A. Result of the Research
1. Description of Research Location a. The history of the researched school
1. The location of MA Nurul Ulum Kotagajah is on Jendral Sudirman Kota Gajah Central Lampung, Post Code 34153.
Telp. 0857 6901 8558. MA Nurul ulum Kotagajah was start in academic year 1988/1989. MA Nurul Ulum Kotagajah is guiding by Mr. Wasim, S.Pd.I
2. Vision and mission
Vision MA Nurul Ulum are devoted, quality and cultured.
Then the mission MA Nurul Ulum as follows:
1) Establish behavioral achievement, critical mindset and creative students.
2) Skilled, dynamic and love almamater, as well as the generation who have a sense of responsibility for the prosperity and development of religion and country.
39 2. Description of Research Data
This research used action research approach. That has purpose to increase the activity and the study result of MA Nurul Ulum Kotagajah conducted in 2 cycles. The students test result was gotten through the test that was given to the students in the begin research and in the end every cycle, while the activity data was gotten from the observation the learning activity was happened.
a. The condition subject of study
This condition was find after the researcher give the pre- survey to the students. It can see on the chapter I from the pre- survey the researcher find some problem as follow :
1) The students’ value of the Listening comprehension test is low.
2) The students have lack vocabulary, so it can be difficult to comprehend in listening subject.
3) They have problem to do the task in listening task.
b. Cycle 1 1) Planning
In this stage the researcher and the collaborator prepared several things related to teaching and learning process such as: preparing the lesson plan, preparing the material,
40 making the items that will be examined as the pre test and post test 1 in the cycle 1.
2) Action
The action in the cycle 1 consisted of 3 meetings, one meeting for the pretest, one meeting for the action, and one meeting for the post test, there are :
a) The first meeting
The first meeting was conducted on Saturday, Desember 12th , this meeting used as the pretest before the students was given action. This meeting was started by praying and greeting, checking the attendance list, and asking the students’ condition. After that, the researcher gave pretest to the students. The kind of test is completing the table. The teacher and students correct the result of the assignment together. The result of this meeting is most of the students got difficulty to answer the questions, because from 22 students only 6 students could passed of this test.
41 Table 2
Result data of pre – test No. Students
Name
Explanation
Pre-Test ≥70
1. AA 60 Failed
2. AL 50 Failed
3. DAR 40 Failed
4. DM 70 Pass
5. DW 60 Failed
6. DMH 50 Failed
7. EA 40 Failed
8. FI 70 Pass
9. FAZ 60 Failed
10. JY 50 Failed
11. JM 50 Failed
12. LN 50 Failed
13. MAJ 60 Failed
14. MLBU 50 Failed
15. NNS 50 Failed
16. RAP 70 Pass
17. SA 50 Failed
18. SM 40 Failed
19. UK 70 Pass
20. WI 70 Pass
21. WY 60 Failed
22. YL 70 Pass
Total Average
x
N
X
𝟏𝟐𝟒𝟎
𝟐𝟐 = 𝟓𝟔, 𝟑𝟔 Failed
a) The second meeting
The second meeting was used as the implementation the action in the cycle I. The second meeting was conduct on Monday, Desember 14th , for 2x45 minutes. The meeting was started by praying and greeting, checking the
42 attendance list, and asking the students condition. Before doing the next action, the teacher explained about Task- based instruction approach. Then the teacher gave information about the giving advice and warning material.
The teacher gave some example of dialogues that consist of expression giving advice and warning.
b) The third meeting
The thrid meeting was conducted on Tuesday, 15th, this meeting used to post test 1, for 2x45 minutes after the students given the action. This meeting was started by praying and greeting, checking the attendance list, and asking the students’ condition. Then, the researcher asked the students to make some group. Then the reseacher gave post test to the students and do this task with their group.
Kind of the test is completing the table. In the post test 1 only 10 students who got an appropriate score (≥70), but the result of the students’ test was better than the students’
test before giving treatment.
43 Table 3
The result data of post – test 1 No. Students Name Explanation
Post-test 1 ≥70
1. AA 60 Failed
2. AL 55 Failed
3. DAR 50 Failed
4. DM 70 Pass
5. DW 60 Failed
6. DMH 55 Failed
7. EA 50 Failed
8. FI 70 Pass
9. FAZ 65 Failed
10. JY 70 Pass
11. JM 50 Failed
12. LN 50 Failed
13. MAJ 75 Pass
14. MLBU 60 Failed
15. NNS 75 Pass
16. RAP 75 Pass
17. SA 70 Pass
18. SM 50 Failed
19. UK 70 Pass
20. WI 75 Pass
21. WY 60 Failed
22. YL 70 Pass
Total Average
x
N
X 1385
= 62,95 22
Failed
1) Observation
In observation of the students activity is conducted when the learning process was continuing. This observation was conducted with the collaborator by using observation sheet.
44 Table 4
The Result Students Activity 1 No. Students Name Indicators
Total
1 2 3
1 AA √ √ √ 3
2 AL √ √ √ 3
3 DAR - - √ 1
4 DM √ √ √ 3
5 DW √ - √ 2
6 DMH - - √ 1
7 EA √ √ √ 3
8 FI √ √ √ 3
9 FAZ √ √ √ 3
10 JY √ √ √ 3
11 JM - - √ 1
12 LN √ √ √ 3
13 MAJ - - √ 1
14 MLBU √ √ √ `3
15 NNS √ - √ 2
16 RAP √ √ √ 3
17 SA √ √ √ 3
18 SM - - √ 1
19 UK √ - √ 2
20 WI √ √ √ 3
21 WY √ √ √ 3
22 YL √ - √ 2
Indicators:
1. To pay attention the explanation of teacher.
2. To understand the task in listening comprehension.
3. To do the task in listening comprehension through task-based instruction approach.
45 2) Reflection
In the end of cycle 1, then the researcher and collaborator to do reflection together. Based on the data entered the reflections in cycle 1 was still found in the deficiencies that occurred in cycle 1. As for the deficiencies in this cycle, there are : when explaining the material the researcher less attention to students so that still there students who are noisy, students are less active in the class, some students got failure in test of cycle I.
The reflection result can be inferred that:
a) The researcher should be more assertive and paying more attention in order that the students can pay attention to the teacher when explaining the material.
b) The researcher should in around to monitor one by one of the students.
c) The researcher should give more attention to students who are less responsive.
c. Cycle 2
Because the action of cycle 1 was not success, in order that in the stage need to be held the cycle II to repair the weakness in the cycle I. The steps of the cycle II as follows:
46 1) Planning
Based on the observation and reflection in cycle I, we tried to received it and arrange the planning for cycle II. Based on the result of cycle I, in this stage the researcher and collaborator made the planning of the action as follow:
preparing the lesson plan, preparing the material, and preparing the observation sheet of the students’ activity.
2) Action
The action in the cycle II consists of 2 meetings, one meeting for the action, and one meeting for the post test 2, the are:
a) The first meeting
The first meeting used as the implementation the action in the cycle II. And the allocation time for one meetings (2 x 45 minutes). The first meeting was conduct on Wednesday, Dec 16th for 2x45 minutes. In this meeting, the researcher as a teacher and the collaborator as the observer. This meeting was started by praying and greeting, asking the students’ condition and checking the attendance list. Then the teacher gave information about the material and explained about giving advice and warning. The teacher also gave the example of
47 dialogue that consist of giving advice and warning.
After the teacher explained the material, and asked the students to read the material. Then the teacher asked the students to make dialogue about the materilas. In this meeting, the condition of the class more effective than before. So, the learning process has run smoothly. In the end of meeting, the teacher gave motivation to the students and stimulating the student to conclude the material. Then closing the meeting.
b) The second meeting
The second meeting was conducted on Thursday, Dec 17th, this meeting used post test 2 in the end cycle II, for 2x45 minutes after the students given the action, the researcher gave post test to the students. In this meeting, most of the students could answer well. It can be seen from the result of post test II. There were 16 students got an appropriate score.
48 Table 5
Result data of post – test 2 No. Students Name Explanation
Post – test 2 ≥70
1. AA 70 Pass
2. AL 55 Failed
3. DAR 65 Failed
4. DM 75 Pass
5. DW 75 Pass
6. DMH 80 Pass
7. EA 60 Failed
8. FI 80 Pass
9. FAZ 80 Pass
10. JY 70 Pass
11. JM 80 Pass
12. LN 65 Failed
13. MAJ 80 Pass
14. MLBU 75 Pass
15. NNS 75 Pass
16. RAP 85 Pass
17. SA 85 Pass
18. SM 65 Failed
19. UK 80 Pass
20. WI 80 Pass
21. WY 60 Failed
22. YL 80 Pass
Total Average
x
N
X 1620
22 = 73,63 Pass
1) Observation
The observation of the students activity is conducted when the learning process was continuing. This observation was conducted with the collaborator by using observation sheet.
49 Table 6
Result Students’ Activity 2 No. Students Name Indicators
Total
1 2 3
1 AA √ √ √ 3
2 AL √ √ √ 3
3 DAR - √ √ 2
4 DM √ √ √ 3
5 DW √ √ √ 3
6 DMH √ √ √ 3
7 EA √ √ √ 3
8 FI √ √ √ 3
9 FAZ √ √ √ 3
10 JY √ √ √ 3
11 JM - √ √ 2
12 LN √ √ √ 3
13 MAJ - √ √ 2
14 MLBU √ √ √ 3
15 NNS √ - √ 2
16 RAP √ √ √ 3
17 SA √ √ √ 3
18 SM - √ √ 2
19 UK √ √ √ 2
20 WI √ √ √ 3
21 WY √ √ √ 3
22 YL √ - √ 2
Indicators:
1. To pay attention the explanation of teacher.
2. To understand the task in listening comprehension.
3. To do the task in listening comprehension through task-based instruction approach.
50 2) Reflection
In the end of cycle II, then the researcher and collaborator to do reflection together. Based on the result of observation learning process in cycle II, it can be inferred that most of the students pay attention the teacher, the students were also active to do the task in the class than before. From the test result, it can be said that the teaching learning process was successful, because it is more than 70% students got minimal score 70, and improving the students’ listening comprehension through task-based instruction approach.
51 B. Interpretation
1. Interpretation every cycle a. Cycle 1 and cycle 2
The researcher make the result of the pre-test, pst-test 1 and post- test 2 as below:
Table 7
Result Data of Pre-test, Post-test 1 and Post-Test 2 No. Students
Name
Test
Explanation Pre-Test Post-Test 1 Post-Test 2
1 AA 60 60 70 Increase
2 AL 50 55 55 Constant
3 DAR 40 50 65 Increase
4 DM 70 70 75 Increase
5 DW 60 60 75 Increase
6 DMH 50 55 80 Increase
7 EA 40 50 60 Increase
8 FI 70 70 80 Increase
9 FAZ 60 65 80 Increase
10 JY 50 70 70 Constant
11 JM 50 50 80 Increase
12 LN 50 50 65 Increase
13 MAJ 60 75 80 Increase
14 MLBU 50 60 75 Increase
15 NNS 50 75 75 Constant
16 RAP 70 75 85 Increase
17 SA 50 70 85 Increase
18 SM 40 50 65 Increase
19 UK 70 70 80 Increase
20 WI 70 75 80 Increase
21 WY 60 60 60 Constant
22 YL 70 70 80 Increase
Total 𝟏𝟐𝟒𝟎
= 𝟓𝟔, 𝟑𝟔 𝟐𝟐
𝟏𝟑𝟖𝟓
= 𝟔𝟐, 𝟗𝟓𝟐𝟐
𝟏𝟔𝟐𝟎
= 𝟕𝟑, 𝟔𝟑 𝟐𝟐 Increase Average
52 2. Analysis of the Result
a. The result of the students pretest
To know the students’ listening comprehension before implementing the treatment, the researcher conducted the pretest. It was done on Saturday, Dec 12,2015. The reseacher got result of pretest, in this test most of the students difficult to answer the question. Based on the table 4 the students’ average were 56,36, it shows that most of the students were not passed yet to achieved the minimum mastery score (70). In this stage, only 6 students (27%) from 22 students were passed of the minimum mastery score.
b. The result of the students post-test 1
To see the students’ listening comprehension after implementing the treatment, the researcher conducted the post test 1. It was done on Tuesday, Dec 15 2015. Based on the table 5 the students’
average was 62,95, it shown that most of the students were not passed yet to achieve the minimum mastery score (70). In this stage, only 10 students (45%) from 22 students were passed of the minimum score. It mean that most of the students were not understand yet about the material.
c. The result of the students post test 2
To see the students’ listening comprehension after implementing the second treatment, the researcher conducted the post test 2. It was done on Thursday, Dec 17 2015. Based on the table 7, the
53 students’score average was 73,63, it was show that most of the students passed of the minimum score score (70). In this stage, 16 students (70%) from 22 students were passed of the minimum score. It meant that most of the students were achieved the material.
According to the Indicator of success which has been set this research is considered success the 70% of the students get minimal score 70. While from the result data of the cycle 1 is known that there are increasing of the students’ score in the pre-test and post-test 1. In the pre-test result data the students who got minimal score ≥70 were 6 students or 27% from 22 students. Then, in the post-test 1 the students who got minimal score ≥70 were 10 students or 45% from 22 students.
The increment of the students’ score of the cycle 1 cannot reach the indicator of success. Then, after conducted the cycle 2 the researcher get the result data and it is known that there is increasing of the students’ score. The students who got the minimal score ≥70 were 16 students or 72% from the 22 students. It means that the indicator of success was reaching in cycle 2. Therefore, this research is considered success until cycle 2.
54 Based on the table 9 above, it can be describe in the graph 1 as follow:
Graph 1
The average score of the test
Based on the table and the graph above, in the cycle 1 from the pretest to the posttest have progress average score from 56,36 to 62,95, there was improvement about 6,59 point. Then from cycle I to the cycle II have progress average score from 62.95 to 73,63 there is improvement about 10,68 point.
The improvement of score was caused by using task-based instruction in English learning process. Therefore, it can be conclude that the task-based instruction has positive effect in teaching and learning process especially in learning listening comprehension.
56.36
62.95
73.63
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pre test Post test 1 Post test 2
55 3. Observation result of Students’ Activity
This observation result was gotten when the learning process happened by collaborator. From the table 4 and table 6 the result of the students’ learning activity observation can be seen in this table as follow:
Table 8
Result of Students’ Activity
No. Students name Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Explanation
1 AA 3 3 Constant
2 AL 3 3 Constant
3 DAR 1 2 Increase
4 DM 3 3 Constant
5 DW 2 3 Increase
6 DMH 1 3 Increase
7 EA 3 3 Constant
8 FI 3 3 Constant
9 FAZ 3 3 Constant
10 JY 3 3 Constant
11 JM 1 2 Increase
12 LN 3 3 Constant
13 MAJ 1 2 Increase
14 MLBU 3 3 Constant
15 NNS 2 2 Constant
16 RAP 3 3 Constant
17 SA 3 3 Constant
18 SM 1 2 Increase
19 UK 2 2 Constant
20 WI 3 3 Constant
21 WY 3 3 Constant
22 YL 2 2 Constant
56 Based on the table above, it can be inferred that the students learning activity was happened increasing from the cycle I to the cycle II. Therefore, this research in use for the student activities side to reach the target. It was caused on the learning in the cycle II the students have begun to responsible to themselves, so that it can bring the good effect to the activity in the learning process. The improvement of the students activities during the teaching and learning process because the teacher used the task-based instruction approach.
57 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION