UNIVALENCE FOR INTEGRAL OPERATORS
by
Daniel Breaz, Nicoleta Breaz
Abstract: We study in this paper two integral operators and we determine the conditions for univalence for these integral operators.
Let A be the class of the functions f, which are analytic in the unit disc
{
∈ ; <1}
= z C z
U and f(0)= f'(0)−1=0 and denote by S the class of univalent functions.
Teorema 1 [4] If f ∈S, α∈C and α ≤1/4 then the function:
[ ]
∫
′ =z f t dt zG
0
) ( )
( α
α
is univalent in U.
Teorema 2 [3] If the function g∈S,α∈C,α ≤1/4n, then the function defined by
[ ]
∫
′ =z nn z f t dt
G
0
, ( ) ( )
α α
is univalent in U for
n
∈
N
*. Teorema 3 [2]Let α,a∈C ,Reα>0 and f ∈A. If
U z z
f z zf z
∈ ∀ ≤ −
) ( 1 ) ( '
) ( " Re
1 2Re α
α
then (∀)β∈C, Reβ ≥Reα , the function
( )
β ββ β
/ 1
0 1
) ( '
=
∫
zt − f tz F
Teorema 4 [1] If the function g is holomorphic in U and g(z)<1 in U then
U
∈ ∀)ξ
( and z∈U the following inequalities hold:
2 2
1 ) ( 1 ) ( '
) 1 ( , 1 ) ( ) ( 1
) ( ) (
z z g z
g
z z g
z g
z g g
− − ≤
− − ≤ −
−
ξ ξ ξ ξ
the equalities hold in case , where 1 1
) ( )
( =
+ +
=ε ε
z t
t z z
g and u <1.
Remark 5 [1]
For z = 0, the inequalities (1) are the form: ξ ξ
ξ ≤
− (−0) ( ) 1
) 0 ( ) (
g g
g g
and
ξ ξ
ξ
⋅ +
+ =
) 0 ( 1
) 0 ( )
(
g g
g .
Considering g(0) = a and z U
z a
a z z g
z ∀ ∈
⋅ +
+ ≤ ⇒
= ( )
1 ) (
ξ .
Lemma 6 (Schwartz)
If the function g is holomorphic in U, g(0) = 0 and g
( )
z ≤1 (∀)z∈U, then: U)z ( )
(z ≤ z ∀ ∈
g and g'(0) ≤1
the equalities hold in case g(z) = z, where =1.
Theorem 7. Let α, , , , complex number with the properties Reδ = a >0, f,g
∈
A ...,z b z g z
a z
f = + 2 2 +... , = + 2 2 +
, ) ( , 1 ) ( '
) ( "
, ) ( , 1 ) ( '
) ( "
U z n z g
z g
U z n z f
z f
∈ ∀ ≤
∈ ∀ ≤
(2)
2 2
2 2a
n
n a n a n
+ ⋅ + ≤
and
1 1 1
< + β
α . (4)
Then (∀)γ ∈C,Reγ ≥athe function:
[ ] [ ]
α β γγ γ
β
α γ
/ 1
0 1 ,
,
, ( ) '( ) '( )
⋅ ⋅
=
∫
z − n nn z t f t g t dt
D
is univalent (∀)n∈N* \
{}
1 .Proof: We consider the function:
∫
′ ′= z n n
dt t g t f z h
0[ ( )] [ ( )]
)
( α β (5)
The function
) ( '
) ( " 1 ) (
z h
z h z
p = ⋅
αβ (6)
where αβ satisfies the conditions (3). We obtain:
{
}
=′ ⋅ ′
′ ′ ⋅ ′ ⋅ = ′′′ ⋅
= αβ αβ αα ββ
)] ( [ )] ( [
)] ( [ )] ( [ 1 ) (
) ( 1 ) (
n n
n n
t g t
f
t g t
f z
h z h z
p
(
)
[ ] [
]
(
)
[
′] [ ]
⋅ ′ =′′ ⋅ ′
⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ′ + ′
⋅ ′′ ⋅ ′
⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
= α − α− αβ βα β − β−
αβ ( ) ( )
) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
(
1 1 1 1 1
n n
n n
n n
n n
n n
z g z f
z g z
g z n z
f z
g z f z
f z n
)
(
) ( )
(
)
( 1
1
n n n
n n n
z g
z g z n z
f
z f z n
′⋅ ′′ ⋅
⋅ + ′ ⋅ ′′ ⋅
⋅ ⋅
≤ ⋅
⋅ + ⋅
⋅
= − −
) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( " )
(
1 1
n n n
n n n
z g
z g nz z
f z f nz z
p
αββ αβα
≤ ⋅
⋅ ⋅ + ⋅
⋅
≤ − −
) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) (
" 1
1
n n n
n n n
z g
z g z n z
f z f nz
αββ αβα
≤ ⋅
⋅ ⋅ + ⋅
⋅ ⋅
≤ − −
) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) (
" 1
1
n n n
n n n
z g
z g z n z
f z f z n
β α
β β
α α
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
< + = ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
≤ β α α β
n n n
n .
p(0) = 0
By Schwartz lemma we have:
⇔ ⋅
≤ ⇔
≤ ≤
⋅ −1 −1
) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( "
1 n n
z z
h z h z z z h
z h
αβ αβ
1
) ( '
) ( "
1 2 2 n
a a
z a
z
z h
z zh a
z
⋅
− ⋅ ≤ ⋅
−
⇔ αβ (8)
Let’s the function x x z
a x x
Q R
Q n
a
= ⋅ − =
→ , ( ) 1 , ]
1 , 0 [ :
2
.
We have
[ ]
0,1 )( , 2 2
2 )
( 2 ∀ ∈
+ ⋅ +
≤ x
a n
n a n x
Q a
n
.
1 ) ( '
) ( "
1 2
≤ ⋅
⋅
−
z h
z h z a
z a
.
In this conditions applying the theorem 3 we obtain:
[ ] [ ]
α β γγ γ
β
α γ
/ 1
0 1 ,
,
, ( ) '( ) '( )
⋅ ⋅
=
∫
z − n nn z t f t g t dt
D
is univalent (∀)n∈N* \{1}.
Corollary 8 [5]. Let α,γ∈C ,Reα =a>0, g∈A
If
)
( 1 ) ( '
) ( "
U z n
z g
z g
∈ ∀ ≤
and
a n
n a n a
n 2 /2
2 2
+ +
≤
γ
then (∀)β∈C, Reβ ≥a, the function
[ ]
γ ββ γ
β β
/ 1
0 1 ,
, ( ) '( )
=
∫
z − nn z t g t
G
is univalent (∀)n∈N* \
{}
1 .Theorem 9. Let α, , , complex number, Reδ =c>0, and the functions f,g∈A ...,
z b z g z
a z
f = + 2 2 +... , = + 2 2 + .
If f and g satisfy the conditions 1 ) ( '
) ( "
<
z f
z f
and 1 ( ) , )
( '
) ( "
U z z
g z g
∈ ∀
< (9)
and
α
withβ
the conditions: 1 1 1< + β
2 1
2 1
max
1
2 2
2 2 2
1
+ ⋅ +
+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ≤
≤
z b a
b a z
z c
z c
z
αβ β α
αββ α
αβ (11),
then (∀)γ∈C,Reγ ≥c the function
[ ] [ ]
α β γ γγ β
α γ
/ 1
0 1 ,
, ( ) '( ) '( )
⋅ ⋅
=
∫
zt − f t g tz
F
is univalent. Proof: Let
[ ] [ ]
f t g t dt zh
z
∫
⋅=
0
) ( ' ) ( ' )
( α β .
Let
) ( '
) ( " 1 ) (
z h
z h z
p = ⋅
αβ .
Then:
( )
(
(
)
) (
(
)
)
(
(
)
) (
(
)
)
= ⋅⋅ ⋅
⋅ ⋅
+ ⋅
⋅ ⋅ ⋅
= αβ α α− α β β αβ α β α β−β
) ( ' ) ( '
) ( " )
( ' )
( ' 1 )
( ' ) ( '
) ( ' ) ( " )
( '
1 1 1
z g z f
z g z g z
f
z g z f
z g z f z f z
p
) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( "
z g
z g z
f z f
⋅ + ⋅
= αβα αββ .
The function p is olomorf , (∀)z∈U .
We respect the conditions (9) and (10) obtain:
1 1 1 ) ( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( " )
( '
) ( " )
( = ⋅ + ⋅ ≤ ⋅ + ⋅ = + <
β α αββ
αβα αββ
αβα g z
z g z
f z f z
g z g z
f z f z
p
U z∈
∀)
( .
αβ β α αββ
αβα αββ
αβα 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
) 0 ( '
) 0 ( " )
0 ( '
) 0 ( " )
0
( a b a b
g g f
f
p = ⋅ + ⋅ = ⋅ + ⋅ = ⋅ +
U z
z b a
b a z
z
p ∀ ∈
⋅ + ⋅ +
+ ⋅ +
≤ , ( )
2 1
2 )
(
2 2
2 2
αβ β
α αβ
β α
⇔ ∈ ∀ +
+
+ ⋅ + ≤ ⋅
⇔ z U
z b a
b a z
z h
z h
) ( , 2
1 2 )
( '
) ( " 1
2 2
2 2
αββ
α αβ
β α
αβ
U z
z b a
b a z
z c
z
z h
z zh c
z c c
∈ ∀ ⋅
+ ⋅ +
+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ ≤ ⋅
−
⇔ , ( )
2 1
2 1
) ( '
) ( " 1
2 2
2 2 2
2
αβ β
α αβ
β α
αβ .
The last inequality implies:
⋅ + ⋅ +
+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅
≤ ⋅
−
≤
z b a
b a z
z c
z
z h
z zh c
z c
z c
αβ β
α αβ
β α αβ
2 2
2 2 2
1 2
2 1
2 1
max )
( '
) ( " 1
The relation (11) and the last inequality implies:
U z z
h z zh c
z c
∈ ∀ ≤ ⋅
−
) ( , 1 ) ( '
) ( "
1 2
and by the theorem 3 we obtain
[ ] [ ]
α β γ γγ β
α γ
/ 1
0 1 ,
,
, ( ) '( ) '( )
⋅ ⋅
=
∫
zt − f t g tz F
Corollary 10 [5] Let
α
,
γ
∈
C
,
Re
α
=
b
>
0
and function ...) (
, = + 2 2 +
∈A g z z a z g
Dacă
U z z
g z g
∈ ∀ <1, ( ) )
( '
) ( "
and satisfy the condition:
+
+ ⋅
⋅ − ≤
≤ a z
a z z b
z b
z
2 2 2
1 1 2
2 1
max
1 γ
then for allβ∈C, Reβ ≥b, the function
[ ]
γ β βγ
β β
1
0 1
, ( ) '( )
=
∫
zt − g tz G
is univalent.
REFERENCES
[1] Z. Nehari- Conformal Mapping, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, Toronto, London, 1952.
[2] N.N. Pascu- An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Braşov, (1987), 43-48.
[3] N.N. Pascu, V. Pescar, On the integral operators of Kim-Merkens and Pfaltzgraff, Studia(Mathematica), Univ. Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, 32, 2(1990), 185-192.
[4] J. A. Pfaltzgraff, Univalence of the integral of f′
( )
z λ, Bull. London Math. Soc. 7(1975), no 3.254-256.[5] V. Pescar and Shigeyoshi Owa- Univalence of certain integral operators, International J. Math. & Math. Sci. Vol. 23.No.10(2000), 697-701.
Authors:
Daniel Breaz - „ 1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, str. N.Iorga, No.13, Departament of Mathematics and Computer Science, dbreaz@lmm.uab.ro