• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Staff Site Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Staff Site Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta"

Copied!
21
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Meeting II

Meeting II

Language and Society

Language and Society

(2)

Sociolinguistics

Sociolinguistics

 Study the relationship between language and society.Study the relationship between language and society.

1.

1. explaining why we speak differently in different social explaining why we speak differently in different social contexts

contexts

2. identifying the social functions of language and the 2. identifying the social functions of language and the

ways it is

ways it is used to convey social meaning.used to convey social meaning.

 An attempt to find correlations between social structure and An attempt to find correlations between social structure and

linguistic structure and to observe any changes that occur linguistic structure and to observe any changes that occur

(Gumpers, 1971: 223) (Gumpers, 1971: 223)

 Language and society Language and society → intertwined → impossible to → intertwined → impossible to

understand one without the other. understand one without the other.

(3)

Sociolinguistics vs. the Sociology of

Sociolinguistics vs. the Sociology of

language

language

 SociolinguisticsSociolinguistics

investigating the relationships between language

investigating the relationships between language

and society with the goal of a better

and society with the goal of a better

understanding of the structure of language and

understanding of the structure of language and

of how languages function in communication

of how languages function in communication

 Sociology of languageSociology of language

to discover how social structure can be better

to discover how social structure can be better

understood through the study of language, e.g.

understood through the study of language, e.g.

how certain linguistic features serve to

how certain linguistic features serve to

characterize particular social arrangement

(4)

Sociolinguistics vs. the Sociology of

Sociolinguistics vs. the Sociology of

language

language

Hudson, 1980: 4-5

Hudson, 1980: 4-5

a.

a.

Sociolinguistics is the study of language

Sociolinguistics is the study of language

in relation to society’,

in relation to society’,

b.

b.

Sociology of language: the study of

Sociology of language: the study of

society in relation to language

society in relation to language

Similarity:

Similarity:

a. Both require systematic study of

a. Both require systematic study of

(5)

The relationship between language

The relationship between language

and society

and society

(wardaugh, : 10)(wardaugh, : 10)

1.

1. Social structure Social structure → linguistic structure and/or behavior → linguistic structure and/or behavior

a. age-grading phenomenon

a. age-grading phenomenon

young children speak differently from older

young children speak differently from older

children and in

children and in turn, children speak differently turn, children speak differently from mature adults.

from mature adults.

b. studies → the varieties of language that speakers

b. studies → the varieties of language that speakers

use reflect

use reflect such matters; their regional, social, such matters; their regional, social, or ethnic origin and possible sex.

or ethnic origin and possible sex.

c. other studies → particular ways of speaking,

c. other studies → particular ways of speaking,

choices of words,

choices of words, and rules for conversing and rules for conversing are are determined by

(6)

The relationship between

The relationship between

language and society

language and society

(wardaugh, : 10)(wardaugh, : 10)

2. Linguistic structure and/or behavior may

2. Linguistic structure and/or behavior may

either influence or determine social structure

either influence or determine social structure

(behind Whorfian hypothesis)

(behind Whorfian hypothesis)

3. The influence is bi-directional; language and

3. The influence is bi-directional; language and

society may influence each other.

society may influence each other.

4. There is no relationship at all.

(7)

Social factors

Social factors

 The participantsThe participants

Who is talking to whom (wife-husband, customer-shopkeeper,

Who is talking to whom (wife-husband, customer-shopkeeper,

boss-worker)

boss-worker)

 The social setting and function of interactionThe social setting and function of interaction e.g. home, work, school

e.g. home, work, school

 The aim or purpose of the interactionThe aim or purpose of the interaction (informative, social)

(informative, social)

(8)

Example I

Example I

Ray

Ray

: Hi mum.

: Hi mum.

Mum

Mum

: Hi. You’re late.

: Hi. You’re late.

Ray

Ray

: Yeah, that bastard Sootbucket kept us in

: Yeah, that bastard Sootbucket kept us in

again.

again.

Mum

Mum

: Nana’s here.

: Nana’s here.

Ray

(9)

Analysis I

Analysis I

Language serves a range of functions; to

Language serves a range of functions; to

ask for and give people information, to

ask for and give people information, to

express indignation and annoyance, as

express indignation and annoyance, as

(10)

Example II

Example II

Ray

Ray

: Good afternoon, sir.

: Good afternoon, sir.

Principle

Principle

: What are you doing here at this

: What are you doing here at this

time?

time?

Ray

Ray

: Mr. Sutton kept us in, sir.

: Mr. Sutton kept us in, sir.

(11)

Example III

Example III

 Every afternoon my friend packs her bag and Every afternoon my friend packs her bag and leaves her Cardiff office at about 5 o’clock. As

leaves her Cardiff office at about 5 o’clock. As

she leaves, her business partner says

she leaves, her business partner says goodbye goodbye Margaret

Margaret, (she replies goodbye Mike) her , (she replies goodbye Mike) her secretary says

secretary says goodbye Ms Walkergoodbye Ms Walker, (she replies , (she replies goodbye Jill) and the caretaker says

goodbye Jill) and the caretaker says Bye Mrs. Bye Mrs. Walker

Walker (to which she responds goodbye Andy). (to which she responds goodbye Andy). As she arrives home she is greeted by

As she arrives home she is greeted by Hi mumHi mum from her son, Jamie,

from her son, Jamie, hello dear, have a good hello dear, have a good day

day?, from her mother, and simply ?, from her mother, and simply you’re late you’re late again! from her husband.

(12)

Example III

Example III

Later in the evening the president of the

Later in the evening the president of the

local flower club calls to ask if she would

local flower club calls to ask if she would

like to join.

like to join.

Good evening, is that Mrs.

Good evening, is that Mrs.

Billington?

Billington?

she asks.

she asks.

No, it’s Ms Walker,

No, it’s Ms Walker,

but my husband’s name is David

but my husband’s name is David

Billington

Billington

, she answers. What can I do for

, she answers. What can I do for

you? Finally a friend calls

you? Finally a friend calls

Boradar Meg,

Boradar Meg,

how’s thing?

(13)

Example IV

Example IV

Sam

Sam

: You seen our ‘enry’s new ‘ouse

: You seen our ‘enry’s new ‘ouse

yet? It’s in ‘alton you know.

yet? It’s in ‘alton you know.

Jim

Jim

: I have indeed. I could hardly

: I have indeed. I could hardly

miss it Sam. Your Henry now

miss it Sam. Your Henry now

owns the biggest house in Halton.

owns the biggest house in Halton.

It illustrated a range of social influences on

It illustrated a range of social influences on

(14)

Social dimensions

Social dimensions

A Social distance scale

A Social distance scale

concerned with

concerned with

participant relationship

participant relationship

A status scale

A status scale

concerned with participant

concerned with participant

relationship

relationship

A formality scale

A formality scale

relating to the setting or

relating to the setting or

type of interaction

type of interaction

Two functional scales

Two functional scales

relating to the

relating to the

purposes or topic of interaction

(15)

The solidarity – social distance

The solidarity – social distance

scale

scale

Intimate

Intimate DistantDistant

High solidarity

High solidarity Low solidarityLow solidarity

The scale is useful in emphasizing that how well

The scale is useful in emphasizing that how well

we know someone is a relevant factor in

we know someone is a relevant factor in

linguistic choice.

linguistic choice.

e.g. meg vs. Mrs. Belington

(16)

The status scale

The status scale

Superior

Superior

high status

high status

Subordinate

Subordinate

low status

low status

e.g.

e.g.

1.

1.

The use of ‘sir’, ‘Mrs.’, to the lecturer by the

The use of ‘sir’, ‘Mrs.’, to the lecturer by the

students

students

The

(17)

The formality scale

The formality scale

Formal

FormalHigh formalityHigh formality

Informal

Informal Low FormalityLow Formality

1.

1. Useful in assessing the influence of social setting Useful in assessing the influence of social setting

or type of interaction on language choice.

or type of interaction on language choice.

2.

2. Often degrees of formality are largely determined Often degrees of formality are largely determined

by solidarity and status relationship. But not

by solidarity and status relationship. But not

always.

(18)

The referential and affective

The referential and affective

function scales

function scales

Referential Referential

High

High lowlow

Information

Information informationinformation

Content

Content contentcontent

affective affective Low

Low highhigh

Affective

Affective affectiveaffective

Content

(19)

The referential and affective

The referential and affective

function scales

function scales

1. The more referentially oriented an

1. The more referentially oriented an

interaction is, the less it tends to express

interaction is, the less it tends to express

(20)

 Chaika ( 1988, 10)Chaika ( 1988, 10)

the context determines meaning,

the context determines meaning,

1. the social status of speakers

1. the social status of speakers

2. the speech event and social conventions

2. the speech event and social conventions

governing it;

governing it;

3. the social-cultural and physical environment

3. the social-cultural and physical environment

4. previous discourse between the speakers or

4. previous discourse between the speakers or

known to them

known to them

5. the intent of the speaker.

(21)

Conclusion

Conclusion

Our word choices depend on who we are

Our word choices depend on who we are

talking to.

talking to.

Language choices convey information

Language choices convey information

about the social relationships between

about the social relationships between

people as well as about the topic of

people as well as about the topic of

discussion.

discussion.

Linguistic variation occurs at other levels

Linguistic variation occurs at other levels

of linguistic analysis: sounds,

of linguistic analysis: sounds,

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Social psychology focuses on the behavior of individuals, and seeks to understand the causes of social behavior and thought, which can involve the behavior and appearance of

Social psychology focuses on the behavior of individuals, and seeks to understand the causes of social behavior and thought, which can involve the behavior and appearance of

Examples: philos (Greek meaning ‘love’), annus (Latin meaning ‘year’), visus (Latin

At the end of the course, students are expected to be able to attempt a good translation from English into Bahasa Indonesia and from Bahasa Indonesia into English at the level

lexical meaning while grammatical morphemes and function words express grammatical meaning...  Free morphemes … which can

This course provides an introductory study on meaning in language, covering such topics as proposition, reference, universe of discourse, definiteness, ambiguity, sameness

Semantics provides an introductory study on meaning in language with a focus on English, covering such topics as propositions, referring expressions, universes of discourse,

tourism promotion are those which attempt to match the pull factors of the destination with the push factors in the client (matching supply.  and demand, including  target