RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
C. Interpretation
1. Action and Learning Result at Cycle 1
4) Reflecting
The result of cycle 2 was be better than cycle 1. There was significant increase in this cycle. The condition of the class was getting better than before. It can be seen that the most of the students have not difficulty in speaking ability. It happened because the teacher used Communication Game. The students have serious in doing the assignment. In this meeting, most of students got good score. It happened caused the teacher and the researcher has revised and increased the teaching and learning process in cycle 1.
In the second cycle, the students were also active to do assignment than before. They also enjoyed in group to performance. It means that Communication Game is effective to improve the students speaking ability. The students who got score more than 65 were 19 (79,17%) out of 24 students. The research did not continue to the next cycle because the students’ average 76,66.
Table 14
Table of the Result Score of Students’ Pre test and Post test 1I N
O .
NAME Pre-tes score
Post-test 1 score
Increasing score
Note
1 AGP 65 65 0 Constant
2 BP 55 6
0
5 Improve
3 CSHQ 65 6
5
0 Constant
4 DAK 60 6
0
0 Constant
5 DR 65 6
5
0 Constant
6 EY 60 6
5
5 Improve
7 ET 55 6
0
5 Improve
8 FWJ 55 6
0
5 Improve
9 GGPF 60 6
0
0 Constant 1
0 HH 70 7
0
0 Constant 1
1 HJWI 60 6
5
5 Improve 1
2 IAA 65 6
5
0 Constant
1 IAC 55 60 5 Improve
3 1
4 MBS 65 6
5
0 Constant 1
5 MHA 70 7
0
0 Constant 1
6 MY 70 7
3
3 Improve 1
7 NSHN 70 7
3
3 Improve 1
8 RDA 60 7
0
10 Improve 1
9 RNAZ 60 6
5
5 Improve 2
0 ST 55 6
0
5 Improve 2
1 SS 55 6
0
5 Improve 2
2 TAHP 60 6
0
0 Constant 2
3 UPS 60 6
0
0 Constant 2
4 VR 65 6
5
0 Constant
Total 1,480
1, 5 4 1
Average 61,66
6 4 , 2 0 Source: the result of pre test and post test 1
In this research, pre-test and post test had done individually It is aimed to know the ability of students before and after treatment. From the result of pre-test and post-test, we know that there was an increasing from the result score, and there was some students get same score or constant but commonly their performance increased. It can be seen from average score in pre-test 61,66 became 64,20 in post-test 1 at cycle 1.
At the cycle 1, the teacher found some difficulties that happend in the class such as students was nervous when speak in frot of the class and did not have imagination about it, and so they can not express and develop their idea. Another case is some students confused how to pronounce the words, because some of word that they want to says is never they listened before.
a. The Result of Students Learning in Cycle 2
The result and data from the cycle 1 make the researcher continued the learning process to the cycle II and fixed the problem at the cycle I.
Finally, the learning process could be better. It can be seen that the students score was increased. The table below show the increasing of students’ speaking ability based on the result of post-test 1 and post-test .
.Table 15
The Result Score of Students’ Post test 1 and Post test 2 N
O .
NAME Post-test 1 score
Post-test 2 score
Increasing score
Note
1 AGP 65 7
0
10 Improve
2 BP 60 6
5
5 Improve
3 CSHQ 65 7
0
5 Improve
4 DAK 60 6
0
0 Constant
5 DR 65 6
5
0 Constant
6 EY 65 6
5
5 Improve
7 ET 60 6
0
0 Constant
8 FWJ 60 6
5
5 Improve
9 GGPF 60 6
0
0 Constant 1
0 HH 70 7
3
3 Improve 1
1 HJWI 65 6
5
0 Constant 1
2 IAA 65 7
0
5 Improve 1
3 IAC 60 6
5
5 Improve
1
4 MBS 65 7
0
5 Improve 1
5 MHA 70 7
3
3 Improve 1
6 MY 73 7
5
2 Improve
1
7 NSHN 73 7
5
2 Improve 1
8 RDA 70 7
3
3 Improve 1
9 RNAZ 65 6
5
0 Constant 2
0 ST 60 6
5
5 Improve 2
1 SS 60 6
0
Improve 2
2 TAHP 60 6
5
5 Constant 2
3 UPS 60 6
0
0 Constant
2
4 VR 65 6
5
0 Constant
Total 1,541 1,599
Average 64,20 66.62
Source: the result of post test 1 test and post test 2
Actually, the result of post-test 1 is good enough. But, the students score could not achieve the target (KKM), after the second treatment and the same test done, most of them increased. It means that improving the student’s speaking ability through communication game.
At the second treatment, the students can explore their idea, decrease emotional, and more understand about the material. It can be seen from their score at post-test 2. Most of the students achieved the KKM.
The increasing of students speaking score from pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2 can be seen in the table and chart below :
.Table 16
The Result Score of Students’ Pre-Tes, Post test 1 and Post test 2 N
O .
NAME
Students Result
Category Pre-tes Post test 1 Post-test 2
1 AGP 65 65 70 Improve
2 BP 55 60 65 Improve
3 CSHQ 65 65 70 Improve
4 DAK 60 60 60 Constant
5 DR 65 65 65 Constant
6 EY 60 65 65 Constant
7 ET 55 60 60 Constant
8 FWJ 55 60 65 Improve
9 GGPF 60 60 60 Constant
1
0 HH 70 70 73 Improve
1
1 HJWI 60 65 65 Constant
1
2 IAA 65 65 70 Improve
1
3 IAC 55 60 65 Improve
1
4 MBS 65 65 70 Improve
1
5 MHA 70 70 73 Improve
1
6 MY 70 73 75 Improve
1
7 NSHN 70 73 75 Improve
s 1 8
RDA 60 70 73
Improve
1
9 RNAZ 60 65 65 Constant
2
0 ST 55 60 65 Improve
2
1 SS 55 60 60 Improve
2
2 TAHP 60 60 65 Improve
2
3 UPS 60 60 60 Constant
2
4 VR 65 65 65 Constant
Total 1,480 1,541 1,599
Average 61,66 64,20 66.62
Source: the result of pretest, post test 1 and post test 2
The data above is presented the improving score of students in speaking ability. The improving can be examined from the results of the students’ score in pre-test. The mean score was only 61,66 which far
from satisfying. But, after using communication game the score was improve.
Besides that, there was an improving from post-test 1 to post test 2. The students could achieve the target, the target is 65% of students got minimum score 65 and they could understand the material and can speaking English well than before. It means that they can improve their idea in speaking ability. So, it can be concluded that using communication game can improve the students’ speaking ability.
Chart 1.
The Comparison of score average at pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2
Based on the table 14 and chart 2 above, it can be inferred that improving the student’s speaking ability through communication game.
There was improving of students score in pre-test, post-test 1 and post-
pre-tes post test 1 post test 2 61,66
64,2 66,62