A
completed reedmat was examined by
the writerinAugust
1962 atFort
Mille Lacs.Eobert
Spading,of the Fort,who had
observed themaking
of themat
there in July 1961,outlinedthe processwhich
is here
augmented by
facts derivedfrom
examinationof thefinished mat.Two Chippewa women
of MilleLacs
Reservation,Minn.,made
the
mat
: Mrs.Maggie
Nequonabe, about 73years ofage,who knew
the technique,and
Mrs.Susan
Shingobe, ayounger woman
towhom
the processwas
unfamiliar.Materials needed are strips of unprocessed wi' goob^ about one- fourth of
an
inch wide,and
freshly gathered stalks of the reed [Phragmitescommunis
Trin. var. herlandieri (Fourn.) Fern.), theconnnon
lowlandgrass8 or9 feet tallrecognizedby
theplumed
head, inch-wide
leaves,and
stalkwithjointsevery3to5 inches.The
fairlytough
stalks,from
one-eighthto three-eighths ofan
inch in diameter, are cut with a knifewhen mature enough
to use (in this case attheend
of July).The
workers strip the leavesfrom
the heavier part of the stalks, bundle the reeds,and
cut off the tender flexible tips.The work
is suspendedby two
strands of wi'goobfrom
aframe
similar to thatused forcedar-barkand
rushmats.The
strands arehung
ata distancefrom
eachotherabout10incheslessthanthewidth
desired for the mat.Two
weaverswork
simultaneously, each at a strandon
theend
ofwhich
she kneels to hold thework
steady (pi.60, a).
As
theweaving
progressesupward,
themat
is loweredby an
additional length of wi^gctoh allowed for the purpose.When
themat
reaches theground
theweaver no
longer kneelson
her strand, but relieson
the weight to steady the work.At
a point within convenient reach eachworker
securelyknots tothe suspended strand a strip about twice the length desired for the mat.A
reed is laid horizontally between theknotted strands in such away
that thesus-pended
strands are atthe farside of the reedfrom
the workers,and
the free strands areon
the near side.Each worker
knots the freenS^GtT'"^^^'
CHIPPEWA MAT-WEAVING TECHNIQUES —
^PETERSEN267
oractive strand
around
the inactivehanging
wi'goobabove
the reedand
about 5 inchesfrom
theend
ofthereed (fig. 33).The
rest of thework
is merely a repetition of theadding
of reedsand
the*s=
Figure 33.
—
Reed mattechnique.knottingofxoi'goob.
At
completionof themat
eachpair of strandsistied ina firm knot,
and
thesmall endsof the reeds aretrimmed
off.The
knot used inweaving
is a half hitch, inwhich
the free end, pointingtoward
the left, is crossed over the inactive strandon
the sidetoward
the worker, is doubledback
behind the strand so as to point to theright,and
is pulledtoward
theworker through
the loopformed by
the active strand until theknotis fairly tight.The
berry-dryingmat examined measured
about3by
7feet.In
useit
was
supportedby
a tablelike structure of sticksand
covered with grassto prevent the berrieson
topfrom
fallingthrough.A mat
of fresh reeds will permit afire hotenough
to dry blueberries in a day.At
the conclusion themat
is laidon
a blanket, the grass is plucked out,and
theberriesfallontothe blanket.A presumably Chippewa mat
similar to this onewas
collected in July 1956by John
Macfie ofParry
Sound, Ontario, Canada, inan abandoned
blueberry-pickingcamp
near Pickle Lake, Ontario, about 115 miles northwest ofLake Nipigon
(pi. 60, 5/ Crafts of the Cree, 1957, p. 57).Through Chippewa
informants, IsaacLawson
at PickleLake and
JoeWesley
at Sioux Lookout,tothe southwest,Mr.
Macfie learned that hisfindwas
a fas'soomin
an^ usedin blueberry drying(letter to the writer
[May
1961]). Detailson
themat were
pro- videdby Edward
S. Rogers, of theEoyal
OntarioMuseum,
Toronto, Ontario,where
themat
isdeposited:
Theends of the mat are secured eachto a length ofspeckled(?) alder. The reeds are secured parallelto each other with 7 rows of lacing,each consisting of2 strandsofstiring. These2 strands of stringare notwovenbytwining but
268 BUREAU OF
AIvIERICANETHNOLOGY
[Bull. 186 appear to be a somewhat similar teclmique .... Occasionally the bottom strand appears tobe looped twice over the top one. The mat is approximately 3ft.wideand4ft.long. [Letter tothewriter,July19,1961.]An accompanying
sketchshowed
a knotted weft identical to that in the MilleLacs
mat.However,
the use of sevenrows
ofweaving, within easy reach oftwo
weavers,held the reedsstraighter. This condition, together with a tighter half-hitchknot thatbrought the reeds closer together, provideda surfacethat,overmost
of itsarea,would
notre- quire grassto keep the berries atop themat.Again
the material ap- pearstobeaPhragmites
reed.Densmore
onceidentifiesthe reedon
her "framesfordryingberries"as
Phragmites
fhragmites (L.)Karst
(1929,p.157),butelsewhere uses thenewer name Phragmites communis
Trin. (1928,pp.378,379).Her
detailscorrespondcloselywiththoseabove
:
Theyweremade on a framelikethepreceding [bulrush,etc.] mats and were woven with basswood twine, but differedfrom the floormatsin that thetwine was placedat intervals of 8or9 inchesinstead of close together, andthe twine was linottedbetween each reed. This separated the reeds, and in the finished
mat produced spaces through which the aircould circulate, thus assisting the drying of the berries. Thesemats were about 24by36 inches in size. [Ibid., 1929, p. 157.]
Perhaps
similar are Seymour's"mats on
a scaffold over a fire" at theUpper
Mississippiand
in northernMinnesota
(1850, p. 183)and
Keating's "fine sievemade
ofreeds, securedinasquareframe"
(1825,p.156),bothfordrying wildrice.
In
speakingof theSaulteauxnorthofLac
Seul,Ontario,who were on
theperiphery ofChippewa
culture. Skinner (1911, p. 127, fig. 45) describes"mats
ofbundlesofstraw . . .sewed
together.... These
were formerly placedon
thefloor of thelodge to sitorreclineupon."The
sketch indicates a variant ofreed-mattechnique: thepaired weftisknottedbetween bimdles with not one but
two
halfhitches.NS*^67f*