34 CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
This chapter deals with the research findings and the discussions of the findings. The research findingsgathered through the instruments used during the research. Then the research findings taken into discussions to answer the research problems. The findings consist the result of the studyby using U-Dictionary.
5. AFM 61 Average
6. AP 61 Average
7. AR 50 Poor
8. ARU 72 Average
9. ANZ 72 Average
10. AH 61 Average
11. CFG 55 Poor
12. CNDN 61 Average
13. CTT 55 Poor
14. HP 44 Very Poor
15. EV 55 Poor
16. TAN 50 Poor
17. GF 55 Poor
18. H 66 Average
19. IRR 77 Good
20. JD 72 Average
21. JSM 66 Average
22. MCK 66 Average
23. MAR 55 Poor
24. NFR 55 Poor
25. NN 61 Poor
26. NI 50 Poor
27. PE 61 Average
28 RD 66 Average
29. RA 72 Average
30. SKG 44 Very Poor
31 SNAE 55 Poor
32 YPB 66 Average
Total 1960
The data from pre-test was intended to investigatethe students’ prior skill of listening before they got the treatment. The pre-test was administered at the first meeting.
Based on the table above, showed the rate percentage of the students’ pre- test. None student got excellent score, there were 3 students got good score, 18 students got average score, 6 students got poor score, 5 students got very poor score. Those score obtained before giving the treatment.
The table above, showed the total score of the students’ pre-test was 1960.
Most of students got avarage score. It means that the students’ listening skill was still low.
Table 4.2. The Students’ Score of Post-test
No. Students’ Initial Names Score Classification
1. AAK 72 Average
2. AD 88 Good
3. ADP 83 Good
4. AA 88 Good
5. AFM 83 Good
6. AP 72 Average
7. AR 77 Good
8. ARU 94 Excellent
9. ANZ 88 Good
10. AH 72 Average
11. CFG 88 Good
12. CNDN 83 Good
13. CTT 77 Good
14. EV 83 Good
15. FIA 83 Good
16. TAN 88 Good
17. GB 88 Good
18. H 83 Good
19. IRR 83 Good
20. JD 94 Excellent
21. JCM 88 Good
22. MCK 83 Good
23. MAR 88 Good
24. NFR 83 Good
25. NN 77 Good
26. NI 83 Good
27. PE 83 Good
28 RD 83 Good
29. RA 94 Excellent
30 STG 83 Good
31 SNAE 88 Good
32 YPB 83 Good
Total 2683
The data from post-test was given to know the students’ listening achievement after they got the treatment. The post-test was administered at the last meeting.
Based on the table above, showed the rate percentage of the students’ post- test. There were3got excellent, there were 26 students got good score, 3 students got average score, none srtudent students got poor score, none student 0 got very poor score. Those score obtained after giving the treatment.
The table above, showed the total score of the students’ post-test was 2683.
Most of students got good score. It means that there was significant improvement of the students’ listening skill.
Table 4.3. The Total Students’ Score of Pre-test and Post-test No. Students’
Initial Names
Pre-test Post-test X2-X1
(D)
Deviation (D2) X1 X1
2 X2 X2
2
1 AAK 61 3721 72 5929 11 121
2 AD 77 5929 88 7744 11 121
3 ADT 61 3721 83 6889 22 484
4 AA 77 5929 88 7744 11 121
5 AFM 61 3721 83 6889 22 484
6 AP 61 3721 72 5929 11 121
7 AR 50 2500 77 5929 27 729
8 AFU 72 5184 94 8836 22 484
9 AAZ 72 5184 88 7744 16 256
10 AH 61 3721 72 5184 11 121
111 CFG 55 3025 88 7744 33 1089
12 CNDN 61 3721 83 6889 22 484
13 CTT 54 3025 77 5929 23 529
14 EV 44 1936 83 6889 39 1521
15 FIA 55 3025 83 6889 28 784
16 FAN 50 2500 88 7744 38 1444
17 GF 55 3025 88 7744 33 1089
18 H 66 4356 83 6889 17 289
19 IRR 77 5929 83 6889 6 36
20 JD 72 5184 94 8836 22 484
21 JDM 66 4356 88 7744 11 121
22 MCK 66 4356 83 6889 17 289
23 MAR 55 3025 88 7744 33 1089
24 NFR 55 3025 83 6889 28 784
25 NN 61 3761 77 5929 16 256
26 NI 50 2500 83 6889 33 1089
27 PE 61 3761 83 6889 22 484
28 RD 66 4356 83 6889 17 289
29 RA 58 3364 94 8836 36 1296
30 SKG 44 1936 83 6889 39 1521
31 SNAE 55 3025 88 7744 33 1089
32 YPB 66 4356 83 6889 17 289
Total
∑x1 ∑x1
2 ∑x2 ∑x2
2 ∑ D ∑D2
1960 120884 2683 227497 733 19414
Based on the table above, showed the difference score obtained of listening test before giving the treatment and after giving the treatment by using U- Dictionary. The total score of the students’ pre-test was lower than the total score of the students’ post-test. It means that teaching listening by using U-Dictionary can increase students’ listening skill.
Table 4.4. The Rate Percentage of the Students’ Pre-Test
No. Classification Score
Pre-test
F %
1. Excellent 91-100 - 0%
2. Good 76-90 3 9%
3. Average 61-75 18 56%
4. Poor 51-60 6 19%
5. Very Poor < 50 5 16%
Total 32 100%
Based on the table above, showed the rate percentage of the students’ pre- test. None (0%) student got excellent score, there were 3 (9%) student got good score, 18 (56%) students got average score, 6(19%) students got poor score, 5 (16%) students got very poor score. Those score obtained before giving the treatment.
Table 4.5. The Rate Percentage of the Students’ Post-Test
No. Classification Score
Post-test
F %
1. Excellent 91-100 3 9%
2. Good 76-90 26 82%
3. Average 61-75 3 9%
4. Poor 51-60 - 0%
5. Very Poor < 50 - 0%
Total 32 100%
Based on the table above, showed the rate percentage of the students’ post- test. There were 3 (9%) got excellent, there were 26 (82% )students got good score, 3 (9%) students got average score, none srtudent (0%) students got poor score, none student 0 (0%) got very poor score. Those score obtained after giving the treatment.
2. The mean score and standard deviation of the students’ pre-test and post-test The mean score and standard deviation of the students’ pre-test and post-test was showed in the following table:
Table 4.6. The Mean Score and Standard Deviation of Pre-test and Post Test Test Mean Score Standard Deviation
Pre-test 61.25 5.186
Post-test 83.84 9.059
Based on the table above, the students’ listeningskill of the XI.2 grade of SMPN 35 Makassar have improvement after giving the treatment by using U-
Dictionary as a media in teaching listening. It can be seen by the students’ mean score of pre-test and post-test.
The table above, showed that the students’ mean score of pre-test was 61.25 and the students’ mean score of post-test was 83.84. It means that the students’
mean score of post-test was higher than the students’ mean score of pre-test.
Because of the students’ mean score of post-test was higher than the students’
mean score of pre-test, the writer concluded that using U-Dictionary as a media in teaching Listening at the XI.2 grade of SMPN 35 Makassar can improve students’
listening skill.
3. The t-test value of the students’ pre-test and post-test
Table 4.7. The T-Test Value of the Students’ Pre-Test and Post-Test T-test Value T-table at p=0,05, df=N-1
14.08 2.040
The table above showed that t-test value was higher than t-table. The result of the listening test showed there was significant difference between t-test and t- table (14.08> 2.040), it means that t-table was lower than t-test.
The result of the t-test statistical analysis showed that there was significant difference between the students’ listening skill before and after giving the treatment, which applied U-Dictionary as a media to increase students listening skill. The statement was proved by the t-test value 14.08 which higher than t-table value 2.040 at the lavel of significance 0.05 and the degree of freedom df = N – 1
= 32 – 1 = 31.
Based on the explanation above, thewriterconcluded that using U-Dictionary as a media at the nine grade of SMPN 35 Makassar can increase students’
listening skill.