A
review of the literature cited abovegives a fairly comprehensive surveyof theabdominal musculatureofinsects inmost
of the principal orders.There
are notable blanks, however, since such important orders asNeuroptera and
Trichoptera are omitted entirely,and
adult Lepidopteraand
Dipterahave
been given scant attention.On
the other
hand
it is gratifying to find thatwe
have, as a basis for acomparative study of insect myology, very fullaccounts of thebody
musculature of the Odonata,Ephemerida, and
Orthoptera. In the Apterygota,we
are indebted to Berlese for an excellent study of the muscles in Protura, toLubbock
for a description of the collembolan musculature,and
to Grassi for brief descriptions of the characteristic differences in the nuisculature of representative genera of Dicelluraand
Thysanura, towhich
isadded
in this paperan
account of the abdominal muscles ofHeterojapyx
; but amore
complete studyof the musculature of Machilidaeand
Lepismatidae,and
perhaps ofCam-
podea, is still to be desired.
When we
look to the papers treating ofholometabolouslarvae,we
find againsatisfactoryand
insome
cases complete accountsof thebody
musculatureinColeoptera,Lepidoptera,Hymenoptera, and
Diptera,but notewithregret a lack of information onNeuroptera and
Trichoptera.To
present here even asummary
of the detailsknown
concern- ing the abdominal muscles of insectswould
occupy anunwarranted amount
of space.A
careful review of the facts to be obtainedfrom
theworks
above listed, however,shows
thatwe may
with confidencemake
certain broad generalizations concerning the fundamental plan of the abdominal musculature of adult pterygote insects.The
basic plan isfound
to be simple; but, as so often occurs in insectmor-
phology,more
difficulties are encountered in finding suitable terms to express the facts than in discovering the facts themselves.Voss
(1905) classified the abdominal muscles as longitudinalmus-
cles, transverse muscles,
and
lateral muscles (Flankenmuskeln). This classification is logicalinasmuch
as it probablyconforms
with the primitivearrangement
of the fibers.The
muscles of the so-called longitudinal groups, however, do not always preserve a lengthwise arrangement; they are often strongly obliciue,and some
ofthem
frequently take a transverse position.The
lateral muscles are desig- nated "dorsoventral" musclesby many
writers, but,though
their attachments are usually dorsaland
ventral,some
of their fiberscom-
monly
run in an oblicjue direction.The
lateral muscles have also beentermed
"transverse" muscles, but, as Samtleben (1929) points32
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 85 out, only the crosswise dorsaland
ventral muscles are literally trans- verse in position. Again, thebody
muscles are sometimes classed as dorsal, ventral,and
lateral muscles, the dorsalsand
ventralscom-
prising longitudinal, oblique,and
transverse fibers,and
the laterals including dorsoventraland
oblique fibers. This classification is evi- dently themost
nearly consistent one that can be devised,and
it has theadded
merit of being in conformity with theembryonic
develop-ment
of the muscles. Unfortunately, however, innaming
the secon- dary muscle groups or individual muscles according to it. the plan brings out such termsas "median
longitudinal dorsal muscles," " ex- ternalmedian
longitudinal dorsalmuscles," or" secondinternalmedian
Fig. 13.
—
Diagrams of the nK)rc simple types of segmental musculature.A, simple condition of musculature in right half of a segment, with dorsal (d) and ventral (v) fibers attached intersegmentally, external laterals (le) intrasegmentally, and internal laterals (li) on intersegmental folds.
B, upper ends of internal lateral muscles (/;) migrated posteriorly, separating a paratergal muscle band (p) from the rest of the dorsal muscles {d).
C, cross section of segment, showing relations of principal groups of muscles.
dl, lateral dorsal muscles; dm, median dorsals; le, external laterals; //, internal laterals; p, paratergal muscle; td, dorsal transverse muscles; tv, ventral trans- verse muscles; ?', ventrals.
longitudinal dorsal muscle." Still
more
unwieldy do such terms 1)e-come when
put into Latin form.It is evidentthat strictanatomical
and
nomenclatural consistency in dealing with thebody
musculature leads to impractical results.The
writer, therefore, has adopted a classification
and
nomenclature that recognizes the anatomicalarrangement
of the muscles, but which,inorder toshorten thenames, errs
somewhat on
the side of specificity in terminology. Five principal groups of muscles are distinguishedand
designated as follows: I.dorsal muscles
(fig. 13A, d), the fibers ofwhich
aretypically longitudinaland
primarily intersegmental in their attachments. II.ventral muscles
(v), resembling the dorsals in that their fibers are typically longitudinaland
attached primarily on the intersegmental lines. III.lateral muscles
(/),NO. 6 INSECT
ABDOMEN — SNODCRASS
33 typically dorso-ventral, their fibers both intersegmentaland
intraseg- niental. I\'.transverse muscles
(C, t), lying internal tothe longi- tudinals, including dorsal transverse inuselcs (td),and
ventral trans- versemuscles (tv). \.spiracular muscles
{s). generally notmore
tha.n
two
connected with each spiracle,one an ocelusor (os), the other a dilator (dls).All the
body
muscles are bilateral in their origin,and
all ofthem
except the ventral transverse muscles remain so in the definitive state.The
fibers of the ventral transverse muscles,which
primarily Are intersegmental,Heymons
(1895) says are at firstattached mesally on a foldof the l)odywall betweenthe nervecords. Later the foldis sup- pressedand
the nl)ersfrom
opposite sidesbecome
continuous across the sternal region.The
fibers of the longitudinal dorsaland
ventral muscles are always separated into symmetrical lateral groups along the midline of thedorsum and
venter, but the lateral sets of dorsal transverse musclescome
togetheron the ventral wall of theheart.Each
i)rimar\- grou]^of musclesmay undergo
an endless diversifica- tion resulting bothfrom
a multiplication of fibers in the group,and from
a rearrangement of the fibers brought about by changes in the points of attachment.With
respect to the dorsaland
\entral muscles, themost
general departurefrom
the sim])le plan, inwhich
the fibers all lie in a single i:)lane, consists of a difi'erentiation of the fibers in each grou]) into internal inuselcsand
esternal muscles.Thus
it isfound in nearly all insects that the dorsal
and
ventral musclescom-
prise each
two
layers of fibers, namely, internal dorsals (di)and
external dorsals (de),and
internalventrals {vi)and extenml
z'cntrals (ve).A
secondform
of diversification afifecting the dorsaland
ven-tral muscles is a
more
or less distinct grouping of the fibers intomedian and
lateral muscles. Inmost
insects,therefore,we may
distin- guish four sets of dorsal fibers,and
correspondingly four sets of ventralfibers.The
several resultingmusclesmay
thenbe distinguished asmedianand
lateral internaldorsals (fig. 14A, B, dim. dil).median
and lateral external dorsals {dem. del),median and
lateral internal ventrals {vim, vii),and median and
lateral external ventrals (z>em, vel).The
lateral muscles aremore
sul)ject to irregularities than are the dorsaland
ventral muscles, but they likewise are often divided into internal laterals (fig. 13 B, C, //')and
external laterals [le).Associated withthe dorsoventral lateral muscles there is sometimes present a longitudinal muscle or