• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

meeting 12 Validity reliability and classical assumptions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "meeting 12 Validity reliability and classical assumptions"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Validity, Reliability and

Classical Assumptions

P

t d b

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Presented by

Mahendra AN

Sources: www-psych.stanford.edu/~bigopp/validity.ppt http://ets.mnsu.edu/darbok/ETHN402-502/RELIABILITY.ppt http://5martconsultingbandung.blogspot.com/2011/01/uji-asumsi-klasik.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heteroscedasticity

Gujarati, D. (2004), Basic Econometrics,

R. Gunawan Sudarmanto, (2005) Alaisis Regresi Linear Ganda dengan SPSS, Graha ilmu, Yogyakarta

Data Quality Tests: Validity and

Reliability

• Reliability: the degree to which a

measurement procedure produces similar

outcomes when it is repeated.

• E.g., gender, birthplace, mother’s name—

should be the same always—

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

should be the same always

• Validity: tests for determining whether a

measure is measuring the concept that

the researcher thinks is being measured,

• i.e., “Am I measuring what I think I am

measuring”?

Goodness Reliability Validity Stability Consistency Test-retest reliability Pararel Form reliability Interitem consis Tency reliability

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Split half Content Validity Face Validity Criteria validity Predictive validity Concurrent Validity Construct validity Convergent validity Discriminant validity Internal Validity External Validity

External Validity

• External validity is reached if data can be

generalized in all different objects, time

and situations.

1 Unbiased sample

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

1. Unbiased sample

2. Big sample size

3. Involve various situations

4. Relatively long time period

Internal Validity

• Internal validity is talking about actual

concept of research.

1. Content Validity

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

2. Criterion-related validity

3. Construct validity

• Generally internal validity is helping fixing

external validity

Content validity

• Face Validity

• “On its face" does it seems like a good

translation of the construct.

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

– Weak Version: If you read it does it appear to

ask questions directed at the concept.

– Strong Version: If experts in that domain

(2)

Criterion-related validity

• Measuring individual differences base on

the criteria.

Concurrent Validity Assess the operationalization's

ability to distinguish between groups that it should

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

theoretically be able to distinguish between. Measured

by low correlation coefficient between groups.

Predictive Validity Assess the operationalization'sability

to predict something it should theoretically be able to

predict. Measured by high correlation coefficient

between groups.

Construct validity

Showing goodness of instrument in translating

the theory.

Convergent validity happens if two instrument

that measure a concept have high correlation

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

that measure a concept have high correlation.

Discriminant validity happens if theoretically two

variables have not correlations and in fact the

correlation is not exist. Tested by factor analysis

.

RELIABILITY

1. Stability

• Parallel form

Giving respondent questions in different formats. Is the train ticket not expensive?

• Double test / test pretest

giving same question to same respondent in the different

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

giving same question to same respondent in the different time

2. Consistency

2.1. Inter-item consistency, is consistency of respondent answer on all of questionnaire instrumentest.

2.2. Split-half reliability, showing correlation between two part of questionnaire

Reliable Not Valid

Valid Not Reliable

Neither Reliable Not

Valid

Both Reliable and

Valid

Validity and Reliability test

Validity test is done by correlating item score

with total score.

• Rank Spearman correlation for ordinal data and

product moment correlation for interval data

product moment correlation for interval data

• Reliability is generally measured by Cronbach

Alpha, Hoyt dan Spearman Brown tests.

Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7 is reliable

Note:

• a valid test is always reliable but a reliable

test is not necessarily valid

e g meas re concepts positi ism instead

• e.g., measure concepts--positivism instead

measuring nouns—invalid

• Reliability is much easier to assess than

(3)

Classical Assumptions Test

Classical assumptions test are requirement tests

for multiple linear regression that use Ordinary

Least Square (OLS) techniques.

• Logistic and ordinal regression techniques don’t

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Logistic and ordinal regression techniques don t

need Classical assumption test.

Classical assumptions test isn’t needed in linear

regression that use to count a value in a

variable. For example, counting stock return use

market model.

5 Types Test

1. Normality

2. Multicolinearity

3. Autocorrelation

4. Heteroskedacity

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

4. Heteroskedacity

5. Linearity

There is no rules that states witch assumption

that should be fulfilled first

.

1. Normality

• Normality is test to know sample data

distribution is come from population that is

normal distributed or not.

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Central limit theorem said that big sample

size (>25) tend to be normal distributed.

Population research don’t need normality

test.

Detecting Data Normality

• Graph techniques (Histogram, P Plot)

• Chi Square

• Skewness and Kurtosis

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Lilefors test

• Kolmogorov Smirnov

Î

most common

use. Criteria: Asymp. Sig (2 talied) > Alpha

Remedial Un-normal Data

• Data transformation (Log Natural, square

root, inverse, etc.)

• Outliers trimming

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Adding sample

2. Multicoliearity

Multicolinerity test is used to knowing high correlation

between independent variable in multiple linear

regression test.

High colinearity between independent variables will

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

disturb relationship between independent and dependent

variable.

Simple linear regression isn’t need multicolinearity test.

Multicolinearity test couldn’t be performed if the

(4)

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Detecting Multiclolinearity

• Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) > 10

• Pearson correlation between variables

(criteria: sig < Alpha)

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Eigen values

• Condition Indexes (CI)

Remedial Multicolinarity

Variables

Combining cross-sectional and time series data

Dropping a variable(s) and specification bias

Transformation of variables (Log Natural, square

root in erse etc )

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

root, inverse, etc.)

Additional or new data

3. Autocorrelation

• Autocorrelation test to knowing whether

any correlation between variables in t

period with variables in prior period (t-1)

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Autocorrelation test is performed for time

series data not for cross sectional data.

Detecting Autocorrelation

• Graphical Method

• The Runs Test

• Durbin Watson Test ( 2< D W value

• Durbin-Watson Test (-2< D-W value

>+2)

(5)

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Remedial Autocorrelation

Variables

• Data transformation

• Transforming regression into generalized

difference equation

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

4. Heteroskedacity

• Heteroskedacity test is a test to indentify

variance differences from residual in an

observation with other observations.

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Regression model should have residual

variance similarity between a odservation

whith oter observation (homoskedastic).

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Detecting Heteroskedacity

• Graph techniques (scater plot)

• Glejser test

• Park test

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• White test

• Corelation spearman of residual (sig >

alpha)

(6)

Remedial of Heteroskedacity

• Data transformation (Log Natural, square

root, inverse, etc.)

• Outliers trimming

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

5. Linearity

• Linearity test to knowing whether the

model that had been built is linear or isn’t

linear.

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• This test is the most rare did in research

because researchers built the model base

on theories. That mean the model had

been built already linear.

Detecting Linearity

• ANOVA linearity test significance value of

F value (criteria: Deviation from linearity >

alpha)

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

• Durbin-Watson

• Ramsey Test

• Lagrange Multiplier

Ridho Allah, keberuntungan dan keberhasilan

Akan selalu melekat pada orang yang selau

berjuang dan bersyukur

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Methods: A cross-sectional psychometric validation study was performed to assess the internal consistency, reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of THI in

The percentage was calculated using the following formula: Notes: Nm : Number of items N : Total question items Each kind of the validity was analyzed as follows: Content Validity

Octo- Continue Table 2: Content validity ratio CVR of all areas and questions of final questionnaire to study knowledge, attitude and practice of women regarding cervical cancer and

Table 2Initial version of Evidence Utilisation in Policymaking Measurement Tool # Question Construct Validity & reliabilitya 1 Recall the last policy brief to which you contributed

321 RELIABILITY AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY EVIDENCE OF STANDING LONG JUMP SLJ AMONG STUDENTS WHO HAVE VISUAL DISABILITIES Nagoor Meera Abdullah1, Mawarni Mohamed2, Mohamad Nizam

Abstract AIM: The aim of the study is to analyze the internal consistency; validity and factor structure of the twelve item General Health Questionnaire for the Macedonian general

Terms to Know 4/5ths rule 163 affirmative action 151 bona fide occupational qualification BFOQ 161 business necessity 161 concurrent validity 167 construct validity 168 content

Validity Test Results of Kalisari Village Cadastral Map Content No Tested Cadastral Map Content Validity Score Category 1 Location of land parcel in the village 0.631 moderately high