setaelargerthanthose of dorsalshield.
Anal
shield with threeusual analsetaeand
fivesmaller,accessorysetae;posteriorusualsetabarbed, largest
on
shield,and
set distinctly anterior to cribum.Endopodal
shields slender.
Metapodal
shieldssmalland
spindle-shaped inmost
specimens.Tubular
portion of peritreme extends to anteriormar-
gin of coxae II; themedian
spurand
invaginationon
posteriorend
of peritreme distinctive; posterior poreson median margin
of peri- treme. Metasternalsetaesmooth and
about as large as anterior pair of sternal setae. Ventralbody
setaelarger atmargins
ofbody,where many
arebarbed; oneortwo
distinctlylarger pairs atposteriorbody
margin. Either lateralmargin
of epistome with about 12 fimbriae,most
ofwhich
are multiple; epistome relatively broad.Fixed
chela with a bifid tip,two
teeth,an
inflated laterally placed seta between tipand
teeth,and
aproximal seta.Movable
chela stouter; possesses
two
teethand
a proximal,ventral,fringe ofsetae,the extent ofwhich
is difficult to determine. All maxillary setae barbed; maxillary corniculi
narrow and
slightly indented laterally.Many
palpal setae barbed.Almost
all setaeon
legsbarbed; difference in size of dorsaland
ventralsetaenotsogreatasinmany
species.Length-width
ratios oftarsi are:Leg
I 7: 1,legII6: 1,legIII 6.5: 1,legIV
8: 1.Male.
—
Dorsal shield covers almost entire dorsal surface; setationand
poresasinfemale. Setae of dorsalintegament,tritosternum,and
presternal areaasinfemale. Ventralshieldwidelyexpanded
posterior tocoxaeIV and
curved anteriorly lateral to coxae IV.Anal
region distinct; accessory setae present as far anterior as level of posterior pair of sternal setae.Deeply
angled anterior sternal pores as in female; setationthroughoutshieldasinfemale. Ventralbody
setae as in female. Peritreme lacksmedian
spur of female.Epistome
as in female. Chelaeshow
sexualdimorphism.Fixed
chela lacks teethbut possesses a seta aboutmidway on
its length.Movable
chela greatly modified; dividedmidway on
itslengthintotwo
branches,the shorter ofwhich
hasa curved,distallybifurcatetipand
lacksteeth;the larger branch, also toothless, is funnel-shapedand
twistedon
its longi- tudinalaxis; abursaand
possibly setaepresent atbase offixed chela.Maxillary corniculi
more
blunt than in female. Palpi as in female.Setation oflegs as infemaleexcept
on
legII,where two
conspicuously stoutventral setaewere
presenton
femur, oneon
genu, oneon
tibia,and two on
tarsus.Legs may
berelativelyshorterthaninfemale.Nymph. — The
onlynymphal
specimen is crushed,and an
exact description is impossible.The
resemblance of the epistome, cheli- cerae,and
maxillae to those of the adult female indicates that it isthe
nymph
of harberi.Although
the ventral shield is very difficult252 PROCEEDINGS
OFTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM
vol.loitodetermine,itssetae
and
pores areas inadults;many
setaeof dorsaland
ventral integument barbed; peritreme not well chitinized.Remarks. —
Distinctive characteristics thatmake
itpossible to dis- tinguish female, male,and nymph
of E. harberifrom
those of other species are:Female: Usual
apical setae largeston
dorsal shield;many
dorsal setaebarbed; six pairs of dorsal pores; anterior pair of sternal setaebarbed; anteriorpair of sternal pores angledposteriorly;
genitoventral shieldwidely
expanded
posteriorly;with over100acces- sory setae; anal shield with three usual anal setaeand
five smaller accessorysetae; posterior usual analsetalargeston shieldand
barbed;
about 12 multiple fimbriae
on
each lateralmargin
of epistome; each chela withtwo
teeth; fixed chelawitha bifid tip; all maxillary setae berbed; almost all setae on legs barbed.Male:
Setation of dorsaland
ventral surfaces as in female; ventral shield widelyexpanded
posterior tocoxaeIV and
curved anteriorly lateral tocoxaeIV
; analregion distinct; epistome as in female; structure of chelae distinct;
all maxillary setaebarbed; maxillary corniculi blunt; conspicuously stout ventralsetae present
on
legII as follows:Femur
two,genu
one, tibia one, tarsus two.Nymph:
Setationand mouth
parts as in female.Ewing
(1925) describedE.harberias differingfrom
microtionlyin havingthe outline of the epistome oval in barheriand
notin microtiand
themarginal teeth of theepistome largeand
branched in microtiand
smalland
single in barberi. Results of examination of type materialand
ofspecimensfrom
a varietyof hostsinMaryland
indicate that these species aresynonymous and
thaton
the basis ofpage
pri- oritybarben
is the valid specific name. Outline of epistomeand number
ofsimpleand
multiple fimbriaeon
epistomemay
varyslightlyamong
individual specimens, but not sufficiently or consistentlyenough
toindicate aspecies distinctionon
thatbasis.Size.
—
Thirty-two female specimensexamined
varied inlengthfrom
952/x to 1,092/a;
mean was
1,025/x. Itwas
possible to obtain accuratemeasurements
ofbody width
in only 12 specimens; in these it variedfrom
588/Ato644/^.Ewing
givesthelengthofone of thetype females as 1,050/x; itswidth
as 720;a.Distribution
and
hosts.— Ewing's
typematerial of barberiwas
takenon
theMaryland
shore of thePotomac
River nearPlummers
Island;
typematerial of microti
was from
Bronxville,N. Y. Additionalspeci-mens
in the U. S. NationalMuseum
collection were taken onlyfrom
the easternUnited
Statesand
southeasternCanada. Ihave examined
specimensfrom
the following hosts: PitymAjs 'pinetomim,^ Point Abino,Welland
County, Ontario,September
16, 1945. "Pine mouse,"Willow
Groove, Del.,June
23, 1939; Petersburg, Va., April 1933;MITES
OFSUBFAMILY HAEMOGAMAStNAE — KEEGAN 253
CollegePark, Md., April 13
and
14, 1932,May
9, 1929,June
14, 1933;Chevy
Chase,Md.,June
7,1932;Cabin
John, Md.,June
2,1932;Burnt
Mills, Md.,
March
24and
29, 1932. "Albemarlemeadow
mouse,"Petersburg, Va., April 6, 1933.
"Meadow
mouse," Somerset, Md.,January
27,1934."Mouse
nest,"GreatFalls,Va.,December
26, 1926."Short-tailedshrew,"Kiverdale,Md.,
May
27. 1934.Types.— Two
females (U.S.N.M. No. 950),from
"nest of smallmammal" from Maryland
shore ofPotomac
River, nearPlummers
Island.
EUHAEMOGAMASUS
QUADRISETATUS (Vitzthum) FlGITBE55, &, CEaemogamasus qtcadrisetatus Vitzthum, Treubia, vol. 8, pp. 52-56, figs. 35-36, 1926;Zool.Jahrb. (Abt. Syst.), vol. 60,p.400,1931.
No
specimens ofthis mitewere
available for study.The
followingdata are taken
from
Vitzthum's paper.Female.
—
Dorsal shield leavesmuch
of posterior portion of dorsal surface unprotected.Almost
all setae of entire animal barbed, butsome on
dorsal shieldmay
be smooth. Dorsalbody
setae are larger at posteriorbody
margin,where
four ofthem
are outstanding in length, being almost half as long asbody
of mite. Tritosternum barbed. Presternal area notmentioned
or figured clearly. Sternal shield rectangular, witha nearly straight posteriormargin
;no
indi- cation is given whether sternal setae are barbed or smooth. Genito- ventral shield flask-shaped,with the usual pair of genitoventralsetaeand
about30 accessorysetae.About
fiveaccessorysetaeon
analshield.Peritreme not figuredclearly.
Endopodal
shieldsnot figuredclearly.Metapodal
shields smalland
in usual position. Metasternal setae about as large as thoseon
sternal shield. Ventralbody
setae not sonumerous
asthose ondorsal surfaceand
largerthanthelatter.Fixed
chela distally bent like a pointedhook
; with a spoonlike excavationand
a tiny tooth,which may
actuallybeapilusdentilis.Legs
are not figured, butVitzthum
reportsthat the onlysmooth
setaeon them
are thoseon tarsus Iand on
distal endsof othertarsi.Size.
— Length
offemaleisgivenas1,130/x.Remarks.
—
Distinctive featuresseemtobe:Almost
allsetaebarbed;
two
pairsof greatlyenlargedposteriorbody
setae,eachof thesealmost half aslongasbody
; sternal shieldwithan
almost straight posterior margin; genitoventral shield with about straight posterior margin;genitoventral shield with about 30 accessory setae; anal shield with.
6 or 6 accessory setae; chelae toothless.
Distribution