• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Mukhopadhiay, M Natural Extracts Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. CRC Press, London, New York. Naland, H Kombucha: Teh Ajaib

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "Mukhopadhiay, M Natural Extracts Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. CRC Press, London, New York. Naland, H Kombucha: Teh Ajaib"

Copied!
19
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

42

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Almajano M. P., Carbo R., Jimenez JAL, Gordon MH. 2008. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of tea infusions. Food Chemical., 108 (1): 55 - 63. Anonim. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analitical

Chemists. Edisi ke 14. Kenneth Helrich, Chapter 44.1.03, United States of America.

Anonim. 1995. SNI 01-3743-1995. Gula Merah. Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN), Jakarta.

Anonim. 2005. Kajian Sosial Ekonomi Aren di Banten. Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Banten.

Anonim. 2012. Mengenal 4 Jenis Teh.

http://balittri.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/component/content/article/ 49-infotekno/159-mengenal-4-macam-jenis-teh. Diakses 5 Oktober 2016. Anonim. 2014. Gula Aren. (http://id.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Gula_Aren/7/10/2016).

Apriyantono, A., D. Fardiaz, N.L. Puspitasari, Sedarnawati dan S. Budiyanto, 1989. Petunjuk Laboratorium Analisis Pangan. IPB-Press, Bogor.

Ardhenita, M. 2008. Kinetika Fermentasi Pada Teh Kombucha dengan Variasi Jenis Teh Berdasarkan pengolahannya. Skripsi. FP. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta.

Azizah, D. N, Kumolowati, E. dan Faramayuda, F. 2014. Penetapan Kadar Flavonoid Metode AlCl3 pada Ekstrak Metanol Kulit Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao L.) Kartika Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi, 2 (2), 45-49 ISSN 2354-6565.

Bhanja T, Kumari A, dan R. Banerjee. 2009. Enrichment of Phenolics and Free Radical Seavenging Property of Wheat Koji Pfrepared with Two Filamentous Fungi. Bioresour Technol.

Cook, N. C. and S. Samman. (1996). Review Flavonoids-Chemistry, Metabolism, Cardioprotective Effect, And Dietary Sources, J. Nutr. Biochem (7): 66-76 Cuppett, S., M. Schrepf and C. Hall III. (1954). Natural Antioxidant – Are They

Reality. Dalam Foreidoon Shahidi: Natural Antioxidants, Chemistry, Health Effect and Applications, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois: 12-24

Dias, T. R., Tomas, G., Teixeira, N. F., Alves, M. G., Olivera, P. F., & Silva, B. M. 2013. White Tea (Camellia sinensis (L)): Antioxidant Properties and Beneficial Health Effects.

Eberl. 1987. Use of Green Flourescent Protein As A Marker for ecological studies of Activated Sludge Communities. FEMS Microbiology Letters.

(2)

43

Fontana, J.D., V.C. Fransco. S.J. deSouza, I.N. Lyra, and M. deSouza. 1990. Nature of plant stimulators in the production of Acetobacter xylinum (“Tea Fungus”) biofilm used in skin theraphy. Appl. Biochem & Biotechnology. Frank, G. W. 1996. Kombucha-Healtly Beverage and Natural Ramedy from the Far

East. Holland Company. Columbia.

Graham HN. 1984. Tea: The Plant and Its Manufacture: Chemistry and Consumption of the Beverage. In Liss AR. The Methylxanthine Beverages and Food : Chemistry, Consumption, and Health Effects. Prog Clin Biol Rev: 29-74.

Gramza-Michalowska, A.2008. Antioxidant potential and radical scavenging activity of different fermentation degree tea leaves extracts. ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum. Technologia Alimentaria 7(4): 15-28.

Greenwalt C.J, R.A Ledford dan K.H Steinkraus. 1998. Detoxification and Characterization of the Antimicrobial activity of the Fermented Tea Kombucha. http://w3.trib.com/kombu/FAQ/antiboitic.html. Diakses

tanggal 18 januari 2017.

Hartoyo, A. 2003. Teh dan Khasiatnya Bagi Kesehatan. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. Hess, D, tt. Plant Physiology, Molecular, Biochemical, and Physiological

Fundamentals of Metabolism and Development. Toppan Company (S) Pte Ltd, Singapore: 117-118.

Hilal, Y., dan U. Engelhardt. 2007. Charac-terization of white tea comparison to green and black tea. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 2: 414-421.

Hoeng C. S., Kaur, Bhupinder, Huda, N., Karim, A. A., Fazilah, A., 2011, Effect of Fermentation on the Composition of Centella asiatica Teas, American Journal of Food and Technology, 6 (7), 581-593

Irine, R. C. 2006. Tuak dan Legen, http://www.id.wikipedia.org/wiki/siwalan. Diakses tanggal 7 Oktober 2016.

Karori, S.M., F.N. Wachira, J.K. Wanyoko; dan R.M. Ngure. 2007. Antioxidant capacity of different types of tea pro-ducts. African Journal of Bio-technology 6(19): 2287-2296.

Karyantina, M dan N. Suhartatik. 2008. Kombucha dengan Variasi Kadar Gula Kelapa sebagai Sumber Karbon. J. Tekno. Dan Industri Pangan XIX (2): 165-169.

Kikuzaki, H., M. Hisamoto, K. Hirose, K. Akiyama, and H. Taniguchi. 2002. Antioxidant properties and ferenulic Acid and Its Related Compound, J. Agric.Food Cheng. PP. 50: 2161-2168.

Kinsella, J. E., Frankel, E., German, B., and Kanmer, J. 1993. Possible Mekanisme for the Protective role of Antioxidants in Wine and Plant Foods. J. Food Technology. 4: 5-89.

(3)

44

Mukhopadhiay, M. 2000. Natural Extracts Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. CRC Press, London, New York.

Naland, H. 2004. Kombucha: Teh Ajaib Pencegah dan Penyembuh Aneka Penyakit. Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta.

Naland, H. 2008. Kombucha, Teh dengan Seribu Khasiat. Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta.

Nasution, Z. dan W. Tjiptadi. 1975. Pengolahan Teh Teknologi Industri Pertanian FATETA IPB., Bogor.

Nazarudin. 1993. Pembudidayaan dan Pengolahan Teh. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. Novar, J. M. 1996. Lab Test on Kombucha Tea. http//:www.kombuchapower.com/

diakses 20 Februari 2017

Nurlela, E. 2002. Kajian Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pembentukan Warna Gula Merah. Skripsi.. Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan. IPB, Bogor. Pourmorad, F., Hosesenimehr, S.J., and N. Shahabimajd. 2006. Antioxidant

activiry, phenol and flavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medical plant. African Journal of Biotechnology. 5(11): 1142-1145.

Rahmadianti,F. 2012. Kenali Jenis-Jenis Si Gula Merah.

http://rss.detik.com/index.php/food. Diakses pada tanggal 4 desember 2012.

Rajalakshmi, D dan S. Narasimhan. (1985). Food Antioxidants: Sources and Methods of Evaluation dalam D.L. Madhavi: Food Antioxidant, Technological, Toxilogical and Health Perspectives. Marcel Dekker Inc., Hongkong: 76-77.

Rampengan, V. J. Pontoh dan D. T. Sembel. 1985. Dasar-dasar Pengawasan Mutu Pangan. Badan Kerjasama Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Indonesia Bagian Timur, Ujung Pandang.

Rohdiana, D. 2015. Teh Proses, Karakteristik, dan Komponen Fungsionalnya. Food Review Indonesia X(8): 34-37

Rohdiana, D. dan T. Widiantara. 2004. Aktivitas antioksidan beberapa klon teh unggulan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Kongres Perhimpunan Ahli Teknologi Pangan Indonesia (PATPI). 17-18 Desember. Jakarta.

Saxena, I. M., F. C. Lin, dan R. M Brown, Jr. 1990. Plant Molecular Biology. Wiley, New York.

Shahidi, F., and M, Naczk. 1995. Food Phenolics : Sources Chemistry-Effects-Applications. Technomic Publishing Company Inc.

Silaban, M. 2005. Pengaruh Jenis Teh dan Lama Fermentasi pada Proses Pembuatan Teh Kombucha. Skripsi, Sarjana. DTP FP USU. Medan.

(4)

45

Siregar, B. A. 2003. Studi Tentang Pengaruh Jenis dan Wadah Fermentasi pada Proses Pembuatan Teh Kombucha (Combucha tea). Skripsi Jurnal THP, FP-USU, Medan.

Siswoputranto, P.S. 1987. Perkembangan Teh, Kopi, Cokelat Internasional. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta

Soekarto, S. T. 1985. Penelitian Organoleptik untuk Industri Pangan dan Hasil Pertanian. Bhatara Karya Aksara, Jakarta.

Suprapti, M.L. 2003. Teh Jamsi dan Manisan Nata Berkhasiat Obat. Jakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Tony, L. L. 1993. Tanaman Sumber Pemanis. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Towaha, J., dan Balittri. 2013. Kandungan Senyawa Kimia pada Daun Teh (Camellia sinensis). Jurnal Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanaman Industri 19(3): 12-16.

White, P.J. and Y. Xing. (1954). Antioxidants from Cereals and Legumes dalam Foreidoon Shahidi: Natural Antioxidants, Chemistry, Health Effect and Applications. AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois: 25-63

Widjanarko. 2008. Siwalan dan Kandungannya. http://www.lintas.berita.com. Diakses tanggal 7 Oktober 2016.

(5)

46 LAMPIRAN 1. Kuisoner Uji Kesukaan Rasa

KUISIONER UJI KESUKAAN RASA KOMBUCHA TEH PUTIH

Nama Panelis :

NIM :

Tanggal Uji :

Pengujian : Kesukaan

Intraksi : Nyatakan penilaian terhadap kesukaan rasa kombucha teh putih dan berikan tanda √ (centrang) pada pernyataan yang sesuai dengan penilaian saudara pada masing-masing kode bahan.

Penilaian Kode Bahan

210 051 192 923

Sangat Suka (5) Suka(4)

Agak Suka (3) Tidak Suka (2)

(6)

47

LAMPIRAN 2. Data Statistika Uji pH Kombucha Teh Putih Data Analisis pH Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 1 3,5 3.7 3,7 3.5 2 3,6 3,5 3,5 3,3 3 3,4 3,6 3,4 3,4 4 3,7 3,6 3,3 3,6 5 3,4 3,4 3,4 3,4 Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N perlakuan 1 R1 5 2 R2 5 3 R3 5 4 R4 5 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: pH

perlakuan Mean Std. Deviation N

R1 3,520 ,1304 5 R2 3,560 ,1140 5 R3 3,460 ,1517 5 R4 3,440 ,1140 5 Total 3,495 ,1276 20 ANOVA pH JK Db KT F hitung Sig. Perlakuan ,046 3 ,015 ,919 ,454 Galat ,264 16 ,017 Total 244,610 20 Corrected Total ,310 19

(7)

48

Grand Mean

Dependent Variable: pH

Mean Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

3,495 ,029 3,434 3,556 pH Duncana,b perlakuan N Subset 1 R4 5 3,440a R3 5 3,460a R1 5 3,520a R2 5 3,560a Sig. ,192

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,017.

a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5,000.

b. Alpha = ,05.

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: pH

Source

Type III Sum of

Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

Perlakuan ,046 3 ,015 ,919 ,454

Error ,264 16 ,017

Total 244,610 20

Corrected Total ,310 19

(8)

49

LAMPIRAN 3. Data Statistika Uji Total Flavonoid Kombucha Teh Putih

Data Analisa Uji Total Flavonoid mgQE/g

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 1 1,3278 1,7293 1,0087 0,5738 2 1,3648 1,7085 0,9963 0,6533 3 1,6921 1,7111 1,0034 0,6434 4 1,4018 1,6877 0,9838 0,7329 5 1,3463 1,7189 1,0250 0,6136 Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N perlakuan 1 R1 5 2 R2 5 3 R3 5 4 R4 5 Descriptive Statistics

Dependent Variable: total flavonoid

perlakuan Mean Std. Deviation N

R1 1,426560 ,1509421 5 R2 1,711100 ,0153818 5 R3 1,003440 ,0152415 5 R4 ,643400 ,0588227 5 Total 1,196125 ,4237371 20 ANOVA Total Flavonoid JK Db KT F hitung Sig. Perlakuan 3,305 3 1,102 164,949 ,000 Galat ,107 16 ,007 Total 32,026 20 Corrected Total 3,412 19

(9)

50

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: total flavonoid

Source

Type III Sum of

Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

Perlakuan 3,305 3 1,102 164,949 ,000

Error ,107 16 ,007

Total 32,026 20

Corrected Total 3,412 19

a. R Squared = ,969 (Adjusted R Squared = ,963)

Grand Mean

Dependent Variable: total flavonoid

Mean Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

1,196 ,018 1,157 1,235 Total Flavonoid Duncana,b perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 4 R4 5 ,643400a R3 5 1,003440b R1 5 1,426560c R2 5 1,711100d Sig. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,007. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5,000. b. Alpha = ,05.

(10)

51

LAMPIRAN 4. Data Statistika Uji Total Fenolik Kombucha Teh Putih Data Analisa Uji Total Fenolik mgGAE/g

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 1 3,8821 6,7144 2,3674 2,0092 2 3,9723 6,8668 2,4798 2,0911 3 3,9608 6,8477 2,5475 2,1058 4 4,0619 7,0193 2,5922 2,1732 5 3,9271 6,7906 2,4236 2,1502 Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N perlakuan 1 R1 5 2 R2 5 3 R3 5 4 R4 5 Descriptive Statistics

Dependent Variable: Total Fenolik

perlakuan Mean Std. Deviation N

R1 3,960840 ,0664884 5 R2 6,847760 ,1127394 5 R3 2,482100 ,0908058 5 R4 2,105900 ,0633674 5 Total 3,849150 1,9149960 20 ANOVA Total Fenolik JK Db KT F hitung Sig. Perlakuan 69,559 3 23,186 3155,480 ,000 Galat ,118 16 ,007 Total 365,996 20 Corrected Total 69,677 19

(11)

52

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Total Fenolik

Source

Type III Sum of

Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

Perlakuan 69,559 3 23,186 3155,480 ,000

Error ,118 16 ,007

Total 365,996 20

Corrected Total 69,677 19

a. R Squared = ,998 (Adjusted R Squared = ,998)

Grand Mean

Dependent Variable: Total Fenolik

Mean Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

3,849 ,019 3,809 3,890 Total Fenolik Duncana,b perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 4 R4 5 2,105900a R3 5 2,482100b R1 5 3,960840c R2 5 6,847760d Sig. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,007. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5,000. b. Alpha = ,05.

(12)

53

LAMPIRAN 5. Data Statistik Uji Kesukaan Rasa Kombucha Teh Putih Data Analisa Kesukaan Rasa Kombucha Teh Putih

Ulangan R1 R2 R3 R4 1 4 5 2 1 2 3 4 2 1 3 3 4 5 2 4 4 3 2 1 5 5 4 3 2 6 5 4 3 2 7 4 5 2 3 8 3 4 5 2 9 3 4 1 2 10 2 4 3 1 11 3 4 2 1 12 4 3 1 2 13 5 4 3 2 14 4 5 2 3 15 5 4 3 2 16 4 3 1 2 17 3 4 1 2 18 3 4 1 2 19 4 3 2 1 20 4 5 3 2 Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N perlakuan 1 R1 20 2 R2 20 3 R3 20 4 R4 20 panelis 1 panelis 1 4 2 panelis 2 4 3 panelis 3 4 4 panelis 4 4 5 panelis 5 4 6 panelis 6 4 7 panelis 7 4 8 panelis 8 4

(13)

54 9 panelis 9 4 10 panelis 10 4 11 panelis 11 4 12 panelis 12 4 13 panelis 13 4 14 panelis 14 4 15 panelis 15 4 16 panelis 16 4 17 panelis 17 4 18 panelis 18 4 19 panelis 19 4 20 panelis 20 4 Descriptive Statistics

Dependent Variable: hedonik rasa

perlakuan panelis Mean Std. Deviation N

R1 panelis 1 4,00 . 1 panelis 2 3,00 . 1 panelis 3 3,00 . 1 panelis 4 4,00 . 1 panelis 5 5,00 . 1 panelis 6 5,00 . 1 panelis 7 4,00 . 1 panelis 8 3,00 . 1 panelis 9 3,00 . 1 panelis 10 2,00 . 1 panelis 11 3,00 . 1 panelis 12 4,00 . 1 panelis 13 5,00 . 1 panelis 14 4,00 . 1 panelis 15 5,00 . 1 panelis 16 4,00 . 1 panelis 17 3,00 . 1 panelis 18 3,00 . 1 panelis 19 4,00 . 1

(14)

55 panelis 20 4,00 . 1 Total 3,75 ,851 20 R2 panelis 1 5,00 . 1 panelis 2 4,00 . 1 panelis 3 4,00 . 1 panelis 4 3,00 . 1 panelis 5 4,00 . 1 panelis 6 4,00 . 1 panelis 7 5,00 . 1 panelis 8 4,00 . 1 panelis 9 4,00 . 1 panelis 10 4,00 . 1 panelis 11 4,00 . 1 panelis 12 3,00 . 1 panelis 13 4,00 . 1 panelis 14 5,00 . 1 panelis 15 4,00 . 1 panelis 16 3,00 . 1 panelis 17 4,00 . 1 panelis 18 4,00 . 1 panelis 19 3,00 . 1 panelis 20 5,00 . 1 Total 4,00 ,649 20 R3 panelis 1 2,00 . 1 panelis 2 2,00 . 1 panelis 3 5,00 . 1 panelis 4 2,00 . 1 panelis 5 3,00 . 1 panelis 6 3,00 . 1 panelis 7 2,00 . 1 panelis 8 5,00 . 1 panelis 9 1,00 . 1 panelis 10 3,00 . 1 panelis 11 2,00 . 1 panelis 12 1,00 . 1 panelis 13 3,00 . 1 panelis 14 2,00 . 1

(15)

56 panelis 15 3,00 . 1 panelis 16 1,00 . 1 panelis 17 1,00 . 1 panelis 18 1,00 . 1 panelis 19 2,00 . 1 panelis 20 3,00 . 1 Total 2,35 1,182 20 R4 panelis 1 1,00 . 1 panelis 2 1,00 . 1 panelis 3 2,00 . 1 panelis 4 1,00 . 1 panelis 5 2,00 . 1 panelis 6 2,00 . 1 panelis 7 3,00 . 1 panelis 8 2,00 . 1 panelis 9 2,00 . 1 panelis 10 1,00 . 1 panelis 11 1,00 . 1 panelis 12 2,00 . 1 panelis 13 2,00 . 1 panelis 14 3,00 . 1 panelis 15 2,00 . 1 panelis 16 2,00 . 1 panelis 17 2,00 . 1 panelis 18 2,00 . 1 panelis 19 1,00 . 1 panelis 20 2,00 . 1 Total 1,80 ,616 20 Total panelis 1 3,00 1,826 4 panelis 2 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 3 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 4 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 5 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 6 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 7 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 8 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 9 2,50 1,291 4

(16)

57

Expected Mean Squaresa,b

Source

Variance Component

Var(panelis) Var(Error) Quadratic Term

perlakuan ,000 1,000 perlakuan

panelis 4,000 1,000

Error ,000 1,000

a. For each source, the expected mean square equals the sum of the coefficients in the cells times the variance components, plus a quadratic term involving effects in the Quadratic Term cell.

b. Expected Mean Squares are based on the Type III Sums of Squares. panelis 10 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 11 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 12 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 13 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 14 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 15 3,50 1,291 4 panelis 16 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 17 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 18 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 19 2,50 1,291 4 panelis 20 3,50 1,291 4 Total 2,98 1,253 80

Dependent Variable: hedonik rasa

JK Db KT F hitung Sig. perlakuan Hypothesis 68,450 3 22,817 35,583 ,000 panelis Hypothesis 18,950 19 ,997 1,555 ,101 Galat 36,550 57 ,641b a. MS(panelis) b. MS(Error)

(17)

58

Grand Mean

Dependent Variable: hedonik rasa

Mean Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

2,975 ,090 2,796 3,154 hedonik rasa Duncana,b perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 R4 20 1,80 a R3 20 2,35 b R1 20 3,75 c R2 20 4,00 c Sig. 1,000 1,000 ,328

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,641. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 20,000. b. Alpha = ,05.

(18)

59 LAMPIRAN 6. Dokomentasi Penelitian

Gula Merah Siwalan, Aren, Tebu, Kelapa

Ferementasi Kombucha Teh Putih (7 Hari) Teh Putih (Merk Kaligua) Uji pH (pH Meter) Kultur Kombucha (SCOBY)

Uji Total Flavonoid (spektrofotometer)

(19)

60 Uji Total Fenolik

(spektrofotometer)

Sample Uji Kesukaan Rasa

Uji Kesukaan Rasa (Panelis)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

(B) Hospital discharge summary report; (C) Radiotherapy summary report; (D) Medical oncology summary report; (E) Operative report;. (v) Report of one of the following

Medan Fungsionalita s Tampilan Rumah Adat Medan: Saat user menekan tombol Lanjut pada halaman Lagu Daerah maka akan masuk ke halaman Rumah Adat yang mana

Berdasarkan pendapat Imam Syafi’i di atas dapat penulis simpulkan bahwa praktek gadai yang dilakukan oleh wali yatim di Desa Jabi-Jabi Kecamatan Sultan Daulat

Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut Direktorat Pembinaan Perguruan Tinggi memandang perlunya meningkatkan kapasitas dan daya saing global perguruan tinggi melalui

namun seiring dengan perubahan zaman dan perkembangan teknologi serta masuknya kebudayaan luar dalam kehidupan masyarakat Minangkabau, masyarakat Minangkabau mulai

Hasil pengujian sistem dengan kondisi roda kanan normal dan roda kiri rusak menggunakan metode open loop dengan memberikan nilai PWM konstan membuat robot

Salah satu poinnya yaitu “Relegius Effect” dimensi etika tujuannya mengukur tentang efek atau akibat pengaruh ajaran agama terhadap perilaku sehari-hari yang tidak terkait

Beberapa s impulan yang diperoleh adalah konsep simpel dan moderen pada desain interior coffee shop terlihat melalui penerapan wujud dasar segi empat dan lingkaran,