Y
A
W
A
E
V
I
G
O
T
N
O
I
T
A
V
I
T
O
M
S
’
N
H
O
J
N
O
Y
D
U
T
S
A
H
A
N
N
A
V
A
S
O
T
Y
C
A
G
E
L
S
’
R
E
H
T
A
F
S
I
H
’
S
K
R
A
P
S
S
A
L
O
H
C
I
N
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
D
E
A
R
J
O
H
N
ASARJANAPENDIDIKANFINALPAPER
e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r
P Requirements e
h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
h i s g n i n a ir T a n y l e M
4 4 0 4 1 2 1 8 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A
F TRAININGANDEDUCATION Y
T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
Y
A
W
A
E
V
I
G
O
T
N
O
I
T
A
V
I
T
O
M
S
’
N
H
O
J
N
O
Y
D
U
T
S
A
H
A
N
N
A
V
A
S
O
T
Y
C
A
G
E
L
S
’
R
E
H
T
A
F
S
I
H
’
S
K
R
A
P
S
S
A
L
O
H
C
I
N
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
D
E
A
R
J
O
H
N
ASARJANAPENDIDIKANFINALPAPER
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
h i s g n i n a ir T a n y l e M
4 4 0 4 1 2 1 8 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E
D ARTSEDUCATION N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
ii
ASarjanaPendidikanFina lPaper no
Y
A
W
A
E
V
I
G
O
T
N
O
I
T
A
V
I
T
O
M
S
’
N
H
O
J
N
O
Y
D
U
T
S
A
H
A
N
N
A
V
A
S
O
T
Y
C
A
G
E
L
S
’
R
E
H
T
A
F
S
I
H
’
S
K
R
A
P
S
S
A
L
O
H
C
I
N
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
D
E
A
R
J
O
H
N
y B a n y l e
M Trianingsih 4 4 0 4 1 2 1 8 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
y b d e v o r p p A
r o s n o p S
,. d P . S , i n i m t a h i r p i r T .
ii i
ASarjanaPendidikanFina lPaper no
Y
A
W
A
E
V
I
G
O
T
N
O
I
T
A
V
I
T
O
M
S
’
N
H
O
J
N
O
Y
D
U
T
S
A
O
T
Y
C
A
G
E
L
S
’
R
E
H
T
A
F
S
I
H
S
A
V
A
N
N
A
H
’
S
K
R
A
P
S
S
A
L
O
H
C
I
N
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
D
E
A
R
J
O
H
N
y B a n y l e
M Trianingsih 4 4 0 4 1 2 1 8 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
s r e n i m a x E f o d r a o B e h t e r o f e b d e d n e f e D
on 6October2014 andDeclaredAcceptable
s r e n i m a x E f o d r a o B
n o s r e p r i a h
C :Paulu sKuswandono ,Ph.D.
y r a t e r c e
S :Drs .Barl iBram ,M.Ed. ,Ph.D.
r e b m e
M : Drs .Y .B .Gunawan ,
r e b m e
M : C .Tutyandari ,S.Pd,.M.Pd.
r e b m e
v i
k
o
o
l
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
e
r’
u
o
y
n
e
h
W
t
a
h
t
e
z
il
a
e
r
d
n
a
u
o
y
d
n
u
o
r
a
e
l
p
o
e
p
e
h
t
ll
a
t
a
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
s
i
e
e
s
u
o
y
n
o
s
r
e
p
e
l
g
n
i
s
y
r
e
v
e
d
r
a
h
s
a
t
s
u
j
s
’t
i
,
m
e
h
t
o
t
d
n
a
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
.
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
g
n
i
o
g
e
r’
u
o
y
s
a
h
a
n
n
a
v
a
S
–
D
e
a
r
J
o
h
n
:
o
t
d
e
t
a
ci
d
e
D
x
M
y
g
r
e
a
t
e
s
t
J
e
s
u
s
C
h
ir
s
t
x
M
y
b
e
l
o
v
e
d
f
a
m
li
y
(
M
y
l
o
v
e
l
y
d
a
d
,
m
y
s
u
p
e
r
m
o
m
,
K
o
J
o
h
n
,
K
o
,
a
s
s
il
e
M
,
a
r
d
n
a
h
C
C
e
M
e
lr
y
n
,
J
o
l
y
n
a
n
d
J
o
e
)l
x
M
y
b
e
s
t
f
ir
e
n
d
s
(
M
a
n
d
a
H
u
t
a
g
a
o
l
,
M
a
y
e
s
it
E
v
a
u
il
n
a
)
x
T
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
i
d
i
o
t
s
x
T
h
e
D
r
a
g
o
n
S
p
i
ir
t
F
a
m
li
y
~
ll
a
u
o
y
e
v
o
L
,
ll
a
u
o
y
t
u
o
h
ti
w
g
n
i
h
t
o
n
m
a
I
v i
k
o
o
l
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
e
r’
u
o
y
n
e
h
W
t
a
h
t
e
z
il
a
e
r
d
n
a
u
o
y
d
n
u
o
r
a
e
l
p
o
e
p
e
h
t
ll
a
t
a
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
s
i
e
e
s
u
o
y
n
o
s
r
e
p
e
l
g
n
i
s
y
r
e
v
e
d
r
a
h
s
a
t
s
u
j
s
’t
i
,
m
e
h
t
o
t
d
n
a
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
.
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
g
n
i
o
g
e
r’
u
o
y
s
a
h
a
n
n
a
v
a
S
–
D
e
a
r
J
o
h
n
:
o
t
d
e
t
a
ci
d
e
D
x
M
y
g
r
e
a
t
e
s
t
J
e
s
u
s
C
h
ir
s
t
x
M
y
b
e
l
o
v
e
d
f
a
m
li
y
(
M
y
l
o
v
e
l
y
d
a
d
,
m
y
s
u
p
e
r
m
o
m
,
K
o
J
o
h
n
,
K
o
,
a
s
s
il
e
M
,
a
r
d
n
a
h
C
C
e
M
e
lr
y
n
,
J
o
l
y
n
a
n
d
J
o
e
)l
x
M
y
b
e
s
t
f
ir
e
n
d
s
(
M
a
n
d
a
H
u
t
a
g
a
o
l
,
M
a
y
e
s
it
E
v
a
u
il
n
a
)
x
T
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
i
d
i
o
t
s
x
T
h
e
D
r
a
g
o
n
S
p
i
ir
t
F
a
m
li
y
~
ll
a
u
o
y
e
v
o
L
,
ll
a
u
o
y
t
u
o
h
ti
w
g
n
i
h
t
o
n
m
a
I
v i
k
o
o
l
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
e
r’
u
o
y
n
e
h
W
t
a
h
t
e
z
il
a
e
r
d
n
a
u
o
y
d
n
u
o
r
a
e
l
p
o
e
p
e
h
t
ll
a
t
a
g
n
il
g
g
u
r
t
s
s
i
e
e
s
u
o
y
n
o
s
r
e
p
e
l
g
n
i
s
y
r
e
v
e
d
r
a
h
s
a
t
s
u
j
s
’t
i
,
m
e
h
t
o
t
d
n
a
,
g
n
i
h
t
e
m
o
s
h
ti
w
.
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
g
n
i
o
g
e
r’
u
o
y
s
a
h
a
n
n
a
v
a
S
–
D
e
a
r
J
o
h
n
:
o
t
d
e
t
a
ci
d
e
D
x
M
y
g
r
e
a
t
e
s
t
J
e
s
u
s
C
h
ir
s
t
x
M
y
b
e
l
o
v
e
d
f
a
m
li
y
(
M
y
l
o
v
e
l
y
d
a
d
,
m
y
s
u
p
e
r
m
o
m
,
K
o
J
o
h
n
,
K
o
,
a
s
s
il
e
M
,
a
r
d
n
a
h
C
C
e
M
e
lr
y
n
,
J
o
l
y
n
a
n
d
J
o
e
)l
x
M
y
b
e
s
t
f
ir
e
n
d
s
(
M
a
n
d
a
H
u
t
a
g
a
o
l
,
M
a
y
e
s
it
E
v
a
u
il
n
a
)
x
T
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
i
d
i
o
t
s
x
T
h
e
D
r
a
g
o
n
S
p
i
ir
t
F
a
m
li
y
v
Y
T
I
L
A
N
I
G
I
R
O
S
’
K
R
O
W
F
O
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h
I ifna lpaper ,which Ihavew irtten ,doe sno tcontaint he d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o k r o w
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r e h t
, a tr a k a y g o
Y 19September2014 r
e ti r W e h T
a n y l e
M T iraningsih 0 4 1 2 1 8
i v
I
S
A
K
I
L
B
U
P
N
A
U
J
U
T
E
S
R
E
P
N
A
A
T
A
Y
N
R
E
P
R
A
B
M
E
L
S
I
M
E
D
A
K
A
N
A
G
N
I
T
N
E
P
E
K
K
U
T
N
U
H
A
I
M
L
I
A
Y
R
A
K
a d n a tr e b g n a
Y tangand ibawahi n,is aya ,mahasiswaUniverstia sSanataDharma: a
m a
N :MelynaT iraningsih a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :08121404 4 a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e
D membe irkankepadaPerpustakaan :l
u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U
Y A W A E V I G O T N O I T A V I T O M S ’ N H O J N O Y D U T S A
H A N N A V A S O T Y C A G E L S ’ R E H T A F S I H
’ S K R A P S S A L O H C I N N I N E E S S
A DEARJOHN
besetraperangka tyang dipelrukan( bliaada) .Dengandemikiansayamembeirkan , n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k
n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m
a b r e t a r a c e s n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a
d tas ,dan mempub ilkasikannya d iInterne tatau n
i a l a i d e
m untuk kepenitngan akademi s tanpa pelru meminta iijn dar i saya n
a k ir e b m e m n u p u a
m royatlykepadasayaselamat etap mencantumkannamasaya .s
il u n e p i a g a b e s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s g n a y i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
l a g g n a t a d a
P : 19Septem ber2014 n
a k a t a y n e m g n a
Y ,
a n y l e
ii v
T
C
A
R
T
S
B
A
an y l e M , h i s g n i n a ir
T .(2014) .A Study on John’ sMoitva iton to Give away Hi s s
a h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e L s ’ r e h t a
F Seen in Nichola s Sparks ’ Dea r John . n
o it a c u d E d n a g n i n i a r T s r e h c a e T : a tr a k a y g o
Y Facu tly ,Depatrmen to fLanguage a m r a h D a t a n a S , m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E , n o it a c u d E s tr A d n a
. y ti s r e v i n U
s e s s u c s i d y d u t s s i h
T Nichola sSparks ’nove len itltedDea rJohn.Thenove l s
ll e
t about the broken-heatred John Tyree whose love ,Savannah ,ha smarired n
a m r e h t o n
a . He rhusband need sa l o to fmoney fo rhi s rteatment. John sell shi s e h t s e v i g y l s u o m y n o n a , s n o it c e ll o c n i o c f o m r o f e h t n i s i h c i h w y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f
.r e h s e v a e l d n a h a n n a v a S o t y e n o m
o t s i m e l b o r p t s ri f e h T . d e v l o s e b o t s m e l b o r p o w t n o s e s u c o f y d u t s s i h T
d n a t s r e d n
u thecharacteirsitcdescirpitono fJohnass eeni nNichola sSparks ’Dear n
h o
J .Thesecond problem i st o ifnd outt hemoitvaiton fo John t o giveaway hi s S
o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a
f avannah . s e il p p a y d u t s e h
T a ilbrary research a sthe method i n gatheirng et h d ata y
d u t s e h t f o s m e l b o r p e h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t d n
a .Thep irmary
e c r u o
s o fthi sstudy i sNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn .The secondary source sare o
b a s k o o b e m o
s u tltierature and psychology .The othe rsecondary source also e
h t m o r f s e m o
c journals which are related to the analysis . The theory o f d
n a n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c the theory o f personaltiy are appiled to analyze John’ s s
c it s ir e t c a r a h
c .Meanwhlie,t het heoryo fmo itvaitoni susedt o ifnd outt heJohn’ s r
e h t a f s i h y a w a e v i g o t n o it a v it o
m ’ slegacyt oSavannah. t
u o b a s a w t l u s e r t s ri f e h
T John’s characte irsitc sdescirp iton .John i san e
l b i s n o p s e r , e r u t a m , e v it c
a ,frim and consistent person .Thesecond resul toft he study wa sabout John’ smoitvaiton sto give away hi sfather’sl egacy .Thestudy
t a h t t u o s d n
if therearetwoint irnsicmoitvaitons whichl eadJohnt ogiveawayhi s y
c a g e l s ’ r e h t a
f . The intirnsic moitvaitons ea r tha tJohn want sto reailze tha t s
t n a w n h o J d n a n a m o w d e ir r a m s i h a n n a v a
S toprovehisl ovet oSavannah. s
i h
T study provides recommendaiton sfor both future researchers who o
t t n a
w analyzeNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn andfo rEngilsht eacherswhowant s s
u o
t et heNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn ast het eaching mateiral .The l esson plan e
r a g n i h c a e t r o f l a ir e t a m d n
a alsoprovidedi nt heappendice si nthi spaper.
y e
ii i v
K
A
R
T
S
B
A
,h i s g n i n a ir
T Melyna .(2014) .A Study on John’ sMoitva iton to Give away Hi s . n h o J r a e D ’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e S s a h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e L s ’ r e h t a F
: a tr a k a y g o
Y Program Stud i Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris ,Jurusan Pendidikan ,
n a k i d i d n e P u m lI n a d n a u r u g e K s a tl u k a F , i n e S n a d a s a h a
B Universtia sSanata
a m r a h
D .
n a it il e n e
P in imembaha stentang nove lNichola sSpark yang berjudu l i
n i l e v o N . n h o J r a e
D mengisahkan tentang John Tyree yang patah h ait karena t
n i
c anya ,Savannah ,telah menikahi p ira lain .Suaminya membutuhkan banyak g
n a
u untukbiaya pengobatann ya. John menjualwarisannyayang berupa koleksi a
y n n a k i r e b m e m , n i o
k kepadaSavannahs ecara mdia - mdia nd a meninggalkann . ya n
a it il e n e
P ii kn fo u skepada ad u rumusan masalah .Masalah pertama h
a l a d
a untukmengeritdesk irpsikarakte irsitkJohnyangtampakpadanove lkarya .
n h o J r a e D l u d u j r e b s k r a p S s a l o h c i
N Masalah kedua adalah untuk mengetahui n
h o J i s a v it o
m untukmemberikanwarisanayahnyakepadaSavannah. n
a it il e n e
P i ni mengapilkasikan peneilita n pustaka sebagai metode pengumpulan data d an pendekatan p iskologi untuk menganailsa rumusan
. h a l a s a
m Sumber utama peneilitan ii n adalah nove lNichola sSparks berjudu l r
e b m u S . n h o J r a e
D sekunderpeneilitanadalahbuku-bukultieratur nd a psikolog.i l
a n r u
J -jurnal terkati dengan anailsis juga digunakan sebagai sumber sekunde.r i
r o e
T karakte irsitk d an kepribadian digunakan untuk mengana ilsa desk irp is .
n h o J k it s i r e t k a r a
k Sedangkan teo ir moitva is digunakan untuk mengetahui n
h o J i s a v it o
m untukmemberikanwarisanayahnyakepadaSavannah. li
s a
H anails a pe trama adalah tentang desk irpsi karakterisitk John. John g
n u g g n a t r e b , a s a w e d , fi t k a g n a y g n a r o h a l a d
a jawab ,tegas nd a konsi tsen.Hasli a
s il a n
a kedua tentang moitvas i John untuk memberikan warisan ayahnya. n
a it il e n e
P menemukan d ua moitvasi instrinsik yang memicu John untuk n
a k i r e b m e
m warisannya. Moitvasi tersebut antara nl ai John menyada ir bahwa h
a n n a v a
S sudah bersuami d an John ingin membukitkan cintanya kepada h
a n n a v a
S .
n a it il e n e
P ii n memberikan rekomendasi kepada penelti i yang akan a
s il a n a g n e
m nove lNichola sSpark syang berjudu lDea rJohn dan kepada guru a
s a h a
B Inggri syang ingin menggunakan nove lini sebagai mate ir pengajaran . n
a d P P
R mater iaja rjuga disediakan d idalam halaman lampiran d ari tugas r
i h k a ii . n
i c n u k a t a
x i
S
T
N
E
M
E
G
D
E
L
W
O
N
K
C
A
r i e h t n e v i g e v a h o h w e l p o e p l l a o t e d u ti t a r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w I
r e y a r p , tr o p p u
s s ,andmoitvaitont o ifnisht hi s ifna lpape.rFris to fall , Iwould ilke ,
r o i v a S y m d n a d r o L e h t o t e d u ti t a r g t s e t a e r g y m s s e r p x e o
t Jesu sChris,tfo rHi s
f r e d n o
w u llove ,blessing ,and guidance fo rme .He srtengthen sme wheneve r I d
n if o t e m d e p l e h d n a p u e v a
g t heway ou twhen I f aced rp oblems .Wtihou tHim , s
i h
t studywli lneve rbecompleted.
Ialso dedicatemy specia lgrattiudet o my beloved famliy who h gas iven ,
e v o l , h ti a f r i e h
t suppor tand prayers to me . Ithank my lovely father, who had l
it n u y d u t s y m h s i n if o t e m r o f d e ti a w s y a w l
a the end o fhi slfie , t(he late) o
t n a i d e o B y r d n e
H andmysupe rmother, whoalway sputs mynamei nhe rpraye r y
r e v
e yd ,a SurianaAstrodiardjo ,mybelovedbrothersYohanesBoedianto ,S.T .
d n
a Dw i Chandra Boedianto, my beloved sister s Meilsa Yuntiawa it and
a n a y l r e
M Soik ,S.T. ,and also my lovely nieceJolyn Kezia Boedianto and my w
e h p e n y l e v o
l Joe lMarvelou sBoedianto. , r o s i v d a y m o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g p e e d y
M V .Triprihatmini ,S.Pd,.M.Hum. , .
A .
M , who ha sgiven me he rpreciou s itme to guide me to go through the
s i h t f o n o it e l p m o
c ifna lpaper . Ithank he rwliilngnes sto check ,to read ,and to k
c a b d e e f s u o i c e r p e v i
g t o mesot ha t Ican ifnishmy ifna lpape rwell . Ialsot hank
l l
a o fthe PB Ilecturers who have taugh tme a lo to fthings ,en irched my e
g d e l w o n
k andgivenmeal o to fexpeirencesbothi nsideandoutsidet het eaching s
e it i v it c
x t
a ir a t e r c e
s , ilbrary staff ,and al lemployee sin Sanata Dharma Universtiy fo r .
y d u t s y m g n ir u d e m g n i p l e h
Iwould t hankal lo fmySanataDharmaUniverstiyf irendswhich Icanno t e
n o y b e n o n o it n e
m . Ialso t hank ,Anggie ,Uiln ,Detta ,Via ,Adi ,Mike ,Sony , a
z i
L ,Vincent ,Andreo, Ela ,Damas ,Pandu ,Usitn ,Nuci ,Okta ,Boki ,Luke ,
o j o J , i a p o
N .It hankt hemf o rbecominggreatf irend sandsupporitngeachother . I f
o y li m a f g i b e h t k n a h t o s l
a Dragon Spiri tFamliy . Ithank t hemf o rthei rwarm .
p i h s d n e ir
f Ialso t hank G -en B Dancer Crew and TMT Squad which gave me n
e d n a t s u
rt couragedmetodevelopmyi nterestt ogethe rasf amliy. o
t k n a h t y m e t a c i d e d
I Andrea sD .S .P., MandaS .F .P. .H, Mayest iE . .
D ,Ntia Tfian iM. ,S.Pd. ,Andr iS .and Winard iW .L. fo rbecoming my bes t s
d n e ir
f da n fort hegreates t itmeoft ogetherness . Ialso t hank al lo fmyf irendsi n ir
u
P Nugrahaboardinghouse ,MB21boardinghouseandBeo52boardinghouse. m
e h t f o l l a t u o h ti w y a d o t m a I t a h w s a e b t o n n a c
I .
e m d e tr o p p u s e v a h t a h t e l p o e p t a e r g e h t f o l l a k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y lt s a L
r a e y e g e ll o c s i h t h g u o r h
t s whom Ihaveno tmenitonedye.t
a n y l e
i x
S
T
N
E
T
N
O
C
F
O
E
L
B
A
T
EG A P E L T I
T ... i S
E G A P L A V O R P P
A ... ii E
G A P N O I T A C I D E
D ... vi Y
T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ... v I
S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E
P ... iv T
C A R T S B
A ... ii....v K
A R T S B
A ... iiv i T
N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A S ... ix S
T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ... ix
N O I T C U D O R T N I I R E T P A H
C ... 1 .
1 .
1 Backgroundoft heStudy ... 1 .
2 .
1 Approachoft heStudy ... 4
I I R E T P A H
C DISCUSSION... 7 .
1 .
2 Reviewo fRelatedTheo ires... 7 .
1 . 1 .
2 Theoryo fCharacteirzaiton ... 7 .
2 . 1 .
2 TheoryofPersonaltiy ... 9 .
3 . 1 .
2 TheoryofMoitvaiton... 10 .
2 .
2 Analysis ... 13 .... .
1 . 2 .
2 John’ sCharacteirsitc sass eeni nNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn ... 13 .
a Acitve... 13 .
b Mature... 15 .
c Responsible ... 18 .
d Frimandconsistent... 19 .
2 . 2 .
2 John’ sMoitvaitoni nGivingAwayHi sFather’ sLegacyt oSavannah ’
s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e s s
a Dea rJohn ... 21 .
a Johnwantst or eailzet ha tSavannahi samar iredwoman ... 22 .
ii x I
I I R E T P A H
C CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ... 27 .
1 .
3 Conclusions ... 27 .
2 .
3 Recommendaitons ... 28
S E C N E R E F E
R ... 30 S
E C I D N E P P
A ... 31 x
i d n e p p
A 1 ... 32 x
i d n e p p
A 2 ... 34 x
i d n e p p
A 3 ... 37 x
i d n e p p
I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
o t n i d e d i v i d s i tI . y d u t s e l o h w e h t f o n o it c u d o rt n i e h t s t n e s e r p r e t p a h c s i h T
b e h t y l e m a n , s tr a p o w
t ackgroundoft hestudyandt heapproachoft hestudy .The
d n a y d u t s s i h t f o y c n e g r u e h t s e r o l p x e h c i h w y d u t S e h t f o d n u o r g k c a B s i tr a p t s ri f
e h t f o s e v it c e j b o , y d u t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t g n it c e l e s n i s n o s a e r l a n o s r e p s ’ r e ti r w e h t
it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t d n a y d u t s s i h t g n it c u d n o c f o m i a e h t t n e s e r p h c i h w y d u t
s on
s i tr a p d n o c e s e h T . y d u t s e h t f o e p o c s e h t ti m il o t s m e l b o r p e h t t n e s e r p l li w h c i h w
h c i h w e r u t a r e ti l f o w e i v e r e h t s e t a r o b a l e t r a p s i h T . y d u t S e h t f o h c a o r p p A e h t
s i h T . y d u t s s i h t n i k r o w e m a r f s ti d n a y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s e ir o e h t t u o b a s n i a l p x e
o s l a t r a
p elaborate sthe methodology which explain sabou t the source sand
s i h t n i d e t c u d n o c s e i g o l o d o h t e
m study.
. 1 .
1 Backgroundoft heStudy
l ,) 6 8 9 1 ( y d o o M o t g n i d r o c c
A tierature may funciton a sa depiciton oft he
o i c o
s -cutlura land even i deologica lstiuaiton o fcetrain peirod o f itme .Someone
, e g d e l w o n k s a h c u s , s e u l a v e v it i s o p l a r e v e s n i a g y a m e r u t a r e ti l s d a e r o h w
d n a s n o s s e l e m o s t e g o s l a n a c e h s r o e h , e r u t a r e ti l m o r F . e c n e ir e p x e d n a , e r u s a e l p
d n u r e tt e
b erstanding abou tlfie (Moody ,1986 ,p . 2-3 .) p A sone o fthe ltierary
k r o
w s ,noveli salso adepiciton of t hesocio-cutlura land i deologica lstiuaiton o f
e fi l .
g n i k a m s a h c u s n o it c a n a e e s y a m e w , s l e v o n e m o s n i , e fi l f o n o it c i p e d a s A
adecisionwhich mightl ead someonet oanotherl fieeven to fthei rmaturtiy .Thi s
t n e v e e h t n i d e r r u c c o h c i h w s n o it a v it o m e m o s y b d e s u a c y ll a u s u s i n o i s i c e
d which
s
i happened before .A tfe rmaking t he big decision ,he/shewli lente ranotherl fie
. y ti r u t a m f o t n e v e g n i k a m n i n o it a v it o m f o s e l p m a x e e h t f o e n
O a decision in nove lcan be
o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f s i h y a w a e v i g d n a h a n n a v a S e v a e l o t n o i s i c e d s ’ n h o J e h t n i n e e s ’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e s s a h a n n a v a
S Dea rJohn novel .Dea rJohn i sa 2006
s ’ n h o J g n ir u D . h a n n a v a S d n a n h o J n e e w t e b y r o t s e v o l e h t t u o b a s ll e t h c i h w l e v o n e h s t a h t n h o J d l o t h a n n a v a S , y r a ti li m n i y t u
d i s marired .Then ,they broke up .
y h w w e n k e h , e m it s i h t n I . h a n n a v a S t e m n h o J , l a r e n u f s ’ r e h t a f s i h r e tf A r r a m h a n n a v a
S iedanothe rmanand t herif amliycondiiton .Tim ,he rhusband ,wa s
o t m i h g n ir b o t d e t n a w h a n n a v a S . s e s a e s i d y l d a e d d e t a c il p m o c f o d e s o n g a i d e c n a r u s n i e h t e c n i s y e n o m h c u m e v a h t o n o d y e h t t u b t n e m t a e rt e v it a n r e tl a y n a p m o
c wli l no t pay the tira l rteatment .s A tfe r meeitng Tim and visiitng
s i h g n il l e s y b e fi l s i h n i n o i s i c e d g i b a s e k a m n h o J , y li m a f w e n s ’ h a n n a v a S . r e y w a l a h g u o r h t h a n n a v a S o t y e n o m e h t f o l l a s e v i g d n a s n o it c e ll o c n i o c s ’ r e h t a f n h o J l l e t o t d n a s u o m y n o n a s a e m a n s i h e k a m o t r e y w a l e h t s k s a e
H abou tTim’ s
s t n e m t a e rt w e n s i h n i s s e r g o r
p . A tfe rfew months , John know s tha t Tim’ s
. e r o f e b n a h t r e tt e b g n it t e g s i n o it i d n o
c Thi snove li svery interesitng to be
e c n i s d e z y l a n
a ti tell sabou tabroken-heatredmanhelping hisl over’ shusbandby
y a w a g n i v i
g hi sfather’sl egacy .Thi snovel t eache sus t o help someonewe l ove
.t r a e h r u o n e k o r b d a h e h s / e h h g u o h t , d r a w e r y n a g n it c e p x e t u o h ti w n a g n i z y l a n a n
I ovel , ti i srequried to have a way o fthinking so tha tthe
n w o s ti e v a h l li w y d u t
’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o e n
o Dea rJohn, t o givet hemoney
h a n n a v a S o
t and leaveherinsprie smet o wrtiea ifna lpape rwhich discussest he
g n i k a m n i n o it a v it o m s ’ n h o
J a decisioni nhisl fie .
j b o e h
T ecitveoft hi sstudyi st o ifndou tJohn’ smoitvaitont ogiveawayhi s
’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e s s a h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a
f Dea rJohn . To achieve
c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r s n o it s e u q h c r a e s e r e m o s , y d u t s e h t y fi c e p s d n a e v it c e j b o e h t
q e h T . d e r a p e r p n e e b e v a
h uesiton saref ormulatedasf ollows:
.
1 Howi sJ ohncharacteirzedi nNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn?
.
2 Wha ti sJohn’s moitvaiton in giving away hi sfather’ slegacy a sseen in
’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i
N Dea rJohnnovel?
e m o s e v i g d l u o c y d u t s s i h t t a h t d e t c e p x e s i
tI beneftisf o rsomeparites . tIi s
e p o
h d tha tthe study would beneif tthe reader so fNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn ,
l li w y d u t s s i h T . l e v o n s i h t r e h tr u f y d u t s o t g n il li w e r a o h w e s o h t r o f y ll a i c e p s e
, fl e s ti k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t g n i y d u t s n i p l e
h sincei tis i nteresitng t o analyze why a
n e k o r
b -heatred man help shi slover’ shusband by giving away hi sonly legacy
r e h t a f s i h m o r
f . Thi s study wli l provide some addiitona l informaiton in
h t g n i d n a t s r e d n
u e nove lparitculalry in analyzing the main characte rand the
. d e v l o v n i s i ti h c i h w n o p u t c e p s a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p Thi sstudyalso provides a lo to f
e v o r p m i o t e c n e r e f e r e n o s a l e v o n e h t g n i d n a t s r e d n u n i n o it a m r o f n i l a n o it i d d a
n o i s n e h e r p m o c g n i d a e r d n a y r a l u b a c o v f o s m r e t n i h t o b , ll i k s g n i d a e
r fo rPB I
s t n e d u t
s .
u t a r e ti
L re and psychology also have a simliartiy tha tboth ltierature and
a m a r d o t n i s n o it i d n o c n a m u h t c i p e d o t s e ir t e r u t a r e ti L
“ whliepsychology studie s
y ll a c it a m e t s y s c it s ir e t c a r a h c n a m u
h ands cienitifcally”(Benedetit, 1996 ,p.130).
h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t ,l e v o n e h t n i n o it a v it o m e h t e z y l a n a o t r e d r o n I . y d u t s s i h t n i d e t c u d n o c e b l li
w tIi sbecausepsychology i sabody o fknowledge
t a l e r h c i h w s e ir o e h t e h T . e h c y s p n a m u h s e i d u t s h c i h
w ed to the topic such a s
s i h t e t e l p m o c o t n e s o h c e r a s c it s ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t d n a n o it a v it o m f o y r o e h t f o a e d i n i a m e h T . y d u t s s i h t tr o p p u s o t d e s u o s l a s i y ti l a n o s r e p f o y r o e h T . y d u t s o r p p a t s o m e h t s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p t a h t s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p p irate
g n i k a m n i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o n o it a v it o m e h t w o n k o t y a
w thedecisionto give
h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f s i h y a w
a basedont hemoitvaitont heory.
. 2 .
1 Approachoft heStudy
y ll a c if it n e i c s d n a y ll a c it a m e t s y s e h c y s p n a m u h s e i d u t s y g o l o h c y s p e c n i S
(Benedetit, 1996 ,p. 130) ,the psychologica lapproach wli lbe used in analyzing
f o n o it a v it o m e h t d n a s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t h t o b e z y l a n a l li w y d u t s s i h T . y d u t s s i h t ’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N f o r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h
t Dea rJohn.
y d u t s s i h
T h as two focuse sto ilmi tthe analysis .Frist ,i tfocuse son the
d n a n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h t g n i s u l e v o n s i h t n i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c s ’ n h o J e v i g o t n h o J f o n o it a v it o m e h t n o s e s u c o f y d u t s s i h t , d n o c e S . y ti l a n o s r e p f o y r o e h t ’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e s s a y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f s i h y a w
a Dea rJohn. The theory o f
.s u c o f d n o c e s s i h t n o s i s y l a n a e h t tr o p p u s o t r e d r o n i d e s u e b l li w n o it a v it o m e h t e s u s k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t n i n o it a v it o m o t d e t a l e r s e i d u t s l a r e v e S
psychologica la pp roach ast hebasi soft hestudy,f o rexamplet hestudy o fRatna
lt it n e ) 3 1 0 2
r e n n u R e ti K e h T s ’i n i e s s o
H andt hes tudyo fLuke( 2012 )enitltedTheI nlfuenceo f
s a m i T y r r a M o t n o it a v it o M r e H n i n o it i d n o C d n a s c it s i r e t c a r a h C s ’ h a n n a v a S h o J r a e D ’ s k r a p S s a l o h c i N n i n e e
S n .Bothstudie suset hepsychologica lapproach
. n o it a v it o m n o s u c o f d n
a Thi s study also use sthe psychology approach by
p l e h o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f s i h y a w a g n i v i g n i n o it a v it o m s ’ n h o J g n i z i s a h p m e . n h o J r a e D n i n e e s s a h a n n a v a S p m o c o t s e c r u o s y n a m s e ri u q e r
tI letet hi sstudy ,a swel lasr eferencebook s
s u o ir a v e r a e r e h T . y d u t s s i h t o d o t d e t c u d n o c s i y d u t s y r a r b il e h t , o S . s e t o n d n a d e s u e r a t a h t s e c r u o
s to analyze the moitvaiton and characte irsitcs o fthe main
o t n i d e d i v i d y ll a c i s a b e r a s e c r u o s e h T . r e t c a r a h
c two pa trs .They are p irmary
s e c r u o s y r a d n o c e s d n a e c r u o
s .
, l e v o n e h t s i y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e c r u o s y r a m ir p e h
T Dea rJohn which i s
ll e w e h t f o e n o s i e H . s k r a p S s a l o h c i N y b n e tt ir
w -known wrtier sin the wo lrd ,
n i n e e b e v a h s k o o b e s o h
w New York Time Bestseller s book ilsts .Dea rJohn
e v a h s l e v o n s i H . t s il r e ll e s t s e B s e m i T k r o Y w e N 1 r e b m u n e h t s t e g o s l a l e v o n s i h T . s e g a u g n a l 0 5 r e v o n i d lr o w e h t r e v o l l a s e i p o c n o il li m 9 8 r e v o d e t n ir p n e e b ,l e v o
n Dea rJohnwa spub ilshedi n2006 .Thi snove lconsist so f335page .s
i h g n ir u D . h a n n a v a S d n a n h o J n e e w t e b y r o t s e v o l e h t t u o b a s ll e t l e v o n e h
T s
s ll e t h a n n a v a S , y r a ti li m n i y t u
d John tha tshe i s marired .Then ,they break up .
t e e m n h o J , l a r e n u f s ’ r e h t a f s i h r e tf
A sSavannah .In thi s itme ,he know swhy
s e ir r a m h a n n a v a
S toanothe rmanandt herif amliycondiiton .Tim ,he rhusband ,i s
d e t a c il p m o c f o d e s o n g a i
d deadly diseases .Savannah wants to b irng him to the
y n a p m o
c wli l not pay the tira l rteatments .A tfe r meeitng Tim and visiitng
s i h g n il l e s y b e fi l s i h n i n o i s i c e d g i b a s e k a m n h o J , y li m a f w e n s ’ h a n n a v a S . r e y w a l a h g u o r h t h a n n a v a S o t y e n o m e h t f o l l a s e v i g d n a s n o it c e ll o c n i o c s ’ r e h t a f o n a e m a n s i h e k a m o t r e y w a l e h t s k s a e
H nymou sand to tel lJohn abou tTim’ s
s t n e m t a e rt w e n s i h n i s s e r g o r
p . tIi s i nteresitng to analyze themoitvaiton of t he
e c n i s , r e t c a r a h c n i a
m h e chooses to help Savannah by giving away hi sfather’ s
h a n n a v a S g n i k a e r b f o d a e t s n i d n a b s u h r e h p l e h o t y c a g e
l ’ ms ariragel fie.
n i p l e h o t d e s u e r a h c i h w s e c r u o s g n it r o p p u s e h t e r a s e c r u o s y r a d n o c e s e h T s ’ n h o J e h t r e h tr u f s s u c s i d l li w y d u t s s i h t , e r o f e b d e t a t s s A . y d u t s e h t g n i z y l a n a s i h y a w a e v i g o t n o it a v it o m s ’ n h o J s s u c s i d o s l a d n a l e v o n e h t n i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c t a
f her’sl egacyt oSavannahass eeni nNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn.
f o s k o o b e h t , l e v o n s i h t n i s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ n h o J g n i z y l a n a n I y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e b l li w y ti l a n o s r e p d n a n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c .Themainbookusedt o
e z y l a n
a thecharacteirsitc so fJohn i n t hi snove li sJes sFeis tand GregoryJ .Feist ’
P f o s e i r o e h
T ersonaltiy 7thediiton (2009) .In analyzing t heJohn’ smoitvaiton i n
t u o b a s k o o b y g o l o h c y s p e h t , h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e l r e h t a f s i h y a w a g n i v i g o p p u s e h t s a d e s u e b l li w n o it a v it o
m tred sources such a sBenjamin B .Lahey’s
n o it c u d o r t n i n a y g o l o h c y s
P 01 thediiton ( 2009 .)M oreinformaitonabou tal loft he
e h t n i d n u o f e b n a c y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e r a h c i h w s e ti s b e w d n a s k o o
b references
s e g a p . s i h c r a e s e r e h
T a ilbrarystudy whichmeanst hatt hemainstepi n t hestudy
e r a e r e h t , s e d i s e B . l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a n i p l e h o t s e t o n g n i k a t d n a g n i d a e r s a w s i p e t s t s ri f e h T . y d u t s e h t g n i h s i n if n i e n o d e b d l u o h s t a h t s p e t s e m o
g n i d a e r , d e t c e l e s n e e b s a h l e v o n e h t r e tf A . d e z y l a n a e b o t d e t n a w s i h c i h w l e v o n
e v o n e h
t lcarefullyandt akings omenotesi salsoi mpo tranti nt hiss tudy.Thet hrid
d n if o t s i p e t
s the issue swhich are coc urred in the nove land analyze them by
s n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t g n it a l u m r o
f .The nex tstep i sto decide the approach ,
r o f k o o
l suppo tred theo ire sand suppo tred informaiton which wli lbe used in
h c i h w s m e l b o r p h c r a e s e r e h t ,t a h t r e tf A . s e c r u o s s u o ir a v m o r f e u s s i e h t g n i z y l a n a
d e t a l u m r o f n e e b e v a
h w ill be analyzed using the approach ,theo ire sand othe r
d u t s e h t f o g n i d n if e h t s a s e i d u t s d e t a l e
r y .Thel as tstepi stoconcludetheanalysi s
y d u t s e h t f o t l u s e r e h t s a y d u t s e h t f
o and provide t he recommendaiton sof t hi s
d l e if n o it a c u d e e h t n i y d u t
2 R E T P A H C
N O I S S U C S I D
r e tf A . d e s s u c s i d e b l li w n h o J f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t ,r e t p a h c s i h t n
I that,t he
e b l li w h a n n a v a S o t y c a g e l s ’ r e h t a f s i h y a w a g n i v i g n i n o it a v it o m s ’ n h o J
. d e z y l a n a
. 1 .
2 ReviewonRelatedTheories
y d u t s e h t o t d e t a l e r s e ir o e h t e h t e z y l a n a l li w t r a p s i h
T namely ht eory o f
. n o it a v it o m f o y r o e h t d n a y ti l a n o s r e p f o y r o e h t , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
. 1 . 1 .
2 Theoryo fCharacteriza iton
. t n a tr o p m i e r a n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h c h t o b , k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t n I
ll i G o t g n i d r o c c
A (1995) ,acharacteri ssomeonewhoha ssomesor tofi denttiyi n
, e c n a r a e p p a r e h / s i h y b p u e d a m e b t h g i m y ti t n e d i e h T . k r o w y r a r e ti l a
a s r e v n o
c iton , aciton , name and thoughts . Abrams stated tha t character s are
n o s r e
p s in l tierary work who are i nterpreted by t hereader sfrom whatt hey said
o d y e h t t a h w y b d n
a (Abrams & Harpham, 2009 , 2p. 4 ). Characteirzaiton i sa
e g n a h c s p o l e v e d d n a s l a e v e r , s e t a e r c r o h t u a n a h c i h w y b d o h t e
m through the
t a h t o s r e t c a r a h c r o j a
m ther eade rcan interpretwha tkind o fperson t hecharacte r
s
i (Henkle ,1977 , pp . - )92 9 . 7
y h p r u
M (1972 , pp . 11 - 36 17 )statest hatt hereareninewaysi n desc irbinga
r o h t u a e h t , y a w s i h t n I . n o it p ir c s e d l a n o s r e p h g u o r h t s i y a w t s ri f e h T . r e t c a r a h c
, n i k s , e c a f s a h c u s , e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c f o s li a t e d e h t s e b ir c s e d
y a w d n o c e s e h T . s e h t o l c d n a , s e y
e i sdescirpiton from the othe rcharacters .
g n i b ir c s e d s e d i s e
B through persona ldescirpiton, t he autho rcanalso descirbet he
n i a g n a c r e d a e r e h t , e r o f e r e h T . s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o f o n o i n i p o e h t h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c h t o e h t m o r f r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i e r o
m ers ’poin to fview .The thrid
e m o s m o r F . h c e e p s r e h r o s i h h g u o r h t s i r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d n i y a w e h t d li u b o t d e p l e h e b n a c r e d a e r e h t , s r e t c a r a h c e h t y b d e s u s n o i s s e r p x e o f e h T . r e tt e b r e t c a r a h c e h t f o g n i d n a t s r e d n
u u trhwayi ndescirbingt hecharacteri s
o t r e d a e r e h t p l e h o s l a n a c r e t c a r a h c e h t f o e fi l t s a p e h T . e fi l t s a p e h t h g u o r h t e u l c a e b t h g i m e fi l t s a p e h t n i s t n e v e e m o S . r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a e r o m d n a t s r e d n u e b n a c h c i h w y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a e r o m d n a t s r e d n u o t r e d a e r e h t r o f f n e e
s romt hedriec tcommentsf romt heauthor ,character’st hough tand speech i n
e h t g n i b ir c s e d n i y a w h tf if e h T . w e i v f o t n i o p ’ s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o r o , n o it a s r e v n o c n o it a m r o f n i s e v i g o s l a r o h t u a e h T . s r e h t o y b n o it a s r e v n o c h g u o r h t s i r e t c a r a h c r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b
a throught heconversaitonbyothe rcharacters .Theconversaiton
o b a n o it a m r o f n i e r o m n i a g o t r e d a e r e h t p l e h t h g i m r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a s r e h t o y
b u t
. y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t r e h / s i h m o r f n w o h s o s l a s i r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d n i y a w r e h t o n A e h T . s n o it c a e
r character’ spersonaltiycanalso beseen t hroughhi so rherr eaciton
s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t h g u o r h T . s t n e v e e fi l s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t r o n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v t u o b a e h T . y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t e n i m r e t e d r e d a e r e h t s t e l r o h t u a e h t , n o it c a e r g n i b ir c s e d f o y a w h t n e v e
s the characte rcan also be shown from the author’ s
e h t g n ir e h t a g n i y a w t s e i s a e e h t y ll a u t c a s i tI . r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a t n e m m o c t c e ri d e h t s e s u r o h t u a e h t n e h w y ll a i c e p s e , l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i . w e i v f o t n i o p n o s r e p d ri h
n w o h
s through the character’ sthought .The character’ sway o fthinking migh t
e h t n i y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i e r o m n i a g o t r e d a e r e h t p l e h a c r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z ir e t c a r a h c n i y a w t s a l e h T . l e v o
n n be shown through
e t c a r a h c e h t f o r o i v a h e b l a u s u n u r o s ti b a h , m s ir e n n a
m r .Manneirsmcanalso give
s e u l
c tot her eade raboutt hepersonaltiyoft hecharacte.r
. 2 . 1 .
2 Theoryo fPersonaltiy
’ n h o J e h t t u o g n ir u g if n i p l e h o t d e s u o s l a e r a y ti l a n o s r e p f o s e ir o e h t e h
T s
e h T . l e v o n e h t n i y ti l a n o s r e
p eth ory o fpersonaltiy provide saway o forganizing
f , e l p o e p f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h
t o rexamplehowt heperson shape shi sbehavio rand
s i t i d n i h e b e c r o f c i m a n y d e n O . s n o it p e c r e p e v it c e j b u s s i h n o d e s a b y ti l a n o s r e p n i v ir t s e h
t gf ors ucces sands upeirortiy.
e h T . s e ir o e h t y ti l a n o s r e p y n a f o s e s o p r u p e e r h t e r a e r e h t t a h t s d d a u a h c s s a K s n o s r e p e m o s y h w , r e h t e g o t o g s ti a rt n i a tr e c r e h t e h w e n i m r e t e d o t s i e s o p r u p t s ri f i b i h x e t h g i m n o s r e p a y h w d n a , t o n o d s r e h t o d n a s ti a rt e m o s e v a
h tdfiferen t rtati s
g n o m a s e c n e r e f fi d e h t n i a l p x e o t s i e s o p r u p d n o c e s e h T . s n o it a u ti s t n e r e f fi d n
i s t
s e v il r i e h t t c u d n o c e l p o e p w o h e r o l p x e o t s i e s o p r u p t s a l e h T . s l a u d i v i d n i . p , 5 9 9 1 , u a h c s s a K
( 268 .)
e h t n
I eth ory o fpersonaltiy, t he study also ifnds at th Freud’ s theory abou t
, d
i e goands uperegoarealsoi mpo tran ttobediscussed .Theids ervest hepleasure
f o g n i k n i h t t u o h ti w e k il y e h t t a h w g n i o d s i n o s r e p a t a h t s n a e m d i e h T . e l p i c n ir p y b d e n r e v o g s i o g E . s t c e p s a l a r o m d n a y ti l a e r e h
t therealtiy p irnciple .Ego i st he
t a h t y ti l a n o s r e p e h t f o t c e p s a l a n o it a
r d irve saperson t oplacet hei rdesrie i(d )and
y ti l a e r e h t o t ) o g e r e p u s ( l a r o m e h
e fi l f o n o it c e f r e p e h t o t e n o e m o s d a e l t h g i m o g e r e p u S . e l p i c n ir p c it s il a e d
i .Mature
d n a d i ri e h t e c n a l a b o t e l b a e b l li w e l p o e
p superego (Feis tJ .& Feis tG. .J ,2009 ,
p
p . 72 - )31 .Mature person could balance t heri srtucture sof t hemind ,wtih t hei r
( o g e r e p u s d n a d i ri e h t g n il l o rt n o c o g
e FeistJ .&Feis tG. .J ,2009 ,p. )4 . 6
t n e r e f fi
D fromFreud’st heoryo fpersonaltiy ,A dl eiranTheoryexplainst ha t
r o f g n i v ir t s s i h d n a e v it c e p s r e p l a i c o s y b d e c n e u lf n i e b t h g i m y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ e n o
fl e s s i y ti l a n o s r e p a t a h t s e v e il e b o s l a r e d l A . s s e c c u s f o y ti r o ir e p u
s -consisten t
s r e p a t a h t s n a e
m on hasl arger esponsiblitiy f o rhi spersonaltiy .Peopleshould be
m o r f t n e r e f fi D . ll e w s a t i g n i o d f o n o s a e r e h t d n a g n i o d e r a y e h t t a h w t u o b a e r a w a
r e d l A , e c n e ir e p x e t s a p e h t y b d e s u a c s i r o i v a h e b t n e s e r p t a h t e v it c e p s r e p s ’ d u e r F
a h e b t n e s e r p t a h t e v e il e
b viori sshapedbyt heviewoft hef uturewhich i st ostirve
u s r o y ti r o ir e p u s e h
t cces s(Feis t .J & Feis tG. .J, 2009 ,p. 56 - )6 . 6
. 3 . 1 .
2 Theoryo fMo itva iton
. p , 0 1 0 2 , .l a t e y a u G ( r o i v a h e b g n i y lr e d n u s n o s a e r e h t o t s r e f e r n o it a v it o M
. ) 2 1
7 According to Broussard, Gredler and Garirson (2004 )moitvaiton i st he
. p ( g n i h t e m o s o d o t t o n r o o d o t e n o e m o s s e v o m t a h t e t u b ir tt
a 106 .) Abram sand
m a h p r a
H (2009) also state tha tmoitvaiton i sthe ground so fthe characters ’
s n o it c a d n a h c e e p s ri e h t n i e r u t a n l a r o m d n a s e ri s e d , t n e m a r e p m e
t (p .42).
c c
A ording to Hufman ,Vernoy .M and Verno .J y (2000) ,there are two
t n i : n o it a v it o m f o s d n i
k irnsicandext irnsicmoitvaiton.I ntirnsicmoitvaitonmean s
r e p o t e ri s e d e h
t formanactf o rti sownsake .Fo rexample ,someoner eadsl tierary
a t e g o t s d e e n r e h r o s i h r o f t o n , e r u s a e l p d n a t s e r e t n i n w o r e h r o s i h r o f s k o o b
t s n a e m n o it a v it o m c i s n ir t x E . d r a w e
e c n a d i o v a r o s d r a w e r l a n r e t x
e o fpunishment .Fo rexample ,astuden tstudie shard
. r e h c a e t r e h r o s i h m o r f e d a r g d o o g d n a d r a w e r a t e g o t r e d r o n i , s d e e n y t e f a s , s d e e n l a c i g o l o h c y s p f o s t s i s n o c s d e e n f o y h c r a r e i h s ' w o l s a M fl e s d n a , s d e e n m e e t s e , s d e e n e v o l d n a g n i g n o l e
b -actuailzaiton needs .The fris t
r e w o l r o y r a m ir p d e r e d i s n o c e r a s d e e n o w
t -orde rneeds; t heremaining t hree are
r e h g i h r o y r a d n o c e
s -orde rneeds(Lahey ,2009 ,p . 3p 3 -7 374).
, g n i h t o l c , d o o f r o f s d e e n l a t n e m a d n u f e h t e r a s d e e n l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h T fl e s d n a , tr o f m o c , r e tl e h
s - spre ervaiton .Someone who face sdeath because of
d e e n r e h t o y n a r o n o it a v r a t
s s o f thi s leve l may resor t to murde r to mee t
e fi l ,l a t n e m a d n u
f -sustainingneed ,desptiewhats ocietymightt hink.
n a m r a h y li d o b d i o v a o t s d e e n e h t e r a s d e e n y t e f a s e h
T d unce traintyabou t
t s o m l a s i y d e g a rt t a e r g a f i s a s e v a h e b n o s r e p e r u c e s n i n A . g n i e b l l e w s 'e n o s e ir t d n a , y ti li b a t s d n a r e d r o r o f d e e n r e v o n a s a h n o s r e p s i h T . g n i d n e p m i s y a w l a . d e t c e p x e n u e h t d n a e g n a rt s e h t d i o v a o t d r a h d e e n e v o l d n a g n i g n o l e b e h t e r a s d e e n t x e n e h
T s .Love need sare about a
y h tl a e
h -loving relaitonship between two people which include smutua l rtust .In
e h T . s e s n e f e d f o g n i p p o r d d n a r a e f f o k c a l e r a e r e h t , p i h s n o it a l e r r e p o r p e h t e h T . l a it n e t o p f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t d n a h t w o r g e lf it s ll i w e v o l f o e c n e s b
a thwaritng
a s i r e g n u h e v o L . t n e m t s u j d a l a m f o e s u a c e m ir p a s a d e r e d i s n o c s i s d e e n e v o l f o . e s a e s i d y c n e i c if e d a h s d e e n m e e t s e e h
T v e two catego ires ,they are sefl-esteem and respec t
. e l p o e p r e h t o m o r
f The se -fl esteem need scomp irse such need sa sdesrie sfo r
m o d e e r
f .Respec tfrom othe rpeople need senclose such concept sa spresitge ,
. n o it a i c e r p p a d n a , n o it a t u p e r ,s u t a t s n o it n e tt a , e c n a t p e c c a , n o it i n g o c e r
fl e s e h
T -actuailzaitonneed saredescirbedast hedesriet obecomemoreand
o e l b a p a c s i e n o t a h t g n i h t y r e v e e m o c e b o t ,s i e n o t a h w e r o
m r becoming .These
, t n e m p o l e v e d , h t w o r g o t s d e e n l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t f o n o it a c if it n e d i e h t e r a s d e e n
o p f o n o it a z il it u d n
a tenital .Theseneed salso appea ratfe rreasonablesaitsfaciton
s d e e n m e e t s e d n a e v o l f
o .
e h t r e w s n a d n a e z y l a n a o t d e s u e r a e v o b a s e ir o e h t e h
T research problems
f o y r o e h t d n a n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h T . e r o f e b d e t a t s n e e b e v a h h c i h w
o t d e s u e r a y ti l a n o s r e
p ifgureoutt hecharacteirsitcs o fJohn ast hemaincharacte r
v o n s i h t n
i el .Thet heory o fcharacteirzaitoni sused t o ifnd outt hecharacteirsitc s
s a d e s u e b l li w y ti l a n o s r e p f o y r o e h T . n h o J f
o et h supporitng t heory which may
h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i e m o s d d
a e characteirsitc o fJohn psychologically because
. e l p o e p f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z i n a g r o f o y a w a s e d i v o r p y ti l a n o s r e p f o y r o e h t
h
T eset heo ire smay help i n analyzing thenove land answeri ng thefris tproblem.
n i h t e h t w o n k o t d e s u s i n o it a v it o m f o y r o e h
T gst ha tmoitvatesomeonet o decide
n h o J y h w n o s a e r e h t t u o e r u g if o t d e s u s i y r o e h t e h t , y d u t s s i h t n I . g n i h t e m o s
d n a h a n n a v a S o t y e n o m e h t e v i g o t s e d i c e
d leave her .Thi stheory i sused to
m e l b o r p d n o c e s e h t r e w s n
. 2 .
2 Analysis
. 1 . 2 .
2 John’ sCharacterisitc sasseeni nNichola sSparks ’Dea rJohn
n a c e w , e v o b a
