In Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14, the authors cannot explain the types of system disturbances based on the performance of the method and proposed MC-UPQC as

Optimal Operation of Multi-Converter-UPQC for Power Quality Improvement in Distribution System using Optimized Fuzzy Logic Controller

4. In Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14, the authors cannot explain the types of system disturbances based on the performance of the method and proposed MC-UPQC as

Optimal Operation of Multi-Converter-UPQC for Power Quality Improvement in Distribution System using Optimized Fuzzy Logic Controller

Original Submission

Amirullah Amirullah, Doctoral Degree Reviewer 3

Back Edit Review Print Submit Review to Editorial Office

Recommendation: Reject

Custom Review Question(s): Response

As a thank you and to acknowledge the contribution of our reviewers, the journal may publish a list of the names of those who have reviewed at the end of the year. This will not be linked to any specific paper and will only be done if the list of reviewers is long enough to protect the anonymity of the review process for individual papers. If you would prefer for your name not to be included in a published list of reviewers, please indicate this below.

Include my name

If anyone else was involved in writing this report, for example a student or a colleague, and they agree to be recognised for this work please provide their name and email address in the free text box below.

Do you want to get recognition for this review on Publons?

Don’t let your reviewing work go unnoticed! Researchers the world over use Publons to effortlessly track their valuable peer review contributions for any journal. If you opt in, your Publons profile will automatically be updated to show a verified record of this review in full compliance with the journal’s review policy. If you don’t have a Publons profile, you will be prompted to create a free account. [Learn more]

Yes

Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript? No

Do you have any conflict of interest to declare? No

Reviewer Comments to Author

1. Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and all the fonts are too small.

2. Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, and all the fonts are too small.

3. Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, and all fonts are too small.

4. In Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14, the authors cannot explain the types of system disturbances based on the performance of the method and proposed MC-UPQC as previously explained in the abstract section? Does it include sag, swell, or interruption?

5. Reviewer has difficulty seeing the wave type display i.e. Source Voltage Waves, Injection/Series Voltage Waves, and Load Voltage Waves in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14 because all display Figures and fonts are too small to be seen by normal eyes.

6. The reviewer has difficulty seeing the appearance of the THD spectra curve i.e. Source Voltage THD, Injection/Series Voltage THD, and Load Voltage THD in Figure 15 and Figure 16 because all the display pictures and fonts are too small to be seen by normal eyes.

7. In Table 6 and Table 7, all the THD values of the new configurations and methods proposed by the authors (proposed MC-UPQC and BS-BOA- FLC-MC-UPQC) are 8.803%, which means they are still above the IEEE 519 standard of 5%.

8. In the conclusion section, the performance of UPQC whatever of the proposed combinations and methods in general i.e. (a) reducing the THD of the load voltage and improving (stabilizing) the magnitude of the load voltage due to voltage sags, swells, and interruptions at the source bus and (b) reducing the THD of the source current due to existence of non-linear load on the load side. The author failed to show the reader about improving all of these parameter values, so the main goal of UPQC implementation in a system finally is not to be achieved.

Reviewer Confidential Comments to Editor:

Please enter confidential comments to the editor.

Attachments:

Action Description File Name Size Last Modified

Download Review_CAS_2 Jan 2023_Amirullah_English.pdf 7.6 KB Jan 01, 2023

Back Edit Review Print Submit Review to Editorial Office Reviewer Recommendation and Comments for Manuscript Number UCBS-2022-0758

CiteScore

.

⁼

Calculated on May,

CiteScoreTracker

.

⁼

Last updated on January, • Updated monthly

Source details

Cybernetics and Systems

Formerly known as:

Scopus coverage years: from to Publisher: Taylor & Francis

ISSN: - E-ISSN: -

Subject area: Computer Science: Information Systems Computer Science: Arti cial Intelligence Computer Science: So ware

Source type: Journal

J Cybern

View all documents ▻ Set document alert  Save to source list Source Homepage

CiteScore

.

^

SJR

.

^

SNIP

.

^

CiteScore CiteScore rank & trend Scopus content coverage

i Improved CiteScore methodology

CiteScore counts the citations received in - to articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters and data papers published in - , and divides this by the number of publications published in - . Learn more▻



Citations - Documents -



Citations to date Documents to date

CiteScore rank

Category Rank Percentile

Computer Science

/ th

Computer Science

/ th

Computer Science



Information Systems

Arti cial Intelligence

▻

View CiteScore methodology CiteScore FAQ▻ Add CiteScore to your site🔗

Terms and conditions Privacy policy

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies .

About Scopus

What is Scopus Content coverage Scopus blog Scopus API Privacy matters

Language

日本語版を表示する看简体中本查看體中版本

Просмотр версии на русском языке

Customer Service

Help Tutorials Contact us

also developed by scimago: SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS Scimago Journal & Country Rank

Home Journal Rankings Country Rankings Viz Tools Help About Us

Dalam dokumen NIP NIDN - Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya (Halaman 33-40)