• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

What does the Hippocampus Do?

Place cells neurons that respond when you are in a

specific place, in the place field of the neuron. So a

place cell would fire when you are in your bedroom

or house, etc. Each hippocampal neuron has a place

field in many different environments. At first when

you put the rat in the new environment, no neurons

fire. Then as the rat becomes familiar with the room,

neurons fire for particular parts of the room.

What does the Hippocampus Do?

Configural Association Theory The theory that the hippocampus retains the interrelation among cues, spatially and temporally. So it remembers the relationship between a visual cue and a location as signaling food.

Path Integration Theory the hippocampus

calculates current location, past location, and

future location from one’s own movement.

The Amygdal: Fear

and Memory

Amygdala

• • The amygdala modulates the formation of memories in other brain structures, such as the hippocampus.

Information or events of particular emotional /

motivational significance are better remembered than those of little importance (c.f. flashbulb memory).

• Lesions in humans and primates reveal a role for the

amygdala in the perception of emotional cues and the

generation of emotional responses, particularly those

associated with negative emotions such as fear.

Amygdala

• • Amygdala lesions before retention testing

disrupt conditioned fear. Hence, the amygdala may be the site of storage of fear memories.

• Temporary inactivation by drugs during

acquisition has the same effect, suggesting a

genuine role in memory encoding.

The Chowchilla Kidnapping

Officials unearth the underground Livermore dungeon in which 26

schoolchildren and their bus driver were held captive in 1976.

Credit: James Palmer / Associated Press 1976

Flashbulb Memory

• The number of details remembered about September 11 and the everyday event were statistically indistinguishable. Most memories were consistent, and over time, the number of consistent details participants were able to recall did decline, but there was no difference in the decline for ordinary memories and for memories of September 11. The number of inconsistent details (e.g. "I was with Fred" changing to "I was with Mary") increased similarly for both ordinary events and September 11.

Flashbulb Memory

• What was different was the confidence and vividness of the memories: Participants were more likely to believe their memories of September 11 were accurate than their ordinary memories, and they reported those memories as being equally vivid, even months after the event. Meanwhile, they reported the ordinary memories

becoming less and less vivid and reliable, even though objectively they could remember no more details about September 11.

Recall for Details During Hurricanes

Terms

• Encoding

• Storage

• Retrieval

• Organizationa l encoding / chunking

• Sensory memory

• Iconic mem.

• Echoic memory

• Short-term memory

• Long-term memory

• Prospective memory

• Tip-of-the- tongue

• Memory

misattribution

• Source memory

• False

recognition

• Bias

• Suggestibility

• Flashbulb mem.

• Transfer- appropriate

• Explicit memory

• Procedural mem.

• Implcit mem.

• Semantic mem.

• Priming

• Episodic

• Transience

• Retroactive interference

• Proactive interference

• Rehearsal

• Working memory

• Long-term memory

• Anterograde amnesia

• Retrograde amnesia

• NMDA receptor

• Retrieval cue

• State-

depenedent mem.

The End of Memory

Back-Up Slides

Forensics and Memory: False Confessions

Forensics and Memory: False Confessions

Forensics and Memory: Brief Overview of Criminal Justice System

• 74% of crimes do not result in arrest

• 76% of charges are dropped or juvenile

• 22% of charges go to trial

• Only about 14 of 1000 crimes committed will

actually go to trial – criminal or civil

Concepts to know

Interference:

Proactive vs. Retroactive

1 2 1 2

Explicitness:

Explicit vs. Implicit

Bla

Concepts to know

Encoding specificity

Modal model of memory:

Sensory memory  Short term memory Long term memory

Information Response

Storage

Retrieval

-Context effect -State dependent learning

Concepts to know

Working memory = structured STM

Phonological loop

Visuospatial sketchpad

Central executive

LTM

Declarative Procedural

Episodic Semantic

Memory structure

Implicit Explicit

Knowing Vivid Recall

Knowing that... Knowing how to...

Varieties of Memory: Declarative

• “What” memory

– What happened, when it happened, that it happened.

• Episodic: events, “when and where”

– Re-experiencing, autobiographical

– Easier to acquire, may suffer from “multiple exposures”

• Semantic: knowledge, facts

– Not autobiographical

– Multiple exposures needed to acquire and strengthen knowledge

– May misattribute knowledge!

Varieties of memory: Procedural

– Consist of procedural and motor memory – “How” memory

• How to do things, procedures used

• Examples: how to ride a bike, how to tie your shoes, how to drive to school/work

– Motor memory

• Consists of actions/muscle use

• Riding a bike!, a dance performance,

Caption: Results of Talarico and Rubin’s (2003) flashbulb memory experiment. (a) The decrease in the number of details remembered was similar for memories of 9/11 and for memories of an

everyday event. (b) Participants’ belief that their memory was accurate remained high for 9/11, but decreased for memories of the everyday event. (Extracted from “Consistency and Key properties of Flashbulb and Everyday Memories,” by J. M. Talarico & D. C. Rubin, Psychological Science, 14, 5, Fig. 1. Copyright © 2003 with permission from the American Psychological Society.

Caption: What happens at a synapse as (a) a stimulus is first presented. The record next to the electrode indicates the rate of firing in the axon of neuron B. (b) As the stimulus is repeated structural changes are beginning to occur. (c) After many repetitions, more

complex connections have developed between the two neurons, which causes an increase in the firing rate, even though the stimulus is the same on that was presented in (a).

Caption: Results of Warrington and

Weiskrantz’s (1968) experiment.

Caption: Results of Stanny and Johnson’s (2000) weapons-focus

experiment. Presence of a weapon that was fired is associated with a decrease in memory about the perpetrator, the victim, and the weapon.

Forgetting Is a Process,

Forgetting Is a Process,

Dokumen terkait