§ 19. LITERATURE.
For § 20. OCKAM AND THE DECAY OF SCHOLASTICISM.—No
complete ed. of Ockam’s works exists. The fullest lists are given by RIEZLER, see below, LITTLE: Grey Friars of Oxford, pp. 226–234, and POTTHAST: II. 871–873. GOLDAST’S Monarchia, II. 313–1296, contains a number of his works, e.g. opus nonaginta dierum, Compendium errorum Johannis XXII., De utili dominio rerum Eccles. et abdicatione bonorum temporalium, Super potestatem summi pontificis, Quaestionum octo decisiones, Dial. de potestate papali et imperiali in tres partes distinctus, (1) de haereticis, (2) de erroribus Joh. XXII., (3) de potestate papae, conciliorum et
imperatoris (first publ. 2 vols., Paris, 1476).—Other works:
Expositio aurea super totam artem veterem, a com. on PORPHYRY’S
Isagoge, and ARISTOTLE’S Elenchus, Bologna, 1496.—Summa logices, Paris, 1488.—Super I V. Iibros sententiarum, Lyons, 1483.—De sacramento altaris, Strassburg, 1491.—De praedestinatione et futuris contingentibus, Bologna, 1496.—
Quodlibeta septem, Paris, 1487.—RIEZLER: D. antipäpstlichen und publizistischen Schriften Occams in his Die literar. Widersacher, etc., 241–277.—HAUREAU: La philos. scolastique.—WERNER: Die Scholastik des späteren M. A., II., Vienna, 1883, and Der hl. Thos.
von Aquino, III.—STÖCKL: Die Philos. des M. A., II. 986–1021, and art. Nominalismus in Wetzer-Welte, IX.—BAUR: Die christl. Kirche d. M. A., p. 377 sqq.—MÜLLER: Der Kampf Ludwigs des Baiern.—
R. L. POOLE in Dict. of Natl. Biog., XLI. 357–362.—R. SEEBERG in Herzog, XIV. 260–280.—A. DORNER; D. Verhältniss von Kirche und Staat nach Occam in Studien und Kritiken, 1886, pp. 672–
722.—F. KROPATSCHECK: Occam und Luther in Beitr. zur
Förderung christl. Theol., Gütersloh, 1900.—Art. Nominalismus, by STÖCKL in Wetzer-Welte, IX. 423–427.
For § 21. CATHERINE OF SIENA.—Her writings. Epistole ed orazioni della seraphica vergine s. Catterina da Siena, Venice, 1600, etc.—
Best ed. 6 vols., Siena, 1707–1726.—Engl. trans. of the Dialogue
of the Seraphic Virgin Cath. of Siena, by ALGAR THOROLD, London, 1896.—Her Letters, ed. by N. TOMMASEO: Le lettere di S. Caterina da Siena, 4 vols., Florence, 1860.—*Eng. trans. by VIDA D.
SCUDDER: St. Cath. of Siena as seen in her Letters, London, 1906, 2d ed., 1906.—Her biography is based upon the Life written by her confessor,RAYMUNDO DE VINEIS SIVE DE CAPUA, d. 1399: vita s.
Cath. Senensis, included in the Siena ed. of her works and in the Acta Sanctt. III. 863–969.—Ital. trans. by Catherine’s secretary, NERI DE LANDOCCIO, Fr. trans. by E. CARTIER, Paris, 1863, 4th ed., 1877.—An abbreviation of Raymund’s work, with annotations, Leggenda della Cat. da Siena, usually called La Leggenda minore, by TOMMASO D’ANTONIO NACCI CAFFARINI, 1414.—K. HASE: Caterina von Siena, Ein Heiligenbild, Leipzig, 1804, new ed., 1892.—J. E. BUTLER: Cath. of Siena, London, 1878, 4th ed., 1895.—AUGUSTA T. DRANE, Engl. Dominican: THE HIST. OF CATH.
OF SIENA, compiled from the Orig. sources, London, 1880, 3d ed., 1900, with a trans. of the Dialogue.—St. Catherine of Siena and her Times, by the author of Mademoiselle Mori (Margaret D. Roberts), New York, 1906, pays little attention to the miraculous element, and presents a full picture of Catherine’s age.—*E. G. GARDNER: St.
Catherine of Siena: A Study in the Religion, Literature, and History of the fourteenth century in Italy, London, 1907.
For § 22. PETER D’AILLY.—PAUL TSCHACKERT: Peter von Ailli. Zur Gesch. des grossen abendländischen Schismas und der
Reformconcilien von Pisa und Constanz, Gotha, 1877, and Art. in HERZOG, I. 274–280.—SALEMBIER: Petrus de Alliaco, Lille,
1886.—LENZ: Drei Traktate aus d. Schriftencyclus d. Konst. Konz., Marburg, 1876.—BESS: Zur Gesch. des Konst. Konzils, Marburg, 1891.—FINKE: Forschungen und Quellen, etc., pp. 103–132.—For a list of D’Ailly’s writings, See TSCHACKERT, pp. 348–365.—Some of them are given in VAN DER HARDT and in DU PIN’S ed. of
Gerson’s Works, I. 489–804, and the De difficultate reform. eccles., and the De necessitate reform. eccles., II. 867–903.
For § 23. JOHN GERSON.—Works. Best ed. by L. E. DU PIN, Prof.
of Theol. in Paris, 5 vols., Antwerp, 1706; 2d ed., Hague Com., 1728. The 2d ed. has been consulted in this work and is pronounced by Schwab “indispensable.” It contains the materials of Gerson’s life and the contents of his works in an introductory essay,
Gersoniana, I. i-cxlv, and also writings by D’AILLY, LANGENSTEIN, ALEMAN and other contemporaries. A number of Gerson’s works are given in GOLDAST’S Monarchia and VAN DER HARDT.—A Vita
142
Gersonis is given in HARDT’S Conc. Const., IV. 26–57.—Chartul.
Univ. Paris., III., IV., under John Arnaud and Gerson.—J. B.
SCHWAB: Johannes Gerson, Prof. der Theologie und Kanzler der Universität Paris, Würzburg, 1858, an exhaustive work, giving also a history of the times, one of the most thorough of biographies and to be compared with HURTER’S Innocent III.—A. MASSON: J.
Gerson, sa vie, son temps et ses oeuvres, Lyons, 1894.—A.
LAMBON: J. Gerson, sa réforme de l’enseigement Theol. et de l’éducation populaire, Paris, 1888.—BESS: Zur Gesch. d.
Konstanz. Konzils; art. Gerson in HERZOG, VI. 612–617.—
LAFONTAINE: Jehas Gerson, 1363–1429, Paris, 1906, pp. 340.—J.
SCHWANE: Dogmengesch.—WERNER: D. Scholastik d. späteren M.
A., IV., V.
For § 24. NICOLAS OF CLAMANGES.—Works, ed. by J. M. LYDIUS, 2 vols., Leyden, 1013, with Life.—The De ruina ecclesiae, with a Life, in VAN DER HARDT: Conc. Constan., vol. I., pt. lII.—Writings not in Lydius are given by BULAEUS in Hist. univ. Paris.—
BALUZIUS: Miscellanea, and D’ACHERY: Spicilegium.—Life in DU
PIN’S Works of Gerson, I., p. xxxix sq.—A. MÜNTZ: Nic. de Clem., sa vie et ses écrits, Strassburg, 1846.—J. SCHWAB: J. Gerson, pp.
493–497.—Artt. by BESS in HERZOG, IV. 138–147, and by KNÖPFSLER in Wetzer-Welte, IX. 298–306.—G. SCHUBERT: Nic.
von Clem. als Verfasser der Schrift de corrupto ecclesiae statu, Grossenhain, 1888.
For § 25. NICOLAS OF CUSA.—Edd. of his Works, 1476 (place not given), as ed. by FABER STAPULENSIS, 3 vols., 1514, Basel.—
German trans. of a number of the works by F. A. SCHRAPFF, Freiburg, 1862.—SCHRAPFF: Der Cardinal und Bischof Nic. von Cusa Mainz, 1843; Nic. von Cusa als Reformator in Kirche, Reich und Philosophie des 15ten Jahrh., Tübingen, 1871.—J. M. DÜX: Der deutsche Card. Nic. von Cusa und die Kirche seiner Zeit, 2 vols., Regensburg, 1847.—J. UEBINGER: D. Gotteslehre des Nic.
von Cusa, Münster, 1888.—J. MARX: Nik. von Cues und seine Stiftungen au Cues und Deventer, Treves, 1906, pp. 115.—C.
SCHMITT: Card. Nic. Cusanus, Coblenz, 1907. Presents him as astronomer, geographer, mathematician, historian, homilete, orator, philosopher, and theologian.—STÖCKL, III. 23–84.—SCHWANE, pp.
98–102.—Art. by FUNK in Wetzer-Welte, IX. 306–315.
§ 20. OCKAM AND THE DECAY OF SCHOLASTICISM.
Scholasticism had its last great representative in Duns Scotus, d. 1308.
After him the scholastic method gradually passed into disrepute. New problems were thrust upon the mind of Western Europe, and new interests were engaging its attention. The theologian of the school and the convent gave way to the practical theological disputant setting forth his views in tracts and on the floor of the councils. Free discussion broke up the hegemony of dogmatic assertion. The authority of the Fathers and of the papacy lost its exclusive hold, and thinkers sought another basis of authority in the general judgment of contemporary Christendom, in the Scriptures alone or in reason. The new interest in letters and the natural world drew attention away from labored theological systems which were more adapted to display the ingenuity of the theologian than to be of practical value to society. The use of the spoken languages of Europe in literature was fitted to force thought into the mould of current exigencies.
The discussions of Roger Bacon show that at the beginning of the
fourteenth century men’s minds, sated with abstruse metaphysical solutions of theological questions, great and trivial, were turning to a world more real and capable of proof.
The chief survivors of the dialectical Schoolmen were Durandus and William Ockam. Gabriel Biel of Tübingen, who died just before the close of the fifteenth century, is usually called the last of the Schoolmen.f 351 Such men as D’Ailly, Gerson and Wyclif, sometimes included under the head of mediaeval scholastics, evidently belong to another class.
A characteristic feature of the scholasticism of Durandus and Ockam is the sharper distinction they made between reason and revelation. Following Duns Scotus, they declared that doctrines peculiar to revealed theology are not susceptible of proof by pure reason. The body of dogmatic truth, as accepted by the Church, they did not question.
A second characteristic is the absence of originality. They elaborated what they received. The Schoolmen of former periods had exhausted the list of theological questions and discussed them from every standpoint.
The third characteristic is the revival and ascendency of nominalism, the principle Roscellinus advocated more than two hundred years before. The Nominalists were also called Terminists, because they represent words as terms which do not necessarily have ideas and realities to correspond to them. A universal is simply a symbol or term for a number of things or for that which is common to a number of things.f 352 Universality is nothing more than a mode of mental conception. The University of Paris resisted
144
the spread of nominalism, and in 1839 the four nations forbade the promulgation of Ockam’s doctrine or listening to its being expounded in private or public.f 353 In 1473, Louis XI. issued a mandate forbidding the doctors at Paris teaching it, and prohibiting the use of the writings of Ockam, Marsiglius and other writers. In 1481 the law was rescinded.
Durandus, known as doctor resolutissimus, the resolute doctor, d. 1334, was born at Pourçain, in the diocese of Clermont, entered the Dominican order, was appointed by Fohn XXII. bishop of Limoux, 1317, and was later elevated to the sees of Puy and Meaux. He attacked some of the rules of the Franciscans and John XXII.’s theory of the beatific vision, and in 1333 was declared by a commission guilty of eleven errors. His theological views are found in his commentary on the Lombard, begun when he was a young man and finished in his old age. He showed independence by assailing some of the views of Thomas Aquinas. He went beyond his predecessors in exalting the Scriptures above tradition and pronouncing their statements more authoritative than the dicta of Aristotle and other philosophers.f 354 All real existence is in the individual. The universal is not an entity which can be divided as a chunk of wood is cut into pieces. The universal, the unity by which objects are grouped together as a class, is deduced from individuals by an act of the mind. That which is common to a class has, apart from the individuals of the class, no real existence.
On the doctrine of the eucharist Durandus seems not to have been fully satisfied with the view held by the Church, and suggested that the words
“this is my body,” may mean “contained under”—contentum sub hoc.
This marks an approach to Luther’s view of consubstantiation. This theologian was held in such high esteem by Gerson that he recommended him, together with Thomas Aquinas, Bradwardine and Henry of Ghent, to the students of the college of Navarre.f 355
The most profound scholastic thinker of the fourteenth century was the Englishman, William Ockam, d. 1349, called doctor invincibilis, the invincible doctor, or, with reference to his advocacy of nominalism, venerabilis inceptor, the venerable inaugurator. His writings, which were more voluminous than lucid, were much published at the close of the fifteenth century, but have not been put into print for several hundred years.
There is no complete edition of them. Ockam’s views combined elements which were strictly mediaeval, and elements which were adopted by the Reformers and modern philosophy. His identification with the cause of the Spiritual Franciscans involved him in controversy with two popes, John XXII. and Benedict XII. His denial of papal infallibility has the appearance not 80 much of a doctrine proceeding from theological conviction as the
chance weapon laid hold of in time of conflict to protect the cause of the Spirituals.
Of the earlier period of Ockam’s life, little is known. He was born in Surrey, studied at Oxford, where he probably was a student of Duns Scotus, entered the Franciscan order, and was probably master in Paris, 1315–1320. For his advocacy of the doctrine of Christ’s absolute poverty he was, by order of John XXII., tried and found guilty and thrown into confinement.f 356 With the aid of Lewis the Bavarian, he and his
companions, Michael of Cesena and Bonagratia, escaped in 1328 to Pisa.
from that time on, the emperor and the Schoolman, as already stated, defended one another. Ockam accompanied the emperor to Munich and was excommunicated. At Cesena’s death the Franciscan seal passed into his hands, but whatever authority he possessed he resigned the next year into the hands of the acknowledged Franciscan general, Farinerius. Clement VI. offered him absolution on condition of his abjuring his errors. Whether he accepted the offer or not is unknown. He died at Munich and is buried there. The distinguished Englishman owes his reputation to his revival of nominalism, his political theories and his definition of the final seat of religious authority.
His theory of nominalism was explicit, and offered no toleration to the realism of the great Schoolmen from Anselm on. Individual things alone have factual existence. The universals are mere terms or symbols, fictions of the mind—fictiones, signa mentalia, nomina, signa verbalia. They are like images in a mirror. A universal stands for an intellectual act—actus intelligenda — and nothing more. Did ideas exist in God’s mind as distinct entities, then the visible world would have been created out of them and not out of nothing.f 357
Following Duns Scotus, Ockam taught determinism. God’s absolute will makes things what they are. Christ might have become wood or stone if God had so chosen. In spite of Aristotle, a body might have different kinds of motion at the same time. In the department of morals, what is now bad might have been good, if God had so willed it.
In the department of civil government, Ockam, advocating the position taken by the electors at Rense, 1338, declared the emperor did not need the confirmation of the pope. The imperial office is derived immediately from
God.f 358 The Church is a priestly institution, administers the sacraments and
shows men the way of salvation, but has no civil jurisdiction,f 359potestas coactiva.
146
The final seat of authority, this thinker found in the Scriptures. Truths such as the Trinity and the incarnation cannot be deduced by argument. The being of God cannot be proven from the so-called idea of God. A plurality of gods may be proven by the reason as well as the existence of the one God. Popes and councils may err. The Bible alone is inerrant. A Christian cannot be held to believe anything not in the Scriptures.f 360
The Church is the community of the faithful—communitas, or congregatio fidelium.f 361 The Roman Church is not identical with it, and this body of Christians may exist independently of the Roman Church. If the pope had plenary power, the law of the Gospel would be more galling than the law of Moses. All would then be the pope’s slaves.f 362 The papacy is not a
necessary institution.
In the doctrine of the eucharist, Ockam represents the traditional view as less probable than the view that Christ’s body is at the side of the bread.
This theory of impanation, which Rupert of Deutz taught, approached Luther’s theory of consubstantiation. However, Ockam accepted the
Church’s view, because it was the less intelligible and because the power of God is unlimited. John of Paris, d. 1308, had compared the presence of Christ in the elements to the co-existence of two natures in the incarnation and was deposed from his chair at the University of Paris, 1304. Gabriel Biel took a similar view.f 363
Ockam’s views on the authority of the civil power, papal errancy, the infallibility of the Scriptures and the eucharist are often compared with the views of Luther.f 364 The German reformer spoke of the English Schoolman as “without doubt the leader and most ingenious of the Schoolmen”—
scholasticorum doctorum sine dubio princeps et ingeniosissimus. He called him his “dear teacher,” and declared himself to be of Ockam’s party—sum Occamicae factionis.f 365 The two men were, however, utterly unlike.
Ockam was a theorist, not a reformer, and in spite of his bold sayings, remained a child of the mediaeval age. He started no party or school in theological matters. Luther exalted personal faith in the living Christ. He discovered new principles in the Scriptures, and made them the active forces of individual and national belief and practice. We might think of Luther as an Ockam if he had lived in the fourteenth century. We cannot think of Ockam as a reformer in the sixteenth century. He would scarcely have renounced monkery. Ockam’s merit consists in this that, in common with Marsiglius and other leaders of thought, he imbibed the new spirit of free discussion, and was bold enough to assail the traditional dogmas of his time. In this way he contributed to the unsettlement of the pernicious mediaeval theory of the seat of authority.
§ 21. CATHERINE OF SIENA, THE SAINT.
Next to Francis d’Assisi, the most celebrated of the Italian saints is Catherine of Siena—Caterina da Siena—1347–1380. With Elizabeth of Thuringia, who lived more than a century before her, she is the most eminent of the holy women of the Middle Ages whom the Church has canonized. Her fame depends upon her single-hearted piety and her efforts to advance the interests of the Church and her nation. She left no order to encourage the reverence for her name. She was the most public of all the women of the Middle Ages in Italy, and yet she passed unscathed and without a taint through streets and in courts. Now, as the daughter of an humble citizen of Siena, she ministers to the poor and the sick: now, as the prophetess of heaven, she appeals to the conscience of popes and of commonwealths. Her native Sienese have sanctified her with the fragrant name la beata poplana, the blessed daughter of the people. Although much in her career, as it has been handed down by her confessor and biographer, may seem to be legendary, and although the hysterical element may not be altogether wanting from her piety, she yet deserves and will have the admiration of all men who are moved by the sight of a noble enthusiasm. It would require a fanatical severity to read the account of her unwearied efforts and the letters, into which she equally poured the fire of her soul, without feeling that the Sienese saint was a very remarkable woman, the Florence Nightingale of her time or more, “one of the most wonderful women that have ever lived,” as her most recent English biographer has pronounced her. Or, shall we join Gregorovius, the thorough student of mediaeval Rome, in saying, “Catherine’s figure flits like that of an angel:
through the darkness of her time, over which her gracious genius sheds a soft radiance. Her life is more worthy and assuredly a more human subject for history than the lives of the popes of her age.”f 366
Catherine Benincasa was the twenty-third of a family of twenty-five children. Her twin sister, Giovanna, died in infancy. Her father was a dyer in prosperous circumstances. Her mother, Monna Lapa, survived the daughter. Catherine treated her with filial respect, wrote her letters, several of which are extant, and had her with her on journeys and in Rome during her last days there. Catherine had no school training, and her knowledge of reading and writing she acquired after she was grown up.
As a child she was susceptible to religious impressions, and frequented the Dominican church near her father’s home. The miracles of her earlier childhood were reported by her confessor and biographer, Raymund of Capua. At twelve her parents arranged for her a marriage, but to avoid it Catherine cut off her beautiful hair. She joined the tertiary order of the Dominicans, the women adherents being called the mantellate from their