Lampiran 1. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian PNS Kabupaten Karo
Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi
Crosstab
Kematangan Pribadi
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 1 2 0 3
Expected Count .3 1.4 1.3 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 7 1 8
Expected Count .8 3.7 3.5 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja .0% 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 2 5 12 19
Expected Count 1.9 8.9 8.2 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 26.3% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 3 14 13 30
Expected Count 3.0 14.0 13.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 10.0% 46.7% 43.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.019a 4 .017
Likelihood Ratio 13.667 4 .008
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.459 1 .019
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,30.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.535 .017
Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab
Tingkat Pendidikan
Total
Rendah Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 1 2 3
Expected Count .5 2.5 3.0
% within Motivasi Kerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 8 8
Expected Count 1.3 6.7 8.0
% within Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 4 15 19
Expected Count 3.2 15.8 19.0
% within Motivasi Kerja 21.1% 78.9% 100.0%
Total Count 5 25 30
Expected Count 5.0 25.0 30.0
% within Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.463a 2 .292
Likelihood Ratio 3.658 2 .161
Linear-by-Linear Association .057 1 .811
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.275 .292
Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab
Kelelahan dan Kebosanan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 0 2 1 3
Expected Count .7 1.9 .4 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Sedang Count 2 6 0 8
Expected Count 1.9 5.1 1.1 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 5 11 3 19
Expected Count 4.4 12.0 2.5 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 57.9% 15.8% 100.0%
Total Count 7 19 4 30
Expected Count 7.0 19.0 4.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 23.3% 63.3% 13.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.101a 4 .541
Likelihood Ratio 4.585 4 .333
Linear-by-Linear Association .394 1 .530
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.306 .541
Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan
Crosstab
Keinginan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count .8 1.7 .5 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 5 1 2 8
Expected Count 2.1 4.5 1.3 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 1 15 3 19
Expected Count 5.1 10.8 3.2 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 5.3% 78.9% 15.8% 100.0%
Total Count 8 17 5 30
Expected Count 8.0 17.0 5.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 26.7% 56.7% 16.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 14.465a 4 .006
Likelihood Ratio 16.098 4 .003
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.318 1 .021
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.570 .006
Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja
Crosstab
Kepuasan Kerja
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count .6 1.3 1.1 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 1 6 1 8
Expected Count 1.6 3.5 2.9 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 75.0% 12.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 3 6 10 19
Expected Count 3.8 8.2 7.0 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 31.6% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count 6 13 11 30
Expected Count 6.0 13.0 11.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 43.3% 36.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.881a 4 .042
Likelihood Ratio 9.795 4 .044
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.343 1 .021
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,60.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency
Coefficient .498 .042
Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi
Crosstab
Kompensasi
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count .5 1.5 1.0 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 1 7 0 8
Expected Count 1.3 4.0 2.7 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 87.5% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 2 7 10 19
Expected Count 3.2 9.5 6.3 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 10.5% 36.8% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count 5 15 10 30
Expected Count 5.0 15.0 10.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.877a 4 .008
Likelihood Ratio 15.015 4 .005
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.175 1 .004
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,50.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.562 .008
Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan
Crosstab
Peraturan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 0 1 2 3
Expected Count .6 .4 2.0 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja .0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Sedang Count 1 1 6 8
Expected Count 1.6 1.1 5.3 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 5 2 12 19
Expected Count 3.8 2.5 12.7 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 6 4 20 30
Expected Count 6.0 4.0 20.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 13.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.339a 4 .674
Likelihood Ratio 2.678 4 .613
Linear-by-Linear Association .673 1 .412
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.269 .674
Lampiran 2. Hasil Uji Chi-Square untuk Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP
Kabupaten Karo
Motivasi Kerja * Kematangan Pribadi
Crosstab
Kematangan Pribadi
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count .5 2.1 .4 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 8 0 8
Expected Count 1.3 5.6 1.1 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 3 12 4 19
Expected Count 3.2 13.3 2.5 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% 100.0%
Total Count 5 21 4 30
Expected Count 5.0 21.0 4.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 16.7% 70.0% 13.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.890a 4 .042
Likelihood Ratio 10.629 4 .031
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.998 1 .083
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.498 .042
Motivasi Kerja * Tingkat Pendidikan Crosstab
Tingkat Pendidikan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 1 0 2 3
Expected Count .6 .2 2.2 3.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 33.3% .0% 66.7% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 0 8 8
Expected Count 1.6 .5 5.9 8.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 5 2 12 19
Expected Count 3.8 1.3 13.9 19.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 6 2 22 30
Expected Count 6.0 2.0 22.0 30.0
% within
Motivasi Kerja 20.0% 6.7% 73.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.466a 4 .347
Likelihood Ratio 6.589 4 .159
Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.360 .347
Motivasi Kerja * Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Crosstab
Kelelahan dan Kebosanan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 0 2 1 3
Expected Count .4 2.1 .5 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Sedang Count 2 6 0 8
Expected Count 1.1 5.6 1.3 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 25.0% 75.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 2 13 4 19
Expected Count 2.5 13.3 3.2 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 10.5% 68.4% 21.1% 100.0%
Total Count 4 21 5 30
Expected Count 4.0 21.0 5.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 13.3% 70.0% 16.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.422a 4 .490
Likelihood Ratio 4.864 4 .302
Linear-by-Linear Association .052 1 .819
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.320 .490
Motivasi Kerja * Keinginan
Crosstab
Keinginan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count .2 1.1 1.7 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 5 3 8
Expected Count .5 2.9 4.5 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 0 5 14 19
Expected Count 1.3 7.0 10.8 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%
Total Count 2 11 17 30
Expected Count 2.0 11.0 17.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 6.7% 36.7% 56.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 23.210a 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 15.912 4 .003
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.985 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.660 .000
Motivasi Kerja * Kepuasan Kerja
Crosstab
Kepuasan Kerja
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 0 3 0 3
Expected Count .4 1.4 1.2 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 6 2 8
Expected Count 1.1 3.7 3.2 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 4 5 10 19
Expected Count 2.5 8.9 7.6 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 21.1% 26.3% 52.6% 100.0%
Total Count 4 14 12 30
Expected Count 4.0 14.0 12.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 13.3% 46.7% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.615a 4 .047
Likelihood Ratio 11.801 4 .019
Linear-by-Linear Association .467 1 .495
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,40.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.493 .047
Motivasi Kerja * Kompensasi
Crosstab
Kompensasi
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 1 2 0 3
Expected Count .1 2.2 .7 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 33.3% 66.7% .0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 8 0 8
Expected Count .3 5.9 1.9 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 0 12 7 19
Expected Count .6 13.9 4.4 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%
Total Count 1 22 7 30
Expected Count 1.0 22.0 7.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 3.3% 73.3% 23.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 14.115a 4 .007
Likelihood Ratio 11.996 4 .017
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.296 1 .007
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,10.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency
Coefficient .566 .007
Motivasi Kerja * Peraturan
Crosstab
Peraturan
Total Rendah Sedang Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja
Rendah Count 0 0 3 3
Expected Count .4 .2 2.4 3.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Sedang Count 0 1 7 8
Expected Count 1.1 .5 6.4 8.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja .0% 12.5% 87.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 4 1 14 19
Expected Count 2.5 1.3 15.2 19.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 21.1% 5.3% 73.7% 100.0%
Total Count 4 2 24 30
Expected Count 4.0 2.0 24.0 30.0
% within Motivasi
Kerja 13.3% 6.7% 80.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.281a 4 .512
Likelihood Ratio 4.729 4 .316
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.974 1 .160
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 7 cells (77,8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,20.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
.314 .512
Lampiran 3. Data Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
1. Data Faktor Kematangan Pribadi Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Gangguan kesehatan
Masa kerja
Ilmu Pengetahuan
Faktor
Lingkungan Pesta Adat Jumlah Score
1. 4 3 3 3 3 16 2
2. 4 3 2 3 5 17 2
3. 4 3 3 4 2 16 2
4. 4 4 3 5 5 21 3
5. 4 4 3 4 2 17 2
6. 5 4 3 4 5 21 3
7. 4 4 2 5 1 16 2
8. 5 4 3 4 3 19 2
9. 3 3 3 3 4 16 2
10. 5 4 3 5 4 21 3
11. 5 3 4 5 4 21 3
12. 4 3 3 3 2 15 1
13. 4 3 2 3 4 16 2
14. 4 4 3 5 1 17 2
15. 4 4 4 5 4 21 3
16. 4 3 3 5 1 16 2
17. 5 4 3 5 4 21 3
18. 4 3 4 5 5 21 3
19. 3 4 4 5 5 21 3
20. 4 4 4 4 3 19 2
21. 4 3 4 5 5 21 3
22. 4 4 4 5 4 21 3
23. 4 3 4 5 5 21 3
24. 4 3 3 3 3 16 2
25. 4 3 2 3 1 13 1
26. 3 3 3 3 2 14 1
27. 4 3 3 4 3 17 2
28. 5 4 3 5 5 22 3
29. 4 3 4 5 5 21 3
30. 4 3 4 5 1 17 2
Score : Rendah = 10-15 Sedang = 16-20
2. Data Faktor Tingkat Pendidikan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan Score
1. 4 3
2. 4 3
3. 4 3
4. 4 3
5. 4 3
6. 4 3
7. 4 3
8. 4 3
9. 1 1
10. 4 3
11. 4 3
12. 4 3
13. 4 3
14. 1 1
15. 4 3
16. 4 3
17. 4 3
18. 5 3
19. 4 3
20. 4 3
21. 4 3
22. 4 3
23. 4 3
24. 2 2
25. 2 2
26. 1 3
27. 1 1
28. 1 1
29. 3 3
30. 1 1
Score : Rendah = 1 Sedang = 2-3
3. Data Faktor Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Kebijakan Pimpinan
Jam Kerja Dinas
Jam Kerja diluar Dinas
Pekerjaan sebagai Penyuluh
Jumlah Score
1. 4 3 5 2 14 2
2. 4 2 1 3 10 1
3. 4 3 1 3 11 1
4. 4 5 2 3 14 2
5. 4 3 1 4 12 2
6. 4 3 3 3 13 2
7. 4 3 1 4 12 2
8. 4 2 2 5 13 2
9. 5 4 3 4 16 2
10. 4 5 5 3 17 3
11. 4 2 2 2 10 1
12. 4 3 4 1 12 2
13. 4 4 2 2 12 2
14. 4 3 2 2 11 1
15. 4 2 2 3 11 1
16. 4 2 2 4 12 2
17. 4 2 1 2 9 1
18. 4 4 2 2 12 2
19. 4 2 3 3 12 2
20. 4 3 2 3 12 2
21. 4 3 5 4 16 3
22. 4 4 2 5 15 3
23. 4 4 2 3 13 2
24. 5 3 3 4 15 2
25. 4 3 2 2 11 1
26. 4 3 3 2 12 2
27. 4 4 4 3 15 3
28. 5 1 5 3 14 2
29. 4 3 2 4 13 2
30. 4 3 3 4 14 2
Score : Rendah = 9-14 Sedang = 12-14
4. Data Faktor Keinginan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No.Resp Penghasi lan
Pengelu aran
Benda yg dibutuhkan
Perlengkapan kerja
Kebutu han rasa
aman
Jaminan peker
jaan
5. Data Faktor Kepuasan Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Wilayah kerja
Dukungan rekan sekerja
Hubungan kerja
Hasil kerja
Penghargaan pimpinan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 3 4 5 2 17 2
2. 4 2 4 2 1 13 1
3. 4 1 4 3 2 14 2
4. 4 4 5 4 2 19 3
5. 5 1 3 2 3 14 2
6. 4 2 4 2 3 15 2
7. 4 1 4 3 1 13 1
8. 4 2 4 2 2 14 2
9. 5 2 4 2 2 15 2
10. 3 3 4 4 4 18 3
11. 5 2 4 2 3 16 2
12. 4 3 4 4 2 17 2
13. 3 2 4 2 2 13 1
14. 4 2 4 5 4 19 3
15. 4 2 4 4 4 18 3
16. 4 1 4 4 2 15 2
17. 4 1 4 3 3 15 2
18. 4 2 4 4 4 18 3
19. 3 3 4 4 4 18 3
20. 4 2 4 3 1 14 2
21. 5 2 4 4 3 18 3
22. 4 4 5 2 2 17 2
23. 4 2 5 4 3 18 3
24. 5 1 2 1 2 11 1
25. 4 3 4 4 4 19 3
26. 5 2 4 4 3 18 3
27. 4 2 2 2 2 12 1
28. 5 2 4 3 2 16 2
29. 3 2 4 1 1 11 1
30. 3 2 5 4 4 18 3
6. Data Faktor Kompensasi Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Tingkat
Pendidikan
Jarak tempat
tugas
Prestasi kerja
Jujur dan adil
Jumlah Score
1. 1 2 2 3 8 2
2. 2 1 1 3 7 2
3. 2 2 1 3 8 2
4. 2 2 2 5 11 3
5. 2 2 1 1 6 1
6. 2 2 2 5 11 3
7. 2 2 1 2 7 2
8. 2 2 1 2 7 2
9. 2 1 2 5 10 3
10. 2 2 1 2 7 2
11. 2 2 2 5 11 3
12. 1 1 2 1 5 1
13. 2 2 2 3 9 2
14. 2 2 2 1 7 2
15. 2 2 2 5 11 3
16. 2 2 2 1 7 2
17. 2 1 2 3 8 2
18. 1 1 2 3 7 2
19. 2 2 2 5 11 3
20. 2 1 2 3 8 2
21. 2 2 2 5 11 3
22. 2 1 1 1 5 1
23. 2 2 1 3 8 2
24. 2 2 2 2 8 2
25. 2 2 2 5 11 3
26. 1 2 1 1 5 1
27. 2 1 2 1 6 1
28. 2 1 2 3 8 2
29. 1 2 2 5 10 3
30. 2 1 2 5 10 3
Score : Rendah = 4-6 Sedang = 7-9
7. Data Faktor Peraturan Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Pelaksana
Peraturan
Sanksi pelanggaran peraturan
Penghargaan pelaksana peraturan
Dampak penegakan peraturan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 3 4 4 14 2
2. 5 5 5 5 20 3
3. 5 5 5 5 20 3
4. 5 5 5 5 20 3
5. 5 5 5 5 20 3
6. 5 5 5 5 20 3
7. 3 3 3 3 12 1
8. 5 5 5 5 20 3
9. 4 2 2 2 10 1
10. 5 3 3 5 16 2
11. 5 5 5 5 20 3
12. 5 5 5 5 20 3
13. 3 3 4 3 13 2
14. 5 5 5 5 20 3
15. 5 5 4 5 19 3
16. 5 5 5 5 20 3
17. 5 5 3 3 16 2
18. 5 5 5 5 20 3
19. 5 5 5 5 20 3
20. 3 3 3 3 12 1
21. 5 5 5 5 20 3
22. 5 2 2 2 11 1
23. 5 5 5 5 20 3
24. 3 3 3 3 12 1
25. 3 3 3 3 12 1
26. 5 5 5 5 20 3
27. 5 5 5 5 20 3
28. 5 5 5 5 20 3
29. 5 5 5 5 20 3
30. 5 5 5 5 20 3
Score : Rendah = 10-13 Sedang = 14-17
8. Data Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Pelaksanaan kerja
Sifat agresif
Kedisplinan kerja
Mutu pekerjaan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 4 4 3 14 2
2. 3 3 3 4 13 2
3. 2 4 4 4 14 2
4. 4 4 4 5 17 3
5. 4 5 3 3 15 2
6. 5 5 2 5 17 3
7. 4 3 5 4 16 3
8. 3 3 4 4 14 2
9. 3 4 4 5 16 3
10. 4 4 5 3 16 3
11. 5 5 5 4 19 3
12. 2 3 3 4 12 1
13. 3 4 3 2 12 1
14. 3 4 4 5 16 3
15. 4 4 5 3 16 3
16. 4 3 4 3 14 2
17. 4 5 4 4 17 3
18. 5 4 3 4 16 3
19. 5 4 3 4 16 3
20. 3 4 3 5 15 2
21. 2 5 4 5 16 3
22. 3 5 4 4 16 3
23. 4 3 5 3 15 2
24. 4 5 4 4 17 3
25. 5 4 4 4 17 3
26. 5 5 5 5 20 3
27. 3 3 3 3 12 1
28. 4 4 4 4 16 3
29. 4 4 5 4 17 3
9. Rekapitulasi Data Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian PNS di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Kemata ngan pribadi
Tingkat pendidi kan
Kelelahan dan kebosa nan
Keingi nan
Kepuasan kerja
Kompen sasi
Peratu ran
Motivasi
1. 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
2. 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 2
3. 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 2
4. 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3
5. 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 2
6. 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3
7. 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 3
8. 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 2
9. 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 3
10. 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3
11. 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 3
12. 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 1
13. 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1
14. 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 3
15. 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 3
16. 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2
17. 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 3
18. 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 3
19. 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3
20. 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2
21. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
22. 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 3
23. 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2
24. 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 3
25. 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 3
26. 1 3 2 3 3 1 3 3
27. 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 1
28. 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 3
29. 3 3 2 2 1 3 3 3
Lampiran 4. Data Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
1. Data Faktor Kematangan Pribadi Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Gangguan kesehatan
Masa kerja
Ilmu Pengetahuan
Faktor
Lingkungan Pesta Adat Jumlah Score
1. 4 3 3 3 2 15 1
2. 4 3 2 3 5 17 2
3. 4 3 3 4 2 16 2
4. 4 4 3 5 3 19 2
5. 4 4 3 4 2 17 2
6. 5 4 2 3 5 19 2
7. 4 4 2 5 1 16 2
8. 5 4 3 4 3 19 2
9. 3 3 3 3 2 14 1
10. 4 3 2 3 3 15 1
11. 5 3 3 5 1 17 2
12. 4 3 3 4 2 16 2
13. 4 3 2 3 2 14 1
14. 4 4 3 5 1 17 2
15. 4 4 3 5 3 19 2
16. 4 3 3 5 1 16 2
17. 5 4 3 5 4 21 3
18. 4 3 3 5 3 18 2
19. 3 3 3 4 1 14 1
20. 4 4 4 4 3 19 2
21. 4 3 3 5 1 16 2
22. 4 3 3 5 4 19 2
23. 4 3 3 5 3 18 2
24. 4 3 3 3 2 15 1
25. 4 3 2 3 1 13 1
26. 5 4 3 5 5 22 3
27. 4 3 3 4 1 15 1
28. 5 4 3 5 2 19 2
29. 4 3 2 5 5 19 2
30. 4 3 4 5 1 17 2
Score : Rendah = 10-15 Sedang = 16-20
2. Data Faktor Tingkat Pendidikan Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Tingkat Pendidikan Score
1. 4 3
2. 4 3
3. 4 3
4. 4 3
5. 4 3
6. 4 3
7. 4 3
8. 4 3
9. 4 3
10. 1 1
11. 4 3
12. 4 3
13. 4 3
14. 4 3
15. 4 3
16. 4 3
17. 4 3
18. 5 3
19. 4 3
20. 4 3
21. 4 3
22. 4 3
23. 4 3
24. 2 2
25. 2 2
26. 1 1
27. 1 1
28. 1 1
29. 1 1
30. 1 1
Score : Rendah = 1 Sedang = 2-3
3. Data Faktor Kelelahan dan Kebosanan Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di kabupaten karo
No. Resp Kebijakan Pimpinan
Jam Kerja Dinas
Jam Kerja diluar Dinas
Pekerjaan sebagai Penyuluh
Jumlah Score
1. 4 3 5 2 14 2
2. 4 2 1 3 10 1
3. 4 3 1 3 11 1
4. 4 5 2 4 15 3
5. 4 3 1 4 12 2
6. 4 3 3 3 13 2
7. 4 3 1 4 12 2
8. 4 2 2 5 13 2
9. 5 4 3 4 16 2
10. 4 5 5 3 17 3
11. 4 4 4 2 14 2
12. 4 3 4 1 12 2
13. 4 4 2 2 12 2
14. 4 3 3 4 14 2
15. 4 2 2 3 11 1
16. 4 2 2 4 12 2
17. 4 2 1 2 9 1
18. 4 4 2 2 12 2
19. 4 2 3 3 12 2
20. 4 3 2 3 12 2
21. 4 3 5 4 16 3
22. 4 4 2 5 15 3
23. 4 4 2 3 13 2
24. 5 3 3 4 15 2
25. 4 3 2 4 13 2
26. 4 3 3 2 12 2
27. 4 4 4 3 15 3
28. 5 1 5 3 14 2
29. 4 3 2 4 13 2
30. 4 3 3 4 14 2
Score : Rendah = 9-14 Sedang = 12-14
4. Data Faktor Keinginan Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No.Resp Penghasi lan
Pengelu aran
Benda yg dibutuhkan
Perlengkapan kerja
Kebutu han rasa
aman
Jaminan peker
jaan
5. Data Faktor Kepuasan Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Wilayah kerja
Dukungan rekan sekerja
Hubungan kerja
Hasil kerja
Penghargaan pimpinan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 3 4 5 3 18 3
2. 4 2 4 3 2 15 2
3. 4 1 4 3 2 14 2
4. 4 4 5 4 2 19 3
5. 5 1 3 2 3 14 2
6. 4 2 4 2 1 13 1
7. 4 1 4 5 4 18 3
8. 4 2 4 4 2 16 3
9. 5 2 4 2 2 15 2
10. 3 2 4 3 2 14 2
11. 5 2 4 4 3 18 3
12. 4 3 4 4 2 17 2
13. 5 3 4 3 2 17 2
14. 4 2 4 5 4 19 3
15. 4 2 4 2 2 14 2
16. 4 1 4 4 2 15 2
17. 4 1 4 3 3 15 2
18. 4 2 4 4 4 18 3
19. 3 3 4 4 4 18 3
20. 4 2 4 3 1 14 2
21. 5 2 4 4 3 18 3
22. 4 4 5 4 2 19 3
23. 4 2 5 4 3 18 3
24. 5 1 2 1 2 11 1
25. 4 1 4 1 1 11 1
26. 5 2 4 4 3 18 3
27. 4 2 4 4 2 16 2
28. 5 2 4 3 2 16 2
29. 3 2 4 1 1 11 1
30. 3 2 5 4 4 18 3
6. Data Faktor Kompensasi Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Tingkat
Pendidikan
Jarak tempat
tugas
Prestasi kerja
Jujur dan adil
Jumlah Score
1. 1 1 2 3 7 2
2. 2 1 2 2 7 2
3. 2 2 1 2 7 2
4. 2 1 2 5 10 3
5. 2 2 1 3 8 2
6. 1 2 2 5 10 3
7. 2 2 2 5 11 3
8. 2 2 1 2 7 2
9. 2 1 1 3 7 2
10. 2 2 1 2 7 2
11. 2 1 2 5 10 3
12. 1 1 2 5 9 2
13. 2 2 1 1 6 1
14. 2 2 2 1 7 2
15. 2 1 2 5 10 3
16. 2 2 2 1 7 2
17. 2 1 2 2 7 2
18. 1 2 2 5 10 3
19. 2 1 1 3 7 2
20. 2 1 2 3 8 2
21. 2 1 2 2 7 2
22. 2 1 2 5 10 3
23. 2 2 1 2 7 2
24. 2 1 2 2 7 2
25. 2 2 2 2 8 2
26. 1 2 1 3 7 2
27. 2 1 2 3 8 2
28. 2 1 2 2 7 2
29. 1 1 3 3 8 2
30. 2 1 2 2 7 2
Score : Rendah = 4-6 Sedang = 7-9
7. Data Faktor Peraturan Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di kabupaten Karo
No. Resp Pelaksana
Peraturan
Sanksi pelanggaran peraturan
Penghargaan pelaksana peraturan
Dampak penegakan peraturan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 3 4 4 14 2
2. 5 5 5 5 20 3
3. 5 5 5 5 20 3
4. 5 5 5 5 20 3
5. 5 5 5 5 20 3
6. 5 5 5 5 20 3
7. 5 5 5 5 20 3
8. 5 5 5 5 20 3
9. 4 2 2 2 10 1
10. 5 3 3 5 16 2
11. 5 5 5 5 20 3
12. 5 5 5 5 20 3
13. 5 5 5 5 20 3
14. 5 5 5 5 20 3
15. 5 5 4 5 19 3
16. 5 5 5 5 20 3
17. 5 5 5 5 20 3
18. 5 5 5 5 20 3
19. 5 5 5 5 20 3
20. 5 5 5 5 20 3
21. 5 5 5 5 20 3
22. 5 2 2 2 11 1
23. 5 5 5 5 20 3
24. 3 3 3 3 12 1
25. 3 3 3 3 12 1
26. 5 5 5 5 20 3
27. 5 5 5 5 20 3
28. 5 5 5 5 20 3
29. 5 5 5 5 20 3
30. 5 5 5 5 20 3
Score : Rendah = 10-13 Sedang = 14-17
8. Data Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Pelaksanaan kerja
Sifat agresif
Kedisplinan kerja
Mutu pekerjaan
Jumlah Score
1. 3 4 4 3 14 2
2. 3 3 3 4 13 2
3. 2 4 4 4 14 2
4. 4 4 4 5 17 3
5. 4 5 3 3 15 2
6. 5 5 2 5 17 3
7. 4 3 5 4 16 3
8. 3 3 4 4 14 2
9. 3 4 4 5 16 3
10. 4 4 5 3 16 3
11. 5 5 5 4 19 3
12. 2 3 3 4 12 1
13. 3 4 3 2 12 1
14. 3 4 4 5 16 3
15. 4 4 5 3 16 3
16. 4 3 4 3 14 2
17. 4 5 4 4 17 3
18. 5 4 3 4 16 3
19. 5 4 3 4 16 3
20. 3 4 3 5 15 2
21. 2 5 4 5 16 3
22. 3 5 4 4 16 3
23. 4 3 5 3 15 2
24. 4 5 4 4 17 3
25. 5 4 4 4 17 3
26. 5 5 5 5 20 3
27. 3 3 3 3 12 1
28. 4 4 4 4 16 3
29. 4 4 5 4 17 3
9. Rekapitulasi Data Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Motivasi Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
No. Resp
Kemata ngan pribadi
Tingkat pendidi kan
Kelelahan dan kebosa nan
Keingi nan
Kepuasan kerja
Kompen sasi
Peratu ran
Motivasi
1. 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 2
2. 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 2
3. 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 2
4. 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5. 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2
6. 2 3 2 3 1 3 3 3
7. 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3
8. 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2
9. 1 3 2 3 2 2 1 3
10. 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 3
11. 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3
12. 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 1
13. 1 3 2 2 2 1 3 1
14. 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3
15. 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 3
16. 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2
17. 3 3 1 2 2 2 3 3
18. 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3
19. 1 3 2 3 3 2 3 3
20. 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2
21. 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3
22. 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 3
23. 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2
24. 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 3
25. 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 3
26. 3 1 2 3 3 2 3 3
27. 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 1
28. 2 1 2 3 2 2 3 3
29. 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 3
Lampiran 5. Pedoman Penetapan Nilai untuk masing-masing Daftar pertanyaan pada Kuesioner Penyuluh Pertanian PNS dan THL-TB PP di Kabupaten Karo
1. Faktor Kematangan Pribadi
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Gangguan Kesehatan a. Tidak ada gangguan b. 1 Jenis gangguan c. 2 Jenis gangguan d. 3 Jenis gangguan e. ˃ 3 Jenis gangguan
5
2. Faktor Tingkat Pendidikan
3. Faktor Kelelahan dan Kebosanan
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Kebijakan pimpinan a. Sangat baik
b. Baik
c. Kurang baik
d. Tidak baik
e. Sangat tidak baik
5 4 3 2 2
2. Jam kerja dinas a. 1-2 Jam
b. 3-4 Jam
c. 5-6 Jam
d. 7-8 Jam
e. ˃ 8 Jam
1 2 3 4 5
3. Jam kerja diluar dinas a. 1 Jam
b. 2 Jam
c. 3 Jam
d. 4 Jam
e. ˃ 4 Jam
1 2 3 4 5
4. Pekerjaan sebagai penyuluh a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
4. Faktor Keinginan
7. Penghargaan yang diharapkan a. 1 Jenis
5. Faktor Kepuasan Kerja
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Wilayah kerja a. Sangat tidak sesuai
b. Tidak sesuai
c. Kurang sesuai
d. Sesuai
e. Sangat sesuai
1 2 3 4 5
2. Dukungan rekan sekerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
3. Hubungan kerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
4. Hasil kerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
5. Penghargaan pimpinan a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
6. Faktor Kompensasi
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Tingkat pendidikan a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
2. Jarak tempat tugas a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
3. Prestasi kerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
4. Jujur dan adil a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
7. Faktor Peraturan
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Pelaksana peraturan a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
2. Sanksi pelanggaran
peraturan
a. 1 Jenis b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
3. Penghargaan pelaksana
peraturan
a. 1 Jenis b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
4. Dampak penegakan
peraturan
a. 1 Jenis b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
8. Motivasi Kerja
No. Uraian Penjelasan Nilai
1. Pelaksanaan kerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
2. Sifat agresif a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
3. Kedisplinan kerja a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
1 2 3 4 5
4. Mutu pekerjaan a. 1 Jenis
b. 2 Jenis c. 3 Jenis d. 4 Jenis e. ˃ 4 Jenis
