• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Baire’s Theorem

Dalam dokumen Stephen Abbott Second Edition (Halaman 118-121)

106 Chapter 3. Basic Topology ofR (a) Is the resulting set compact? Perfect?

(b) Using the algorithms from Section3.1, compute the length and dimension of this Cantor-like set.

Exercise 3.4.5. LetA and B be nonempty subsets of R. Show that if there exist disjoint open sets U and V with A⊆ U and B ⊆V, then A and B are separated.

Exercise 3.4.6. Prove Theorem3.4.6.

Exercise 3.4.7. A setEistotally disconnected if, given any two distinct points x, y∈E, there exist separated setsAandB withx∈A,y∈B, andE=A∪B.

(a) Show thatQis totally disconnected.

(b) Is the set of irrational numbers totally disconnected?

Exercise 3.4.8. Follow these steps to show that the Cantor set is totally dis- connected in the sense described in Exercise3.4.7.

LetC= n=0Cn, as defined in Section3.1.

(a) Given x, y ∈C, with x < y, set ǫ=y−x. For each n= 0,1,2, . . ., the set Cn consists of a finite number of closed intervals. Explain why there must exist anN large enough so that it is impossible forxandyboth to belong to the same closed interval of CN.

(b) Show thatC is totally disconnected.

Exercise 3.4.9. Let{r1, r2, r3, . . .}be an enumeration of the rational numbers, and for eachn∈Nset ǫn= 1/2n. DefineO=

n=1Vǫn(rn), and letF=Oc. (a) Argue that F is a closed, nonempty set consisting only of irrational

numbers.

(b) DoesF contain any nonempty open intervals? IsF totally disconnected?

(See Exercise3.4.7for the definition.)

(c) Is it possible to know whether F is perfect? If not, can we modify this construction to produce a nonempty perfect set of irrational numbers?

3.5. Baire’s Theorem 107 to this tidy description of all open sets is the Cantor set. The Cantor set is a closed, uncountable set that contains no intervals of any kind. Thus, no such characterization of closed sets should be anticipated.

Recall that the arbitrary union of open sets is always an open set. Likewise, the arbitrary intersection of closed sets is closed. By taking unions of closed sets or intersections of open sets, however, it is possible to obtain a new selection of subsets ofR.

Definition 3.5.1. A setA⊆Ris called anFσ set if it can be written as the countable union of closed sets. A set B ⊆ R is called a Gδ set if it can be written as the countable intersection of open sets.

Exercise 3.5.1. Argue that a setAis aGδ set if and only if its complement is anFσ set.

Exercise 3.5.2. Replace each with the word finite or countable, depending on which is more appropriate.

(a) The union ofFσ sets is anFσ set.

(b) The intersection ofFσ sets is anFσ set.

(c) The union ofGδ sets is aGδ set.

(d) The intersection ofGδ sets is aGδ set.

Exercise 3.5.3. (This exercise has already appeared as Exercise3.2.15.) (a) Show that a closed interval [a, b] is aGδ set.

(b) Show that the half-open interval (a, b] is both aGδ and anFσ set.

(c) Show thatQis anFσ set, and the set of irrationalsIforms aGδ set.

It is not readily obvious that the classFσ does not include every subset of R, but we are now ready to argue that I is not anFσ set (and consequently Q is not aGδ set). This will follow from a theorem due to Ren´e Louis Baire (1874–1932).

Recall that a setG⊆Risdense inRif, given any two real numbersa < b, it is possible to find a pointx∈Gwitha < x < b.

Theorem 3.5.2. If {G1, G2, G3, . . .} is a countable collection of dense, open sets, then the intersection n=1Gn is not empty.

Proof. Before embarking on the proof, notice that we have seen a conclusion like this before. Theorem3.3.5 asserts that a nested sequence of compact sets has a nontrivial intersection. In this theorem, we are dealing with dense, open sets, but as it turns out, we are going to use Theorem3.3.5—and actually, just the Nested Interval Property—as the crucial step in the argument.

Exercise 3.5.4. Starting with n= 1, inductively construct a nested sequence ofclosed intervalsI1⊇I2⊇I3⊇ · · · satisfyingIn⊆Gn. Give special attention to the issue of the endpoints of eachIn. Show how this leads to a proof of the theorem.

108 Chapter 3. Basic Topology ofR Exercise 3.5.5. Show that it is impossible to write

R=

n=1

Fn,

where for eachn∈N,Fn is a closed set containing no nonempty open intervals.

Exercise 3.5.6. Show how the previous exercise implies that the set I of irrationals cannot be anFσ set, andQcannot be aGδ set.

Exercise 3.5.7. Using Exercise 3.5.6 and versions of the statements in Exercise3.5.2, construct a set that is neither inFσ nor inGδ.

Nowhere-Dense Sets

We have encountered several equivalent ways to assert that a particular set G is dense in R. In Section 3.2, we observed thatGis dense in R if and only if every point ofRis a limit point ofG. Because the closure of any set is obtained by taking the union of the set and its limit points, we have that

Gis dense inRif and only ifG=R.

The set Q is dense in R; the set Z is clearly not. In fact, in the jargon of analysis,Zis nowhere-dense inR.

Definition 3.5.3. A setE isnowhere-dense ifE contains no nonempty open intervals.

Exercise 3.5.8. Show that a set E is nowhere-dense in Rif and only if the complement of E is dense inR.

Exercise 3.5.9. Decide whether the following sets are dense in R, nowhere- dense inR, or somewhere in between.

(a) A=Q∩[0,5].

(b) B ={1/n:n∈N}. (c) the set of irrationals.

(d) the Cantor set.

We can now restate Theorem3.5.2in a slightly more general form.

Theorem 3.5.4 (Baire’s Theorem). The set of real numbers R cannot be written as the countable union of nowhere-dense sets.

Proof. For contradiction, assume that E1, E2, E3, . . . are each nowhere-dense and satisfyR=

n=1En.

Exercise 3.5.10. Finish the proof by finding a contradiction to the results in this section.

Dalam dokumen Stephen Abbott Second Edition (Halaman 118-121)