Relatingtothings.
NUMERAL
SYSTEMS. 43 Indians are considered as belonging to theanimated
class of beings, they say:mauchsa, mayauchsu,
one person, or a person, or living being. Itistruly incorrect tosay ngutti lenno, aman.
And
inthe plural,nischowak lennowak, two
men, &c.All
and
ak, the terminations of these last in tlie i)lural, are respectively applied, theformertoinanimate,thelatter toanimate
objects.
But
as exceptions, it is stated thatamong
nouns, treesand
the larger plants are considered animate, while fishes take theinanimatetermination. Itisthus evidentthat a similar idea hasgoverned
theform
of thenumeral
adjectivt in theDelaware and
theMexican.
Other examples among
th«North American
languagesmight
be cited, but the above are sufficientto indicate the object of in- quiry.The system
appears,however,nottohave
been universal, as, according to Dr. Wilson, there isno
distinction ofnumerals
inthe
Seneca
orother Iroquois languages.Singularly enough, the
same
idea prevails in thenumeralsof otherand
far distant races, ofwhich
a few specimensmay
be useful.The Hon. John
Pickering, in"Memoirs
of theAmerican Academy," N.
S., vol. ii,gives an account of thelanguage and
inhabitants ofTobi, orLord
North's Island,in theIndian Archi- pelago, derived from anAmerican seaman, Horace
Holden,who
spenttwo
yearsupon
it. This island issituated about lat. 3°2' north
and
Ion. 131° 4' east,and
is of very small extentand
sparsely inhabited.The
different forms of the digits are thus given in theaccompanying
vocabulary:—
Generalcardinals.
44 JfUMERAL
SYSTEMS.In countingj^K/i, hooks,the}"usestilladifferent set ofnumerals,
which were
not recollected. Itwould appear
further that stones, birds,and days were counted by
thesame numerals
as cocoa- nuts,and men and women by
thoseemployed
toenumerate
fish.Mr.
Hale,in the"Ethnography,
&c., of theU.
S.Exploring
Expedition,"copiesHolden's
vocabulary,which
isalsoappended
to a narrative of-his captivity, published atBoston.Dr. L.
H.
Gulick, in hisnoteson
theGrammar
ofthePonape
dialect
(12mo.
Honolulu, 1858, pp. 39), states that"the enume-
ration of allobjects isalike as far as nine, afterwhich
there isa singularvariety."The
differenceisin—
"I.
The mode
ofcounting
allanimated
objects,and
all kinds of sticksand
timbers,and
everything that toa native isconnected inidea with separate sticks, as trees,canoes, &c."II.
The enumeration
ofyams,
taro,and
a few of themost
costly articles." III.
The numbering
of cocoanuts, bread-fruits, eggs, shells, stones, &c., in fact, probably, ofallcommon,
leastvalued objects, not includedunder
thefirst head."Examples
are given, not necessaryto repeat here, as also of peculiarities in thenumerative
particles.The
Island ofPonape, Paanopa,
or, as writtenby
]\Ir. Hale,Bonabe,
isone of the central islands of JMicrouesia.That
gen-tleman
gives alsoa vocabularyofthelanguage
ofTaputeoua,
in theKingsmill
group, one of themost
eastern,and
separatedfrom Tobi by 2600
miles.Speaking
of the numerals, he says that the natives furnished the expeditionwnth
several sets or classes,which he
conjecturedwere used
in counting objects of different kinds,though
hehad no means
of obtainingfrom them any
explanation.There were
five ofthem
in all,and
all given inthe digits, orfrom one
to ten.—
Eth. ofEx. Exp.
p. 440.Leaving
Micronesiafor Polynesia,Mr. Hale
states thatsome
of theterms for the higher
numbers
are onlyused in counting particulararticles.For
four, theHawaiians,
for instance,have two
terms,ha and
tauna.For
forty, theyhave
tanaha,iato,and
ta'au.
The
first of these, tanaha, is the generalterm;
iato isused
in countingpiecesoftapa(nativecloth),and
ta^ait incount- ingfish. (lb. p. 2.50.)It is
remarkable
that thus, inTobi and Taputeoua,
the dis- tinction shouldextend
to all the digits;and
inPonape,
wliichNUMEllAL
SYSTEMS. 45is
between
the two,and Hawaii,
distant3500
miles, itshould be coufined to thehigher numbers.The
lastexample
here presented isfrom I^owcn's Yorul)a Dic- tionary, in the 10thvol. Smithsonian Contributions. In this, an AfricanLanguage,
traces of thesame system
also appear.Thus
in ordinary counting thefirst
vowel
is short, whileamong
Avhat the authorterms
"cardinals of price,"up
to forty, the vowel islong; thus okay, one>edzl,
two
; okay, edzl.The
reason given for this is that the latter arecontractions of owO-kay, oioo-edzi,i. e. one cowrie,
two
cowries, &c.Itthus appears that this peculiararithmetic is of
wide
distri- bution,and by no means
confined to a single or even to cognate races.A more
perfectknowledge
of barbarianlanguageswould
probablyshow
its still greaterextension. Inwhat
processof thehuman mind
it has its origin,and
the reasons for the singular collocationof objectswhich
different tribesembrace
inthe severalforms
of thenumerals, are questions of curious speculation.The
division of objects intoanimate and
inanimate, or,astheyhave been termed by
otherwriters, nobleand
ignoble, is a well-known
feature in several of the languages ofNorth America.
Mr. Howse
states that theCree and Chippeway
(Ojibwa)nouns
are divisible intotwo
classes, animateand
inanimate, analogous to genderinEuropean
languages, butthatmany
inanimate nouns,from
possessingsome
realorimaginary
excellence, are personified as animates.Perhaps
aclue to thismay
be foundin the pan- theism, or ratherpan-demonism
of the Indian mythology.The
Indians of Oregon, forexample, believe thatnot onlyall animals were once people possessed ofsupernatural powers,or magicians, butthatprominent
mountains, isolated rocks,very
old trees,and
other remarkable objects,were
so likewise, abeliefwhich, infact,seems
tohave
characterized the superstitions of all the tribes of the continent. But,though
thismight
accountfora simpledivi- sion into animateand
inanimate,embracing
all such objects,itwould
not explain the multiplicity of forms exhibited insome
of theexamples above
given.The
disposition to particularize,and
thewant
of generic termsamong
barbarousraces,may have had some
connection with this division, forsince to adopta differentsystem
of counting every objectwould
be impossible, the simple desireto bespecificmay have
led toan anomalous
form ofclassi-fication.
4G
NU3IERAL
SYSTEMS. SThe
secondobjectin this investigation is toascertain theseriesI
a'of
numbers upon which enumeration
isbased among
different *t tribes.The most
natural, and,among
barbarous nations,most
"fljcommon,
is the quinary system, or thatby
fives, corresponding ^ with the fingers of one hand.In
this the first five digits are\
simple, thatisto say,arealldifferent; thesecond
form compounds
|or modifications of thesefirst, aswill
be
seenby
referringback
''^, to theexample
givenof theMexican,
'Inmany
cases, however, ? ithashappened
that, in the lapse of time,new words have been
;
adopted for a portion, while the old
have become
obsolete, orappear
only occasionally incombination.In
anumber
of voca- bularies examined, itwould appear
that thenumbers
7and
8most
frequently retain thecompound
form,and
10 hasoftenestchanged.The
tand
8usually contain the elements of thewords
2and
3, asrepresenting the2d and 3d
fingerson
thesecond
hand.Nine
is frequently
"one
less than ten."Probably
inalmost
allthese languagesthe quinarysystem was
the oldest,and
the decimal,where
itnow
exists,hasbeen
ofsub- sequent introduction, or rather growth. In the Chinook, for example, thenames
ofthe digits are all simplewith
theexcep- tionof that for seven.Thus makst
two,sini-makd
seven, sini being, perhaps,an
obsolete form of five.These
obsoleteforms
aresometimes
revealed in thenumeral
tenand
itscompounds and
multiples.Thus
the simple digit tenmay have one name,
while ineleven=10-fl,
ortwenty=2xl0,
theword
will be entirely different. In theNapa,
of California,-/?,open signifies two,and ma-ha-ish
ten, buttwenty
ishopi-hol, theother multi- ples retaining the syllable Jiolup
to one hundred,which
is ??ia-ha-ish sol, the
h
beingchanged
to s foreuphony.
Twenty
is, insome
languages, a translation oftwo
tens, in others adistinctword
exists,and
this is inmany
thename
for head, body, or person, as in the Opata, seisdosme
(literally one person), signifying, of course, all the fingersand
toes ofone
person. In theNisqually theword
fortwenty, s'ha-lat-chi,means
literally the fingers
and
toes.As
to the othermultiples of ten, they are usually expressedby
the literal translation of3x10, 4x10,
&c.But
in theOpata and
kindred dialects thisform
occurs, 20, seisdosme;
30, seisdosme macoi
tarewa, i. e. tenmore
thanone
person; 40,wodun
dosme, ortwo
twenties; 50,I
NUMERAL
SYSTEMS. 47xoodun
dosme macoi tarewa
; 60,heidum
dosme, three twen-ties, &c.
A good many anomalous
forms occur, unnecessary to repeat here, as, forinstance, 2x
4for 8,2x
3 for six.Besides the quinary
and
decimal series, the binaryand
vigin- tesimal aresupposed
to berepresented.A
sufficientnumber
ofextended vocabulariesof numeralshave
notbeen
obtained toadmit
of athorough
examinationand com-
parison ofthe different seriesin use,and
the following table has, therefore,been
prepared,which
willenable the collector tocom-
bine both subjects of inquiry in one, the figureshaving been
selectedinreference tothelatter,and
thearrangement
in parallelcolumns
tothe former.These
areheaded
"Simple
Cardinals,""Personal
Cardinals,"and
"Cardinals of Yalue," merely as a guide,and
not as indicating that theywill in all casesconvey
the true idea. It is desired that as careful inquiryas possible should bemade
into the facts in eachone,and
that the objects included inthe separate classesbe
enumerated. It is probable that insome
languagesothercolumns must be
added.Very
fewtribes,it willbe found,countbeyond
100,whilesome
of themore
ignoranthave no numbers beyond
five. Itisdesira- ableinallcases,ifpossible, to ascertain themeaning
ofthelarger collectivenumbers,
as 10, 20,and
100,and
another pointof in- quirymay
be thenames
of thedifferent fingers, especially of thethumb,
thus:—
Little finger.
Ring
finger.Middle
finger Fore-finger.Thumb.
48
NUMERAL
SYSTEMS.TABLE OF NUMERALS.
NUMERAL
SYSTEMS. 49TABLE OF NUMERALS.
Cardinalsofvalue.
Dalam dokumen
Smithsonian miscellaneous collections
(Halaman 46-54)