are quite a number, however, which are extremely rare, and
by
nomeans
entitled to be considered as inhabitantsof the District. Suchmay
be divided intothree classes: First, those which visitus in severe winters, being driven beyond their usual rangeby
inclemency of the weather or scarcity of food; such asNyctea nivea, Astur atricapillus, Falco peregrines, Lanius borealis, Pinicola enucleator, Loxiaamericana, L. leucoptera, uEgiothus linarias, Plecfrophanes nivalis. Second, those whichvisitusinthelatterpartofsummer,
mostlythewanderingyoung
of speciesbreeding farther south, as Rhynclwpsnigra,severalspeciesof Ardcida',
and
probably Chamcepeliapasserina. In thethirdand more
extensive classaretoberangedthestragglersproper; speciesobservedfor the most part but once,
whose
appearance is wholly fortuitous, dependingupon
nofixedhabitofthebird. Thus,several species of Sea-Ducks
(Fuligulince): three species of the pelagic family Procellariidce, Graculus dilophus, Tyrannus verticalis,Milvulus forficatus?, Chondestes grammicus, theEuropean
Mareca penelope,have all been observed in the District orimmediatevicinity.Such
occurrences arealways inter- esting,and
should properly be enumerated inmaking up
a list; but they takenopart in the regular orderof things.The
greatmass
of the birdswhichpass throughthe Districtin their spring migrations do not stop to breed before reaching, atleast, the AlleghanianorCanadian faunain regions northand
east of us, in the latitude ofNew England
andNew
York, or thesame
fauna farther southathigherelevationsnorthand
westofusintheAppalachian chain.Probablythe majority go stillfarther north, to Labrador, the Hudson's
Bay
regions,and
even Arctic America.Our
regularwintervisitants, as well asthosewhichstraggleattimesfromthenorth,donot,asarule, breedanywhere
in the United States. Some, however, likeDendrcecaCBstiva, breed anywhere, apparentlyindependent of latitude.
Our
reg- ularfallmigrants forthe mostpart pass on through the United States towinterintheWest
Indiesand
CentralorevenSouth America,thoughsome
lingerthrough that season along theGulf coast.The manner
in which these extensive migrations are performed varies, doubtless, in different cases,and
it is verydifficult to understandhow some
of the weak, short-winged birds accomplish suchimmense
distances.The manner
is almostasmuch
of a mysteryas are the impelling, control- ing,and
guiding causes, none of which have ever been satisfactorily explained.Some
birds appearto perform the long journeyby
contin- ually flyingfrom forest toforest,orfromhedgeto hedge; but, as arule, birdsmount
directly high intothe air,and
continue an uninterrupted flight until hungeror weariness compelsthem
to desist. This contin- uous kind of migration is performedby some
species at night.Some
of the small insectivorous birds have been observed just at daybreak to descend from a great height,and after remaining motionless for a while, asif to recuperatetheir energies, search diligently for food,
and
resumetheirflighttowardevening.Any
onewho
haslivedinthewoods30
during the migratory season
must
have repeatedlyheard the notes of passingbirdshighoverhead,invisibleinthe darkness.The
distance at whichnotes can be heard underthese circumstancesissurprising.We
havedistinctlyheardthe notesof the Bobolink, in the daytime,
when
the bird itself
was beyond
the rangeof vision.The
loud honkingof wild geese while migrating is wellknown.
A
circumstance which has great influenceupon
the appearanceof birdsin theDistrict, as a perturbating elementinconditionsotherwise natural, is the presence of a large city.The
resulting modification in thenumber
of speciesand
of individualsand
in their habits ismuch
greaterthanformerly,
now
that thecityhastrebleditspopulation within twentyor twenty-five years,and
suburban residencesbeyond
actual municipal limits havealteredthe faceof the country very materially.The
general result, as usual, has been the entireextirpation ofafew species, and decided decrease in thenumbers
ofmany
others. Thisis strikinglyshown
in the casesofDucks and
otherwater- fowl,andofgame
birds generally.
The
ChesapeakeBay and
all itstributariesarespecially adaptedtothe winter residenceof water-fowl,andstillwould beafavorite resortdidnot the incessant persecutiontowhichthese birds aresubjected forcethem
toseeksaferquartersinthebaysand
inlets ofmore
southern shores.The same
istrueofvarious shyand
solitary birds which have gradually retired, whollyor ingreatest part with the clearing up of the forests,tomore
mountainous or other secludedand
lessaccessiblere- gions.The Wild Turkey
has been practically exterminated, thoughstill lingering nearus;
and
so has doubtless theSand-hill Crane.The
PileatedWoodpecker
isnearlyinthesame
predicament,thoughstillseen oncein awhile.The
modificationhasno doubt been greater during the period betweenthetwo
editionsofour Listthan in alltimepreviously,and we
have been obligedtobear thisconstantlyinmind
inremodeling our notices of the species. Nevertheless, the pertinacity with whichsome
birdshold theirground
is surprising; thecommon
Partridge,for example, beingstill found near the city, though soincessantly perse- cuted.A
fewbirds appeartoincreaseinnumbers
with theopeningup
of country, their insect fare, probably,beng
improved,and some
of theirnaturalenemies beingrestrained.Examples
of changeofhabits consequent upon the settlement of the country are affordedby
the Swallows, Swifts,and some
otherspecies.The Chimney
Swiftformerly bredin hollow trees, butuow
finds chimneys entirely eligible.The Barn
Swallownow
breeds entirely on the raftersand beams
of out- houses; the Purple Martin gives preference to the boxesnow
every- whereplacedfor itsconvenience; theCliff Swallow hasabandoned
itsrocks forthe eaves of houses.
The
Bluebird,House Wren, and
Pewit Flycatcherarealmost asdomestic;we
havethe Chip-bird inthe trellis,and even the
Owl
inthe belfry.A
very disturbing element has been introduced sinceourList origi- nallyappeared; namely, theEuropean
Sparrow.Though
nearly everyGENERAL CHARACTER OF THE AVIFAUNA. 31
one—
even among- thosewho
wereinstrumentalin importing the pest—
admitsthat
we made
a great blunder, allareslowtobepersuadedofthe enormityofthe mischief theselittlecreatureswillwork
inthe course of time.With
this, however,we
have here nothing todo;we
onlybring-up
thesubjectinconnection withthedecreaseinthenumber and
variety ofour native singingbirds inthecityitself. Thisis afactwhichprob- ably everyone hasnoticed, and which few pretendto deny anylonger.It is not
due
to the buildingup
of thecityand
the increase in thepop- ulation, assome
have supposed.The
city is parkedand
preserved nearlythroughout,and
fullofshadeand
ornamentaltrees.The
actualnumber
of treesis vastly greaterthan itwas
in thecow--pasturedaysof the ante helium epoch;and
there is no reasonwhy
those birds which ordinarilyinhabit cities should notbe at least asnumerous
as ever, or rathermore
so, werethey not drivenaway by
the Sparrows. Itwould perhapsbemore
accurate to say, were they not crowdedand
elbowed outoftheway;
the impressmade
bythesturdylittleforeignvulgariansupon
thenative population beingeffectedratherby
theirnumbers,their persistency, turbulence,and
noisiness, thanby
their pugnacity or ag- gressiveness; though downright acts of hostilitymay
be continually witnessed. In fine, there isnot foodand room enough
formany
other birds where Sparrowsare numerous.We
should not close this slight sketch without special reference to thephenomenal
season of 1882, inwhich the ordinary courseof migra- tory eventswas
interrupted in an unprecedented manner.We
had, in fact,a"tidalwave"
ofbirdsduringthesecondand
thirdweeksinMay.
Itstormedfortendays,
up
toabout themiddleofthe month,and
before the cold rain ceased therewas
such a gathering of birds inthecityashad
neverbeenwitnessedby
the " oldest inhabitant."Many
thousands of birds filledthe streetsand
parks; so greatwas
thenumber and
so brilliantthe assemblage that thenewspaperstook itup and
published theirnotes andqueries.To
accountfor theunwonted
apparition,some
onestartedthestorythatavessel,justarrived atawharfinGeorgetown
fromtheWest
Indies,had
brought a cargoof tropical birds whichhad
in
some manner
escaped!And
no wonder,when
the citywas
swarm- ing with Scarlet Tanagers, Golden Orioles, Rose-breasted Grosbeaks, Eedstarts,Summer and
otherWarblers,all as strange tothe average Washingtonian as themost
brilliantexoticbirds could be.Yet
these lovelycreatures are with us always for thosewho
canseeand
feel.In theback yard of a private residence
—
a space 20by
40feet, con- taining onepeach treeand some
grapevine— we
counted six speciesat once; a BaltimoreOriole, aCanada
Flycatcher, a Redstart, aSummer
Yellow-bird, a Black-Throated Blue Warbler,
and
a Chestnut-sided Warbler. In the parks itwas common
to see a flock of sixor eight ScarletTanagersinonetree. There wereflocks ofRose-breasted Gros- beaks inthe Smithsonian Grouuds; thesebirdswereshotby
boys near the city,one little fellow killing six.The
most remarkable sightwe
32
witnessed ourselves
was
a great troopof ahundred
ormore
Orchard Orioles in the Smithsonian Grounds, rambling with a few Baltiinores over thenew-mown
grasslike aflock of Blackbirds, whileat thesame moment,
on turning the head, the black, white,and
rose-color of the beautiful Grosbeakwas
seen contrasted with the green over head;Summer
Warblers, Black-and-yellow Warblers,and
Chestnut-sided Warblers were skipping togetherthrough thetender foliage; Hermit Thrushes were hiding in the evergreen shrubbery,and
the ubiquitous Sparrows werechafferingand
dickeringon every hand.The
rare birdswereindueproportionmore numerous
thaneverbefore.We
have knowledge of nineCape May
Warblers taken this season.The
Golden-winged, Blue-wingedYellow,and
NashvilleWarblers wereall not
uncommon.
Several specimens of the Connecticut Warbler, never seen herebefore in the spring,and
therareMourning
Warbler, seldomknown
to have beencaptured inthe District, werealsotaken.The
weatherwas
unquestionablythe cause of thisapparition. Con- sidering the country at large,it held the birds back; they could notmake
their usualheadway
against so protracted a storm;and
even afterit ceased here,therewas
a coldwave
northof us whichretarded their advance. It also seemed tohave
deflected the ordinaryline of migrationfrom thehighway
of theAppalachianchaintothe lower-lying landbetween these mountainsand
the sea-coast. In aword, a broad stream of birds flowing northwardwas
contracted between compara- tively narrow banksand
then obstructed in its course, the District happening to fall just in themain
channel. This seems sufficientto accountforthephenomenon. As
to themultitudes ofbirds in thecity itself—
forwe
cannot imagine the whole country round aboutto have been equally overcharged— we must
supposethem
to have beendriven inby
coldand
hunger.They
actedforthemost
part as thoughchilledand
starved, showing nomore
fear ofman
than the Sparrows them-selves, and
some
that wereshot beingfound greatly emaciated.Evidence ofthe correctness of thisviewof the case willbe found
by
consulting theweathercharts for the periodin mention. Paragraphsinrelation to theweather as affecting birds appeared in various north- ernjournals, though nothing like the "tidal
wave" we
witnessed here seems tohave
beenelsewhere noted.With
these cursoryremarkswe
proceed to the annotated listof the specieswhichhave beenascertainedtooccurinthe]Hstrict.Our
obser-vations, from which thispaperhas been prepared, extend overaperiod ofabouttwenty-five years,during which such timeascould properlybe sparedfromother pursuitshas been devoted to the studyof birds.
No
specieshas been admittedwhich hasnot actuallybeen takeninthe Dis- trictor itsimmediatevicinity.
We
indicatetheprobableoccurrenceof a few more, noneof which,'however, are included in the enumeration.The
dates givenforthearrivalsand
departuresofthe non-residentsare.inanycasethe
mean
ofthoserecordedduringsuccessiveyears, sincetheyPASSERES
OSCINES TURDID^E.do
varysomewhat
accordingtothespeedyortardyadvanceoftheseasons.They may
not in every instancebe quite correct, for notto finda birdis at best but negative evidenceof its absence. If,then,
we
say, for example, "arrives themiddleof Apriland
remains until the middleof September,"we
are to be understood to state that accordingtoour observations thespeciesinquestionisnotordinarily to be found before thefirst nor after thelast of these dates. Itis regretted that theac- countsofsome
ofthewater-birds, notably theAnatidcc, are still incom- pletewith reference to the times of arrivaland
departure; but itishopedthat the veryfullparticulars givenofmost ofthe land birds will ina measure condonethis defect.
In the presenteditionthespeciesare
numbered
1to248consecutively.With
this numerationisretained inparenthesis that oftheold List,for facility of cross-reference.The
arrangementand
nomenclature are altered entirely, beingconformedto those of "the CouesCheck
List of NorthAmerican
Birds,"etc.*The number
which eachspecies bears iu thatList isalso affixed in brackets.Order PASSERES
:Passerine
Birds.Suborder OSCINES
:Singing
Birds.Family TUKDID^
: Thrushes.SubfamilyTURDUSLL: TypicalThrushes.
1. (4S.J TurdusmigratoriusLinn. Romx.
A permanent
resident,though probablynot representedby
thesame
individualsall theyear round.A
fewbreed,and
afew remain during the winter; but the greaternumber
pass through duringthe migra- tions,proceeding farther north for the summer,and
farthersouth for thewinter. It is most abundant during themonths
ofMarch and
Fig.1.
—
HeadofRobin,nat.size.*TheCouesCheckListofNorth AmericauBirds. SecondEdition,RevisedtoDate, and entirely Rewritten, under Direction ofthe Author, with a Dictionary of the Etymology, Orthography,andOrthoepyof theScientificNames,theConcordance of previous Lists, andaCatalogueofhis Ornithological Publications. Boston. Estes andLauriat. 1882. 1 vol.,imp. 8vo,pp.1G5.
Bull.Nat, Mus. No. 26 3