Post-test
C. Discussion
Based on table 4.21, it can be seen that t- obtained 8.181 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
students was in very good category, 6 (11,7 %) students was in good category and 0 (0%) was in enough category and 0 (0 %) students was in bad category. This shows that the experimental class has an increase in the first meeting test, which means discovery learning is going well and can be accepted by students.
In the results of the second meeting, out of 28 students, pre-test in experimental group class in second meeting, there was 0 ( 0 %) students in really nice category, 11 (26%) students was in very good category, 12 (20,7%) students was in good category, 5 (5,9%) students was in enough category, and 0 ( 0 %) students was in bad category. While, in post-test, there was 4(11,1%) students was in really nice category, 24 (60,6 %) students was in very good category, 0 (0 %) students was in good category, 0 (0%) was in enough category and 0 (0 %) students was in bad category.. This shows that the experimental class has an increase in the second meeting test, which means discovery learning is going well and can be accepted by students.
In the results of the third (last) meeting, out of 28 students pre-test in experimental group class in third meeting, there was 4 (12,3%) students in really nice category, 19 (46,3%) students was in very good category, 4 (7,6
%) students was in good category, 1 (1,9%) students was in enough category, and 0 (0%) students was in bad category. While, in post-test, there was 15 (47,5%) students was in really nice category, 13 (35%) students was in very good category, 0 (0 %) students was in good
category, 0 (0%) was in enough category and 0 (0 %) students was in bad category. This shows that the experimental class has an increase in the third meeting test, which means discovery learning is going well and can be accepted by students.
In the prerequisite test, data normality test, it is known that the data in the group experimental (pre-test and post-test) are all normally distributed.
Prerequisite, this must be met so that the test results are more convincing.
In the test of the effect of the pre-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the pre-test of the first meeting one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension pre-test 1 in the experiemental group was 50.2857 and Std. Deviation was 10.99110. The result of the one sample t-test, t-obtained was 9.491at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t-table was two tailed test was 2.052. It can be seen that t- obtained 9.491 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
In the test of the effect of the pre-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the pre-test of the second meeting . one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension pre-test 2 in the experiemental group was 52.0000 and Std. Deviation was 14.06861. The result of the one sample t-test, t- obtained was 6.770 at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t-table was two tailed test was 2.052. Based on table 4.13, it can be seen that t- obtained
6.770 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
In the test of the effect of the pre-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the pre-test of the third meeting, it was found that the mean one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension pre-test 3 in the experiemental group was 68.000 and Std. Deviation was 11.85405. The result of the one sample t-test, t- obtained was 0.893at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t- table was two tailed test was 2.052. It can be seen that t- obtained 0.893 was lower than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was rejected and the null hypothesis (Ho) was accepted.
In the test of the effect of the post-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the post-test of the first meeting it was found that the one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension post-test 1 in the experiemental group was 64.1786 and Std. Deviation was 8.89467. The result of the one sample t-test, t- obtained was 3.463 at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t- table was two tailed test was 2.052. Based on table 4.17, it can be seen that t- obtained 3.463 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
In the test of the effect of the post-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the post-test of the second meeting, it was found that the one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension post-test 2 in the experiemental group was 71.7500 and Std. Deviation was 6.7414. The result of the one sample t-test, t- obtained was 1.374 at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t- table was two tailed test was 2.052. Based on table 4.19, it can be seen that t- obtained 1.374 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was rejected and the null hypothesis (Ho) was accepted.
In the test of the effect of the post-test in the experimental group based on the one sample t-test at the post-test of the third meeting, it was found that the one sample statistics, the mean of reading comprehension post-test 1 in the experiemental group was 82.2500 and Std. Deviation was 7.92383. The result of the one sample t-test, t- obtained was 8.181 at the significant level 0,025 and the degree of freedom 27 and the value of t- table was two tailed test was 2.052. Based on table 4.21, it can be seen that t- obtained 8.181 was higher than the critical value of t-table 2.052. It can be stated the research hypothesis (H1) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
Discovery learning involve in the teaching and learning process so that the students can understand the text. Discovery learning does not restrict students to expand the written material accommodated by the
teacher. Hosnan (2014) says, discovery learning is a model to develop away of active learning by discovering for yourself, investigating yourself, then the results obtain will be loyal and long lasting in memory. The fundamental of this form because students can make their very own experiments and draw their conclusion of knowledge on their own.
Due to those confident activities, it is assume that student's accomplishment in appreciating and gaining the information is more than teacher provide. Consequently, Discovery learning is a form of learning that involves students in subjective activities such as brainstorming, debate, independent reading, and striving. It makes the students able to understand the text. Therefore, students can obtain intelligence of the method of learning English to increase their comprehension. On the other hand, in addition to having advantages, Discovery Leraning method also has several disadvantages including, time consuming, often require a resource rich learning envirotment, and depends upon learnenrs having adequate literancy. Therefore, advantages and disadvntages of discovery learning method it will be successful in the learning process if the teacher and students can cooperate in the learning process, the students will get what they want in the learning process.
It is understood that the discovery learning method has a significant effect on reading comprehension among students after being given treatment and has not been given treatment. It can be concluded that the discovery learning method can be used to help students in reading
comprehension and or the English teacher, utilizing discovery learning to teach reading comprehension and to be curious in learn English.
CHAPTHER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION