• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

IMPROVING STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (FGD).

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "IMPROVING STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (FGD)."

Copied!
19
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING

RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION

(FGD)

A THESIS

Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

By

WENNY SASMITA

Registration Number. 208321068

ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, the writer would like to thanks the almighty Allah SWT for blessing and given the ability to the writer to complete this thesis with title “Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Recount Text Through Focus group Discussion (FGD)” as a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan at English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan ( UNIMED ).

During the process of writing, the writer realizes that cannot accomplish without God blessing and supporting from many people. The writer would like to express her sincere gratitude to:

 Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hajar Damanik, M.Si, Rector of State University of Medan.  Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum., Dean of Faculty of Languages and Arts.  Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd., Head of English Department, Dra.Rahmah,

M.Hum., as the Secretary of English Department and Dra. Masitowarni Siregar, M.Ed., as the Head of English Education Study Program, for their suggestions and administrative assistance during the completion of thesis.  Prof. Dr. Busmin Gurning, M.Pd., as her advisor, Drs. Willem Saragih,

M.Pd., as her Academic lecturer, and all the lecturers and administrative staff of English Department.

 Drs. H. Irwan Mastoti., the headmaster of SMP Negeri 2 Tanjung Pura, Siti Nuraini, as the English teacher who had helped the writer during the research in that school and also to all the students of class VIII-4.

 H. Ali Amrin Manday and Hj. Syawaliah, S.Pd., her beloved parents as the inspirations of her life, for their endless loves and day night prays and everything writer got. The writers’ brother Makhruzar, S.E., and my sisters Usumartina, S.Pd., Nia Wicita. And all of and her big family who always supported the writer to work hard to finish her study in English Department, State University of Medan.

 Elfriede R. Hutabarat, Indah Sari, Yohana Faulina, Meldi Haryati, Sastrinda Azzaritia, Arras Yusrizal, Ririn, Putri as her friends and all of education extension’ 08.

There are other people whose names that couldn’t be listed. Thank you for all supports in helping the writer for finishing this thesis.

Medan, September 2012 The Writer

(7)

ABSTRACT

Sasmita, Wenny Registration Number 208321068. Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing of Recount Text Through Focus Group Discussion ( FGD ). A Thesis. Faculty of Language and Arts. State University of Medan. 2012.

This study deals with the improvement of students’ writing achievement through focus group discussion method. The objective of this study is to find out whether students’ writing

achievement will be improved through focus group discussion method. This study was conducted by using classroom action research. The subject of this research was class VIII-4 SMPN. 2 Tanjung Pura. The number of the students was 36 students which consist of 18 male students and 18 female students. The research was conducted in two cycles. Each cycle consisted three meetings. The instrument for collecting the data were quantitative data (writing test ) and qualitative data ( observation sheet, interview and field note). Based on the analysis, students’ achievement kept improving in every test. In the orientation test, the means score was 59.44. In the first test of cycle I, the mean score was 75.41, and in the second test in cycle II, the mean score was 81.52. Based on the observation sheet, interview and field note, it was found that the teaching learning process ran well. The students were more active, enthusiastic in writing. In line with the data, it was found that focus group discussion method improved the students’

(8)

i

C. Instruments of Data Collecting ... 22

D. The Procedure of the Research ... 23

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ... 43

A. Conclusion ... 43

B. Suggestion ... 43

(9)

ii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Students’ Score Semester I and II ... 3

Table 2.1 Criteria of Assessment in Writing Recount ... 13

Table 3.1 The Activities and Output In Cycle I ... 27

Table 3.2 The Activities and Output In Cycle II ... 28

Table 3.3 Scoring of Recount Writing Test ... 29

Table 4.1 Students’ Score of Orientation Test, Cycle I and Cycle II ... 32

Table 4.2 The Percentage of Students’ Recount Writing Competence ... 37

(10)

iii

LIST OF FIGURE

(11)

iv

LIST OF APPENDICES

Page

Appendix A Lesson Plan ... 46

Appendix B students’ Writing Scores... 66

Appendix C Observation Sheet ... 73

Appendix D Field Note ... 75

(12)

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Study

Language is considered to be a system of communicating with other people using sounds,

symbols, and words in expressing a meaning, idea, or thought. Language has an important thing

in human activity. Everybody needs language to interact with other people. Without language,

people cannot convey feeling, thought, intention, or information to other both in written and

spoken form. Nowadays, English has become international language which is used by many

people in the world both in written and spoken form. English helps people to communicate with

other people from different culture background. In Indonesia, English has been taught since the

kindergarten level up to the university, but in fact, there are many people who cannot

comprehend English well. Therefore, to know English well, people must master four basic skills

in mastering English, namely listening, speaking, reading and writing.

This study would be focused in writing skills. Writing is one of the language skills that

should be acquired in learning a language. Writing also means a process of communication that

conveys ideas and opinion in a written form which suggests that the writer and readers should

have similar understanding of what is written. The writing process is intended to provide a step

by step model for writing so that the finished piece is the best it can be ( Carol Ann Tomlinson,

2005 : 181 ).

The writer choose the topic because based on the writer’s interview and observation on

Teaching Practice Program ( PPL ), most of the students got bored and lost their interest in

writing, especially writing recount. They told that writing recount was very difficult for them to

(13)

And also why the students told that writing recount was very difficult, because the students can

not know about generic structure and language feature in writing recount. So that, the students do

not understand to arranged the simple text.

After the writer observed the students in several meetings, the writer found some factors that

showed why this condition happened. The students did not have a good motivation to write

because the topic was not interesting. When they have limited vocabulary, it is impossible for

them to write recount. Other factors like, uninteresting method and teaching process. The

students felt that the teaching and learning process was monotonous and uninteresting. Now, in

this study, researcher will be focused in score of the students. Because the researcher want to

improve the score to the students.

The writer has done an interview and observation at SMP Negeri 2 Tanjung Pura. Based on

the writer’s interview and observation in the school, the students’ achievement in writing recount

was still low. It can be seen the students’ score semester I and semester II.

Table I.I Students’ Score Semester I and Semester II

(14)

12 IFD 55 60

The method that the teacher used in teaching writing was too complex and monotonous. The

teacher just explains without asking the students what they do not know. Students need an easy

way to make them able to understand the explanation quickly. If the method of the teacher

monotonous and uninteresting, the students will be lazy to study the subject.

If the conditions happen, it means that the teaching and learning process uninteresting and be

less effective. To change it, teacher needs a suitable method, a technique, or a strategy. The

purpose of using them is to solve the problem and to increase the students’ achievement in

(15)

Focus group discussion method the teacher can help students to improve students’

achievement in writing particularly writing recount in order that the students can write recount

well.

For this purpose, learning writing recount by using focus group discussion method may

be one of the alternatives in teaching process. In focus group discussion the students can share

with their group, and one of the students can ask with member of their group, what the title

about, and how to write this paragraph act.

Focus group discussion is very important to be applied to increase students’ achievement in

writing recount because writing recount is a writing which retells events or experiences in the

past. Thus, students’ can retell their friends or the other groups about their bad or good

experiences in the past easily. By using focus group discussion in writing recount, the students

are hoped to be able to write recount easily. Focus group discussion method is hoped to be able

to reduce boredom of the students and increase their motivation in writing recount because it can

make class more enjoyable and relaxed.

The previous researches was doing by Rizky (2010 ) shown that the effect of Focus group

Discussion on Students’ writing narrative. Base on the research analysis, it can be concluded that

there is significant effect of using Focus Group Discussion on students’ writing narrative. In

other words it can be stated that students’ achievement that are taught through Focus Group

Discussion is better than students’ achievement that are taught by using without Focus Group

Discussion in SMK Hidayah Semarang.

Based on the previous researcher above, the writer interest to apply Focus Group Discussion

in writing. But in this study the writer will apply Focus Group Discussion in writing Recount of

(16)

study to get more experience and learning with group working to analyst the generic structure

and language feature of Focus Group Discussion.

From the explanation above, the writer wants to conduct the research to see how the Focus

Group discussion can improve students’ achievement in writing, especially writing recount of

VIII year of SMP Negeri 2 Tanjung Pura.

B. The Problem of the Study

In relation to the background of the study, the problem of the study is formulated as in the

following: Is students’ achievement in writing recount text improved through focus group

discussion method?

C. The Objective of the Study

The objective of the study is to investigate the significant improvement of students’

achievement in writing of recount text through the application of focus group discussion method.

D. The Scope of the Study

Writing seems to be a difficult task for students. It is difficult because there are some aspects

to considered, for example, vocabulary, tenses, etc. In this case, focus will be give to writing

recount.

Recount is used to tell past experience. In recount text have a generic structure, is it

orientation, events and re-orientation.

(17)

The finding of the study is expected to be useful and relevant both theoretically and

practically.

Theoretically for:

1. For English teacher: The findings of the study are useful to enrich horizons on

theories of language learning.

2. For students: The findings of the study will enhance previous theories on the second

language learning.

3. For researcher: The findings of the study can be used as the reference for those who

want to conduct a research in English teaching learning process.

Practically for:

1. For English teachers are to give information in their attempt to decide the using focus group discussion method and in improving students’ achievement in writing recount.

2. For students are to improve their writing ability, so that can enjoy themselves in learning

English in the class and to motivate the students to be better in writing recount text.

3. For researchers are to develop information and knowledge from this study,

especially writing recount.

4. For other are to increase the readers’ knowledge about focus group discussion (

(18)

CAHPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

Based on the result of the study, the conclusion are drawn as follows:

1. There is a significant improvement of students’ writing ability through focus group

discussion method. It showed by the mean of the students’ score orientation test ( 59.44 ),

test I ( 75.41 ) and test II ( 81.52 ).

2. The students felt more enjoy and interested I learning writing through focus group

discussion method. It is showed by their enthusiasm and their activity in writing in two

cycles in their respond while they were asked about the material.

3. Therefore, focus group discussion improved students’ achievement in writing recount text.

B. Suggestion

Based on the result of this study, the use of focus group discussion method could improve the

students achievement in writing. The following suggestion are offered:

1. For the writer : the writer develops and enriches the knowledge in education and language.

2. For the teacher : it’s better by using focus group discussion method in writing recount in

teaching learning process, because it’s proven that this method improved the students’

achievement in writing recount easily and creatively.

3. For the students : students improve their writing ability, so that can write well.

4. For others: can give them some data, sources through focus group discussion method in

(19)

REFERENCES

Brown, H.D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, Anne. 2010. Doing action research in English Language Teaching. New York: Rutledge.

Carol, A.T. 2001. Curriculum Design for writing Instruction: California.

Ferrance, E. 2000. Action Research. New York: Brown University.

Freebody, P. 2004. Qualitative research in education. California: British library.

Glass, K.T. 2005. Curriculum Design for Writing Instruction. Creating Standards- based Lesson Plans and Rubrics / Kathy Tuchman Glass: foreword by Carol Ann Tomlinson.

Harmer, J. 2004. How to Teach Writing. England: Longman.

Heaten, J.B. 1984. Writing English Language Test. Longman handbooks for Language Teachers general Editors. Donn Byrne: England.

Johnson, K. 2001. An Introduction Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education

Knapp, P.M.Watkins. 2005. Genre Text and Grammar. Sidney: University of New South Wales.

Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching & Learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers. An International Thomson Publishing Company: Boston.

http://www . Bincang Media.com. Focus group discussion. Accessed on 28th march 2011

http://www. Sikompeduli.blogspot.com. focus group discussion. Accessed on 15th February2012

http://www.Writing recount.com. Accessed on 21 October 2011

Gambar

Table 1.1 Students’ Score Semester I and II .................................................
Figure 2.1  ..................................................................................................
Table I.I Students’ Score Semester I and Semester II

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Karakteristik internal wanita pengolah ikan asin di pesisir Muara Angke yang diduga berhubungan dengan tingkat keterampilan wanita pengolah ikan asin adalah: (1) umur, (2)

Hasil uji terhadap ekstrak daun delima putih, ceremai, kemuning, dan bunga kecombrang menunjukkan hasil bahwa keempat ekstrak tersebut tidak bersifat toksik terhadap sel

Pada minggu ke 4 antara kontrol dengan yang diiradiasi jumlah bakteri aerob dalam sampel daging yang berasal dari ketiga RPH tidak berbeda nyata (p<0,05).. Pada penyimpanan

ARIF RAKHMAN HAKIM. Pengembangan Peta Teknologi Menggunakan Text Mining dan Analisis Jejaring untuk Manajemen Inovasi dan Teknologi. Dibimbing oleh TAUFIK DJATNA dan

Les Parties visées à l’annexe I font en sorte, individuellement ou conjointement, que leurs émissions anthropiques agrégées, exprimées en équivalent dioxyde de carbone, des gaz

Penelitian terhadap proses keputusan pembelian produk baru oleh kelompok pasar bisnis tipe bisnis grosir industri FMCG di pasar tradisional penting untuk

For Lecturer, (1) learning journal becomes a valuable feedback on students' learning; (2) the teacher can find out if classes are held interestingly, the students mastered

[r]