CHAPTER IV RESULT OF THE RESEARCH AND
C. Description of The Research
2. Cycle II
material and then 40% responding the question. It can be seen that more than 50% from all class was active in the learning process.
d. Reflecting
Based on the result of the first meeting, it can be seen that the most of the students got difficulty to memorize vocabulary. The reflection in cycle I was still found inthe deficienciesthat is occurredin cycle I. As forthe deficiencies in this first cycle, there are: when explaining the material, the researcher got less attention to students so that the students were noisy, students are less active in the group, some students got failure in test of cycle I. The reflection result can be inferred that:
1) The researcher should be more assertive and payed more attention in order that thestudents can pay attention to the teacher when explaining the material.
2) The researcher should more in around to monitor one by one in the group.
3) The researcher should give more attention to students who are less responsive
In the planning of cycle II, the researcher and collaborator discussed about some problems that found in cycle I. Therefore, in this step the researcher would prepare the lesson plan, and material that would be used in teaching learning process. The material was list of vocabulary (noun, verb, adjective). Moreover, the researcher made an observation sheet that consists of list of students’ name and list of the students’ activities that will be observed during teaching learning process.
b. Acting
The researcher and collaborator arranged the schedule of action in cycle II. It can be seen on the table below:
Table 11
The Schedule of Action in Cycle II
Meeting Day/Date Time
1st Thursday, November 23rd 2017 09.00-10.30 a.m 2nd Tuesday, December 30th 2017 08.30 – 09.30a.m
1) The First Meeting
The first meeting was done onTuesday, Thursday, November 23rd2017 at 09.00-10.30 a.m at the beginning of the class, the
researcher greeted the students friendly. The students answered it friendly also.
The learning process in the cycle II was focused on the weakness of cycle I. The researcher divided the students into several groups, each group consist 5 students. The researcher guided the students how to answer crossword puzzle first. Then, if the studentsunderstand about crossword puzzle the researcher let each group to answer with their group. After that if they have done,the teacher and the student disscussed together to know which one the group got better score.The students looked very enthusiastic. In the second meeting, the students seemed more active than previous meeting.
Finally, the bell rang after 2 x 30 minutes. It means that the time was up and the researcher closed the lesson and reminded the students to study again about vocabulary.
2) The Second Meeting
The second meeting was done on Tuesday, December 30th 2017 at 08.30–09.30 a.m. The researcher began the class by greeted the students. After that, the researcher asked about their condition and checked the attendance list. The researcher asked to the students whether they have any question about the material. Then, the researcher gave feedback to the students about their question.
After that, the researcher gave pos-test cycle II with the similar task on post-test cycle I before. The score of post-test cycle II can be seen on the table below:
Table 12
The Students’ Score at Post-test Cycle II
No. Students’
Code
Score
1. AND P 80
2. I NY 70
3. IPT 80
4. KTT 70
5. KM AR 80
6. KM PI 50
7. KM PD 80
8. NKR 80
9. NWG 70
10. NWGM 70
11. NKSY 100
12. PEA 90
13. PF 70
14. PM 80
15. SHA 80
16. WFS 90
17. WHI 50
18. WNA 60
19. WRSH 90
20. WRAI 70
21. WYN SH 80
22. WSK 100
Total 1.690
Lowest Score 50
Highest Score 100
Average 76.81
Table 13
Frequency of Students’ Score at Post-test Cycle II
Students’
Score
Frequency Percentage (%)
Category
45 – 53 2 9% Low
54 – 64 1 6% Low
65 – 73 6 27% Average
74 – 82 8 36% Average
83 – 91 3 13% High
92–100 2 9% High
Total 22 100%
Referring to the data above, it showed the result of post-test cycle II fulfill the minimum standard criteria in which there were of 20 students got score ≥ 70 and only 2 students who was not success yet. The average score of post-test cycle II was 76.81. It means that they were successful.
c. Observing
While the treatment was given, observation was also conducted.
Here, the researcher was as teacher and the English teacher was as a collaborator who observes the students’ activities during teaching learning process.
After doing the treatment and observation, the researcher got the result of the students’ learning activities from the collaborator as follows:
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
45 – 53 54 – 64 65 – 73 74 – 82 83 – 91 92–100
Figure 6
Graph of the Result of Post-test 1I
Table 14
The Result of Students’ Activities in Cycle II
No Student’s Name
The aspects that is observed
Give an
attention to the teacher’s explanation
Enthusiastically join the learning process
Able to understand the
material
Responding the teacher question
1 AND P
2 I NY
3 IPT
4 KTT
5 KM AR
6 KM PI
7 KM PD
8 NKR
9 NWG
10 NWGM
11 NKSY
12 PEA
13 PF
14 PM
15 SHA
16 WFS
17 WHI
18 WNA
19 WRSH
20 WRAI
21 WYN SH
22 WSK
Total 20 19 17 18 Note :
Give the thick sign ( ) to the student’s activity
The sudents’ activities that are observed are:
1. Give an attention to the teacher’s explanation 2. Enthusiastically join the learning process 3. Able to understand the material
4. Responding the teacher’s question
Table 15
Frequency of Students’ Activities in Cycle II
No Students’ Activity Frequency Percentage 1 Give an attention to the teachers
explanation 20 90%
2 Enthusiastically join the
learning process 19 86%
3 Able to understand the material 17 77%
4 Responding the teacher
question 18 81%
According to the result of the observation above, it can be concluded that the learning process was succesfull. It can be inferred that the learning process has done well and the students were active in theclass than cycle I.
d. Reflecting
Based on the result, it can be seen that the most of the students have not difficulty to memorize vocabulary. It happened because they enjoyed in teaching learning process. It makes the students easy to memorize vocabulary. In this meeting, the students have serious in doing the exercise, so most of the students got good score.
In the second cycle, the students were also active to do the assignment and exercise than before. They also felt confident to answer the question. It means that learning in class was an effective method to increased students’ vocabulary mastery. The students who got score more than 70 were 19 (86%) out of 22 students. The research did not continue to the next cycle because the students’ average was 78.19.