CYRTOCEEAS
OHIOENSE, Meek.Shell long, slender, gently arched,
and
very graduall}^ ta- pering, section nearly circular, theclorso-ventral diameter being slightly greater than the transverse. Septa distantfrom
each other,on
the outer orconvex
(ventral) side of the curve, slightlymore
than one-sixth,and on
the inner side about one-seventh, the dorso-ventral diameter. Siphuncle situated near the outer sideof the curve,but notexactly marginal. Surfaceornamented by
small,somewhat
irregularannularridgesand
strisethat curve a littlebackward
in crossing the ventral side.Rather
distinct, raised lines alsomark
the surface longitudinally, so as toform
with the annularmarkings
asomewhat
cancellated appearance.Length
of a specimen incomplete at both ends,and
septate throughout, excepting about one inch of the anterior end, 6.50 inches (measuring along theconvex
side of the curve). Dorso- ventral diameter at the posterior end, 1.33 inches; transverse' Since seeing thesefiguresofProf. Barrande's, I
am
led tothink it pro- bable that C. hyblis, White, and C. multicostata, M.&
W.,may
belong to onespecies, the apparent obtuselyrounded smooth apex of C. hyblisbeing theprincipalcharacterthat ledustosuppose the C. multicostatatobequite distinct.A
comparison of specimens, liowever,might showother distinc- tions.[June
6,NATURAL
SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 87 diameter at thesame
place, 1.27 inches.The
increase insize issuchthat the
same measurements
at a point three inches farther forward, are respectively 1.56and
1.50 inches, while from this point to thebroken anterior end,which includes only about one inch of thebody
chamber,the shell diminishes a little in both diameters,but apparentlymore
in the transversethanthe dorso- ventral,though
thismay
be in part due to accidental lateral pressure.This speciesseems to berelatedto Crxjptoceras eitgemum, Hall (Regents' 15th Report,p. 70, pi.9, figs. 1,2,and 3),but evidently not only attained a larger size, but differs in having its dorso- ventraldiametera littlegreaterthanthe transverse, instead of the reverse. It alsodiffersin being
marked
withdistinctlongitudinal raised lines,as well as intapering somewhat, fromthe centralre-gionforward,
and
inhavingits septamore
closelyarranged. Inform
it agreesmore
orlessnearly with several of theBohemian
species figuredby
Dr.Barrande, butit differs from all ofthem
in its surfacemarkings
; while from his C.pugio^ which has some-what
similarsculpturing, itdiffersinbeing a littlemore
curved,and
withouttransverse undulations.The
entire shell could scarcelyhave been less than 12 to 14 inches in length,and
probably curved so as to form about one- fourth of acircle.Locality
and
position. Dublin, Franklin Co., Ohio. Cornife- rousgroup
of theDevonian
series.GYROCEKAS
(TKOCHOCERAS?) OHIOENSE,Meek.Shell attaining a largesize, oval-subdiscoid;
composed
of thi-ee or four rather rapidly enlarging whorls, the inner ones of which are closely contiguous, while thelast one seemstobecome
alittle free at the aperture; umbilicus largeand
of moderate depth.Volutions
rounded —subquadrangular, with the transverse dia-
meter somewhat
greater than the dorso-ventral; rather broadly
flattened on
the periphery, and
compressed convex
on the sides,
which round
off graduallyinto the umbilicus,and more
abruptly to the periphery,exceptinginyoung
shells, which havethe sides of the volutionsmore
flattened,and
rounding as abruptly into the umbilicus as to theflattened outer side. Septa moderately distant, orseparatedby
spaceswhich measure, on the middle of each side, about one-third the dorso-ventral diameter ofthe volu- 1871.]88 PROCEEDINGS OF
THE ACADEMY
OPtion atthe
same
point; curvinggracefullybackward
as theycross the sides,and
forward as the}'passfrom the sides to the flattened periphery,incrossingwliichthe}'againmake
another,butstronger,backward
curve.Body chamber
large, oroccupyingmore
than half the outer volution. Surface (of cast)ornamented by
small transverse ridges, ofwhich aboutthirtymay
l^e counted toa side ofeachvolution,theouter halfonly ofwhich they occupy, without passing over orupon
the periphery; whileon
the inner volutions they are sometimes so short as toassume
the aspect of trans- versely elongated nodes. Siphuncle, aperture,and
finer surfacemarkings unknown.
Greatest diameteracross the disc of a specimen with a part of the outer volutionbrokenaway, about nine inches; dorso-ventral diameter of outer volution at the point
where
it is broken olfj 3.63 inches; thickness,or transverse diameter,ofsame
atsame
point, about 3.90inches.Owing
to the factthat the onlytwo
specimens ofthis species Ihave
seen are both in such a condition as toshow
clearly only one side (theuppersideofit isa Trochoceras),Iam
insome
littledoubt
whether it is a Oyroceras or a Trochoceras.From
the depthof theconcavityofthis side,however,Icanscarcelyquestion that the volutions arereallycoiled in thesame
plane, as inGyro-
cerasand
Nautilus.The
contiguous character of its volutions (excepting apparently the last one, near the aperture) is, how- ever,rather against itsbeing a Gyroceras,though
the innerturns aresometimes in contactin species apparently belonging tothat genus. If thelast turn reallj' doesbecome
free, as seems tobe thecase, this characterwould
be equally against the probability of itsbeing a Nautilus; but as the specimens are not in a condi- tion to quiteremove
alldoubtson
this point,it isbarely possible that this shellmay
be found tobelong tosome
of the sections of thatgroup,though I can scarcelythink so.I
know
ofno described species of Gyroceras so nearly allied to this specificall}', asto require aclose comparison.Locality
and
position. Delaware, Ohio,and
inMarion County
ofthesame
State. Coruiferouslimestoneof the UpiDcrHelderberg Series (Devonian).[June 6,
NATURAL
SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 89GYKOCERAS
(NAUTILUS?) INELEGANS,Meek.Shell attaining a largesize,subdiscoidal. Volutions about
two and
a half tothree,increasing rapidly in size,havingasomewhat
greater dorso-ventral than transverse diameter, being moderately compressedon
each side, narrowlyrounded
over the periphery,and
rounding regularly into the umbilicus,which is of moderate depthand
distinctly narrower than the dorso-ventral diameterof the outer whorl. First turn apparentlyslightlyembraced by
the second,which
seemstobecome
free toward the aperture. Septa rather distant, deeply concave on their anterior faces, and all crossing thesidesand
peripherywith veryslightbackward
curves; separated from each other on the peripheryb}^ spaces equalling abouthalfthe dorso-ventraldiameteratthe point ofmeasurement.Body chamber
large,orforminghalf the outer volutions; aperture notexpanded
; lip sinuous on the outer side. Surface of cast showing,on
the inner volutions,some
traces of rather distant transverse ridges, whichbecome
nearly or quite obsolete on the outer turn. Siphuncleand
finer surface markingsunknown.
Greatest diameter across the disc of a specimen a little com- pressed
by
accidental pressure, nine inches; dorso-ventral dia- meter of last turn near the aperture, 4.10 inches; transverse diameter of same, 3.50 inches.This is another form in reo;ard to the generic characters of which I
am
in doubt. Itsmore
rapidlyexpanding
volutions,more rounded
periphery, proportionally narrow umbilicus,and
closely contiguous, orevenslightlyembraced
inner turns, giveitamuch more
nautiloid look than the last,and
I should scarcely hesitate to refer it to the genus Nautilus,if it were notforthe fact that the outer volution seems to be a little detached at the aperture. Still,thismay
possibl}- be due tocompression.Locality