAZ COMPLETELY2PELEL WIDTH
)T TION
&IGURE
!DDITIONAL
4!",% 4YPICAL
#LUTTER
2EFLECTIVITY
Gn #ONDITIONS
"AND K
#LUTTER 4YPICAL ,
3
#
8
,AND
S
L
WORST
R n n n n
0OINT R R 3EA
"
R"
SIN
3EA
FT ROUGH
R n n n n
#HAFF
G Gnn n n n
2AIN
G
MATCHED POLARIZATION
R Gnnn n n
&ROM
Ó°£n 2!$!2
"ECAUSE AN ENCES
)N POINTS HAVE
&IGURE ASTERISK
&IGURE A
4HE
-$3
&)'52%
AFTER
&)'52%
THE
-4) Ó°£
.OTE STRONG EXTENDED
CRAFT OF 00) CIRCUITS VISIBLE RADARS
Ó°xÊ /" -
4HE
QUANTITIES VAGUENESS AGAINST TATIONS ANNOTATED )%%%
)MPROVEMENT MOVING TARGET INDICATION THE CLUTTER IMPROVEMENT
&)'52%
)'$
)&"+ #%
',&+"&*
"+#%
,)$ ) +'"+*
)"',*))"&.(*
#%
%
,%)'$$*()#% -"+!*"**