• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION-S2.doc

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION-S2.doc"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION Nama mata kuliah: Philosophical Foundations of Language and Education Kode Mata kuliah: MKKU IG 600

Jumlah sks: 3 Tujuan:

Upon the completion of this subject, students are expected to

Understand that language is a characteristics of human beings and therefore to know about language is to know something about being human

Look into certain philosophical problems that may arise from false beliefs about the structure of language and to see possibilities in rectifying them through language teaching activities

Exchange ideas and perspectives regarding language which is viewed as a reflection of reality and discuss thouroughlythe validity of understanding the structure of language as the basis to understand the structure of reality.

Deskripsi:

This course introduces basic philosophical foundations of language education covering basic principles of the philosophy of language as they relate to how language is taught and learned. Topics commonly covered in syntax, semantics and pragmatics such as speech acts, reference, and proposition will be dealth with within the framework of such educational issues as curriculum reform, quality and equality, and teacher professionalism. Students taking this course are introduced to the fact that language is a characteristics of human beings and expected to look into certain philosophical problems that may arise from false belief about the structure of language and to see possibilities in rectifying them through selected activities in language teaching and learning.

Sistem penilaian:

Assesment will be based on performances in both mid-term and final exams as well as in accomplishing individual projects (summary of reading tasks, presentation of

assigned topics, paper writing, etc) plus attendance and participation in class discussions. Scoring mechanism will be discussed in the first meeting.

Rincian pertemuan:

(2)

Pertemuan 3: Speech acts

Pertemuan 4: What are schools really like today? Pertemuan 5: Reference and Descripstions Pertemuan 6: What should be taught and how? Pertemuan 7: Names and Demonstrative Pertemuan 8: Young mind at stake

Pertemuan 9: Propositional Attitudes

Pertemuan 10: Can we be excellent and equal, too Pertemuan 11: Possible Worlds and Situations Pertemuan 12: The school in the body politic Pertemuan 13: Metaphor and Private Languages Pertemuan 14: A Synthesis and Summing Up References:

Gross, B. & Gross, R. 1985. The Great School Debate. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Martinich, A.P. (ed.). 1985. The Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rubinstein, J. & Slife Brent D. 1980. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Constroversial Psychological Issues. Guilford, Connecticut: The Dusshkin Publishing Group, Inc. Snyder, Benson R. 1971. The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In this present semester, therefore, she wants to investigate the problems that the student teachers face in doing the teaching practicum, and ultimately find

In this domain, it refers to a means factors which the students have regarding to their speaking skill. These factors come up when the students have problems on their speaking

Concern with the fact, the study tries to investigate whe ther teachers’ perception is aware with the notion of bilingual and multilingual in the view of linguistics,

The study is intended to know the problems in using relative pronouns faced by the tenth grade students of MA Darul ulum Palangka Raya.The sample of this study was

account. 43 ) in this paper, some of the problems faced by the students have been elected and some solutions are suggested in order to assist them to deliver better

Study of the nature of Problem Based Learning PBL The PBL model begins with the fact that many students who graduated are less able to applying the knowledge to solve problems in

The experimental participants were introduced to Peer-Review Technique in essay writing sessions whilst the control group participants were taught through the teacher‟s traditional

With the social competence that is owned and expected by the PAI teacher to be able to overcome the problems experienced by students, namely the lack of good character formation for