IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES USED BY HATERS IN WILL SMITH’S
INSTAGRAM COMMENTS
THESIS
BY
NUR ANGGRE APRILIANI 71190422002
MASTER’S PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF LITERATURE
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN
2022
i
IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES USED BY HATERS IN WILL SMITH’S
INSTAGRAM COMMENTS
THESIS
BY
NUR ANGGRE APRILIANI 71190422002
Submitted to Master’s Program Department of English Literature
Faculty of Literature
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of Magister Sastra in English Literature
Supervisor I, Supervisor II,
DR. M. MANUGEREN, M.A PURWARNO S.S, M.A
Dean of the Faculty, Head of Department,
DR. PURWANTO SIWI, M.A DR. M. MANUGEREN, M.A
MASTER’S PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FACULTY OF LITERATURE
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN
2022
ii
AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT
I, herewith, certify that the thesis entitled IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES USEDBY HATERS IN WILL SMITH’SINSTAGRAM COMMENTS is the
result of my own work and has never been partially or fully submitted for any other graded academic works, professional qualifications or other purposes beyond the Degree of Magister Sastra at Master’s Program in English Literature, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan. All direct or indirect sources are acknowledged as references. Anything pertaining to quotation or computer software application in writing this thesis or any other things tied to Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI)
‘Intellectual Property Rights’ together with its legal consequences likely resulted, is upon my own responsibility.
Medan, July 2022
NUR ANGGRE APRILIANI
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Alhamdulillahirabbil’ aalamiin, praise to Allah swt, The Most Merciful and Most
Gracious and Peace and Prayer be upon His Prophet Muhammad saw. First of all, I would like to extend my everlasting thanks to Allah SWT who has blessed me so I could accomplish my thesis. Then I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr.
Purwanto Siwi, S.S, M.A as the dean of Faculty and my thanks also go to the head of the Department and as my first supervisor Dr. M. Manugeren, M.A for the approval of this thesis and also my second supervisor Purwarno, SS, M.A for the approval of this thesis as well as giving precious suggestions and guidance during the process of the thesis writing. I would also like to extend my deep thanks to all the lecturers who have taught me invaluable knowledge during my study and also to all of department staff who have made me easier in completing this thesis. The greatest and sincerest thanks are fully addressed to my beloved parents Sungkono & Tukinah, husband Jaka Suprapto Putra, S.E, son Kafka Ghani Arjaka, parents in law, my beloved siblings, brothers in law and all my friends, who have patiently given me their wealth, moral and spiritual support, as well as unconditional love. Finally, I hope this thesis will be much useful for the readers as well as next researchers who have special interest in the field of literature. May Allah swt, The Almighty God, bless us all.Aamiin.
Medan, July2022
The writer
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL SHEET ... i
AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT ... ii
ABSTRACT ... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... v
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background ... 1
1.2 Problem Identification ... 5
1.3 Objective ... 6
1.4 Scope ... 6
1.5 Significant ... 6
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Related Theories ... 8
2.2 Psychology of Literature ... 8
2.3 Pragmatic ... 10
2.4 Speech Act ... 12
2.4.1 Locutionary ... 13
2.4.2 Illocutionary... 14
2.4.3 Perlocutionary ... 14
2.5 Impoliteness ... 15
2.6 Impoliteness Strategies ... 17
2.6.1 Bald on Record Impoliteness ... 19
2.6.2 Positive Impoliteness ... 20
2.6.3 Negative Impoliteness ... 21
2.6.4 Sarcasm or Mock ... 22
2.7 Function of Impoliteness ... 23
2.7.1 Affective Impoliteness ... 23
2.7.2 Coercive Impoliteness ... 24
vi
2.7.3 Entertaining Impoliteness ... 24
2.8 Relevant Studies ... 25
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Design ... 27
3.2 Source of Data ... 27
3.3 Data Collecting ... 28
34 Data Analysis ... 29
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS AND FINDING 4.1 Impoliteness Strategies ... 31
4.1.1 Bald on Record Impoliteness ... 34
4.1.2 Positive Impoliteness ... 37
4.1.3 Negative Impoliteness ... 41
4.1.4 Sarcasm or Mock ... 44
4.2 Finding ... 48
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 5.1 Conclusion ... 50
5.2 Recommendation ... 51
REFERENCES ... 53
APPENDIX ... 55
53
REFERENCES
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010).Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed). Belmont: WardsworthCengage Learning.
Ary, et. Al. (2005).Introducion to Research in Education.Wadsworth: Cangege Learning
Austin, J.L. (1975).How to Do Things with Words.Oxford University Press.
Blair, R. (2014). “ Integration of Education: Using Social Media Networks to Engage Students”. Systematics, Cybernetics and Informatics.Vol.12, No. 6.Kaplan University.
Bodgan, C. (1992). Qualitative Research for education, An Introduction to Theory and Method. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon
Bousfield, D. (2008). “Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power”. In: D. Bousfield and M. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–155.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Bousfield, D., &Locher, M.A. (2008).Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349- 367.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 1, 35- 72.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. (2003). Hate Speech riviewed: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects‟.Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545-1579 Cutting, Joan. (2002). Pragmatic and Discourse: A Resource Book for Student.
London: Routledge
Edraswara, Suwardi. (2003). MetodologiPenelitianSastra.Yogyakarta:
PustakaWidyatama.
Freud, Sigmund. (1939). Moses and Monotheism.New York: Vintage
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hardjana, A. (1991). KritikSastra: SebuahPengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia
Instagram. (2014). About us. http://instagram.com/about/us/. Retrieved 17 June 2022 Lakoff.(2016). An Analyzes of gender differences in the use of impoliteness strategies. Retrieved from; https://prezi.com/emtfk4hrnead/an-analysis- ofgender- differences-in-the-use-of-impoliteness/. Retrieved 18 June 2022
Leech, G. (1983).Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness.Oxford University Press.
Levinson, C. (1983). Pragmatics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, C. S. (1987). Politeness: Some universal in language usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2014).Qualitative Data Analysis:
A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Mey Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics.USA:Blackwell
Mey, Jacob. (2003). By Pragmatic: An Introduction, 45. Blackwell
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness (1st ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, S. (2005). Gender and impoliteness.Journal of Politeness Research 1:
263–280.
Miles, B. et.al. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mullary, L. (2008). “Stop hassling me!” Impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional workplace”. In D. Bousfield and M. Locher (eds.).
Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, pp.1,16. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nawawi, Hadari. (1991). MetodePenelitianBidangSosial.Yogyakarta: UGM Press.
Parker, Frank. (1986). Linguistics for Non-Linguistic. London: Taynor& Francis.
Ltd.
Rahardi, Kunjaga. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga
Ratna, NyomanKutha. (2003). ParadigmaSosiologiSastra.Yogyakarta:
PustakaPelajar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge U. Press.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1994).The truth of performatives.International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2(1), pp. 99-107.
Terkourafi, M. (2008).Toward Unified Theory of Politeness and Rudeness. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Wellek, Rena & Austin Warren.(1977). Theory of Literature. London: Pinguin Books, Ltd
Wellek, Rena & Austin Warren.(1990). Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
Yule, G. (1996).Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55 APPENDIX
The Transcription of Comment by Hatrs on Will Smith’s Instagram
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
