• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

art. rev 2REZ. 135KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:21 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "art. rev 2REZ. 135KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:21 AM"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

UNIVALENCE FOR INTEGRAL OPERATORS

by

Daniel Breaz, Nicoleta Breaz

Abstract: We study in this paper two integral operators and we determine the conditions for univalence for these integral operators.

Let A be the class of the functions f, which are analytic in the unit disc

{

∈ ; <1

}

= z C z

U and f(0)= f'(0)−1=0 and denote by S the class of univalent functions.

Teorema 1 [4] If fS, α∈C and α ≤1/4 then the function:

[ ]

′ =z f t dt z

G

0

) ( )

( α

α

is univalent in U.

Teorema 2 [3] If the function gS,α∈C,α ≤1/4n, then the function defined by

[ ]

′ =z n

n z f t dt

G

0

, ( ) ( )

α α

is univalent in U for

n

N

*. Teorema 3 [2]

Let α,aC ,Reα>0 and fA. If

U z z

f z zf z

∈ ∀ ≤ −

) ( 1 ) ( '

) ( " Re

1 2Re α

α

then (∀)β∈C, Reβ ≥Reα , the function

( )

β β

β β

/ 1

0 1

) ( '

  

 

=

ztf t

z F

(2)

Teorema 4 [1] If the function g is holomorphic in U and g(z)<1 in U then

U

∈ ∀)ξ

( and zU the following inequalities hold:

2 2

1 ) ( 1 ) ( '

) 1 ( , 1 ) ( ) ( 1

) ( ) (

z z g z

g

z z g

z g

z g g

− − ≤

− − ≤ −

ξ ξ ξ ξ

the equalities hold in case , where 1 1

) ( )

( =

+ +

=ε ε

z t

t z z

g and u <1.

Remark 5 [1]

For z = 0, the inequalities (1) are the form: ξ ξ

ξ

− (−0) ( ) 1

) 0 ( ) (

g g

g g

and

ξ ξ

ξ

⋅ +

+ =

) 0 ( 1

) 0 ( )

(

g g

g .

Considering g(0) = a and z U

z a

a z z g

z ∀ ∈

⋅ +

+ ≤ ⇒

= ( )

1 ) (

ξ .

Lemma 6 (Schwartz)

If the function g is holomorphic in U, g(0) = 0 and g

( )

z ≤1 (∀)zU, then: U

)z ( )

(zz ∀ ∈

g and g'(0) ≤1

the equalities hold in case g(z) = z, where =1.

Theorem 7. Let α, , , , complex number with the properties Reδ = a >0, f,g

A ...,

z b z g z

a z

f = + 2 2 +... , = + 2 2 +

, ) ( , 1 ) ( '

) ( "

, ) ( , 1 ) ( '

) ( "

U z n z g

z g

U z n z f

z f

∈ ∀ ≤

∈ ∀ ≤

(2)

2 2

2 2a

n

n a n a n

   

  + ⋅ + ≤

(3)

and

1 1 1

< + β

α . (4)

Then (∀)γ ∈C,Reγ ≥athe function:

[ ] [ ]

α β γ

γ γ

β

α γ

/ 1

0 1 ,

,

, ( ) '( ) '( )

   

=

zn n

n z t f t g t dt

D

is univalent (∀)nN* \

{}

1 .

Proof: We consider the function:

′ ′

= z n n

dt t g t f z h

0[ ( )] [ ( )]

)

( α β (5)

The function

) ( '

) ( " 1 ) (

z h

z h z

p = ⋅

αβ (6)

where αβ satisfies the conditions (3). We obtain:

{

}

=

′ ⋅ ′

′ ′ ⋅ ′ ⋅ = ′′′ ⋅

= αβ αβ αα ββ

)] ( [ )] ( [

)] ( [ )] ( [ 1 ) (

) ( 1 ) (

n n

n n

t g t

f

t g t

f z

h z h z

p

(

)

[ ] [

]

(

)

[

] [ ]

⋅ ′ =

′′ ⋅ ′

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ′ + ′

⋅ ′′ ⋅ ′

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

= α − α− αβ βα β − β−

αβ ( ) ( )

) ( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

(

1 1 1 1 1

n n

n n

n n

n n

n n

z g z f

z g z

g z n z

f z

g z f z

f z n

)

(

) ( )

(

)

( 1

1

n n n

n n n

z g

z g z n z

f

z f z n

′⋅ ′′ ⋅

⋅ + ′ ⋅ ′′ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

(4)

≤ ⋅

⋅ + ⋅

= − −

) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( " )

(

1 1

n n n

n n n

z g

z g nz z

f z f nz z

p

αββ αβα

≤ ⋅

⋅ ⋅ + ⋅

≤ − −

) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) (

" 1

1

n n n

n n n

z g

z g z n z

f z f nz

αββ αβα

≤ ⋅

⋅ ⋅ + ⋅

⋅ ⋅

≤ − −

) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) (

" 1

1

n n n

n n n

z g

z g z n z

f z f z n

β α

β β

α α

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

< + = ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅

β α α β

n n n

n .

p(0) = 0

By Schwartz lemma we have:

⇔ ⋅

≤ ⇔

≤ ≤

⋅ −1 −1

) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( "

1 n n

z z

h z h z z z h

z h

αβ αβ

1

) ( '

) ( "

1 2 2 n

a a

z a

z

z h

z zh a

z

⋅     

   − ⋅ ≤ ⋅

    

   −

⇔ αβ (8)

Let’s the function x x z

a x x

Q R

Q n

a

= ⋅ − =

→ , ( ) 1 , ]

1 , 0 [ :

2

.

We have

[ ]

0,1 )

( , 2 2

2 )

( 2 ∀ ∈

  

 

+ ⋅ +

x

a n

n a n x

Q a

n

.

(5)

1 ) ( '

) ( "

1 2

≤ ⋅

⋅     

   −

z h

z h z a

z a

.

In this conditions applying the theorem 3 we obtain:

[ ] [ ]

α β γ

γ γ

β

α γ

/ 1

0 1 ,

,

, ( ) '( ) '( )

   

=

zn n

n z t f t g t dt

D

is univalent (∀)nN* \{1}.

Corollary 8 [5]. Let α,γ∈C ,Reα =a>0, gA

If

)

( 1 ) ( '

) ( "

U z n

z g

z g

∈ ∀ ≤

and

a n

n a n a

n 2 /2

2 2

   

  + +

γ

then (∀)β∈C, Reβ ≥a, the function

[ ]

γ β

β γ

β β

/ 1

0 1 ,

, ( ) '( )

   

 

=

zn

n z t g t

G

is univalent (∀)nN* \

{}

1 .

Theorem 9. Let α, , , complex number, Reδ =c>0, and the functions f,gA ...,

z b z g z

a z

f = + 2 2 +... , = + 2 2 + .

If f and g satisfy the conditions 1 ) ( '

) ( "

<

z f

z f

and 1 ( ) , )

( '

) ( "

U z z

g z g

∈ ∀

< (9)

and

α

with

β

the conditions: 1 1 1

< + β

(6)

2 1

2 1

max

1

2 2

2 2 2

1

    

 

    

 

+ ⋅ +

+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ≤

z b a

b a z

z c

z c

z

αβ β α

αββ α

αβ (11),

then (∀)γ∈C,Reγ ≥c the function

[ ] [ ]

α β γ γ

γ β

α γ

/ 1

0 1 ,

, ( ) '( ) '( )

   

=

ztf t g t

z

F

is univalent. Proof: Let

[ ] [ ]

f t g t dt z

h

z

=

0

) ( ' ) ( ' )

( α β .

Let

) ( '

) ( " 1 ) (

z h

z h z

p = ⋅

αβ .

Then:

( )

(

(

)

) (

(

)

)

(

(

)

) (

(

)

)

= ⋅

⋅ ⋅

⋅ ⋅

+ ⋅

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

= αβ α α− α β β αβ α β α β−β

) ( ' ) ( '

) ( " )

( ' )

( ' 1 )

( ' ) ( '

) ( ' ) ( " )

( '

1 1 1

z g z f

z g z g z

f

z g z f

z g z f z f z

p

) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( "

z g

z g z

f z f

⋅ + ⋅

= αβα αββ .

The function p is olomorf , (∀)zU .

We respect the conditions (9) and (10) obtain:

1 1 1 ) ( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( " )

( '

) ( " )

( = ⋅ + ⋅ ≤ ⋅ + ⋅ = + <

β α αββ

αβα αββ

αβα g z

z g z

f z f z

g z g z

f z f z

p

U z

∀)

( .

αβ β α αββ

αβα αββ

αβα 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

) 0 ( '

) 0 ( " )

0 ( '

) 0 ( " )

0

( a b a b

g g f

f

p = ⋅ + ⋅ = ⋅ + ⋅ = ⋅ +

(7)

U z

z b a

b a z

z

p ∀ ∈

⋅ + ⋅ +

+ ⋅ +

≤ , ( )

2 1

2 )

(

2 2

2 2

αβ β

α αβ

β α

⇔ ∈ ∀ +

+

+ ⋅ + ≤ ⋅

z U

z b a

b a z

z h

z h

) ( , 2

1 2 )

( '

) ( " 1

2 2

2 2

αββ

α αβ

β α

αβ

U z

z b a

b a z

z c

z

z h

z zh c

z c c

∈ ∀ ⋅

+ ⋅ +

+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ ≤ ⋅

⇔ , ( )

2 1

2 1

) ( '

) ( " 1

2 2

2 2 2

2

αβ β

α αβ

β α

αβ .

The last inequality implies:

    

 

    

 

⋅ + ⋅ +

+ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅

≤ ⋅

z b a

b a z

z c

z

z h

z zh c

z c

z c

αβ β

α αβ

β α αβ

2 2

2 2 2

1 2

2 1

2 1

max )

( '

) ( " 1

The relation (11) and the last inequality implies:

U z z

h z zh c

z c

∈ ∀ ≤ ⋅

) ( , 1 ) ( '

) ( "

1 2

and by the theorem 3 we obtain

[ ] [ ]

α β γ γ

γ β

α γ

/ 1

0 1 ,

,

, ( ) '( ) '( )

   

=

ztf t g t

z F

(8)

Corollary 10 [5] Let

α

,

γ

C

,

Re

α

=

b

>

0

and function ...

) (

, = + 2 2 +

A g z z a z g

Dacă

U z z

g z g

∈ ∀ <1, ( ) )

( '

) ( "

and satisfy the condition:

    

  

  

 +

+ ⋅     

  

⋅ − ≤

a z

a z z b

z b

z

2 2 2

1 1 2

2 1

max

1 γ

then for allβ∈C, Reβ ≥b, the function

[ ]

γ β β

γ

β β

1

0 1

, ( ) '( )

   

 

=

ztg t

z G

is univalent.

REFERENCES

[1] Z. Nehari- Conformal Mapping, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, Toronto, London, 1952.

[2] N.N. Pascu- An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceedings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Braşov, (1987), 43-48.

[3] N.N. Pascu, V. Pescar, On the integral operators of Kim-Merkens and Pfaltzgraff, Studia(Mathematica), Univ. Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, 32, 2(1990), 185-192.

[4] J. A. Pfaltzgraff, Univalence of the integral of f

( )

z λ, Bull. London Math. Soc. 7(1975), no 3.254-256.

[5] V. Pescar and Shigeyoshi Owa- Univalence of certain integral operators, International J. Math. & Math. Sci. Vol. 23.No.10(2000), 697-701.

Authors:

Daniel Breaz - „ 1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, str. N.Iorga, No.13, Departament of Mathematics and Computer Science, [email protected]

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

At first, we make a brief presentation of class TUCD ( ) α and of some of its properties, as well as a number of matters connected to some integral operators studied on

1.Miller S.S., Mocanu P.T.- Integral operators on certain classes of analytic functions, Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and their Applications, Halstead Pres, John

Subordinated processes are processes constructed from integral representations with random kernels, or said another way, where the stable random measure (of the integral

In this note we shall study the analyticity and the univalence of some integral operators if the functions involved belongs to some special subclasses of univalent functions..

The purpose of this paper is to generalize the definition of G n,α by means of the Al-Oboudi differential operator and investigate univalence condition of this generalized

For this general integral operator we study some interesting univalence properties, to which a number of univalent conditions would follow upon specializing the parameters

Pascu, On a univalence criterion II , in Itinerant seminar on func- tional equations, approximation and convexity (Cluj-Napoca, 1985), 153–154, Univ.. Pascu, An improvement of

Srivastava, The Hardy space of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators, J.. Li, Some properties of two integral operators,