The existence of nuclear weapons since the era of the second world war until todayiis still a debate among elites and scholars even in the
international community. The claim to the impact of nuclear weapons certainly has its own perspective so that countries try to develop nuclear weapons and try to prevent development because they are based on different perspectives. The views of Waltz and Sagan greatly influence the nuclear dynamics that occur in the world as well as nuclear developing countries consider that nuclear is very beneficial to international security and then nuclear-free countries such as Southeast Asia and a number of other countries consider that nuclear is a threat to the international world. This is a never-ending debate in which both sides claim that their views are correct.
North Korea is a country that has problems in international politics.
This communist countryilocated in an area that is politically very prone to conflict. Supported by the instability of North Korea, the nuclear danger becomes very real. When a country feels threatened by North Korea's nuclear weapons, that country will increase its arsenal. This stepiquickly followed by other neighbors in the area who did have fragile relationships. Therefore, the international community needs to be careful about North Korea's nuclear program.
They had to guess the direction North Korea wanted. From the very beginning of the nuclear talks initiated by the United States under the Bill Clinton administration, there has been a strong push for financial incentives. All of theseimuch needed by poor North Korea in realizing the ideals of being a strong and prosperous country. So nuclear is used as a tool to secure North Korea's diplomatic power.
Nuclear presence is a threat to international security, because with the increase in nuclear developing countries, they feel strong and thirst for power so that it has the potential to trigger nuclear war. In addition, another threat is when the NWS countries conduct nuclear tests, of course, damage the environment for the radiation they cause.
Therefore, according to the author, nuclear development threatens international security after seeing and comparing the positive and negative impacts of the benefits of nuclear existence. And then departing from the two assumptions between Sagan and Waltz, it has been summarized in the concept of international security that the existence of nuclear weapons is a threat to the environment, health, food, politics, economy and then indicated to international security.
The set of international legal rules governing nuclear matters was created as an effort to maintain international peace and security. The laws made are implemented and supervised by the countries jointly to prevent the development of nuclear technology for military purposes and to avoid suspicions of countries in the world on countries that are developing their nuclear technology. The rules of international law in maintaining global peace and stability should be implemented more carefully by the UN Security Council as an organ that has a direct mandate from the UN Charter in maintaining international peace and security. The UN Security Council should in carrying out its responsibilities act in accordance with the principles of international law in order to achieve common goals. And to make it happen can not be separated from the contribution of each country.
The UN rules in the form of resolutions that have been issued as many as three resolutions before the latest UN Security Council Resolution Number 2094 in order to follow up on North Korea's nuclear test. The implementation of these resolutions is lacking where there are several countries that are still not firm in implementing the contents of the resolution. It is hoped that every country can follow up and implement the contents of the resolution as a concrete step in preventing any more countries from conducting nuclear tests for military purposes that can trigger the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT None
CONFLICT OF INTEREST None
REFERENCES
Abdurahman, Dudung. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Sejarah.
Yogyakarta: ArRuzz Media.
Abdurahman, Dudung. 2011. Metode Penelitian Sejarah Islam.
Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Al Syahrin, Muhammad Najeri. "Logika Dilema Keamanan Asia Timur dan Rasionalitas Pengembangan Senjata Nuklir Korea Utara." Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 2, no. 2 (2018): 116-138.
Amir, Hendarsah, 2007. 11 Macan Asia Musuh Amerika. Yogjakarta:
Galangpres
Barston R P .1988. Modern Diplomacy. Longman House United Kingdom: Harlow.
Bastian, Indra. 2014. Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Sektor Publik.
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Diamond, Louise, 2002. Multi-Track Diplomacy: A System Approach to Peace, Bloomfield, USA: Kumarin Press, Inc.,
Djelantik, Sukawarsini, 2008. Diplomasi antara Teori dan Praktik, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,
Etel Solingen, 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East, (Princeton: Princeton University Press.
International Institute for Strategic Studies. 2004. North Korea’s Weapons Programmes: A Net Assessment. London: IISS.
J.G. Starke. 2008. Pengantar Hukum Internasional 1 terjemahan Bambang Iriana Djajaatmadja. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
James. Wirtz, J. 2010, Weapon of Mass Destruction”, dalam The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies. London & New York:
Routldge.
Mas’oed, M., 1990. Ilmu Hubungan Internasional: Disiplin Dan Metodologi. Jakarta: LP3ES
Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Encyclopedia. 2002. Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. USA: Merriam Webster Inc.
N.D. White. “Keeping the peace: The United Nations and the maintenance of International peace and security”. (Oxford:
Manchester University Press. 1997). hlm. 37
Permata, Inda Mustika. "Analisis Konstruktivisme: Prilaku Korea Utara Terhadap Denuklirisasi." Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) 8, no. 2 (2019): 104-116.
Purwono, Andi, and Ahmad Saifuddin Zuhri. "Peran Nuklir Korea Utara Sebagai Instrumen Diplomasi Politik Internasional."
SPEKTRUM 7, no. 2 (2010).
Samuel S. Kim. 2004. The International Relations of Northeast Asia.
USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Selig. S. Harrison. 2002. Korean Endgame: A Strategy For Reunification And Us Disengagement. USA: Princeton University Press.
SIPRI, Yearbook 2008, Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)
Sjamsuddin, Helius. 2007. Metodologi Sejarah, Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Sumaryo Suryokusumo. 1987. Organisasi Internasional. Jakarta: UI Press.
Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, eds. 2003. The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers Aldershot. UK: Ashgate.
Winarno Budi. 2011. Isu-Isu Global Kontemporer. Cet. I. Yogyakarta:
CAPS.
Dewi, Maharani Chandra. “Cyber Espionage in National and Global Perspective: How Indonesia Deal With This