• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Case Study

Dalam dokumen Logistics Operations and Management (Halaman 194-198)

Part I Introduction

P- S Roll

9.3 Case Study

In this section, challenges in the packaging of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) are explained [22].

Table 9.2 Packaging Consequences [6]

Packaging Consequences Trade-Offs

Increased package information Decreases order-filling times Decreases tracking of lost shipments Increased package protection Decreases damage in transport

Increases weight

Decreases cube utilization from larger dimensions Increases product value

Increased standardization Decreases MH

Decreases customer customization

MEMS are made of mechanical devices and mechanical components that can be as small as a few microns. They can be mechanical interconnects of microsystems, and they can also receive signals from one physical domain and send them to another, such as mechanical to electrical, electrical to mechanical, and electrical to chemical. These devices are broadly categorized as either sensors or actuators.

MEMS sensors are devices such as pressure sensors, accelerometers, and gyro- meters that perceive an aspect of their environment and produce a corresponding output signal. Actuators are devices that are given a specific input signal on which

Table 9.3 Current Packaging Parameters, Challenges, and Suggested Possible Solutions for MEMS

Packaging Parameters

Challenges Possible Solutions

Release etch and dry

Washing away parts during release

Freeze drying, coating, or processes that reduce surface tension

Must release parts individually

after dicing Use dimples

Develop a dicing Laser sawing Dicing and

cleaving

Eliminating contamination caused by cooling fluid and

particulates during wafer sawing

Release dice after dicing Cleave wafers

Laser sawing

Wafer level encapsulation Die handling Damages top die’s face contact

region

Fixtures that hold MEMS dice by sides rather than top face, such as collects that fit existing pick- and-place equipment

Stress Abating performance degradation and resonant frequency shifts

Low modulus

Low creep die attach material Curling of thin film layers Annealing

Misalignment of device features Die attach materials with CTE similar to that of silicon

Outgassing Corrosion Low outgassing epoxies

Outgassing of organic solvents from polymeric die attach materials

Low modulus solders New die attach materials Removal of outgassing vapor Testing Applying nonelectric stimuli

to devices

Electrical test structures to mimic nonelectrical functions Testing moving device features

before release

Inability to release parts before dicing

Modify (where possible) wafer- scale probers to do nonelectrical tests

Cost-effective, high-throughput, and parallel-packaged device- test systems

to act and a specific motion or action is produced. Other examples of MEMS actua- tors are microengines, microlocks, and discriminators.

MEMS packaging is quite different from conventional integrated circuit (IC) packaging. Whereas many MEMS devices must interface with the environment to perform their intended functions, the package must be able to facilitate access with the environment while protecting the enclosed devices. The package must also not interface with or impede the action of the MEMS device. The incomplete attach- ment material should be low stress and low outgassing while also minimizing stress relaxation over time, which can lead to scale-factor shifts in sensor devices. The fabrication process used in creating the devices must be compatible with each other and not damage the devices. Many devices are specific in application, requiring custom packages that are not commercially available. Devices may also need media compatible packages that can protect the devices from harsh environments in which the MEMS device may operate. Current packaging parameters, challenges, and sug- gested possible solutions for MEMS are shown in Table 9.3.

References

[1] E.L. Magad, J.M. Amos, Total Materials Management, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995.

[2] P. Baily, D. Framer, Material Management Handbook, Grower Publishing, England, 1988.

[3] R.H. Ballou, Business Logistics Management, third ed., Prentice Hall, New York, 1992.

[4] R.M. Eastman, Material Handlings, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1987.

[5] J.A. Tompkins, J.A. White, Y.A. Bozer, E.H. Frazelle, J.M.A. Tanchoco, J. Trevino, Facilities Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.

[6] J.R. Stock, D.M. Lambert, Strategic Logistics Management, fourth ed., McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 2001.

[7] Satich C. Ailawadi, Rakesh Sing, Logistics Management, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 2006.

[8] A. West, Managing Distribution and Change: The Total Distribution Concept, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.

[9] S. Chittratanawat, J.S. Noble, An integrated approach for facility layout, P/D location and material handling system design, Int. J. Prod. Res. 37 (1999) 683706.

[10] S.G. Lee, S.W. Lye, Design for manual packaging, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Republic of Singapore, Emerald J. 33(2) (2003) 163189.

[11] J. Paulo, A Mathematical Model of Operation Allocation and Material Handling System Selection Problem Manufacturing System, M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Windsor, Canada, 2002.

[12] J. Paulo, R.S. Lashkari, S.P. Dutta, Operation allocation and material handling system selection problem manufacturing system: a sequential modeling approach, Int. J. Prod.

Res. 40 (2002) 735.

[13] R.S. Lashkari, Towards an integrated model of operation allocation and material han- dling selection in cellular manufacturing systems, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87(2) (2004) 115139.

[14] W. Soroka, Fundamentals of Packaging Technology, Institute of Packaging Professionals, Naperville, IL, 2002. ISBN 1-930268-25-4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Special:BookSources/1930268254.

[15] F. Albert Paine, The Packaging User’s Handbook, Springer, Blackie Academic and Professional, New York, 1991 (published by authority of the Institute of Packaging).

[16] J. Garcı´a-Arca, J.C. Prado-Prado, Antonio-Garcia-Lorenzo, Logistics improvement through packaging rationalization: a practical experience, J. Packag. Technol. Sci. 19 (2006) 303308.

[17] W.F. Friedman, J.J. Kipnees, Industrial Packaging, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1960.

[18] Hanlon J.F., Kelsey R.J., & Forcinio H.E., Handbook of Package Engineering, third ed., CRC Press, London, 1998.

[19] D.M. Lambert, JR Stock, L.M. Ellarm, Fundamental of Logistics Management, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1998.

[20] J. Hassel, T. Leek, Packaging Effects on Logistics Activities: A Study at ROL International, Jo¨nko¨ping International Business School, Jo¨nko¨ping, 2006.

[21] F.T.S. Chan, H.K. Chan, K.L. Choy, A systematic approach to manufacturing packag- ing logistics, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 29(910) (2006) 10881101.

[22] A.P. Malshe, C. O’Neal, S.B. Singh, W.D. Brown, W.P. Eaton, W.M. Miller, Challenges in the packaging of MEMS, Int. J. Microcircuits Electron. Packag. 22(3) (1999) Third Quarter (ISSN 1063-1674) 24.

10 Storage, Warehousing, and Inventory Management

Maryam Abbasi

Department of Industrial Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Dalam dokumen Logistics Operations and Management (Halaman 194-198)