•
DespitethecommitmentoftheRoyalThaiGovernment(RTG)topromotegenderequality,women’s
decision-makingandrepresentationinleadershippositionsintheforestrysectorremainextremely
low.
•
Evidence-based research and gender-disaggregated statistics in forestry are needed to enhance
understanding of the diversity of forest-dependent communities and women’s concerns and
priorities.
•
Thetechnicalcapacityofforestryoficials,includingdecision-makers,ongenderanalysismustbe
developedtopromotegendermainstreaminginforestry.
Key messages
Policy brief
Understanding women’s participation in
forestry in Thailand
Gender and forests in a changing landscape
Photo by Ratchada Arpornsilp
Background
AsasignatorytovarioushumanrightsconventionssuchastheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscrimination AgainstWomen(CEDAW),theUNDeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoples(UNDRIP)andtheBeijingDeclaration and Platform for Action, Thailand has undertaken various initiatives to promote gender equality across all sectors. For example, the Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012-2016) is a departure from the previous growth-oriented approach to more of a people-centred development approach. This plan has prioritized promotion of women’sparticipationindecision-makingprocessesatsubnationalandnationallevelsforgreatercontributiontonational socio-economicdevelopment.TheOficeofWomen’sAffairsandFamilyDevelopmentoftheMinistryofSocialDevelopment andHumanSecurity1ismandatedtopromotegenderequalityandwomen’sempowermentthroughitsive-yearlyNational Women’sDevelopmentPlans(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
MenandwomeninThailandhavedistinctroles,skillsandknowledgeinrelationtoforestry.Womengenerallyfocusmoreon protectingtraditionalknowledge,forestritualsandkeepingrecordsofcustomarylawsonforestprotectionandconservation (Box1).Morethan60percentofforest-dependentwomengathernon-woodforestproducts(NWFPs)forsubsistenceand sale(KanjanandKaewchote2004;Upadhyayetal.2013).Men,ontheotherhand,generallyenforcewrittenagreements andlawsthatpertaintologgingandforestpatrolling,andtendtodominatedecision-makingprocessesconcerningthe managementofforestsandforestresources.
Duetowomen’srelianceonforests,primarilyforsubsistence,theirrightsandresponsibilitiesinforestmanagementand protectionhaveoftenbeenperceivedassecondarytothoseofmen.Womenarerarelyacceptedasprogrammeandield teamleadersatthesubnationallevelandinexecutivepositionsinforestryinstitutionsatthenationallevel.Asaresult, womenareunder-representedindecision-makinginforestryplanningandmanagementatbothlevels.Thisiscompounded byinadequateevidence-basedresearchanddatacollectiononwomen’scontributionstosustainableforestmanagement, whichinhibitsinformedgender-inclusiveforestpolicyplanningandformulation(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).
ThisbriefdiscusseshowgenderperspectivesarebeingintegratedinThailand’sforestpoliciesandlawsintermsofwomen’s representation,participation,accesstoanddecision-makinginforestuseandmanagement.Ithighlightskeychallengesand offersrecommendationsforfurtherpromotionofgendermainstreaminginforestry.
1Asthenationalinstrumentforwomen’swelfare,theoficepromotesthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,genderequalityandthestrengthofthe familyinstitution.Italsodevelopspolicies,measuresandmechanismstopromoteandsupportotherunitsinthepublicandprivatesectorstoimplement policiesonthedevelopmentofwomen’scapacity,theprotectionofwomen’srightsandthepromotionofgenderequalityandsocialjustice.
Box 1. Capacity development for women forest users
Gender concerns in forest policies
FollowingthedevastatinglashloodsinSouthernThailandin1988andrealizingtheimpactofincreasingdeforestation anddegradation,theRTGenforcedanationwideloggingbanin1989.Sincethen,overhalfofthecountry’s19millionha offoresthasbeendesignatedasprotectedforest,coveringaroundone-ifthofthetotallandarea(RECOFTC2013).Laws governingnationalparksandwildlifesanctuaries,suchastheNationalParkAct,havemadeitillegaltoharvesttimberor evenNWFPsfromforests.Thishasaffectedforest-dependentcommunitiesadverselyastheyareunabletoaccesswhathad previouslysupportedtheirlivelihoods.
TheprovisionsoftheNationalForestPolicyNo.18(1985),theForestAct(1941),theNationalForestReserveAct(1964),the ForestPlantationAct(1992)andtheNationalParkAct(1961)havefocusedontheprotectionandpreservationofnatural resourcesandprohibittheircollectionandexploitationforthedirectorindirectbeneitofthestateorlocalcommunities.As womenaretheprimaryusersofNWFPsforbothsubsistenceandincomegeneration,theserestrictionshaveaffectedtheir consumptionpatternsandlivelihoodsconsiderably.
TheRTGsubsequentlybegansupportingincreaseddevolutionfollowingthe1998CabinetResolution,whichallowedlocal communitiestouseforestsfortheirlivelihoodsandliveinsidenationalparks.TheDecentralizationAct(1999)enabledlocal governmentunitstofacilitatelocalpeople’sengagementinnaturalresourcemanagement,includingforestry,byfacilitating development of management plans, access to resources and networking. As a result, the Royal Forest Department was successfulinformallyregisteringapproximately7000communityforestrysitesoutsideprotectedareasby2010(RECOFTC 2013).
Thailand’s Constitution enshrines the rights of local communities in policy planning on environmental development and conservation,includingwomen’sparticipation(SOHR2007).Buttherecognitionofgenderrightsandresponsibilitiesand women’sparticipationandrepresentationaskeystakeholdersinforestmanagementanddecision-makingremainabsent inforestlawsandacts(AlizaiandApipoonyanon2013).TomainstreamgenderfurtherinThaiforestpoliciesandpractices, moreeffortsareneededtoaddressthefollowingkeychallenges:
• Forestlawsandregulationspresumeforestcommunitiesashomogenoussocialentitiesanddonottakeintoaccountthe rightsofmenandwomenandtheirdifferentresponsibilities.
• Womenareunder-representedindecision-makingandinleadershiprolesatnationalandsubnationallevelsinforestry institutions.
Moving forward
• Convenedialoguesandconsultationmeetingsatnationalandsubnationallevelsfortheinclusionofwomen’sconcerns inforestry-relatedlegalinstrumentsandmeasures;reviewexistingforestplansandprogrammestomakethemmore gender-sensitiveandtopromotegenderequality.
• Strengthenthesustainedengagementofcivilsocietyorganizationsinnationalconsultationstohelpensuredevelopment andimplementationofgender-responsiveforestplansandprogrammes.
• Developthetechnicalcapacitiesofforestoficialsongenderanalysistoenablethemtofacilitatetheinvolvementof womeninforestry-relatedplanning.
• Anappropriatemechanismisrequiredtocollectgender-disaggregateddataaslackofevidence-baseddataongenderin forestryimpedesinformedpolicyplanning.Thiscanbedonebyinvestinginresearchandcreatingagender-disaggregated databasetofacilitatebetterknowledgegenerationongenderconcernsandprioritiesinforestry.
References
Alizai, A. & Apipoonyanon, C. 2013.Assessing the integration of gender perspectives into Thai national forest policy.
Bangkok.Unpublished.
Kanjan,C.&Kaewchote,J.2004.Communities for watershed protection: Mae Khan, Thailand.Manila,AsiaForestNetwork. SecretariatoftheHouseofRepresentatives(SOHR).2007.The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand.Bangkok,SOHR.
Availableat,www.senate.go.th/th_senate/English/constitution2007.pdf).
TheCenterforPeopleandForests(RECOFTC).2013.Community forestry in Thailand.Bangkok,RECOFTC.Availableat,
http://www.recoftc.org/country/thailand/basic-page/community-forestry-thailand)
Upadhyay,B.,Arpornsilp,R.&Soontornwong,S.2013.Gender and community forests in a changing landscape: Lessons
from Ban Thung Yao, Thailand.Bangkok,RECOFTC.
Thisbriefispartofaprojectentitled‘MainstreamingGenderIssuesintoForestPoliciesofDevelopingAsia-PaciicForestryCommission